THE
MOTO GUZZI
STORY
Racing and production models from 1921 to the present day
IAN FALLOON Foreword by Umberto Todero
Main
The story of Moto Guzzi is one of survival. As one of Italy's oldest anc most legendary motorcycle marques
Moto Guzzi rose to the height of success during the 1930s, and again in the 1950s, when they dominated 250 and 350cc Grand Prix racing. The company's
withdrawal from racing coincided with a period of stagnation, lasting until it was sold to De Tomaso in 1973. During the 1970s the V7 Sport and Le Mans models were at the forefront of the new superbike era, and later, with Dr John Wittner's help, Guzzi embraced leading-edge technology with the 1,000cc Daytona
If one aspect characterizes Moto Guzzi it is continuity. The great 500cc Falcone was in production from 1950 until 1976 and the V7, which originally saw the light of day in 1966, has continued well into the 1990s in the form of the V11. This continuity breeds loyalty, and Guzzi owners are a fiercely proud breed. Guzzis are not like other motorcycles, even Italian ones, and to qualify as an owner requires a dedication and individuality that will be rewarded in a long-term relationship. To quote a Cycle magazine test from 1974: The Guzzi excels at long exposure, and compared to other motorcycles the drug is slower-acting: it comes in time-release form'.. The same holds true today.
From Carlo Guzzi's Tipo GP of 1921 to the V11 over 75 years later, every Moto Guzzi has been unique and charismatic. Under the control of the Trident Rowan Group, the marque is once again on the verge of a new chapter in that story of survival. The next century will see the launch of a new and exciting range of motorcycles that could enable the
company once again to rise to the forefront.
With the help of Moto Guzzi staff past
and present, together with information and many previously unpublished photographs from the collection of foremost Guzzi expert, Ivar de Gier, leading motorcycle journalist and
photographer lan Falloon presents a
uniquely comprehensive history. Every racing and production model from the birth of the company to the present day is described and analysed, while appendices give production figures and
specifications to provide the definitive chronicle of a much-loved marque
THE
MOTO GUZZI
STORY
Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2022 with funding from Kahle/Austin Foundation
aTL448. M66 F35 1999
Palloon, Ian.
The Moto Guzzi story racingand production 1999.
Racing and production models from 1921 to the present day
IAN FALLOON Foreword by Umberto Todero
https://archive.org/details/motoguzzistoryra0000fall
(Haynes
Haynes Publishing
Contents
© lan Falloon 1999
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior permission in writing from Haynes Publishing.
First published in May 1999
British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library
ISBN 1 85960 4145
Library of Congress catalog card no. 98-75403
Published by Haynes Publishing, Sparkford, Nr Yeovil, Somerset, B.A22 7J], UK.
Tel: 01963 440635 Fax: 01963 440001
Int. tel: +44 1963 440635 Fax: +44 1963 440001
E-mail: sales@haynes-manuals.co.uk Web site: http://www.haynes.com
Haynes North America, Inc.
861 Lawrence Drive, Newbury Park, California 91320 USA
All illustrations not otherwise credired are from Moto Guzzi or the author's collection.
Designed & typeset by G&M, Raunds, Northamptonshire Printed and bound in Great Britain by J. H. Haynes & Co. Ltd
Foreword by Umberto Todero Introduction and Acknowledgements
1
Chapter Chapter 2 Chapter 3 Chapter 4 Chapter 5
Early days The 1930s: a golden era Post-war racing: success with earlier designs Expanding the customer base Symbolic singles: Airone, Astore and Falcone The second golden age
Chapter 6 Chapter 7 Chapter 8 Chapter 9
The V7 V7 Sport: the first and the best? Big tourers and cruisers Le Mans Smaller twins Dr John and the Daytona New directions
Chapter 10 Chapter 11 Chapter 12 Chapter 13
7
9
20
34
41
53
60
83
89
113
129
140
152
161
Appendix 1 Appendix 2
Index
Moto Guzzi production figures, 1921-97 169 Specifications of racing and production Moto Guzzis, 1921-98 170
175
Colour Section pages 97-112
Foreword
They respected the engineer enormously for his skills and shared his belief in the idea. With a return to peace they saw the opportunity to make the plan a reality, Giovanni
Ravelli was a famous motorcycle racer with considerable success, and already
relished a new 'steel horse' to ride in competition. Unfortunately destiny
wouldsee that Ravelli would not
realise his dream. A flying accident saw the young life given back to its country.
Although the most enthusiastic
proponent of the plan had disapof motorcycles, particularly the peared, Giorgio Parodi and Carlo chassis. Guzzi still believed in the idea.
Motoyoung pilots in bornItalian Airar
Guzzi was the
then
Force during the First World War,
Giorgio Parodi and Giovanni Ravelli,
had the good fortune to form a warm relationship with the engineer Carlo Guzzi. They not only shared the fate
of the war, but also a passion for
engines. The three found themselves
in tune with each other, so Guzzi
announced an idea that he had gener-
ated. Guzzi planned to create a motor-
cycle that was quite different from
those currently produced. He wanted to revolutionise many characteristics
Undeterred and with initiative and
The two pilots had no reservations.
Introduction and Acknowledgements
will, together with financing (1,500 lire) from Giorgio's father - the ship-
owner Vittorio Emanuele Parodi -
their union saw the birth of their first motorcycle, called the 'G.P." (GuzziParodi). However, Giorgio Parodi, in recognition of the motorcycle's creator, wanted the name changed to
'MOTO GUZZI. He also chose the
winged eagle as a symbol of the brand,
the same eagle that for many years
adorned the pilots' uniform. This was to honour their fallen companion. It
was on 15 March 1921 that the
ANONIMA МОгО
SOCIETA
GUZZI was officially founded.
Umberto Todero
The story of Moto Guzzi is one of :
1 fiercel proud and individual company. Inthe world ofmotor-
cycling there is no other marque that has been brave enough, not only to be original, but also to follow that with
incredible racing success.From the outset, Carlo Guzzi, and his underrated brother Giuseppe, eschewed
conventionality. Their designs were so
advanced that they had extraordin-
arily long production runs. Apart from a large number of small-capacity motor-
cycles produced after the Second World War, and some specialised
racing machines, it is the horizontal
four-stroke single with its large exter-
nal flywheel that epitomises Moto
Guzzi until the mid-1960s. From the
late 1960s it has been the transversely mounted 90° V-twin that has become the company's symbol.
That two engine designs have feat-
ured so strongly in the history says
much about Moto Guzzi. It is a company steeped in tradition and innately conservative. Being located at
Mandello del Lario has isolated it
from any temptation to be a dedicated follower of fashion. In recent years
production levels have been modest
and many of the motorcycle compo-
nents continued to be produced at Mandello. That is about to change.
The future calls for a significant
increase in production and technological development. Moto Guzzi is now looking to emulate the glory days of
the 1950s when it was not only the leading Italian producer of motor-
cycles, but also supremely victorious on the race tracks. One of the aspects
that the company is determined to retain is Moto Guzzi's individuality,
and all enthusiasts will be thankful that Guzzi willnotbecome just
another motorcycle manufacturer producing bland products.
My own interest in Moto Guzzi spans a 25-year period from when I
first rode a V7 Sport. So memorable was that motorcycle that it led me to
other Sports and various LeMans
models. Although the sporting profile
of Moto Guzzi has waned in recent
years, the California has now evolved into one of the best motorcycles of the type available anywhere. Nonetheless, it is the sporting Guzzis that have kept the name alive 1 have unashamedly placed more emphasis on these machines.
and
As racing has played such a significant part in the history of Moto Guzzi,
this has also been given considerable
attention. Surprisingly, new informa-
tion on some of the racing bikes has been unearthed. Until now there has
been some confusion surrounding the
development of the 350 Grand Prix bikes from 1953, and hopefully this
has now been clarified with information from Umberto Todero.
This book is basically arranged by categorising each type of motorcycle as chronologically as possible. With such a plethora of individual models, some having extraordinary production runs, a purely chronological assess-
ment is not really practical. I have tried to organise the book in such a way that it is easy for the reader to find information. Technical data is often inconsistent between factory
bulletins and publicity brochures, so where there has been conflict I have opted for the official data rather than
publicity material.
The emphasis in the text has been placed on racing and civilian produc tion models. Other books cover prototypes, record-breaking specials and military vehicles in
greater depth.
While these are all mentioned, their coverage has been limited so as to
concentrate on areas that have not previously been thoroughly documented. The text also unashamedly
places considerable emphasis on tech-
nical details as part of the purpose of
the book is as a reference source.
When choosing photographic mater-
ial to supplement thetext I have
endeavoured to balance factory publicity photos with period and current
shots. Where possible, photos not pre-
viously published in other books on Moto Guzzi have been chosen.
Writing such a detailed history would not have been possible without the contribution of many enthusiasts around the world, particularly Ivar de Gier and those at Moto Guzzi in Mandello del Lario. Special thanks must go to expert Moto Guzzi historian Ivar de Gier, who kindly proof-
read the text, provided technical
information, and brought much inform-
ation that only a long-term scholar of
the marque can provide. He also
allowed access to his comprehensive
collection of photographs of racing Moto Guzzis andperiod brochures
and manuals.
At Moto Guzzi. Umberto Tadero not only provided the Foreword to
this book but also considerable information regarding the racing programme during the 1950s. Dott Ing
Aleksandar Bacie also assisted me greatly by continually obtaining
further details about the intricacies of
8
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
the 1950s racing bikes from Mr
Todero. Eleonora Scali, the Public Relations Manager at Moto Guzzi, provided assistance early inthis
Ken Kavanagh proved an invaluable
source of information on the important racing era of the mid-1950s. With an extraordinary memory for detail, Ken
not onlysupplied some important were fantastically enthusiasticand photographs but also gave a new
project. Others at Moto Guzzi who
helpful were Serafino Valsecchi, who diligently wheeled numerous bikes out of the museum and his workshop for me to photograph. Gabriella Stropeni spent many hours in the archive find-
insight into the racing department. He also acted as an interested observer of
the fortunes of Moto Guzzi in Italy,
keeping me informed of the latest about the company in the Italian financialpress. Noted motorcycle
ing the information I requested, and Romano Pisi, Export Manager, provided much information on the
photographers Phil Aynsley and Roy
Kidney kindly allowed the use of some
of their superb photographs for the colour section. Other enthusiasts
current situation at Moto Guzzi. Danilo Mojoli and Dott Bacic provided technical details of the new V-twin engine.
whom I would like to thank are
Former Moto Guzzi factory rider
Gerolamo Bettoni, John Buskes, Bruce
Finlayson, Gordon Kline, Tony Lavery and Giuseppe Profeta. Luciano Gazzola kindly identified some racing
Thanks must alsogophotos. to Bob Guntrip and Peter Callaghan of
Streetbike magazine, Jeremy Bowdler of
Two Wheels,and Ken Wootton of
Australian Motorcycle News. Gerry
O'Brien ofAustralian Motorcycle
Imports assisted with communication with the Moto Guzzi factory and also provided bikes for photographs.
Finally, none of this would have been possible without the continued
support of my wife Miriam.
lan Falloon October 1998
Early Days
Ithough Carlo Guzzi had long
A dreamed of building his own
motorcycle, it was not until the First
World War, as a 29-year-old mechanic
in the Italian Air Force, that his
dream could become a reality. In the Air Force he found two equally passionate motorcycling enthusiasts, and
many long nightswere spent dis-
cussing his ideas. So enthusiastic were
they for this motorcycle that they decided, after the end of the war, to
get together and produce it. Carlo Guzzi's two companions were the young pilots Giorgio Parodi and
Giovanni Ravelli, and they formed an alliance that would eventually see the
formation of one of Italy's greatest
motorcycle manufacturers.
While many young men dream and talk of doing such things, the Guzzi, Parodi and Ravelli combination differed in that all three could bring with
them necessary and complementary
skills. It was not only this that set the
new venture apart from the many
fledgling enterprises that emerged at the end of the First World War; both Guzzi and Parodi were geniuses in their respective fields. Unfortunately
Ravelli was never given the chance to establish his credentials as the rider spearheading the new motorcycle on
the racetrack as he was tragically
killed in a flying accident shortly after
the end of the war.The indications
were that he would have been successful; a native of Brescia, he had
several notable racing results on
Triumph in the years leading up to the
outbreak of war. In Ravelli's honour the Air Force eagle was used on the
Moto Guzzi name plate and continues to this day.
Carlo Guzzi was born in Milan on 4
June 1889, where he studied and gained a Diploma di Copo Tecnico. He came from a strong engineering family, his father at one time owning an engineering consultancy. Prior to
the war he worked for the motor company Isotta Franchini, but it was the influence of a Mandello blacksmith
that led him to motorcycles.
The Guzzi family spent much time
in a small fishing village, Mandello-
Tonzanico, on the shores of Lake Como just north of Lecco. Later the
Carlo Guzzi, who together with Giorgio
Parodi and Giovanni Ravelli founded Moto Guzzi following the First World War.
name was to change to Mandello del Lario, and here Carlo Guzzi and the local blacksmith Giorgio Ripamonti would dismantle motorcycles and
analyse their faults. Carlo was a fanatical motorcyclist and his first plans for
a machine date from well before the war. When Carlo's mother moved to Mandello during the war, it became
the family home.
Although born in Venice in 1897, Giorgio Parodi was from a wealthy Genoan family of ship-owners, and it was he that guaranteed the financial backing for the venture. He approached his father Emanuele Parodi and in a letter of 3 January 1919 Emanuele granted approval for 1,500 to 2,000 lire to be used to fund the prototype. This letter is still on
display at the Moto Guzzi museum at Mandello del Lario and was pivotal in enabling Carlo Guzzi to proceed with his plans. Furthermore, Emanuele took more than a passing interest in the project and promised more funds
if he approved of it.
It was not until 1920 that the proto-
type began to take shape, closely
following the concept that Carlo
Guzzi had envisaged before the war. He wanted to eliminate hand-pumped lubrication systems and exposed pri-
mary drive chains. Unlike many
motorcycles of the time, the engine
was pivotal to the design and featured
many characteristics that would distinguish Moto Guzzis for the next 50 years. It would also be Carlo Guzzi's clear engineering ideals that would shape the course of the company. These ideals were often outside that of mainstream thought, but brilliant in their conception and execution.
10
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
EARLY DAYS
11
that would appear for many decades was the multi-plate metal-to-metal
clutch lubricated by oil mist. The clutch was located in the large primary gear that drove the gearbox,
only a small amount of oil getting to
theclutch from the primary gear
chamber. Clever design also saw the
drive chain receive lubrication.
Aeronautical engineering practice
was evident in the cylinder head
design; this used four parallel overhead valves that were operated by an overhead camshaft driven by a shaft and bevel-gears. These valves were -closed by exposed hairpin valve springs. Twin spark plugs and a dual ignition were used to ignite the mix-
ture through a Bosch magneto.
Compression was a modest 3.5:1, and with 12bhp the first Moto Guzzi was capable of 100km/h (62mph). It may
not sound fast today, but that was quite a speed for 1920.
The chassis was designed in cooperation with Carlo's older brother, Giuseppe. Like Carlo, Giuseppe was a highly innovative engineer, but being so reserved he has not received much of the credit due for his input. The tubular frame was quite unusual for
the period in that it had twin front downtubes. The rear bolted triangle was unsprung with girder forks and dual springs at the front. Only the rear wheel had a brake, the front wheel carrying a gear to drive the
speedometer.
This prototype was called the 'G.P.'.
or Guzzi-Parodi, but the name was
soon changed to Moto Guzzi as
Giorgio Parodi did not want the
initials confused with his own.
The Normale
The prototype 'G.P.'was soon fol-
lowed by a production version,the
Normale. While the 'G.P.' had been an expression of Carlo Guzzi's engin-
eering purism, the Normale of early 1921 incorporated several modifica-
tions born of economic necessity.
Announced in the magazine Motociclismo on 15 December 1920. the first change was to the four-valve cylinder head and bevel-gear-driven overhead camshaft. These were replaced by an unusual arrangement of two opposed valves: a side 45mm inlet closed by a coil spring, and an
overhead 42mm exhaust valve oper-
ated by a pushrod and rocker and
closed by a hairpin spring. The use of hairpin valve springs was very rare at that time, but would become virtually
universal on racing engines many years later: The situationof the
exhaust overhead with the inlet on the side was also the reverse of what
was usual at that time. It was Guzzi's idea to place the valve most prone to overheating directly in the airflow.
As might be expected, valve timing
was very moderate with the inlet opening 3° before top dead centre,
closing 45° after bottom dead centre, and the exhaust opening 50° before bottom dead10°acentre and closing
The 'G.P.' still survives, on display in the Moto Guzzi museum at Mandello,
engine cooling but also meant that a
They were also often very advanced
low-slung chassis could be built
for their day.
around it. The geared primary drive meant that the engine rotated in the direction, another unusual feature at that time.To smooth out vibration and enable a more compact crankcase unit there was a 280mm (11-inch) external flywheel, also to become a Guzzi trademark. The lubrication system was exceptionally advanced, with an oil pump driven from the camshaft supplying oil to an external tank mounted in the air stream. Another Guzzi characteristic
The 'G.P.'
Carlo Guzzi's first horizontal four-stroke 500cc single-cylinder engine
was cast in aluminium, the engine in
unit with the three-speed gearbox. Along with a helical gear primary drive and considerably oversquare
engine dimensions of 88 x 82mm bore
and stroke, the engine deviated considerably from that considered normal for the period. Laying the engine hori-
zontal in the frame not only aided
An advertisement for Giuseppe Guzzi's business, c1910. After the death of their
father, Giuseppe Guzzi (seen here behind the wheel of the car) supported the family and ensured that Carlo completed his education. Giuseppe later went on to develop the early Moto Guzzi frames. (Ivar de Gier collection)
fter top dead centre. Side inlet valves were not known for their good breathing characteristics, so with a 4:1 com-
pression ratio and an Amac 15 PSY 1-inch carburettor, the power produced by the Normale was less than
the 'G.P." at 8bhp at 3,200гpm.
The rest of the engine followed the
format established by the prototype. Bore and stroke were identical, but
the vertically split unit-construction aluminium crankcase (with cast-iron cylinder and head) featured many differences from the 'G.P.'. The Normale
also had a more basic total-loss oil system using a hand-operated pump
to supply oil to the crankcase.
The frame also followed the exam-
ple set by the prototype, but it was
one-piece, the rear triangle braced by
a piece of sheet metal. A similar girder fork was used with dual springs and no
damping. Wheels were the usual 26 x 21-inch used at that time, shod with
Dunlop 26 x 3-inch beaded-edge
There was still only a rear brake and a single Brooks seat. Weighing in
at only 130kg (287lb), the Normale had a top speed of 85km/h (53mph).
For 1920 the Normale was an unusual
motorcycle. Not only were many of its
features unique, but it also looked strangely utilitarian with
its olive
green paint highlighted by gold pinstriping.
With the appearance of the
Normale. Emanuele Parodi had suffi-
cient confidence in the design to
establish the Società Anomina Moto Guzzi in Genoa, with himself as president. on 15 March 1921. In addition
A restored 1922 Normale outside the factory at Mandello. While production ran until 1924 there were detail differences from year to year.
two other engineers were also
involved, Carlo's brother Giuseppe, and Giorgio's cousin Angelo. Even
though the company was named after
Carlo Guzzi,the elder Parodi was
astute enough to retain all the shares
in the company. Carlo was paid a
royalty for each machine produced,
but never had any financial interest in
the company. Even though the total production of 1921 was a modest 17 motorcycles, it was the beginning for one of the greatest Italian motorcycle marques, and also one of the longest lived.
The company was established in a
30-square -metre building at Mandello del Lario (still part of the Moto Guzzi complex) with 17 workers. The location, away from any immediate large
cities, has always meant that Moto Guzzi draws its workforce from the local area. Thus several generations have worked for the company. and even today the average worker's life with the company is 35 years. This continuity and sense of community
involvement has meantthat. Moto
Guzzi is a unique company within the
world of motorcycling. It has probably also contributed to Moto Guzzi's individuality.
The Moto Guzzi factory at Mandello del Lario in 1921. The original buildings are still in existence. (Ivar de Gier collection)
AUTOMOBIL
GIUSEPPL GUZZI = C
MANDELLO Larie
GIeL MeTARidU LENGE A BENZIPA
5D.6h6
ega
12
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
EARLY DAYS
13
Soon after the formation of the new company, local parliamentarian Aldo
Finzi tested one of the new motor-
cycles. Finzi was a prominent sportsman and motorcycle enthusiast and was so impressed with the bike that he endeavoured to convince Carlo Guzzi
to go racing, Guzzi was not particularly enthusiastic about racing,but
Finzi finally exerted enough political
pressure that Parodi and Guzzi had no
option but to agree. They would pro-
vide Finzi with a bike for the Raid
Nord-Sud. (Prior to this a racing
Gatti's second place in the prestigious
Circuito del Lario on a lightly modi-
fied Normale.
The Circuito del Lario was held around Lake Como and considered
the Italian TT. With Guzzis filling 5th,
1Ith, 12th and 14th places it was
enough to give them the team trophy. The company was ecstatic and advertised this racing success in Motociclismo only four days after the race. This encouraging result on their
home ground convinced Guzzi to
design a real racer, and eventually a
more sporting production motorcycle. first Circuito del Lario on 28 May These would appear in 1923.
Moto Guzzi had been entered in the
1921; Carlo Guzzi's brother-in-law, In the meantime a few improveValentini Gatti, was to have ridden an ments flowed through to the official 'G.P.", but he did not race.) Normale, notably an automatic lubri-
Thus the first participation by Moto cation system (a scavenge pump was Guzzi in racing was the Raid Nord- fitted in the crankcase), and dual igniSud, a road race from Milan to Naples tion became an option. There were and the premier event on the Italian also larger cooling fins on the cylinder racing calendar. Aldo Finzi and Mario head and cylinder. An increase in the Cavedini rode production Normales compression ratio to 4.7:l saw the with modified lighting, leaving Milan power increase to 8.5bhp at 3,400rpm.
on 17 September 1921 in the late evening. After 22 hours Cavedini
The C2V
arrived in Naples, in 20th place and 4 hours behind the winning Indian 1000 of Nazzaro Biagio. Finzi finished 22nd after crashing near Modena and con-
While the basic format of the Moto Guzzi 500cc single-cylinder motor-
cycle was retained, it was primarily by fitting a new cylinder head that Carlo
tinuing without lights. It was an
Guzzi expected to make the bike a competitive racer. Two 45mm overhead valves were inclined at a very
encouraging result for a new design. and Aldo Finzi's brother Gino imme-
diately tookone of the Normales down to Sicily for the Targa Florio Motociclista a week later. On 25
narrow 7°20', operated by exposed pushrods and closed by exposed hair-
pin valve springs. With an increase in compression to 5.25:1, and a 1-inch Amac racing carburettor, power was
increased to 17bhp at 4,200rpm,
enough to propel the Corsa 2 Valvole (CZV) to around 120km/h (74mph). Dual ignition was an option and later the carburettor became 25mm Dell'Orto. Together with this revised
a
engine, the CZV received a new
frame, with a tubular rear section, and a longer 1,410mm (551/2-inch) wheelbase to add to the straight-line stability. Colours also changed to bright red
for the first series of CZV, the first
time that colour was used on Guzzis.
In 1924, when the C4V was intro-
duced, the CZV reverted to the green paintwork and the sharing of its frame with the Sport. Production continued until 1927 when it was deleted, being
offered again in 1928. In 1930 the CZV was replaced by the 2VT.
The C2V was an immediate
improvement on the earlier Normalebased racers, and its first success was
an economy contest organised by
Gatti
Valentino achieved 74.955 kilometres on 1 litre of fuel at 51.545km/h.
Motociclismo.
In April 1923 a team was entered in the Giro d'Italia. This 2,470-kilo-
metre road race was a classic and
important annual event and was won
by Guido Mentasti at an average
speed of 51km/h (32mph). Another noteworthyvictory the
The CZV was the first proper racing Moto Guzzi. Ridden by Valentino Gatti, this bike won the 1923 Circuito del Lario.
Circuito del Lario, won by Gatti at an average speed of 61km/h (37.8mph).
However, even the C2V was being
outpaced by the end of 1923 by more
specific racing designs, and there
would be a new engine, the CAV, for
the following season.
The Sport
In the meantime the Normale was dis-
continued in favour of the Sport, a
combination of a more powerful
Normale engine and a frame and running gear similar to the CZV but with-
out reinforcement. These were to be the only production Guzzis from 1923 until 1928 and came with a variety of options, specifically a sidecar attachment, front brake, and Bosch lighting system. With a compression ratio of
4:5:1, power was up to 13bhp at
3,800грm, but increasing this was
always limited by the side inlet and overhead exhaust cylinderhead design. However, moderate though the power may have been, it was still enough to propel the 130kg (2871b)
to maximum speed of
100km/h (62mph). From 1923 until 1927 the Sport was painted green like the Normale, but for 1928 was red. The green CZV also featured the non-
reinforced frame of the Sport.
The C4V
Much more effort was spent on developing racing bikes during this period, and 1924 saw the C4V and a return to
the four-valve cylinder head pio-
neered by the 'G.P.". The earlier C2V
also remained available as a cata-
logued racer. Providing privateers with these factory racers was a shrewd mar-
keting move, contributing to the increased public awareness of Moto Guzzi as a successful racing motor-
cycle; this was an approach that would serve the company well in the future.
With its four-valve cylinder head
and
bevel-gear-driven overhead camshaft, the CAV was a much more serious Grand Prix racer than earlier racing Guzzis despite retainingthe hand-change three-speed gearbox
and unsprung frame. As before the
bore and stroke were 88 x 82mm, but
the two 37mm and two 34mm
exhaustvalves were inclined at a wider 58°40'. For a racing engine the
valve timing was very moderate with
Replacing the Normale, the Sport was Moto Guzzi's only production motorcycle until
1928.
the inlet opening 9º before top dead centre, closing 61° after bottom dead centre. The60°bexhaustvalveopened efore bottom dead centre and closed 20° after top dead centre. The four-
valve layout allowed for a central 18mm spark plug, With a racing
Amac 28.5mm carburettor and a 6:1
compression ratio, the CV initially
produced 22bhp at 5,500rpm. There
was a new frame with a shorter
1,380mm (541/-inch) wheelbase, a
rim brake on the front and 27 x 2.75inch tyres. Performance of the 130kg (28716) CAV was considerably
improved over the C2V, with a top
speed of approximately 140km/h This increase in performance
(87mph).
immediately translated into victories on the racetrack. For the 1924 season
the Ghersi brothers, Pietro and Mario,
in the
joined Gattiand Mentasti
Guzzi team.The debut of theC4V
took place on 9 June 1924 at
Cremona for speed trials. Guido Mentasti set a lap record of
125.265km/h (78mph) and a speed of
135.142km/h (84mph) for a timed 10 kilometres, a new 500cc class record.
The first race for the C4V was on
29 June at the Circuito del Lario.
As with the 'G.P.', the CAV featured a four-valve cylinder head with a bevel-gear. driven single overhead camshaft. This is the bike on which Mentasti won the 1924
September 1921 he gave Guzzi their first victory with a win in the 500cc
class on the classic Madonie circuit.
The following year, 1922, saw a consolidation both in production and
racing The Normale continued in modest production, and the racing
bikes, rather than being specific competition designs, were still modified Normales. Guzzi entered nine events and won two, both with Cavedini: the
Circuito del Piave in May, and the third Ravelli Cup in July. However, the more important events, the Nations Grand Prix held at the new
Monza Autodrome, the Raid NordSud and the Circuito del Lario, continued to elude them. Guzzi improved on their 1921 result in the Raid NordSud with Carlo Marazzani finishing Sth overall, but their most significant result of the year was Valentino
Championship of Europe, still on display at the Moto Guzzi museum.
14
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
EARLY DAYS
15
Here Pietro Ghersi won at an average
speed of 67.631km/h (42mph), with Mentasti second and brother Mario fourth. Other victories for the CAV followed at Lugano. Tortona and La
Spezia, but the most significant ofvictoryEurope,was inheldthe firstat MonzaChampionshipon
September. In a field consisting of the works Sunbeam, Norton, Sarolea and twin-cylinder Peugeot, Mentasti won at an average speed of 130.647km/h
(81mph). Shortly before the race he
had most of the gearbox removed,
also dismantling the hand gearchange. Running with primary gears only, he soundly beat ace rider Tazio Nuvolari on a Norton TT over the 400km race to establish Guzzi as a serious force in 500cc racing. Emphasising Guzzi's superiority, local track expert Erminio
Visioli finished second, and Pietro
Ghersi fourth. These C4Vs were almost standard bikes, except for
strengthening of the rear frame trian-
gle, a shortened rear mudguard, no
One of the greatest riders for Moto Guzzi during the 1920s was Guido Mentasti. His career was, however, short-lived as he was killed retuming from a race in Brescia in -
April 1925.
seat springs and the oil tank located on top of the fuel tank. When Pietro Ghersi rode a C4V to victory at the German Grand Prix at Avus on 21
September Guzzi was no longer an obscure Italian motorcycle manufacturer. From the original idea in 1919, by 1925 Carlo Guzzi's individual and
unusual design had been well and
truly vindicated. Shortly after these
victories the C4V was added to the regular catalogue as a production
racer and was available until 1926.
During 1925 there were still officially entered factory bikes, and the
CAV managed 32 victories. On 29
September Guzzi made their first
attempt on world speed records with
the C4V. At Monza,
Siro Casali,
Ghersi and Prini broke 37 world records, including 500 miles at an
speed of
129.629km/h (80mph). Modifications to the C4V for this attempt included an André steering damper and Excelsior front fork friction dampers. As a Grand Prix
average
racer, however, the CAV was begin-
ning to be outclassed, so for 1926
Carlo Guzzi decided to create a completely new 250, purely for competi-
While it looked like
tion.
scaled-down CAV, this new engine was so advanced that it would form the basis of successful 250cc racing
Guzzis for 30 years.
The TT250
By 1926 the success of the racing pro-
gramme was beginning to pay dividends. There were now 350 employees at Mandello producing around 3,000 motorcycles a year.
With the classic Guzzi layout of a hor-
izontal engine, tubular double-cradle frame and three-speed unit gearbox now well established, the 250 would
also follow this pattern. Carlo Guzzi's
intention was to compete in the Isle of Man TT, and on 1 May 1926 he made the new 250 available to Motociclismo for testing.
The lines closely followed those of
the CAV, but the engine now had
square dimensions, 68 x 68mm bore and stroke. and a bevel-gear-driven single overhead camshaft operating
two valves. These had an included
angle of 58°, a very narrow angle for that time, and this undoubtedly con-
tributed to be very high specific power
4
In 1926 the TT250 surprised the racing world at the Isle of Man. It was powered by an extremely advanced purpose-built engine
with a high specific output.
output of 60bhp per litre. In 1926 this was an extraordinary figure for nor-
mally aspirated engines, only matched by the Delage and Bugatti Grand Prix cars. With an 8:1 compression ratio,
15bhp was produced at 6,000грm.
This increase in rpm was made possible by the use of roller big-end bearings instead of plain bushes, and these were soon adopted on the 500cc C4V. Weighing in at only 105kg (2311lb),
the TT250was capable of around
118km/h (73.3mph),
In June a 250 and 500 were taken to the Isle of Man for Pietro Ghersi to
ride in the Lightweight and Senior
TIs. On the TT250, now with a Binks
hand throttle andAndré steering
damper, Ghersi astonished the partisan crowd by finishing second behind C. W. (Paddy) Johnson's Cotton and
setting the fastest lap at 63.12mph (101.6km/h). Unfortunately Ghersi
wasdisqualified for changing an
unspecified spark plug (to a FERT
instead of KLG) during the race, but
it had been an impressive racing debut
in the most prestigious event in
Europe. He retired during the Senior TT.
A rider's view of the 1926 TT250.
Pietro Ghersi set the fastest lap in that
year's Lightweight TT.
Although the Isle of Man had been a disappointing event, 1926 was a
very successful year for Guzzi in com-
petition, with 42 victories. A month
after the TT, in the Circuito del Lario,
Ugo Prini rode to victory in the 250
class,although Pietro Ghersi was
defeated by the Sunbeam of Achille Varzi in the 500 class. However, the most important event of the year in
Italy was the Nations Grand Prix held at Monza in September. Here again the 250 was triumphant, with Prini and Ghersi joint winners. The TT250
was then marketed as a catalogue
гасег.
The 4VTT
In 1927 production of the 250 and
500cc racers increased alongside that
of the 500cc Sport streetbike, and for
that year the 500cc C4V catalogue
racer became the 4VTT. Essentially
based on the 1926 factory four-valve
Circuito del Lario 500 racer, the
4VTT had a nickel-steel crankshaft with needle-roller con-rod bearings.
16
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
EARLY DAYS
17
The move to needle-roller big-end
bearings was a particularly significant
one for Moto Guzzi and would now become a Guzzi feature. The cylinder head was bronze instead of cast-iron and power was increased to 27bhp. Drum brakes were now fitted front and rear with a Webb-type front fork.
The rear frame featured the strength-
ening first fitted on the European championship C4V of 1924. The footpegs were more rear mounted, and the
oil tank was mounted in front of a
larger fuel tank. A tool box was fitted on the tank and there was a standard steering damper. The 4VTT also had larger tyres, a 2.75 x 27-inch on the front and 3.00 x 27-inch on the rear. The throttle was the hand-operated Binks type that had been used on the
official bikes during 1926.
After the disappointment of 1926,
Guzzi again decided to contest the Lightweight and Senior TT events at
the Isle of Man. There were three entrants in the 250 and two in the
Marketed as a 'Super-Sport, this is the 4VTT from a 1926 catalogue of the Austrian distributor Hessel & Schneider of Vienna. (Ivar de Gier collection)
5 PS
SUPER-SPORT-MODELL
MG ILL
499 ECH
nee der Sareungradfeite
DAS SUPER-SPORT-MODELL.
(CHAMPIONATO D'EUROPA)
Vier Ventile mit Königswelle.
Das Super-Sport-Modell unterfheider fich von der Touren-Malchine folgend :
Motor: Wie bei Sport -Type.
Ventile:
500, but the best result Guzzi could
achieve was Luigi Archangeli's second
place in the Lightweight. By now the 500, despite the four-valve cylinder head, was becoming uncompetitive, and 50 of Guzzi's 62 victories during
1927 were achieved by the 250.
Surprisingly, given Moto Guzzi's
increasing success, especially with the 250, the company announced a withdrawal from competition in February 1928. This was to concentrate on reg ular production and development of new models. High on the list of priorities was the expansion of the range of
street motorcycles, which at that stage
still only consisted of the Normalebased Sport, and the development of a
three-wheeled commercial vehicle.
The withdrawal from competition was an unpopular decision with racing followers throughout Italy, but the range
of catalogued racers was increased so that privateers could continue to promote the marque.
The 4VSS and SS250
Revised and faster versions of both the 4V 500, the previously discontinued CZV, and the TT250 were made available.Although the 4VTT of 1927 continued through until 1929,
the 4VSS superseded it with its
slightly more powerful engine and drum front brake. Both models now had a triple-spring front fork and the oil tank moved to the top of the fuel tank. They also received a horn and provision for lights. The 4VSSwas available in limited numbers through until 1934. The TT250 continued as before, but was supplemented by a faster SS250. With a bronze cylinder
head the power was increased to
18bhp, enough to propel the SS to
125km/h (78mph).
SS250 Guzzis won Italian championships in 1927 and 1930-33. As with the 500cc 4VSS, the SS250 was sold through until 1934, by which time the three-speed gearbox was also a limiting factor in its competitiveness as a
racer, and the bronze cylinder head had reverted to cast-iron. From 1934 racing 250s were reserved for factory
riders only.
The G.T.
More significant than the few cata-
logue racers, however, was the expan-
sion of the range with the sprungframe Gran Turismo. Launched in January 1928, only a few were built (78 between 1928 and 1930) and it
was not popular. However, once again it showed the company's capacity for
original ideas and putting them into
practice.
When Carlo's engineer
prother Giuseppe modified the frame
of the 500 Sport to incorporate a
swingarm operating four springs in
compression by rods, both Carlo and Giorgio Parodi agreed to produce it. The springs were located in a pressed steel box underneath the engine.
Giuseppe, known by his nickname Naco, had officially joined the com-
pany in 1927, and was even more
modest than Carlo. He was to be the impetus behind all of Moto Guzzi's significant frame development and
was a champion of the sprung frame. This he had begun to design in 1925,
and there were several versions.
Unfortunately the idea of a sprung
frame was too advanced for the conservative motorcycle world and would take later racing success to establish the merits of the idea. As with most of Moto Guzzi designs, it too was enduring, surviving through
it
to the final Falcone of 1967.
One of the problems with the G.T.
was its modest performance. The
13.2bhp engine now needed to propel 150kg (3311b), and top speed was only
100km/h (62mph). This may have
been fast enough in 1920, but higher standards of performance were
expected by 1928.
Giuseppe Guzzi used this bike to demonstrate the advantages of a sprung frame. After a successful trip to the Arctic Circle it was nicknamed the 'Norge.
The Sport included a few modifica-
tions for 1928, notably a drum front
brake and a new cylinder and head
with larger finning. By the end of that
construction would last through until 1946 on many production and mili-
tary versions. The power was 13.2bhp
at 3,800rpm, with camshaft timing
year a version appeared that looked thatdiffered from that of the
much like the later Sport 14. This has
become unofficially knownas the Sport 13, although it is not listed in
factory data as such. A luxury version
of the Sport was also available with
legshields and full lighting powered by
a Bosch mag-dynamo (a magneto-
dynamo combination).
The Sport 14
By the end of 1928 the Sport had trip to the Arctic Circle on his own evolved into the Sport 14, with a new development bike to promotethe unsprung frame and the three-spring merits of the design. After this suc- forks from the racers. Soon there was cessful journey the G.T. was nick- an improved electrical system with a
In the meantime Giuseppe made a
named the 'Norge' (Norway). This
Miller dynamo separate from the mag-
trip was only one of many that
neto ignition. The Sport 14 was supplied with or without lighting, so the
Giuseppe undertook on his prototype
dynamo could be installed later if
to test his designs, and the bike still exists. Giuseppe even re-registered it after the Second World War when he
required. This provision for a dynamo
was a significant step forward for
hid it from the Italian military who
Moto Guzzi, and these models were characterised by the letter L, representing "Luce' (light), in front of the engine number. New crankcases and
were confiscating all motorcycles over 250cc. However, these trips were still
not enough to convince the buying
crankcase cover, both with a bulge for the dynamo and dynamo gear, distinguished the Sport 14 from earlier varieties. The engine had a larger cylinder
public of the merits of Giuseppe's idea
and the unsprung Sport continued as
the production mainstay. By 1928 production was around 50 a week, a large number for the day.
barrel and head assembly and this
Normale. The inlet opened 20° before
top dead centre, closing60° after
bottom dead centre, and the exhaust valve opened 62° before bottom dead
centre, closing 26° after top dead centre. The compression ratio was
4.5:1 and carburation was by an Amac 1-inch carburettor. The claimed top speed was 100km/h
(62mph),
although
Motociclismo
tested a restored Sport 14 in December 1980 and achieved only
gelteuert werden, lind ebenfo wie diefe, von einem aldichten Gelmfe aus Alaminium eingelchlollen. Der Antrieb der Königswelle erfolge durch Kegel- Zahnider.
A. M. A. C. Spezial in vertikaler Lage.
87.5km/h (54mph) with the rider fully prone. The standing 400-metre time was 25.294 seconds at 82.190km/h (51mph). Although it seems slow by
Vergaser:
today's standards, the Sport 14 was one of the better-performing motor-
cycles of the period and was extremely
popular. Weight was a moderate
130kg (2871b) and it was Guzzi's bestselling model of the 1920s.
Within ten years Moto Guzzi had become one of Italy's premier motorcycle manufacturers, and in 1928 the company launched a unique vehicle that would be one of its most success.
ful. With the front half of a 500cc
Sport combined with a truck-like rear, the Type 107 Motocarri was created.
18
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
EARLY DAYS
19
overhead-valve top end that differed.
The 2VT remained in production
until 1934, by which time it had been supplemented by a sprung-frame ver-
sion, the G.T. 2VT. Designed for
longer distance events, the G.T. 2VT first appeared in 1931 and used the
chassis of the sprung-frame G.T.
Neither the 2VT nor the G.T. 2VT was strictly a racing bike. Standard
equipment included lighting, luggage
racks and legshields and they were really luxuryversions of standard
bikes. Weighing in at a solid 150kg
(3311b), the top speed of the G.T.
2VT with a 17bhp engine was only
around 120km/h (75mph).
This year was the final year for the C4V 500 TT and TT250, these being
superseded in 1931 by the higher-
performance SS. Factory racing 250s
now had a pedal-operated three-
speed gearbox (with new ratios) and Brampton forks, although the priva-
teer versionsretained the hand
gearshift. By now the 250 was developing 20bhp at 6,500-7,000rpm, trulyimpressive figure for 1930. Continuous development saw the 250 overshadow the 500, with 36 out of 49 victories in 1930. Some of these were particularly impressive: 250 Guzzis filled the first five places in the Coppa Albano, came first and second in the Targa Florio, and Truzzi again
At the Nations Grand Prix in essentially the existing dual overhead triumphed in the Nations Grand Prix. September 1928 250cc Guzzis had valve C2V engine in a new Sport 15 filled the first five places, and the frame with a saddle tank and front. The Sport 15 and G.T. 16 company was again victorious in the brake. Even the crankcases were the Most innovations appeared on the Circuito del Lario that year. As Sport 15 L' type, so it was only the production Sport 15 of 1931, with a already mentioned, with these racing results fromprivateers surpassing Replacing the CZV in 1930, the 2VT was less of a pure racing machine. The frame
Because so many were produced, Sport I4s can still be found at Italian markets. Here is an example at Imola with full lighting and sidecar.
Mario Ghersi won the Targa Florio in April. As before, this season proved to Guzzi's capacity for originality, and be a good one for Moto Guzzi, culmiremained in production, later with nating Egidio Truzzi's victory in the Astore and Falcone-based engines as 250cc in Nations Grand Prix the Ercole, until 1980. From 1931 it September.
While it may have seemed an incongruous concept, once again it showed
in
was produced in two versions, the '125' Civile and Militare. The front
The 2VT and G.T. 2VT
half was now roughly the later 500cc Sport 15 with a saddle fuel tank, and these 13bhp vehicles were produced until 1936.
The year 1930 saw only a few changes
to existing models. The C2V 500cc racer was replaced by the 2VT ("ValvoleTesta - overhead valve).
and saddle tank were shared with the Sport 15.
expectations, Guzzi decidednot to run an official team for 1929. The
only official entry for that year would
be a return to the Isle of Man, where
Pietro Ghersi rode an SS250 in the
Lightweight TT. However, as with pre-
vious Tourist Trophies, it wasan
unfortunate meeting for Guzzi with Ghersi retiring on the final lap while comfortably in the lead.
The catalogue 500cc and 250cc
production racers (including the C2V
500) continued into 1929, as did the Sport 14 and the few G.T.s that were
manufactured. The 4VSS 500 featured more chrome plating and dual silencers and provided Guzzi with
their first victory that year when
new frame (still unsprung) and a
saddle-style fuel tank rather than the tank positioned on top of the frame tube. They were painted brown/ama-
ranth until 1933when a purple
'Lusso' (luxury) version was added.
This had more chrome on the tank, wheel rims and various cycle parts. Some were also painted red, and the
Sport 15 would be Guzzi's most popu-
lar production bike through the
1930s, lasting until 1939.
The venerable side inlet and overhead exhaust valve engine that had
its origins back with the Normale of 1921 was still used, but it had been considerably developed overthe years. Carburation was now by an
Amal 6/142 and the needle-roller big-
end bearings of the C4V were
adopted to improve reliability. Another feature that carried over
from the C4V was the introduction of a stronger T-shaped con-rod in place
of the weak 'O'-section tube type.
The presence of 'L crankcases, needle-rollerbig-end, and the
shaped con-rod are valuable clues
when dating pre-war Sports. In 1936
a Dell'Orto carburettor replaced the Amal, and 1937 saw new controls. The Sport 15 frame and saddle tank also made it to the sprung G.T., which in 1930 became the G.T. 16.
However, somehow the G.T. versions did not catch on and the G.T. 16 only lasted until 1934.
While many motorcyele manufac
turers suffered after the Great Crash of 1929, Italian manufacturers, like
those in Germany, were fortunate that their Fascist governments saw motor
Moto Guzzi's most popular model during the 1930s was the Sport 15, still with the
rigid frame and side inlet valve engine.
Less popular was the G. T. 16, identical to the Sport 15 but for a sprung frame.
sport as an important propaganda
tool. So rather than being a period of
depression, the 1930s were to be fruit-
ful for Moto Guzzi, especially on the
track. This success translated into
Guzzi earning the status as the leading
Italian motorcycle manufacturer by
the end of the decade.
THE 1930s: A GOLDEN ERA
21
(in front of the fuel tank) and one for
the compressor (between the rear wheel and the engine).With a com-
pression ratio of 5:1, 40bhp was devel-
oped
at
with
the
supercharger operating at 0.75 bat. This was too much power for the rigid
The 1930s: a golden era
be used again with the supercharged
250 single later in the decade. The exhaust ports were also 30mm and the ignition was by twin Bosch magnetos.
The engine was oversquare with dimensions of 56 50mm, and
because it was to be supercharged the
valve angle was widened. Whereas
earlier racing engines had used narrow
included valve angles and overhead camshafts, the four had its two overhead valves set 70° apart. These were
operated by exposed pushrods and
rockers driven by two camshafts situ-
ated inside the cylinder block. As expected with a supercharger, the
frame and small (177mm front and 225mm rear) brakes to handle, and
the engine was considerably heavy at 80kg (176lb).
valve timing was very moderate with the inlet opening 10° before top dead
centre and closing 50° after bottom dead centre, and the exhaust opening
50° before bottom dead centre and closing 10°a fter top dead centre.
Valve lift was 5.75mm for the inlet
and 6.50mm for the exhaust.
In many respects the four was thor-
oughly up to date. The three-bearing
crankshaft rods ran on roller bearings
and the con-rods on needle rollers. The 4-litre lubrication system
included an oil cooler mounted on the
front frame downtubes, and there
were two oil tanks, one for the engine The supercharged four-cylinder 500cc engine of 1930. On top of the engine is the transverse expansion chamber, with the gear-driven rotary supercharger above the
gearbox.
Giuseppe Guzzi's frame, although rigid and not strong enough for the powerful engine, was alsoquite advanced. More importantly, it featured some characteristics that would appear on later Guzzi racing frames, right through until the 1950s. The
Theconsiderableonset of thedevelopmentnew decadeofsaythe racing four-stroke engine, both in
automotive and motorcycle applications. The appearance of superchargers and multi-cylinder engines had led
to huge increases in power, and for 500cc racing motorcycles this indicated that the days of the naturally
aspirated four-stroke single were num-
bered.However, this emphasis on
horsepower was not initially matched by chassis development and it would
be
several years before the heavy, powerful and complex multi-cylin-
dered machines dominated the racing circuits.
The Quattro Cilindri 500
Epitomising this lack of harmony was
Carlo Guzzi and Oreste Pasolini's
500cc supercharged transverse fourcylinder racing motorcycle of 1931.
Designed to be an answer to the four-
cylinder OPRA (later the Rondine
and eventually Gilera) of Piero Remor
and Carlo Gianini, the four was an
amalgam of ancient and modern engi-
neering practice. Thus it was disappointing and never achieved Guzz's expectations. The idea of four nearly horizontal cylinders and a one-piece alloy crankcase with the gear-driven Cozette rotary supercharger bolted on
to the rear of the gearbox was novel, as were the four separate and identical cast-iron cylinder heads and barrels. Yet there was still only a hand-operated three-speed gearbox. The super-
charger fed a cylindrical expansion chamber mounted above the four
30mm inlet ports. This chamber was designed to maintain constant high pressure to the inlet ports and would
front part of the cradle frame was steel tubing, bolted to duraluminium plates
underneath and on both sides of the
engine. The triangulated rear steel tube section bolted to these plates.
The use of duraluminium sheet metal as part of the frame was a new idea for Moto Guzzi, but would become a feature of most racing Guzzis over the
next 20 years.
First tested at Monza in September 1931, the 165kg (36416) four-cylinder 500 was disappointing from the start and only raced once. This was at the Nations Grand Prix at Monza where
three bikes were raced (with one
spare), the riders being Terzo Bandini,
Fumagalli and Moretti. Bandini battled for the lead with Piero Taruffi's Norton for 37 laps but all three bikes
retired. However, Carlo Guzzi was not completely disillusioned by the perfor-
mance of the four, and continued to test it with Siro Casali during 1932
before dropping the project that year. While not an unqualified racing suc-
cess, it did spawn a three-cylinder
road bike.
Racing duties throughout1931
were still consigned to the SS250 and SS500. The biggest change to the 250
was the introduction of a foot-operated gearchange, and the front fork
became aone-spring
Brampton.
Factory bikes were fitted with either a
hand or foot gearchange, sometimes both. From 1932 the foot gearchange
became an option on the 250SS and
TT. Again the 250 was victorious in
the Nations Grand Prix, Alfredo
Panella and Ricardo Brusi taking the
first two places. PierroGhersi
Exposed hairpin valve springs controlled the valves, and ignition was by twin
magnetos,
attempted the Lightweight IT at the Isle of Man once more. but retired. Other victories during 1931 included
Ugo Prini's win in the 250cc class of
the Circuito del Lario, and Terzo Bandini's win in the 250cc Swiss
Grand Prix held at Berne.
The Tre Cilindri
The G.T. 16, a Sport 15 in a sprung
frame. had been introduced in 1930,
and early in 1932 Carlo Guzzi pro-
duced a remarkable touring bike in a similar style. Following the disappointment of the four-cylinder racer, three
of the cylinders were taken to create a compact 500cc in-line triple. With the
four's 56mm pistons, the stroke was increased 2mm 67mm to give
to
500cc. The two overhead valves fol-
Only one example of the highly advanced Tre Cilindri survived, and is on display at the
museum at Mandello.
22
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
THE 1930s: A GOLDEN ERA
23
lowed the four-cylinder's example by being operated by pushrods and rock-
ers, but now used coil springs instead of hairpins. Coil ignition was used, a distributor being driven off the rightside camshaft, together with a single Amal carburettor. With its 4.5:1 compression ratio, the three-cylinder pro-
duced 25bhp at 5,500rpm. Despite
the undersquare bore and stroke, this engine was very advanced. The fly-
wheel was incorporated inside the engine cases, as was the three-speed gearbox as usual. Running entirely on
needle-colier bearings, the crankshaft
had 120° crank throws creating a very smooth engine.
The frame, in two parts bolted together, followed the form set by the
racer apart from the inclusion of rear
suspension with a new design of
friction damper.
Unfortunately the Tre Cilindri did not meet with universal acclaim, and because of its specification it needed to be sold at a premium price. The
conservative market was just not
ready for such an expensive touring bike that could only provide modest
performance. Even though the weight was only 160kg (353lb), top speed was
no more than 130km/h (81mph).
Buyers still preferred the Sport 15 (especially ata price 35per cent lower), and after one year the Tre
Cilindri was discontinued.
The P 175, P 250, P.E. 250 and G.T. 17
If the Tre Cilindri had been a marketing disaster, Guzzi's expansion of its
make them more aesthetically appeal-
ing.Designed for the advantageous motoleggere taxation class for lightweight motorcycles, the P 175 was
produced until 1937. Still with a
hand-operated three-speed gearbox, it was a sprightly little machine. While
the 59 x 63.7mm engine only pro-
duced 7bhp at 5,000rpm, it only
weighed 115kg (2531lb) and could achieve 100km/h (62mph).
In 1933 the Fascist government
abolished the tax differences between
light and regular motorcycles, so in
1934 the production range was
range into the lightweight segment. expanded with the addition of the was a brilliant success. With the P 250 alongside the P 175. Displacing
232.3cc with its 68 x 64mm bore and
release of the P 175 in 1932 some new
stroke andpushrod-operated over-
features were introduced that would eventually find their way on to the
head valves, the P 250 owed more to the P 175 than the racing 250s. With slightly larget, 33mm,valves, power
500cc production models, in particular overhead valves. Typically for a
Guzzi, the cylinder head design was very advanced, the two 32mm valves
was only 9bhp at 5,500rpm, and top speed was also around
having a 62° included angle. The
(62mph). Unlike the P 175, however, the P 250 had a foot-operated gearbox
engine cases were also redesigned to
The G.T. 17 was powered by the same opposed-valve engine as the Sport. In the African war of 1935-36 it gained a reputation for exceptional robustness.
and could be distinguished from the smaller model by its deeper mudguards and a frame that included a sheet metal sectionbehind the
engine. The P 250 was soon joined by a sprung-frame PE. (E for Elastico) that weighed considerably more, 135kg (2981b), but offered superior comfort and handling.
Also throughout this period some of Guzzi's most successful ventures were military vehicles, in particular the G.T. 17. Based on the G.T. 16. this had the 500cc 13.2bhp opposed-
valve engine, three-speedgearbox
and sprung frame. Carburation was now by a Dell'Orto MC 26F instead
of an Amal, and a Marelli MLA1
magneto rather than a Bosch ZE1.
The G.T. 17 also featured a double exhaust. The kickstart was on the right (left on the G.T. 16), and no
battery was fitted; instead there was a
heavy-duty dynamo and voltage regu-
lator. Single and dual seat versions
were offered and there were a variety of options available, some including machine-gun mounting. The G.T. 17 was the first of a long line of Moto Guzzis built for specific military or police applications. Motor-tricycles
also featured strongly in the produc-
tion from 1931until 1936. Two
versions with the 500cc opposed-
valve engine were produced, the '32'
military version, and the '125' civilian version.
The 500 Bicilindrica
With the four-cylinder permanently
retired, racing during 1932 continued with developed versions of the 4VSS
and SS250. By now the 500cc 4VSS
had a bronze cylinder head,and
factory versions a twin Amal 6/011 carburettor with single float chamber on a V-shaped inlet manifold. Power was now 32bhp with a top speed in
the region of 170km/h (105.6mph), but the rest of the bike was quite out of date, especially the hand-operated three-speed gearbox. However, there
was still one significant victory in store for the venerable 4VSS, the 1932 Milano-Napoli. Last run in
1925, this race was shifted to June (fromSeptember) and called the Mussolini Gold Cup. On his 4VSS Carlo Fumagalli won at an average
speed of 93.084km/h (57.8mph), with
One of Moto Guzzi's more successful ventures during the 1930s was the expansion of
the lightweight range. This is a P 175.
Virginio Fieschi second on another
4V. Ricardo Brusi and Alfredo
Panella matched this with a first and
second in the 250 class. As usual,
excellent race results continued for
the 250 during 1932, victories by
Brusi in the European Grand Prix and
Fumagalli in the Swiss Grand Prix
being particularly notable. Continued
development saw the power up to
20bhp.
While the 4VSS 500cc racer was catalogued alongside the 250SS for 1933, it was clear that the 4VSS was no longer competitive. Race victories
were hard to achieve and the MilanoNapoli event of 1933 was a disaster for Moto Guzzi. Fortunately Federico Susini on the non-factory 250 was victorious in the 250 class, the only Guzzi
to finish. All ten works bikes failed.
There were, however, other important
250cc victories, in particular Walter
Handley's win in the Swiss Grand Prix in July. Handley had observed Mario Ghersi in the Lightweight TT of 1933
(where he finished sixth), and had also wanted to ride a Guzzi in that
event but had not been able to due to
his contract with Excelsior.
Works 250s of that vear received a four-speed foot-operated gearbox and
were code-named 4M for 4 Marce (four-speed). Even though Mario
Ghersi retired in the Milano-Napoli, the 4M became the standard factory
250 after that event. It featured new
crankcases, a cast-iron instead of bronze cylinder head, and an Amal
6/011 carburettor.
Needing a new 500, Carlo Guzzi,
with characteristic originality, sought to combine two of his highly successful 250s to create a 500cc V-twin. The resulting Bicilindrica lived until 1951 and managed to blend the delicate
balancebetween horsepower and agility. In thedesign of the
Bicilindrica, Carlo Guzzi retained the horizontal cylinder of the SS250, and
placed another cylinder 120° behind it. This cylinder had circular finning and both featured a single overhead camshaft driven by a shaft and bevel gear. Thus the same bore and stroke
were retained (68 x 68mm), and the same valves, 37mm for the inlet and
34mm for the exhaust, with an identical 58° included valve angle. Initially the cylinders and heads were in cast-
iron. As expected, the aluminium
crankcase contained the four-speed gearbox, operated by a foot change,
and the 38/70 geared primary drive. The big-end and the crankshaft ran on 30mm roller-bearings with a central main bearing. Thus separate
crankpins were used and spaced 120ª
apart to give even firing intervals. As the pins were integral with the crank webs the roller big-end bearings were
unusual in that they were split dia-
24
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
THE 1930s: A GOLDEN ERA
25
NATi sam
M018 GAZZI
For 1935 both the 250 and 500 received Giuseppe Guzzi's sprung frame. The 250 also featured the Bicilindrica's larger front
The 1933 version of the Bicilindrica 500 had a rigid rear end. There were few changes for 1934 but the handling was still
brake.
unsatisfactory.
could only improve, and if it had not been for the rise of the supercharged
500s later in the decade, it would
have been undoubtedly more successful. As it was, the Bicilindrica demonstrated its excellence by spearheading Moto Guzzi's 500cc racing programme
for nearly 20 years.
of the
the
With
addition
Bicilindrica, things started to look up
on the racetracks for Guzzi during 1934. Both the 250 and 500 were developed, the 250 now being
reserved for works riders only. It also (3331b)1934 the and power increased tO received a new frame (still with a rigid 43.35bhp. The three-part crankcase rear end), and a new saddle-style fuel was now cast in electron rather than tank with an oil tank on top, aluminium and featured a revised oil Brampton forks and 19-inch wheels.
metrically. There was also the usual Guzzi external flywheel on the left
side of the engine.
Carburation was by two Dell'Orto
28.5mm carburettors, ignition by a
magneto situated between the cylin-
ders, and lubrication by dry sump.
The original version had a rigid frame
and Brampton forks and weighed around 160kg (3531b). First displayed in September 1933, power was 41bhp at 7,000rpm, and top speed 186km/h (115.5mph). For the second version of
ing the Bicilindrica the "monster'
because of its evil handling. A month later, on 20 May, it was raced again at
the ItalianGrand Prix at Rome's
Littorio autodrome. Tenni took first
place followed by Moretti, while Brusi
won the 250cc race. Tenni continued
this success on the Bicilindrica to take
the Italian 500cc Championship that
year, and Bandini won the MilanoNapoli event at an average speed of 98.370km/h (61mph). Brusi also led home four Guzzis in the 250 class. It
had been a good year, with some
important results, but 1935 would see
Guzzi achieve what they had set out
to do back in 1926, winning the most
important road race in Europe,the
Isle of Man Tourist Trophy.
Central to the improvement of
both the 250 and 500 Bicilindrica for 1935 was the adoption of a sprung
frame, designed by Giuseppe Guzzi. It was an unorthodox system with the rear fork pivoted near the engine and triangulated underneath. There were two springs in horizontal tubes alongside the wheel and damping was by friction dampers adjusted by a lever
and cable on the left side of the fuel tank. Changes to the engine included
narrower and stronger con-rods, and narrower valve stems. Power for the
500 went to 50bhp at 7,500rpm, with top speed around 200km/h
a
(124mph). This was amply demonstrated by Tenni during the Grand Prix of Tripoli at the Mellaha circuit at the end of March, which he won at an average speed of 178km/h
(110mph). The 250 for 1935 received the 202mm brakes of the Bicilindrica,
and also shared the engine improve-
ments.
Inthe
of
Milano-Napoli event April 1935 Guzzi swept the board overall in both the 500 and 250cc
Tenni won, followed by
classes.
Giordano Aldrighetti, Bandini and Brusi on the 250. Tenni's winning average speed of 107.91km/h (67mph) indicated the superiority of the sprung frame. A similar victory
followed one month later at Monza in the Gran Premio del Reale. This time the Bicilindrica was again triumphant,
Bandini ahead of Tenni and Aldrighetti at an average speed of 164.678km/h (102.3mph). Aldo
Pigorini took the 250 to its class vic-
tory,Tenni again won the Italian
500cc championship, with Pigorini
taking the 250cc championship, these
results doing much to publicise the
new sprung frame.
The Tourist Trophy races that year
were to be the most significant
successes for Guzzi to that date. At 35
years of age Stanley Woods was a
veteran of the Isle of Man course with six TT wins to his credit, and both he
Tenni were entered on 250
Stanley Woods being congratulated by Giorgio Parodi following his historic victory in the Lightweight TT of 1935.
weight was reduced to 151kg
pump.
The 500 Bicilindrica was essentially
The racing debut of the Bicilindrica was on 15 October 1933 in the Italian
unchanged but for the 202mm brakes
front and rear. The official team of Tenni, Bandini and Amilcare Moretti
Grand Prix at the Rome Autodromo del Littorio. Here three bikes were was also strengthened by the inclusion raced by Terzo Bandini, Guglielmo ofIrishman Stanley Woods for Sandri and the rising star, Omobono selected international events, notably Tenni. Tenni crashed, Bandini retired, the Spanish Grand Prix in April fol-
and Sandri finished second, although
Guzzi triumphed with the first three
places in the 250cc event. It had been
a very promising start for the new
machine and once again Carlo Guzzi's originality had been vindicated. With
more development the Bicilindrica
lowed by the Isle of ManTourist
Trophy.
The Bicilindrica's first success was the Spanish Grand Prix at Montjuich
Park, Barcelona, on 22 April 1934.
Stanley Woods rode to victory in both
the 250 and 500cc classes, nicknam-
26
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
THE 1930s: A GOLDEN ERA
27
continued in production until 1939.
advance. The gearbox was now fourspeed and foot-operated, and there was the usual 280mm external fly-
wheel. All the gearbox shafts ran in
ball bearings, there was a helical-
geared primary drive, and the big-end
bearings were needle-rollers. So sound
was this design that it would form the
basis of all later Guzzi 500 singles, including the magnificent Condor,
Dondolino and Gambalunga competi-
tion machines.
The rest of the new 500 V followed a design similar to that of the earlier Sport 15, but with many variations, The frame was rigid but now included
sheet metal plates behind the engine. The girder front fork now had friction
dampers and all the bodywork was new. This included fuel tanks, mud-
guards, and the inclusion of toolboxes.
Wheels were 19-inch and the V was
shorter than the Sport 15 with its
1,400mm (55-inch) wheelbase.
Asprung-frame G.T.V. was also
offered, and this would have a longer
production run than the V, lasting until 1949. Surprisingly, given the
more advanced specification of the V and G.T.V., the new engine was also
built with the earlier side inlet and
overhead exhaust valve cylinder head. The result was the 'S', and its sprung-
frame brother the G.T.S. Still making
13.2bhp as they had back in 1928,
these four-speed variants were also
offered with the option of a hand
gearchange, and were designed as a
rugged workhorse rather than a sport-
ing motorcycle. Despite the perfor-
mance benefits offered by the
engine, the G.T.S. combination of the sprung frame with the earlier engine
was also surprisingly popular, with
nearly twice as many manufactured. This was related more to the reliability of the engine; if an overhead valve
dropped on the S engine it did not
end with catastrophic engine damage.
The V achieved 130km/h (81mph) against the 105km/h (65mph) of the S.
It must also be remembered that
the venerable Sport 15 with its
opposed-valve engine and hand-
change three-speedgearbox was
Guzzi's production mainstay during the 1930s. It received some minor changes to colours,brakes, front suspension andcarburettors, but
The popularity of the Sport 15, especially given the alternative of the V and
G.T.V., indicated theconservative
nature of the motorcycle-buying
public, something that continues to
this day.
There were few changes to the
range of production bikes in 1935. The W and G.T.W. joined the 500cc
overhead valve line-up, being identical to the 18bhp V and G.T.V. apart
from a higher-performance22bhp
engine. This was achieved by means of a slightly higher compression ratio (6:1), a new camshatt, and a 28.5mm
carburettor. The W was produced through until 1939, and the G.T.W. until 1949. The higher-horsepower
engine brought the sporting G.T.W.'s
performance up to the level of the
lighter unsprung versions, giving a top speed of 140km/h (87mph). There were now seven 500s in the production range, the Sport 15, V, W and S
with unsprung frames, and the G.T.V., G.T. W. and G.T.S, with sprung frames.
Notwithstanding military and threewheeled vehicles, this would remain the basic line-up until the outbreak of
the Second World War.
Although the overhead valve "V' engine offered superior performance, questionable
reliability saw the more basic 'S', with its opposed-valve engine, more popular. This is
one of the final Vs, from 1939.
exhausts. 1936 was also significant in that it was the year that great engi-
neer Giulio Carcano joined the com-
pany; he would play an important role at Mandello until the mid- 1960s.
With a temporaryreductionin
international tensionduring 1937
there was a return to active competition on all fronts, not just in Italy.
However, asearly as1934 the
Bicilindrica had come under some
pressure from the supercharged waterand affected Guzz's racing involve- cooled four-cylinder Rondine. With ment. Economic sanctions and fuel Rondine selling this design to Gilera shortages due to the invasion of who intended to race it during 1937, Ethiopia limited participation in inter- the Guzzi Bicilindrica's days of dominational events to the Swiss and nance looked limited. By the end of European Grands Prix. At Berne 1937 a prototype water-cooled superTenni won the 250 event but retired charged Bicilindrica was produced, as
During 1936 politics intervened
from the500cc race, and at the
well as a prototype supercharged 250,
German event, to coincide with the
but only the 250 would make it to the race track. Fortunately Guzzi still had their venerable 250, and the remarkable Omobono Tenni, whose bravery and talent more than compensated for any deficiency of horsepower. At the
Isle of Man in 1937 Tenni took the
The great rider Omobono Tenni also rode a 250TT in the Lightweight TT of 1935,
but crashed.
powering a four-wheeled Nibbio, designed by Count Giovanni Lurani and Carlo Guzzi's son Ulisse. On 5 November 1935 the 50bhp Nibbio
Guzzis. Woods also had a Bicilindrica for the Senior TT. In the Lightweight
TT on 19 June,Woods gave Guzzi
their first Tourist Trophy at an average
broke kilometre and mile under-500cc
speed of 71.56mph (115km/h) in rain and very poor conditions. Tenni
vetturette records on the Firenze-
crashed and Woods's winning margin was over 3 minutes from Tyrell Smith on the four-valve Rudge that had won
Mare road. In May 1939 Lurani set
more records, this time on a stretch of
the Berlin-Munich autobahn, with a
top speed of 174km/h (108mph).
the previous year.
The Senior TT three days later was
a far closer race. Also heldin
The V, G.T.V., S, G.T.S., W and G.T.W.
atrocious conditions, Stanley Woods rode the race of his life to beat Jimmy Guthrie on a Norton. On the final lap Woods set a new lap record of 86.53mph (139km/h) defeat
The production 500cc single-cylinder
engine came in for a complete
redesign for 1934, and was called the 'V'. While retaining the distinctive horizontal cylinder, 88 x 82mm bore
Guthrie by 4 seconds. Despite the poor conditions, he also set a new
and stroke, and external flywheel, the
race record at 84.68mph (136km/h).
valve layout followed that of the
It was a historic victory. Not only was it the first victory by an Italian motor-
P 175: two overhead valves operated
by pushrods and rockers with external hairpin springs, The aluminium crankcase was also restyled along the lines of the P 175. The cast-iron cylinder head had twin exhaust ports, and with a 5.5:1 compression ratio and an Amal 27mm carburettor, power was
cycle on the British manufacturers' home turf, but it signalled the end of the rigid frame and the big single for
racing. These victories were especially
important in elevating the status of
Moto Guzzi as a world-class, not just an Italian, motorcycle manufacturer.
up to 186hp at 4,300rpm. Ignition was
Soonthe Bicilindricawas also
by a Bosch magneto with manual
Lightweight Tourist Trophy and set a
lap record at 77.72mph new (125km/h); Stanley Woodsretired
while leading.
For 1937 the North-South race was changed to Milano-Taranto, distance of 1,283km (797 miles). Again
it was a Guzzi benefit, Sandri winning
at 104.013km/h (65mph), leading
Guzzi 500s to 11 of the first 15 places outright, while Nello Pagani took the
250 racing class. Sandri finished off
the year with a win in the Italian
Olympics, the Guzzis were outclassed by the supercharged DKWs.
However, in Italian events Guzzi's dominance continued. As usual in the Milano-Napoli race a full factory
team was entered, Aldo Pigorini
taking the 250 and Tenni the 500cc
classes. The Italian Grand Prix at
Monza on 27 September also saw the
Guzzi Bicilindrica triumphant, this
time over the German invasion.
Tenni tookfirst and Aldrighetti second ahead of the twosuper-
charged BMWs. Results were similar
in the 250 race, but with the places reversed and Aldrighetti taking first place ahead of Tenni. The factory
racing bikes were very similar to those
of 1935 but for long trumpet-type
In 1935 the V engine was uprated and became the "W". This was also offered in rigid
and sprung-frame versions, but was even less popular than the V. Here is a 1937 G.T.W., visually similar to the G.T.V.
28
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
THE 1930s: A GOLDEN ERA
29
500cc championship, and Pagani matching that with the 250cc cham-
pionship.
Another project later that year was an aerodynamic exercise on the 250 by the Aeronautical Institute at Turin Polytechnic. Under Carcano's supervision a fully faired motorcycle was
designed for record-breaking attempts,
but it got no further than the model
The 500 G.T.C., P.L. 250, P.L.S. 250 and P.E.S.
Lamiera - the pressed-steel frame), Costs were kept down by the use of
this type of frame, a welded steel
girder fork and an almost total
absence of chrome. The P.L., with its 22mm carburettor, produced 10bhp and could achieve around 100km/h (61mph). It replaced the P 250, but
the P.E. (E signifying Elastico), with a sprung frame and 9bhp 232cc engine,
P,L.S., also appeared in 1937. This produced slightly more power than
Also in 1937 the 500 G.T.C. was the PL., 12bhp, weighed 105kg
introduced, a competition version of the 22bhp G.T.W. Designed for the production categories of races such as Milano-Taranto.
(231½1b), and by 1939 had evolved
was shelved, Carlo Guzzi proceeded
with the supercharged 250 for 1938. Initially this was to be for endurance record-breaking attempts, but it
would later prove eminently suitable for road racing.
The air-cooled 250cc single was fitted with a Guzzi-manufactured
Cozette supercharger above the gearbox driven by gears contained in the
primary drive casing. In order to over-
come the difficulties presented by
500 BICILINORICO
CON COMPRESSO
supercharging a single cylinder, an expansion chamber was located
between the supercharger and cylin-
Above: The prototype supercharged 500
still on
Bicilindrica engine of 1937,
display in the Moto Guzzi museum. Left: Tenni beng congratulated by the
Richmond after
Lightweight TT victory.
Below: Stanley Woods rode a Bicilindrica
500 in the Nations Grand Prix at Monza in 1937, and finished fifth. By now the
Bicilindrica no longer featired the rideradjustable rear friction dampers.
der. Supercharger pressure altered depending on the type of fuel used:
with the usual petrol-benzol mixture during 1938 with the addition of a of the day it was 0.6-0.8 bar, but on increased slightly to 24-26bhp at sporty version of the sprung-frame methanol pressure was increased to P.E., the P.E.S. With the 12bbp 70 x 1.3-1.5 bar.
exhausts, a 20-inch front wheel and a 64mm 247cc engine of the P.L.S., and In the cylinder head of the super-
rear mudguard seat pad. The G.T.W.'s
a three-speed foot-operated gearbox, discarded and both the RE.S. weighed in at 135kg (2981b) the fuel and oil tanks were larger. and top speed was around 110km/h
Unfortunately at 160kg (3531b) it was far too heavy for this sort of competicion and only had a modest top speed
(68mph): however. when modified for
events such as the Milano-Taranto.
charged 250, the 37mm inlet and 35mm exhaust valves were
unchanged, the inlet port being
33.5mmwith the exhaust 29mm.
With a Dell'Orto 32mm carburettor
125km/h (78mph).
power was increased to 38bhp at 7,900rрm, or 45bhp on methanol.
continued through until 1939.
In 1937 the P 250 became a 247cc by means of a bore increase to 70mm
The supercharged 250
The supercharged 250 also received a new frame in steel with an alloy rear
While the development of the waterand was designated the PL. (L for cooled Bicilindrica prototype of 1937
section, and wheels with alloy rims and electron hubs. The total weight
The sporting version of the 250cc P series was the P.E.S. Even though it was modified for racing, it was not exactly a competitive
mount and was overshadowed by the Albatros.
30
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
THE 1930s: A GOLDEN ERA
31
as if it shared very little with the mun-
dane touring model. By the time it
entered production there was an alu-
minium cylinder head and barrel,
electron crankcase, straight-cut pri-
mary gears, a single exhaust, and con-
stant mesh-type four-speed gearbox.
Standard versions produced 28bhp, but with special preparation (as for
Pagani in the 1939 Circuito del Lario) the pushrod engine was tuned to pro-
duce 32bhp. This tuning included a
lighter, 6.6kg (141/lb), 260mm (101/4inch) flywheel, sodium-filled exhaust
valve, andtwo-ring piston. The
39mm inlet and 35mm exhaust valves
were inclined at 62°. The lower and lighter composite frame was derived from that of the supercharged 250, and with 21-inch aluminium rimmed wheels and cast electron brakes,the Condor weighed only 140kg (3081b) with full electrical equipment.
Without lights and adapted for circuit racing the weight was less, at around
Although occasionally raced, the supercharged 250 of 1938 was more successful when
used for record attempts.This is the post-war version with the large expansion
chamber between the blower and carburettor.
Nations Grand Prix at Monza the
was 132kg (2911b) and top speed over 200km/h (124mph).
Guzzis were defeated by the Benellis and BMWs.
It was immediately successful as a record-breaker, Nello Pagani setting a host of world records at Monza on 30 September. These included an average of 180.81km/h (112mph) over 5 kilo-
The Condor and Albatros
There were also two new additions to the 500cc line-up for 1938, a 500cc metres and 170.273km/h (106mph) catalogue racer to replace the G.T.C., over 100 kilometres. On 30 theCondor, and a newmilitary November Tenni attempted more motorcycle,the G.T. 20.Although
records, raising the 5-kilometre record
not available until 1939, the Condor had been raced in prototype form by
to 187.832km/h (117mph) and also setting a one-hour record of 180.502
Ugo Prini in the 1938 Circuito del
kilometres (112 miles).
Lario, where it took a class victory.
Road racing dutiesthroughout Called the Nuova C, this still had a 1938 were maintained by the cast-iron cylinder and head, but with Bicilindrica, together with the unsu- a Dell'Orto SS 32mm carburettor, percharged 250, and it was a difficult new camshaft and 7:1 compression it year for Moto Guzzi. In the Milano- produced 28bhp at 5,000гpm. The
Taranto race Pagani finished third overall on a 250 at a speed of
Nuova C weighed much less than the G. T.C. at 145kg (320lb) with full elec104.479km/h (65mph), faster than trical equipment, and its encouraging Sandri's winning speed of a year earl- performance saw it being sold as the ier on the Bicilindrica. The G.T.C. G.T.C.L. a few months later. By 1939 took the production category, but the it had become officially the Condor, Bicilindricas of Tenniand Sandri one of the most classically good lookretired. While 500cc victories were ing Guzzis ever created, and the first hard to come by, Pagani still managed of many to carry the name of a bird.
Although descended fromthe
to take the 250 Italian championship, and there was no entry by Guzzi at the
G.T.V., the Condor was such a pur-
poseful racing machine that it looked
Isle of Man that year. Even in the
125kg (276lb). With a top speed in
the region of 160km/h (99mph), the red Condor was undoubtedly one of the most competitive 500cc motor-
cycles available in Italy in 1939. Unfortunately the outbreak of war
that year halted Condor production and only 69 weremanufactured
between 1939 and 1940. Some even ended up being used as a mount by Mussolini's riding bodyguards. The Condor would,however,be resur-
rected in 1946 as the great Dondolino and Gambalunga.
Not only did 1939 see the introduction of the superb Condor, but it also
saw the supercharged 250 take to the
racetrack in addition to the record
attempts. Carlo Guzzi now realised
that both his 250 and Bicilindrica
were being outclassed, and while the
new 500 supercharged racer would
have to wait until 1940, it was a rela-
tivelysimple matterto adapt the
supercharged 250 for the track. There were also some experiments with fuel
injection, both electromagnetic and mechanical. Theelectromagnetic injection wasa joint design by
Caproni-Fuscaldo, but further devel. opment was interrupted by the war.
Entered in the Milano-Taranto, the supercharged 250s of Tenni, Pagani, and Sandri all retired, although amazingly the prototype Caproni-Fuscaldo-
Replacing the G.T.C. was the Condor, a much more purposefud racing design and one of the classic Moto Guzzis. (Roy Kidney)
injected supercharged 250 of Raffaele
Alberti finished second in the 250
class. This bike was called 'Gerolamo' by the factory design team. This was a
nickname for 'The Hunchback of Notre Dame' and referred to the
shape of the engine with its expansion chamber sitting on top.
That year also saw Guzzi return to the Isle of Man with Tenni and Woods
on supercharged 250s, but both retired. Maurice Cann rode
a
Bicilindrica to ninth in the Senior TT, but this machine was now totally outclassed by its supercharged competition. Further bad luck followed at the Dutch and European Grands Prix, but
the supercharged 250was to have
more success in Germany in August. One month before the outbreak of the
war, Pagani and Sandri rode supercharged 250s to victory ahead of the
two-stroke DKWs.
On 20 October 1939, on the
autostrada between Bergamo and
Brescia, further world records were set by the supercharged 250. This time
Alberti was timed over a flying kilometre 213.270km/h(132mph). Sandri too now broke most of Tenni's records of the previous year, raising
at
the five kilometres to 201.447km/h (125mph). After the war, too, the
supercharged 250 continued to set
records. On 28 February 1948 Luigi
Cavanna attempted several new 350cc sidecar world
records at
Charrat-Saxon in Switzerland. The flying kilometre was achieved at
172.993km/h (107mph). To show how
the
advanced design really was, Cavanna set more records with the
supercharged 250 in 1952.
It was not only the supercharged 250 that achieved better results for
Moto Guzzi during 1939 - the
Condor, too, was proving a far more
competitive machine than the earlier
G.T.C. In the Circuito del Lario
Pagani won, beating Serafini's supercharged Gilera four with more than twice the Condor's horsepower.
Joining the Condor in 1939 production racing was the for 250cc Albatros, and this was also immediately successful. In the Circuito di Losanna (Lausanne) and Circuito di
Another classic catalogue racer of the 1930s was the Albatros. Originally intended for
privateers, this would assume premier road racing status following the end of the Second World War.
32
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
THE 1930s: A GOLDEN ERA
33
Bari, Massimo Masserini and Enrico
Lorenzetti took class wins on both the Condor and Albatros.
Replacing the unremarkable PE.S., the Albatros was even more sophisti-
cated than the Condor with a bevelgear-driven single overhead camshaft engine derived from the racing 250s.
Designed by Carlo Guzzi with the assistance of Carcano, the Albatros
had the usual 68 x 68mm dimensions,
but with an 8.5:1 compression ratio and a Dell'Orto SS30M carburettor. With 33mm inlet and 31mm exhaust valves it initially produced 20bhp at
7,000rpm on a petrol-benzol mixture. The crankcases were the same as for
the supercharged 250, cast in elec-
tron, as were the straight-cut primary
gears. The frame was similar to the Condor with its hydronalium alloy
rear section. Other chassis parts were also shared with the Condor, in partic-
ular the 200mm electron brakes and 21-inch aluminium rimmed wheels.
With full electrical equipment the Albatros weighed 135kg (2981b), but specially prepared racing versions were only 115-120kg (254-2651b). Even more expensive than the Condor, Albatros production was severely affected by the outbreak of the war and only 25 were manufactured during 1939. Lorenzetti did, however, manage to win the 250cc Italian championship (2nd Category)
in 1940 before war interrupted motorcycle competition.
The Egretta, Ardetta, Airone, G.T. 20, Alce, Trialce and ER
Regular production during 1939 was still centred on the same seven versions of 500cc machines as before, together with the cheaper 246cc P series.The PL.S. became the Egretta (with the 12bhp P.E.S. engine), much
the same as before but with an
improved finish, and the basic PL. became the Ardetta, with coil rather
than magneto ignition. This very basic
machine was the cheapest in the
range and was available through a special hire-purchase arrangement
had Marelli magneto ignition, a fourspeed foot-operated gearbox,and a
tubular (rather than pressed-steel) sprung frame.When it was launched it was still called a P.E., but this was soon changed to Airone. Power was
up to 9.5bhp at 4,800rpm, giving a top
speed of around 95km/h (59mph).
The Airone was quite popular in the year leading up to the war, with 997
being manufactured. The 1940 version of the Airone featured
a pressed-steel frame derived from the Ardetta and PL.
Like the Condor, production of the
G.T. 20 military motorcycle in 1938
was on a limited scale, and it was
really an interim model. From experi-
ence gained with the G.T. 17 in the war in Ethiopia in 1936, the G.T. 20
was designed for a more specific mili-
tary application, in particular improved ground clearance. Although the basic 13.2bhp overhead exhaust
and side inlet valve engine was
retained, it was now derived from the
S and featured a four-speed hand-operated gearbox.The new frame mounted the engine higher, and the
front and rear wheels were inter-
changeable. Although only a few were built, its successor, the Alce, was to be Guzzi's most famous military motor-
cycle.
Similar to the short-lived G.T. 20, the Alce had an oil pump automatic
valve and alterations to the stand, exhaust pipes and tool boxes. Produced until 1945, still with the
opposed-valve 13.2bhp engine, the
Alce was the predominant vehicle for the Italian motorcycle corps. After the
war it continued to be produced in
limited numbers until 1958, by which
time, it had evolved into the
Superalce, with the V engine,
The Alce was also produced in
small truck form, the Trialce, between
1940 and 1943. Some of these were designed to be parachuted from aero-
planes. Another significant three-
wheeler was the civilian ER, which was produced from 1938 until 1941. More a truck than a motorcycle, this
featured the 17.8bhp V engine and
had three forward speeds plus reverse.
While its 1,000kg carrying capacity was not much higher than before, the
ER was a much stronger vehicle. It soon gained a reputation for being
unbreakable.
As Italy did not enter the Second
World War until June 1940, the Guzzi factory operated as normal into that
year. There was also a Milano-Taranto event held on 6 May. This time Guido
Cerato rode a Condor to victory at
103.036km/h (64mph), with the
supercharged 250 of Alberti second. That month also saw the appearance of a bike that could have made Guzzi unbeatable in the 500cc class had the war not intervened, the Tre Cilindri
500.
Tre Cilindri 500 Developed in 1939 as an answer to
the supercharged Gilera, BMW and
During the war the Alce, Trialce and 500U dominated production. The Alce was available in several varieties, and with a solo seat in addition to the dual-seat type
pictured here.
Unfortinately the 500cc supercharged triple of 1940 was a victim of poor timing. The war interrupted development, and afterwards superchargers were banned.
NSU, Guzzi's supercharged 500 triple again exhibited Carlo Guzzi's capacity
for originality. Foremost was the use of aluminium for the cylinder head and barrels with cast-iron liners, an
all-enclosed valve system, and a five-
speed gearbox. Inclined at 45°, the
tbree-cylinder 59 x 60mm engine had twin overhead camshafts driven by a chain on the right side of the engine.
Two valves per cylinder were used, inclined at 62º, and with an 8:1 compression ratio and a Cozette supercharger power was about 55-60bhp. This was despite Sandri enthusiastically. claiming that it produced around 85bhp at 8,000rpm after tests on the Bergamo-Brescia autostrada on 11 March 1940. Like the earlier three-cylinder, the four-bearing
crankshaft had the cranks spaced at
120°. Lubrication was dry sump with
the oil reservoir incorporated in the fuel tank, as was fairly usual Guzzi practice.
The composite frame featured a tubular top section with the engine
hung underneath, and a hydronalium
rear pressing with the usual Guzzi
rear suspension. The Brampton fork,
21-inch wheels and electron brakes
were from the Condor, and if there
was a disadvantageto the new machine it was in the weight of
175kg (3861b). It was also longer than both the Condor and Bicilindrica with a 1,470mm (58-
inch) wheelbase. Only raced once, by
Sandri at the Lido di Albaro circuit at Genoa on 26 May, it retired, but had showed promise. On this occa-
sion the front brake was a much
larger 280mm unit. Unfortunately
the timing of its appearance could
not have been worse. Italy joined the
war, and when racing commenced
again superchargers were banned.
The 500U
By now Guzzi was almost totally com-
mitted to the production of military motorcycles, the Alce, Trialce and,
from 1942, the Motocarri 500U.
There were no resources for the manufacture of any other models and it was not until late in 1945 that normal pro-
duction could be resumed. Some
experimental work continued during
the war, notably the G.T.E. of 1942, which used a four-valve version of the 500cc single and produced 18.9bhp.
The Motocarri 500U superseded the ER and was considerably more heavy
duty than the Trialce. It featured a
fan-cooled overhead valve 500cc V
engine, the first time this engine was used in a military vehicle. It produced
17.8bhp at 4,300rpm,allowing
1,000kg payload. A differential reduc-
tion provided six forward and two
reverse gears.
This vehicle, with 1,608 manufactured in 1943 alone, formed the basis of production during the war. When
the war finally ended, however, Guzzi was fortunately more prepared than
many other manufacturers. Being situ-
ated on Lake Como away from the
regular industrial centre around Milan
had saved the company from exten-
sive Allied bombing. Moto Guzzi
with Fascist Party clubs.
There was also one new P series
machine for 1939 that would figure more prominently in later years, the Airone (Heron). This 246cc machine
emerged from the devastation ready to take on the world in providing
cheap transport. That in turn pro-
vided the company with the resources to become a major force in motorcycle road racing.
POST-WAR RACING: SUCCESS WITH EARLIER DESIGNS
35
that had appeared in 1940,the
Dondolino of 1946 was essentially a tuned Condor. The frame was identical, but the rear suspension used only a single spring, and as most Dondolinos were produced without electrical equipment the weight was reduced to 128kg (2821b). Braking
Post-war racing: success with earlier designs
was improved by a 260mm front drum
brake, with internalcontrols tO
improve streamlining, together with a 220 x 50mm rear brake. Most changes occurred in the engine: the inlet valve
was 44mm, with a 40mm exhaust valve; thecompression tatio was increased to 8.5:1; and with
cylinder
Albatros and Condor.
Initially these were catalogue racers in the style of the earlier bikes, but soon they were developed into more specialised machines. As the Albatros was a full racing design anyway, this was not too difficult, but the Condor needed more serious treatment and evolved into the equally magnificent Dondolino and official factory
A °resumedafter the end ofracing
soon as motorcycle road
Second World War, Moto Guzzi re-
entered that world of competition. With supercharging banned by the
FIM, both the supercharged 250 and 500 triple were rendered obsolete, so that left the way open for the return
of the pre-war Bicilindrica. Guzzi also decided to develop the pre-war single-
the
Gambalunga. Breaking from the tradi-
tion of using ornithological names, Dondolino meant "rocking-chair', because of its suspect roadholding,
while Gambalunga, or long-leg', signi-
fied a longer-stroke engine.
The Dondolino Faced with more intense competition, particularly from the Gilera Saturno
Dell'Orto SS 35M carburettor power was up to 336hp at 5,500rpm. This gave the Dondolino a top speed of
around 170km/h (106mph).
The Dondolino was immediately a
match for the Saturno and soon forced Gilera to release a 35bhp
'Sanremo' version. In the new Guzzi's
first race on 12 May1946 Luigi
Ruggeri finished second to Bandirolo's
Saturno at the Circuito del Luino.
One week later hewon the 2nd
Category at the Circuito di Regio
Emilia. In the hands of factory rider Nando Balzarotti the Dondolino won the 1946 500cc Spanish Grand Prix at Barcelona. It was also successful in other 1946 events, but its forte was
really in second division championship races and the long-distance events like the Milano-Taranto.
Ruggeri took the 1946 500cc Italian championship (2nd Category), and in
the Milano-Taranto the Dondolino
continued to be successful well after production ended in 1951. When the Milano-Taranto race was recreated on 17 May 1950, it was the Dondolino of
Guido Leoni that triumphed over
470
Descended from the pre-war Condor, the Dondolino was one of the most successful privateer racing Guzzis.
The Dondolino excelled in the Milano-Taranto road races. Duilio Agostini, pictured here, won the race in 1953, his efforts being rewarded with a works Grand Prix ride. Today he operates a Moto Guzzi dealership in Mandello.
batches for privateers from 1946 until 1951 (54 units). Each batch differed
in small details: some had a spoiler
under the engine, a stiffer rear spring, a smaller rear mudguard or a larger oil class, it became renowned forin its tank. In 1949 it was listed at a price ruggedness and strength on these long double that of the 500cc G.T.V. or events.Victories followed in 1951, G.T.W., so it was for serious racers 1952 and 1953; Bruno Franchisi won only. in the first two years (increasing the speed to 112.317km/h (69.75mph)) The Gambalunga and Duilio Agostini in 1953. Sergio In 1946 a Dondolino was developed Pinza and Alberti Amaldo gave the into a works bike by Ing Carcano, Dondolino its final important results, and the result was the Gambalunga. class wins in 1954 and the final event In a manner typical of many Italian of 1956. companies,the factory wanted to
Priamo's Gilera at an average speed of 102.033km/h (63mph).
Although not the fastest bike its
The Dondolino was built in small provide something special for an
Italian rider who showed promise, in this case factory tester Balzarotti. By
decreasing the bore to 84mm and increasing the stroke to 90mm, the
Gambalunga was the first500cc
single-cylinder Moto Guzzi to break with the traditional oversquare bore
and stroke. The longer stroke was used in an effort to reduce the stress
on the main bearings by reducing the
rod angularity. Running on the low
octane fuel required at that time, the compressionratio was 8:1. Even
though it produced more power than the Dondolino, 35bhp at 5,800гpm, the long-stroke engine was not total success and, for the 1948 Italian
36
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
POST-WAR RACING: SUCCESS WITH EARLIER DESIGNS
37
Grand Prix at Faenza, Guzzi reverted to the short-stroke engine on the factory-prepared Gambalunga. Now
with an additional roller main bear-
ing housed in the primary drive cover, this engine was known as the "Tipo Faenza' and was also shared with the regular production
Dondolino.
Where the Gambalunga really devi-
ated from the Dondolino was in the
use of leading-link front forks, a par-
ticular favourite of Carcano, and something that would feature on
nearly all racing Guzzis over the next
ten years. In an era where the tele-
scopic fork was predominant, the use
of leading-link forks another Guzzi trademark. In addition there
was a completely redesigned fuel tank and rear mudguard, a slightly altered frame with different rear frame plates and front downtubes, and the oil tank
was mounted under the seat. However, possibly the most striking thing about the Gambalunga was its
colour: silver paint with blue lettering.
The weight, too, was slighted reduced
by comparison with the Dondolino, to 125kg (276lb).
Considering that the Gambalunga was still a single-cylinder with
pushrod-operated overhead valves, it was surprisingly successful. In 1947 won the Italian Grand Prix, followingLorenzetti thatwith victory in Geneva and the bike's most significant success, the European Grand
Prix (at Ulster) of 1948. By then most
500cc factory racing duties were assigned to the Bicilindrica, the
lighter Gambalunga being kept partic-
ularly for the road circuits where its lack of horsepower was more than compensated for by the light weight
and ease of riding. After 1948 the
Gambalunga was occasionally made
available to privateers and continued
to be developed and win important events through until 1953. In that year Szabo wOn theHungarian
Championship, while Jean Behra won successive French Championships from 1949 until 1951.
Although still strongly derived from the pre-war Condor, the Gambalunga
had a thoroughly developed racing engine. The crankcases were cast in electron, and the cylinders and head in aluminium. All the engine components were manufactured from the finest materials available at that time.
Features such as the uncaged big-end
rollers were unusual but did not limit the reliability and life of the engine as
the engine speeds were quite moder-
ate. The con-rods were still bolted together to retain these 24 x 3mm
rollers.The inlet valve was now
46mm and the sodium-filled exhaust valve 40mm, these set at an angle of
60°.
In 1950 the Gambalunga was low-
ered to improve streamlining. The
rear mudguard was modified and 20inch wheels replaced the 21-inch of
the earlier machine. There was a
revised frame, stronger around the
steering head to cope with the
increased forces of the leading-link
forks, but also including a new
swingarm, rear 'L supports and upper friction damper mounting tubes. All
these machines now had the short-
Although closely related to the Dondolino, the Gambalga had a different frame and leading-link forks. Early versions were
painted silver, and each year saw further development: this 1950 version has 20-inch wheels.
180km/h (112mph). This was not
really enough to make the twin totally
competitive; however, the great rider Tenni still won the 1947 Italian championship on a Bicilindrica.
There were only a few changes from the pre-war version with its
Brampton forks. The cylinder heads and cylinders (with cast-iron liners)
were cast in electron, the rear cylinder
now having horizontal finning. In
1948 the Bicilindrica received a new frame, designed by Antonio Micucci,
and telescopic forks. The frame was quite advanced, using the upper tube
The final version of the Gambalunga of 195l was red and featured a more streamlined tail section and a detachable float bowl Dell'Orto carburettor.
stroke engine, so 'Gambalunga"was technically no longer the correct des-
was a functional elegance about the design, but not the beauty of those
ignation.
less exotic earlier machines.
The following year the final Gambalungaappeared, now with
The 500 Bicilindrica
another rear mudguard/seat unit and an engine with a 35mm remote float bowl Dell'Orto carburettor producing 37bhp at 6,000rpm. This final version was again red, but the quest for aero-
The banning of supercharging immediately after the war allowed the prewar Bicilindrica to be brought out of
retirement to resume racing duties.
Limited to the 72 octane petrol availdynamic efficiency meant that the able at the time, the maximum power Gambalunga had lost the classic lines was reduced to 42bhp, and the correof the Condor and Dondolino. There sponding topspeed to around
as an oil tank, and the Micuccidesigned forksfeatured hydraulic
damping and a leading axle. With its bulbous tank it was an unusual-look-
ing motorcycle, but exceptionally well engineered.
Tenni took it to the Isle of Man
where he entered the Senior TT. This
time he could not emulate his
Lightweight win of 1937 as he was slowed by ignition problems after the
fourth lap, but he still set the fastest
lap at nearly 141km/h (88mph). This would be Tenni's final race as he was killed testing the experimental 250
twin at practice for the Swiss Grand
Antonio Micucci designed a new frame, with telescopic forks, for the 1948 Bicilindrica. On this underrated motorcycle Tenni set the fastest lap in the Senior TT that year.
38
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
POST-WAR RACING: SUCCESS WITH EARLIER DESIGNS
39
Left: Cann being congratulated after his
1948 Lightweight TT win. (Ivar de Gier collection)
Below: Maurice Cann crossing the finish line to take victory on an Albatros in the
1948 Lightweight TT. (Ivar de Gier
collection)
Prix at Berne shortly afterwards. The
Bicilindrica still remained competitive in the Italian championship, Bertacchini winning this in 1948. The Bicilindrica was also used to set several world records that year, in partic-
ular in Piero Taruffi's four-wheeled
- Bisiluro that achieved a top speed of 207km/h. (129mph).
The Albatros
The 250 Albatros of 1939-40 was to be even more successful than the 500 in its transition to post-war competi-
tion. Still very much based on the 1926 TT250, unlike the Dondolino
and Gambalunga the Albatros was an uncompromised racing design from the outset. Following the failure of the
new 250 Parallel Twin, the Albatros also became the basis of the factory. 250s, and during 1946-48 was almost
the 250cc Italian championship in
1946, Tenni in 1947, and Lorenzetti
in 1948. At the first Isle of Man
Tourist Trophy races since the end of
the war, in 1947, Irish rider Manliff
Barrington rode an Albatros to victory
in the Lightweight TT at an average speed of 73.22mph (118km/h), with
Maurice Cann second. Cann took the
event the following year at 75.18mph (121km/h).
Compared to the pre-war Albatros, the post-war version lost the electrical system and kickstart, and eventually the casting on the crankease for the dynamo; this reduced the weight to around 120kg (2651b). Despite the low octane fuel, power was increased to 23bhp at 7,000rpm with a larger carburettor (32mm), and a larger inlet valve (35mm). Top speed was around 170km/h (105mph). However, by 1948 the Albatros was coming under somepressure from the resurrected Benelli. With its girder forks and prewar brakes, it suffered from an obsolete chassis. This would be rectified in 1949 Gambalunghino. However,even though the latter usurped it as a Grand Prix racer, and
withthe
Italy and other countries until 1954; of five spur gears. The 360° crankshaft many were fitted with later was in one piece with three main Gambalunghino parts to keep them bearings. The cylinder head featured
competitive. The Albatros was always
an expensive motorcycle, on a par with the Dondolino, and only 34 were manufactured between 1940 and
1949.
The 250 Bicilindrica
(Parallel Twin)
It had been intended to replace the 250 single with a new twin in 1947, but in the event this did nor happen. Tio prototypes were constructed, one
in 1947 and one in 1948, but they proved disappointing. The air-cooled double overhead camshaft parallel twin was an interesting design, but
with a 10:1 compression ratio it could only manage 25bhp at 9,000rpm after some development. Designed by
Antonio Micucci, the all-alloy engine
had square dimensions of 54 x 54mm, dry sump lubrication with an external
29mm inlet and 23mm exhaust valves
inclined at a wide 80°, with two coil
springs per valve.
Thebiggest handicap facing the
Parallel Twin was that it was originally
intended to be run with a super-
charger, these being banned before the design was completed. As with many other immediate post-war
designs, few alterations were made to
compensate. Thus the Parallel Twin
93
was left with several features that were less than optimum for an unsupercharged engine, notably the wide valve angle and weighty engine to withstand increased horsepower and
rpm.
Technologically advanced materials were used throughout in the 250 twin: electron for the crankcases, cylinders
and brakes, hydronalium for the
frame, and aluminium-bronze com-
oil tank, and a four-speed gearbox. bustion chambers. With leading-axle
the Albatros was not offered after The cylinders were inclined at 60°t elescopic front forks, and a light 1949, it continued to have a highly from the vertical and the twin over- weight of only 125kg (276lb), it would successful life as a privateer 250 in head camshafts were driven by a train have been expected to outclass the
The post-war Albatros had no electrical system, the model shown here also having the dynamo drive removed from the crankcase
casting.
40
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
Left: Althoughtechnologically quite
advanced, the 250 Parallel Twin failed to meet expectations. The 1948 version is
still on display in the Moto Guzzi
museum.
Below left: The Moto Guzzi racing
department was well prepared for the
1949 season. This late - 1948 photo shows
a 250 Parallel Twin on the bench at the
top right, a Gambalunga lower right, and several of the new Gambalmghio.
Albatros, but this was not the case.
Testing only confirmed the superiority
- of the traditional Moto Guzzi layout,
which provided a lower centre of
gravity for a better-balanced machine, although two were taken to the Isle of Man in 1948. Manliff Barrington then
showed that the twin was not a lost cause when he led the Lightweight
TT for the first two laps at an average
speed of around 75mph (47mph).
Unfortunately the death of Omobono
Tenni while testing the Bicilindrica 250 a month later sealed its fate and
4.
Expanding the customer base
Guzzi was also fortunate in that
during the early part of the 1950s the
company made very few marketing errors and most of its products were sound. The problems for Moto Guzzi
occurred towards the end of the decade, and into the 1960s, when
they failed to respond to the general
downturn facing motoreycling.
Much of the initial credit for this
great post-war revival of Moto Guzzi
must be given to Enrico Parodi,
Giorgio's brother. Enrico had joined the company in 1942 while Giorgio was serving with the Italian forces.
Injuries sustained to his eyes and arm saw Giorgio retire to Genoa in 1945, Enrico taking over as day-to-day manager even though he still spent much time in Genoa. By this time Emanuele Vittorio, and his nephew Angelo, had both died. Giorgio still maintained an
interest in what was happening at
Mandello, but died suddenly in
August 1955. Unfortunately, while undoubtedly a brilliant man, Enrico
later lost direction and foresight, con-
tributing to the crisis the company
faced during the 1960s. When Carlo Guzzi also died in November 1964 Enrico was left to salvage what he could, but by then it was too late. By
1966 the Parodi fortune had been lost
and the company was put into
receivership.
The Guzzino, Motoleggera and Cardellino
Enrico Parodi always saw cheap and basic transportation at the lower end of the market as the key for survival. Sensing this demand even before the end of the war, he had Carlo Guzzi
initially design a 38cc two-stroke
engine that could be mounted on a
Whilethatitwas the racetrack Moto
Guzzi its reputation, none of that success would have been possible without secure financial and managerial back-
ing. Much of the production during
the 1930s had consisted of the smaller
P series, but it had been the venerable unsprung Sport 15 with the opposedvalve engine that had still dominated
in terms of sales.
during the Second
Production
World War had largely been limited to
military vehicles of 500cc, but after
the war there was little demand for
either military vehicles or larger-
capacity motorcycles. As with many other Italian motorcycle manufacturers, survival in those rather grim days
relied on producing vehicles that people could afford. Immediately
responding to market demands, there was now a distinct change in emphasis
in the type of motorcycles manufac-
tured.
With the release of the two-stroke
64cc Guzzino, Guzzi entered the
world of mass production.
Soon
renamed the Motoleggera 65, this was SO successful that production at Mandello increased from 4,518 in
1946 to 15.654 in 1947. By 1950 total
Moto Guzzi production was 30,236 motorcycles, 22,115 of which were 65cctwo-strokes.These mundane
vehicles of transportation may have been of little interest to the enthusiast, but the revenue generated from
their sales enabled Moto Guzzi to expandits racing programme and
create expensive and sophisticated
racing prototypes. Because of this they
are extremely important in the historical context.
had always given slory
bicycle in the manner of Ducati's
there was no more development.
In 1949 came the inaugural world championship for motorcycles, championship in which Guzzi, like most manufacturers, was especially
a
keen to participate. Prior to 1949 there had been only individual Grands Prix, and the European
Championship. Thus entries from the various manufacturers in Italy, Britain and Germany were largely dependent
on the particular event. Now there
was an opportunity for all manufacturers to compete for one championship, and it was the start of a golden
Albatros
era of racing. Taking
transforming itthe into
the
and
Gambalunghino, and more development of the Bicilindrica, gave Guzzi
the perfect machinesforthis new
championship. As with the 1930s, the
1950s was to be one of the great
decades for the company.
Cucciolo. Soon this idea, the Colibri (Hummingbird), was replaced by one that incorporated a 65cc two-stroke engine in a complete frame and running gear, and thus the Guzzino was born. With Carlo Guzzi now assuming an 'elder statesman' design role, other engineers were given more responsi bility. Carcano was involved in developing the Gambalunga, and Antonio
Micucci the Guzzino. Micucci had
joined the company during the war as
a two-stroke specialist, and started
work on the Guzzino as early as 1944.
Where the Guzzino really suc-
ceeded was that it looked and operated more like a motorcycle than its competition, which in 1946 were pri-
marily bicycles with engines attached.
Although it had 26-inch wheels, the
blade-type front forks were sprung, as was the pressed steel swingarm. Both
wheels featured lateral drum brakes.
7
The frame was an excellent and
simple design, consisting of a single
straight 50mm tube connecting the steering head with the swingarm. A
subframe supporting the 6.5-litre fuel
tank and solo seat was attached to
this frame tube, with the engine
mounted underneath the frame. This,
too, was quite advanced for its day, being a 64cc two-stroke with rotary valve induction. Cast entirely in alu-
minium, with the cylinder inclined
30° to the horizontal, the 42 x 46mm
engine produced a modest 2bhp at 5,000rpm. Because of the poor fuel
available the compression ratio was
only 5.5:1, with the cylinder fed by a
Dell'Orto MA 13mm carburettor. In typical Guzzi fashion the primary
42
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
EXPANDING THE CUSTOMER BASE
43
records,
one with a modified
Motoleggera. On the Charrat-Saxon road in Switzerland. Raffaele Alberti
set, amongst others, a 75cc flying mile
record at
96.072 km/h (59.7mph). Luigi Cavanna also set several 350cc
records at the same time with the supercharged 250. Later, at
Montlhery. further records were set with a 73cc version (46 x 46mm) of
the Motoleggera. In September 1950,
ridden byGianni Leoni and Bruno
Rutto in addition to Alberti, a total of
33 75cc and 100cc records were set.
The little Motoleggera had such a
following during the years immedi
ately after the war that in 1949 Moto
Guzzi organised a rally at Mandello for Guzzino owners. This was so success-
ful that 14.000 people attended, with over 12,500 bikes, causing a traffic. jam all the way to the nearby town of Lecco. Gradually the price and specifeation was reduced until 1954 when the Motoleggera became the Cardellino (Goldfinch).
As with all successful Guzzi designs, the basic Guzzino of 1946 was to have a long production run, the Cardellino
finally ending in 1963. So successful was the Motoleggera that it was also
built in a joint venture with Motor
Guzzi Hispania of Barcelona; the bikes
were identical but for tank and side
cover decals.
With buyers now turning towards larger-displacement motorcycles, the Cardellino initially remained at 65cc. but with a lower price and specification than before. Most noticeable was a reduction in wheel size to 20 inches
and a rear subframe that included a
mudguard attachment with adjustable friction shock absorbers, In 1955 the Cardellino received telescopic front forks and revised styling. and by 1957 the engine had grown to 73cc. Now in two versions, the Lusso (Luxury) and Turismo, the 45 x 46mm engine pro-
duced 2.6bhp at 5,200rpm with a 6.4:1 compression ratio. The Lusso had a larger (8.5-litre) fuel tank and
gained some girth over its predecessor.
weighing in at 60kg (13216):the
Turismo weighed slightly less at 57kg (1261b). Finally the hand gearchange
was replaced by a foot-operated type. In 1958 came the Nuovo Cardellino,
which featured the 73cc engine with
thealuminium cylinderand hard-
chromed barrel that had been
pioneered on the Zigolo.
The final version of the Cardellino was the 83cc version of 1962. Boring the 73cc engine to 48mm and increas-
ing the compression to 7:1 saw the
power increase modestly to 2.9bhp at
5,200грm. The 83 Cardellino also fea-
tured twin shock absorber rear sus-
pension and weighed around 58kg
(1101b). Production ended in 1963
with 3,732 units constructed that year. By that stage the design was
beginning to show its age. It was still a
three-speed two-stroke singlethat could barely top65km/h (40mph). Not surprisingly there waslittle
demand for such basic transportation, especially considering the recession
facing the motorcycle market in general. To further seal the
Cardellino's fate, the company was in crisis in the mid-1960s.
The Galletto
Following the success of the Guzzino
GALLETTO
MOTO GUZZI
Offering a unique combination of scooter and motorcycle, the Galletto was extremely
The Motoleggera spearheaded Moto Guzz's public relations exercises in the years
immediately after the war. Here, at a Holy Year rally in Rome in 1950, three 65s draw the chariot of former racer Rio Berton dressed as an ancient Roman.
lar in an era where basic transporta-
drive was by gear (initially straight-cut
tion was in demand. With a name
but soon helical) and the clutch a wet
multi-plate type. The gearbox was a hand-change three-speed. Weighing only 45kg (991b), the top speed was hardly earth-shattering at 50km/h
change to Moroleggera 65, production
continued virtually unchanged through to 1949, when the bike was
fitted with a stronger swingarm, reinforced forks and a cast-iron cylinder.
(31mph). The most significant aspect of the Guzzino was that it was cheap and reliable, and hence hugely popu-
On 28 February 1948 Guzzi once again attempted several world speed
Throughout the 1950s the Motoleggera and Cardellino accounted for nearly half of Moto Guzzi production, and were successfully promoted as cheap transport for the worker. This is a brochure for the 1958 Cardellino Lusso. (Ivar de Gier collection)
motoleggera
popular for 15 years. This is the brochure for the 192cc version of 1960. (Ivar de Gier collection)
minium, in particular the instrument
mounting plate, engine side cover larger utilitarianmotorcycle.An plates, and legshields on the early unusual and highly successful motor- versions.
rally in 1949, Carlo Guzzi decided that the time was right for a slightly
cycle/scooter hybrid, this was called The overhead valve four-stroke the Galletto (Cockerel). Indicative of engine was designed by Carlo Guzzi Enrico Parodi's intuitive feeling for specifically for the Galletto and was themarket during those post-war initially 150cc with a bore and stroke years, the Galletto was neither a true of 60 x 53mm. The crankcase, cylin-
der and cylinder head were cast in
scooter nOt a motorcycle. It was
aluminium. It was a typical Guzzi hor-
designed so that a woman could oper-
izontal single with an external flywheel, buthad thecrankshaft unusually incorporated in the left
ate it wearing a dress, hence the
enclosure of the engine and large rear
mudguard. Other practical features called for the Galletto to turn almost around its axis. While Ducati failed
crankcase with only one flywheel. By
the time it went into production the engine size had grown to160cc
miserably with their ambitious scooter,
the Cruiser of 1953, Guzzi found a niche with their Galletto. After a peak of 12,305 in 1950, production settled
(62mm bore) and this size lasted until
1952. The 26mm valves were oper-
ated by pushrods and rockers, and
was uprated to 175cc by boring the engine to 65mm. The compression
ratio was increased slightly to 6:1 and a four-speed gearbox fitted. This version lasted two years before the engine
grew.again in 1954, to 192cc. By
lengthening the stroke of the 175 to
58mm and increasing the compression ratio once again (to 6.4:1). 7.5bhp was now developed at 5,200rpm. The cylinder was now cast-iron instead of alloy with a liner. On the 192 the flywheel magneto was deleted and a dynamo mounted above the engine together with battery and coil igni-
tion, which meant a higher engine
enclosure. Other small changes were a
smaller rear mudguard andlarger
headlight. In this guise the Galletto
down to around 4,000 a year before
declining in the early 1960s.
Distinguished by interchangeable 17-inch wheels (including an optional spare), the Galletto offered the limited weather protection of a scooter,
with a tubular and pressed-steel frame
incorporating the steering head and fuel tank. The spare wheel could be mounted in front of the engine and
could also function as a crash bar. For those Gallettos without a spare wheel there was an aluminium cover. Many of the other body parts were also alu-
remained unchangedthrough until lubrication was dry sump. With a 1960.
5.6:1 compression ratio and a Dell'Orto MA 18 BS 1 carburettor,
6bhp was produced at 5,200rpm. The three-speed gearbox was operated by a pedal. The front suspension was by leading link forks, and the rear by a single-sided swingarm with horizontal
coil springs and an eccentric chain adjuster. The standard colour was an ivory-beige,and with a weight of
107kg (23616) the 160cc Galletto was capable of around 80km/h (50mph).
Barely two years later the Galletto
The final version appeared in 1961,
still with the 192cc engine but now with 7.7bhp and a 7:1 compression ratio. In an endeavour to compete with the new compact cars that were becoming more affordable, a Marelli 12-volt 75-watt dynastart was attached behind the engine and con-
nected to the flywheel by a V belt for
cardellino
73 cc
starting. New bodywork included an aluminium headlight enclosure, and
MOTO GUZZI
load-adjustable
hydraulic
shock
absorbers accompanied the electric
44
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
EXPANDING THE CUSTOMER BASE
45
work. The Micucci-designed rotary
valve two-stroke differed considerably
from that of the Motoleggera. Not only was the cylinder horizontal, but
there werealso completely new
With square engine dimensions (50 x 50mm) and a 6:1
crankcases.
compression ratio, the first Zigolo produced 4bhp at 5,200гpm.
With its 19-inch wheels the Zigolo
looked more like a motorcycle than the Moroleggera, but offered a very basic specification. The front suspen-
sion was by undamped telescopic
forks, while the rear swingarm used a
rubber element in compression with Hartford-type friction dampers. Underneath the bodywork was a spine frame, and while weighing in at 75kg (1651b), the three-speed Zigolo could achieve 76km/h (47mph). To empha-
sise the utilitarian nature of the
machine it was painted grey, including the wheel rims. There was no chrome
and the rear friction dampers and
silencer were blued.
With initial production of 6,107 in 1953, Moto Guzzi was so encouraged by the Zigolo's reception that a more powerful dual-seat Sport version was 98cc Zigolo (Bunting). This was a new planned for the following year. In the design intended to All the gap event this did not happen, but 1954 between the Motoleggera and saw theLusso, with much more Galletto and was also unusual in that attractive red paintwork and a it featured partially enclosed body- chromed fuel tank. Although the
start, which unfortunately was not the most reliable system. It was mounted behind the engine where it was sus-
ceptible to debris thrown from the
rear wheel, There was also a considerable increase in weight due the added
to
electrical equipment, 134kg (2951b), but the top speed remained
in the region of 85km/h (53mph). The cosmetic facelift and electric start still
was not enough to save the Galletto and production ended in 1965, when only 1,500 were manufactured. Problems with the electric start
notwithstanding, the Galletto over its 15-year production span established
itself as a well-designed and well-engineered vehicle with exceptional relia-
bility. A tribute to its excellence is that in the small towns of Italy, and
particularly those around Lake Como,
Gallettos are still a regular sight on the roads, which is something that cannot be said about too many other
utilitarian motorcycles nearly 50 years
old.
The Zigolo In 1953 the two-stroke line was also expanded with the addition of the
with a compression ratio of 7.5:1 pro-
engine was unchanged, the Lusso also had a dual seat and was distinguished
by 17-inch wheels. Introduction of the
Lusso saw production of the Zigolo more than double to 14,793 in 1954 and 15,800 in 1955. It is interesting
that during this heyday period of
racing for Moto Guzzi, when total production was around 40,000 machines a year, the Cardellino,
Galletto and Zigolo accounted for the
entire output bar 2-3,000 Airones
and a few hundred Falcones.
In 1958 the Zigolo Series II was
introduced. While only in production for two years, this now featured a light alloy cylinder with a hard chromed
barrel that had been pioneered on the Grand Prix racing four-strokes. It was
a significant technical advance for
two-stroke engines, and soon found
its way to the Cardellino. Later it would feature on four-stroke Moto
Guzzi engines, in particular the later
V7. This new cylinder allowed the compression ratio to be increased to
7.5:1. and power to 4.6bhp at
5,200гpm. With the 17-inch wheels of the Lusso, the Series II weighed 77kg (1701b) and had a top speed of around 80km/h (50mph).
The final version of the Zigolo appeared in 1959 and ran through until 1965. Now with a bore and
stroke of 52 x 52mm, the 110cc Zigolo
Bridging the gap between the Motoleggera and Galletto was the Zigolo. This is a publicity photo of the 98cc Zigolo Lusso of 1954. less starkly presented than the regular Turismo.
duced 4.2bhp at 5,200rpm. The car-
burettor was now a Dell'Orto MAF 18 Bl (up from 15mm), the exhaust was
a canister type underneaththe
swingarm, and the telescopic front
forks now featuredoil damping.
Weight was much the same as before at 78kg (1721b), but the three-speed
Zigolo 110 was still pressed to achieve
80km/h (50mph), By 1965 this
modest performance was no longer satisfactory, and although 110 Zigolo production had initially peakedat 12,310 in 1960, by 1965 only 1,925 were manufactured. The motorcycle was not only obsolete by that stage, but also out of tune with the market-
place.
The Lodola
Since the inaugural world champi-
onship of 1949, Moto Guzzi had been
one of the foremost names on the
racetrack. By 1956 the company had
won a considerable number of world
and national championship events
and was pouring considerable energy
and resources into its racing pro-
gramme. Yet in terms of production Moto Guzzi was still manufacturing two-strokes of 65 and 98cc, the utili-
tarian Galletto, and the ageing Astore
and Falcone. There seemed to be no correlation between the magnificent
racing motorcycles and the Moto
Guzzis available to the consumer.
The first Giro d'Italia, a road race
for motorcycles up to 175cc, took place in 1953, and proved exceptionally successful, even rivalling the traditional Milano-Taranto event. Seeing the domestic demand for lightweight sporting motorcycles increasing,
Enrico Parodi encouraged Carlo Guzzi
to design one last engine before he
retired. The result was the Lodola
(Skylark), a 175cc overhead camshaft
four-stroke single that sported many new features for a Moto Guzzi.
Even though the Lodola was not really envisaged as a competition machine in the manner of the contemporary Mondiall and Ducati, market demands dictated that Carlo an overhead Guzzi incorporate camshaft. Driven by a chain rather than the more expensive bevel gears
used byother manufacturers, the
cylinder was inclined at 45° rather
MoTo Guzzi
175 cc.
Although more sporting than the Lodola Normale, the 175 Sport of 1958 was still no
match for the comparable Ducati or Mondial. (Ivar de Gier collection)
than horizontal. The cam chain also
featured a novel chain tensioner via a
rocker and steel platenearthe camshaft; this was intentionally
designed to compensate for different rates of expansion. With oversquare
dimensions of 62 x 57.8mm, the
entire engine was cast in aluminium
alloy. The 34mm inlet and 31mm exhaust valves used enclosed coil
springs rather than the usual hairpin type, and with a 7.5:1 compression ratio and a Dell'Orto UB 22 BS 2A carburettor, 9bhp was developed at
mance left the Lodola overshadowed by the competition from other Italian manufacturers, and in 1958 a Sport
version was made available.
Although an increase in compres-
sion to 9:1 saw power up to 11bhp.
the Sport was still a relatively sedate performer with a top speed around
120km/h (75mph). Changes from the first Lodola included larger brakes and a dual seat. The shock absorbers could be adjusted in two positions, forward for solo or upright with a passenger. By
1958production of the Lodola was
4,900, down from the 6,120 of 1957. Moto Guzzi needed the model to be engine continued Guzzi traditions. successful as it had tooled the plant at The lubrication was dry sump and the Mandello at considerable expense. flywheel was still outside the Thus 1959 saw an increase in engine crankcases, although now hidden size to 235cc, the larger bike being underneath an aluminium side cover. titled the Gran Turismo and replacing
6,000грm.
In many other respects the Lodola
Primary drive was by helical gear, the the ageing Airone.
clutch a wet multi-plate type, and The increase in engine size also there was a four-speed gearbox. The brought some major changes in the crankshaft was a three-piece affair design. The single overhead camshaft with roller big-end and ballmain was replaced by valves operated by bearings. pushrods and rockers, and the alloy The frame was a full-duplex cradle cylinder by one of cast-iron. Both the type with oil-damped telescopic front bore and stroke were altered to forks and a swingarm with twin shock achieve the increase in capacity, the absorbers. Brakes were a pair of single dimensions now being 68 x 64mm. cast-iron drums laced to a pair of alloy Although less sporting than the 175, wheel rims, an 18-inch on the front the 235 Lodola soon gained a reputaand 17-inch on the rear. Weighing in tion for solid and reliable, if not excit-
at 109kg (2401b), the first Lodola was capable of around 110km/h (68mph).
Unfortunately this modest perfor-
ing, performance. It was also in a
lower state of tune than the 175, and with its 7.5:1 compression ratio still
EXPANDING THE CUSTOMER BASE
47
46
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
Czechoslovakia, in 1959, Guzzi riders
took four gold medals, helping the
Italian team to second overall.
For 1960 the
235cc Lodola
Regolarità was offered to privateers,
and while it featured a similar engine to the previous year's factory 235, the
weightwas upslightly to 110kg
(24211b). The factory continued to
develop the Lodola for trials. Victories
followed in the
Italian
Valli
Bergamache Trials Championship, and six gold medals at the 1960 ISDT
of Bad Ausee in Austria. In 1961 the capacity was increased to 247cc (68 x
68mm), with a five-speed gearbox.
With an 11:1 compression ratio, 16bhp was now produced at
7,500rpm, enough for a string of successes and several gold medals in the 1961 and 1962 ISDT.
The high point for the Lodola was the ISDT of 1963, held in Spindleruv Mlyu, Czechoslovakia. With Guzzis comprising the entire Italian entry (five Lodolas and five Stornellos),
Italy won the Silver Vase and all ten
by
riders gained gold medals. In a world
increasingly dominated two-strokes, Moto Guzzi had shown the
benefits and qualities of a well devel.
oped four-stroke. At the end of that year Guzzi withdrew from interna-
tional trials competition and that was
the final curtainforthe Lodola
Regolarità. The Stornello, however,
lived on a little longer.
The Stornello
At the same time as the Lodola lost its
overhead camshaft for the cheaper
solution of overhead valves operated by pushrods and rockers, Moto Guzzi decided to enter the world of the basic lightweight four-stroke with the Stornello (Starling). Given his first production bike since Guzzi's withdrawal from racing, Giulio Carcano
designed this new machine to be
intentionally inexpensive to manufac-
ture. It incorporated many features
unusual for a Guzzi. The single cylin-
der was only tilted 25º forward and
the two overhead valves were parallel-
mounted and operated by pushrods and rockers. The lubrication was wet sump and the bore and stroke undersquare at 52 x 58mm.The primary
drive also had three helical gears, so
that unlike other Guzzis the engine
Designed by Carcano, the Stomello was a brilliant and attractive little motorcycle. In 1968 it was enlarged to 160cc, and this is a first series 160.
rotated forwards. The gearbox was
four-speed, the clutch the usual multi-
plate type, and ignition was by a flywheel magneto. It was also the first four-stroke engine to feature pressure
die-cast crankcases. Hardly a high-performance design, the 123cc
Stornello Turismo of 1960 had an 8:1 compression ratio and a Dell'Orto ME 18 BS carburettor. Maximum power
was 6.8bhp.
The duplex frame used the engine
as a stressed member, and telescopic forks, twin rear shock absorbers and 17-inch wheels were fitted. Offered with either a single or dual seat, it
Replacing the Airone, the 235cc Lodola Gran Turismo offered even more sedate performance than the 175. The overhead camshaft made way for pushrods and rockers and the weight was increased to 115kg. (Streetbike)
nomic rationalisation meant that production of the Lodola was finished. It was significant that the crisis at Moto
around 110km/h (68mph).
produced 11bhp. Contributing to this
milder tune was an air cleaner inside
After a hiccup in 1961, when only 650 Lodolas were produced, the Gran Turismo continuedthrough until 1965. Although a prototype 247cc
an airbox in front of the oil tank.
With an increase in weight to 115kg (2531/21b), the Gran Turismo had a similar performance to the earlier 175
Guzzi during the mid- 1960s coincided with the departure of the four model lines that had sustained the company
Sport version was displayed at the 1965 Milan Show, by that year eco-
during 1950s. Unfortunately the company also let these basic motorcycles run well past their 'use-by date', and this undoubt-
SO admirably
Lodola Normale, and a top speed of
The Lodola had a more successful life as a trials machine. The Regolarità of 1959-61 was 235cc and still used an overhead camshaft engine.
edly contributed to the difficulties
made for a very small and light
machine at 92kg (203lb) and, with a 100km/h (62mph) top speed, performance was sprightly. Offering similar performance to the 235cc Lodola at a price 44 per cent lower, the Stornello was immediately successful, and 5,610 were produced in 1960. Still, as a per-
Redesigned in 1970 to accept a five-speed gearbox, the Stomello was not only uglier but also considerably heavier - a case of new not always being better. This is a 125, but the 160 was almost identical.
faced in 1966.
The Lodola did, however, have a
competition life as a trials motorcycle. Following their withdrawal from road
racing at the end of 1957, Moto Guzzi
entered prepared Lodolas in selected
trials events during 1958 in prepara-
tion for a more serious attempt in
1959. Both 175 and 235cc machines were developed (both with overhead camshafts), the 175 weighing 107kg
(236lb) and developing12bhp at
and the 235 weighing
108kg (2381b) and producing 14bhp at 7,500rpm. In the International Six
Day Trial held in Gottwaldov,
48
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
EXPANDING THE CUSTOMER BASE
49
formance machine it was overshadowed by the competition and the end of 196l saw the introduction of the
Stornello Sport.
For the Sport there was a new cylinder head, now with inclined
rather than parallel valves. The compression ratio was increased to 9.8:1, a
Dell'Orto UB 20 B carburettor was fitted, and power was up to 10bhp. Other changes included fitting lower
handlebars, a racing-style seat and 17inch alloy wheel rims. The Sport ran until 1967, by which time it had been
slightly restyled but was essentially
unchanged.
From 1965 many variations on the Stornello theme appeared. It was the only lightweight Guzzi to survive the rationalisation of 1966, and the first versions were a Scrambler, theES. (Fuori Strada), and Regolarità. The 125 Regolarità was derived from the prize-winning 1963 ISDT bikes, and with a 24mm carburettor and 11.3:1 compression it produced 12bhp at 8,000гpm. In 1965 and 1966 460 of these purpose-built competition machines were produced. In the latter
year they were joined by the Sport
America (or Sport USA) and the
Scrambler USA. Some of these US
bikes were also sold in Europe, a few to the police.
Italian theStornello grew to
In 1968
153cc (58 x 58mm bore and stroke) and the 160 was born. The magneto was replaced by an alternator with
battery and coil ignition, and the
weight increased to 107kg (236lb).
The engine now featured a large bulge
on the right crankcase cover for the alternator. Developing 12.6bhp
at
7,500rpm, the 160 had a top speed of 118km/h (73mph).
Both the 125 and 160cc versions of the Storello came in for a redesign in 1971 and the range was rationalised
to three versions, the 125, 160 and 125 Scrambler. These would continue through to 1975, but only modest numbers were manufactured. To
incorporate a five-speed gearbox the
engine cases were redesigned with
ugly alloy outer covers and both the
125 and 160 now featured inclined
overhead valves. An increase in compression, to 9.6:1 for the 125, saw power increase to 13.4bhp at 7,400грm. The 160 now had a 9.5:1
compression ratio and produced 16.2bhp at 7.400rpm. While there
was also a corresponding increase in weight, to 113kg (249lb), the perfor-
mance of the new five-speed versions was improved. The 125 could achieve
117km/h (73mph), while the 160 managed 122km/h (76mph). The
Scrambler weighed slightly more at 117kg (2601b). There was completely new suspension and bodywork for the new versions. However, by 1974, with
Alejandro De Tomaso at the helm, it
was obvious that the new range of
smaller Moto Guzzis would be Benelli-
derived. Also regulations were beginning to affect all motorcycles having a mandatory left-side gearshift and this
would mean another redesign. The final 1,040 Stornellos rolled out of Mandello in 1974, after a 15-year
production run. From now on all small single-cylinder Moto Guzzis would be two-strokes.
The Dingo
As he had immediately after the war,
Enrico Parodi was convinced, even in the early 1960s with the severe down-
turn affecting the industry, that the
By 1968 the Dingo had a four-speed foot-operated gearchange. In 1970 the range was
restyled and consisted of the Supersport, Grantismo, and Cross. (Ivar de Gier collection)
П 50)
MOTO GUZZI
future for Moto Guzzi lay in the
production of motorcycles for the
lower end of the market. Thus in 1963. as the Cardellino was being discontin-
ued, the Dingo was born.
Produced in two versions, the
Turismo and Sport, the 49cc Dingo two-stroke had a bore and stroke of
38.5 x 42mm, and with a Dell'Orto SHA 14.9 carburettor produced
1.4bhp at 4,800rpm. A very basic machine, it featured a three-speed
hand-change gearbox and a pressedsteel frame. In 1966 these two ver-
sions were joined by the Dingo Cross
and the Dingo Super with a tubular
steel frame, but most development
occurred from 1967, when the engine
featured a four-speed foot-operated gearbox and a GT version joined the Cross.
By this stage Guzzi had become part
of SEIMM, a government-controlled
holding company (see Chapter 7).
Despite the rationalisation that saw the disappearance of four models, the unremarkable Dingo not only contin-
ued but was developed further. In
1968 came a Dingo Supersport, and in
1970 the entire range was restyled. The three-speed Turismo (3V)
returned, and there was a new version, the MM (Monomarcia) with an
automatic centrifugal clutch and
pedals. Unremarkable it may have
been, but the Dingo was moderately
successful. Even while it is not exactly the most fondly remembered Guzzi of the late 1960s and early '70s, it contributed to the commercial viability of the company prior to the De Tomaso era. Production continued until 1976.
The Trotter and Chiù
An even more basic machine emerged
from Mandello in 1966, the 41cc Trotter. An entry-level two-stroke
moped, it initially had an engine with a bore and stroke of 37 x 38mm. As cheap transportation it was a concept reminiscent of the Motoleggera, but
with its rigid frame and 16-inch
wheels was even less of a real motorcycle. The Dell'Orto SHA 14.9 carbu-
rettor was mounted in front of the
engine and an automatic centrifugal clutch was fitted. In 1970 the Trotter grew to 49cc (38.5 x 42mm) and the
cylinder was placed horizontally. There was now also the Trotter
The final, and most sophisticated, Trotter was the Mark of 1970-73. This had leading-link front forks and a twin shock absorber swingarn.
Special M with leading-link front sus-
pension, the Trotter Special V with a stepless transmission powered by a V. belt, and the Trotter Mark M, with a rear swingarm. Finally there was the
Trotter Mark V, with the stepless transmissionand a sprung frame.
These four Trotters continued in production until 1973, by which time De Tomaso was more interested in pro-
moting the Benelli two-strokes, and
the Trotter evolved into the Chiù.
Like the earlier Zigolo and Dingo, the Trotter was also produced in Spain as a Moto Guzzi Hispania.
With a new horizontal 49cc two-stroke engine (40 x 39mm), the Chiù
was a much more modern-looking
machine than the Trotter. It had
mechanical telescopic front forks and swingarm rear suspension and a more
powerful, 1.5bhp engine than the
Nibbio and Cross 50s, also introduced in 1974. It continued as a Moto Guzzi
until 1976, then remained as the
Benelli Elle until the early 1980s.
De Tomaso bikes: the 250 TS, 125, Cross 50, Nibbio, Magnum, 350/400 GTS, 254, 125 2C 4T, 125 C and 125 TT
The De Tomaso purchase of Moto
Guzzi (see Chapter 8) saw the range
expand to include a number of re-
badged Benellis that were only superficially associated with Mandello del
Lario. The first of these was the 250 TS, produced from 1973 until 1982.
Very much a Benelli 2C, this five-
speed 56 x 47mm two-stroke twin was
almost identical but for chrome cylinder bores and a larger, Dell'Orto VHB
25 B, carburettor. With a 10:1 com-
pression ratio, 30bhp was produced at 7,400грm. This gave the 129kg
(2841b) TS sprightly performance and
a top speed of around 150km/h
(93mph). The first version came with a twin leading shoe front drum brake,
which was replaced by a single 260mm Brembo front dise in 1975. That year it also gained electronic ignition and an ugly square instrument panel. While the Benelli and
Guzzi were similar, the Guzzi was sold as a more upmarket version, but both lacked convenience features like auto-
matic oiling. Thus neither was suc-
cessful against the Japanese in the
market for middleweight two-strokes.
Shortly after the release of the 250 strokame stroke three Betell inspiredTrial,tra. singles,
Tuttoterreno (a trail bike)and
Turismo. Like most of the Benellis
that Guzzi inherited from De Tomaso, these were poorly designed and executed motorcycles that did not com-
pare very well with the Japanese
competition. Although sharing the
same 120cc two-stroke engine and
five-speed gearbox, the Trial produced
14bhp at 6,500rpm, while the
Tuttoterreno and Turismo produced
50
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
EXPANDING THE CUSTOMER BASE
51
After these 125s came the Cross 50 and Nibbio, both with five-speed 50cc two-stroke engines and in production
from 1974 until 1982. The Cross 50 underwent a number of modifications and developments during its lifespan,
notably a later high-riseexhaust system and ABS bodywork. The
Nibbio was a touring version, styled along the lines of the 125 Turismo. In
1976 the 50cc Magnum minibike
joined the range, but this only lasted until 1979.
One of De Tomaso's first projects with Benelli had been to produce a single overhead camshaft four-cylinder engine, in nearly every respect a copy of a Honda design. In 1974 the
350cc version became the Moto Guzzi
350 GTS. This was very closely based
on the excellent Honda engine, but with quality Italian chassis components and Bosch electrics, and could have been a successful motorcycle.
Unfortunately, as with the Benelli 500 four, the Guzzi was perceived as being
too closely derivative of the Honda.
The 350 (50 x 44mm) produced
38bhp at 9,500rpm and featured four Dell'Orto VHB 20 D carburettors.
In 1975 the 350 gained a 300mm
Brembo front disc brake, and also
grew to 400cc, with power from the
50 x 50.6mm engine up to 40bhp.
Weighing in at 175kg (386lb), it was no lightweight, but was a smooth and sophisticated machine. However, at
that time Honda also released their
CB40OF, but the world was not ready
for either bike. The Guzzi 350/400
GTS lasted only until 1979.
Another of De Tomaso's more
unusual projects was the 254 of 1977.
Also shared with a Benelli - the
Quattro - the Guzzi version had some
unorthodox features including the
instruments mounted on the fuel tank and plastic bodywork. The tiny fourcylinder engine had cylinders reminiscent of the earlier 500cc racing V8, but a shorter stroke: the bore and stroke were 44 x 38mm. The five-
speed single overhead camshaft 231cc
engine was fed by four Dell'Orto PHBG 18 B carburettors, and with a
10.5:1 compression ratioproduced
27.86hp at 10.500rDm. A 260mm
Grimeca front disc brake was fitted,
the 254 running 18-inch cast allov
wheels front and rear. Although only
fitted with 2.75 and 3.00-inch tyres,
the wheels looked almost too large for the 117kg (2581b) 254. Top speed was around 150km/h (93mph).
An oddity, the 254 remained in
production until 1981, but was not a particularly practical motoreycle for
the street. From 1979 the 254 had a
Brembo front disc brake and a more conventional Le Mans-style instru-
ment panel. De Tomaso also had plans
for a Moto Guzzi version of the
Benelli six-cylinder;
prototype
engine is on display in the Moto Guzzi
museum, but this project was shelved
before anything came of it.
From the 254 emanated the 125 2C
4T (two-cylinder, four-stroke) of
1979. With a 45.4 x 38mm engine dis-
placing 123.57cc, this too featured a
chain-driven single overhead camshaft and two valves per cylinder, a 22.5mm inlet and 18mm exhaust.
Overall, the Benelli experience at Moto Guzzi was not successful. The
motorcycles did not fit into the
Mandello ethos and often the produCts were either inferior too
for
unusual
marketplace.
Fortunately Dethe
Tomaso let Guzzi
maintain its individuality with the V7 series.
The Ercole, Edile, Ercolino, Aiace, Dingotre, Furghino,
• 3 x 3, Motozappa and Motocoltivatore
It must also be remembered that over a very long period some of the most
significant Guzzis, in terms of production if not technical interest, were the
three-wheeledcommercialvehicles.
From the Type 107 of 1928, these was developed into a wide range of models
duction mainstaysfor
30years.
Initially with a 17.8bhp V engine, the major appeal of the Ercole was its cartype five-speed gearbox (plus reverse) and shaft drive. Fully sprung and able to carry 1,500kg, performance was still
only moderate with a top speed of 60km/h (37mph). The Edile, on the other hand, was only produced during 1946 (150 were manufactured), but
with a l6bhp engine, a weight of
1,350kg, a 25km/h (16mph) top speed and no suspension, it was not popular. However, with its enormous 3,600kg
payload, the Edile provided more car-
Modelled very much on the Honda 350 four, the Guzzi 350 and 400 GTS featured
quality Italian suspension and brakes. This is the first 350 - later versions had a Brembo front disc brake.
the Turismo was a single Grimeca
15.4bhp. They all shared a Dell'Orto
VHB 22 BS carburettor, and while the off-road versions weighed 98kg
220mm front disc brake. A few 125
Turismos were also sold in England as
(216lb),the Turismo came in at 78.5kg (1731b). Another feature of
badge-engineered 'Co-
Meriden's
Uno.
Most of the De Tomaso re-badged Benellis did little to uphold the magnificent Moto Guzzi tradition. One of the more interesting was the 254, unusually styled with the instruments incorporated in the top of the fuel tank. (Australian Motorcycle News)
rying capacity than any other Moto Guzzi three-wheeler.
Throughout its life the Ercole was
continually developed. In 1950 the
engine received a light alloy cylinder
and head with enclosed rocker gear,
and in 1952 an automatic advance magneto. A variation with a cab
the various engines that were With a compression ratio of 10.65:1, used motorcycles at thetime. appeared in 1955, and hydraulic and two Dell'Orto PHBG 20 B carbu- Production of this type of vehicle brakes in 1956. In 1959 an electric rettors, 16bhp was produced at lasted until 1980. start and coil ignition was introduced, 10,600гpm.This little five-speed The first commercial vehicles to and later there was a version adapted engine was placed in a 254 chassis so appear after the war were the Ercole to run on methane. Throughout the the dimensions were identical, except and Edile, both using the 500cc V difficult period of the early1960s that weight was reduced to 110kg engine. Ercole production was maintained at (2431b). The claimed top speed was The Ercole (Hercules - the first around 2,000 units a year, before around 130km/h (81mph). Lasting Guzzi to use a Greek mythological tapering off at a few hundred a year in through until 1981, it may not have name) was to be one of Guzzi's pro- the early *70s. By that stage the 500cc seemed like a recipe for success, but the 125 2C 4T was a highly agreeable Three-wheeled goods vehicles played an important part in Moto Guzzi production
using in
little commuting motoreyclethat
thrived on high revs.
The final Benelli-inspired Moto Guzzis were a pair ofparticularly
uninspiring water-cooled two-strokes,
the 125 C (Custom) and 125 TT
(Trail). Introduced at the 1983 Milan Show, it was not until 1985 that they
became available, only being duced ent 1986. The 123. 15c€ (56 x 50mm) single-cylinder engine now
featured automatic oiling, reed valves
and a six-speed gearbox. With a
Dell'Orto PHBL 25 BS carburettor. 16.5bhp was produced at 7,000гpm.
Both models featured monoshock rear suspension, and the 125 C included a
windscreen and a ridiculous 16-inch front wheel, a real tribute to the fash-
ion of the day. The 125 TT, with its
35mm offset axle Marzocchi forks and
21-inch front wheel, was a more effective motorevele but still failed to offer a superior alternative in this competitive segment.
from 1928 until 1980, one of the most successful being the Ercole. Towards the end of its life it had the option of an enclosed cab, and was still powered by the venerable overhead valve 500cc single.
52
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
as well as expected. However, this
engine concept would spawn the later V7 even though there were only a few similarities between the two designs (see Chapter 7).
The intention had been to create a vehicle that could cope with a variety of terrains. By having a shaft drive to
each of the three wheels it had an
amazingly complicated drive system.
Drive to the front wheel was by a
shaft and bevel gear from the steering head, and behind each rear wheel was a smaller wheel that could be adapted
for caterpillar track. The engine was
air-cooled, assisted by a fan in front of
the engine, and incorporated a gear-
box with six forward speeds plus
reverse. Even though it could be used
almost anywhere and in the most
adverse weather conditions,
ulti-
mately the 3 x 3 was unnecessarily
heavy and complicated for the performance it could offer.
There were also three types of agri-
cultural tractors produced in the 49cc Dingo engine came the Dingotre 1960s: the Motozappa G2. of 1965-68, and the Furghino of Motocoltivatore and, for1965, the
Symbolic singles: Airone, Astore and Falcone
Commissioned by the Italian Ministry of Defence, the 3 x 3 Autoveicolo da Montagna of 1961 was extremely complicated, boasting an all-wheel drive with a variable track.
The V-twin 750cc engine shared some of the features of the later V7, but it is incorrect to say that the V7 originated from the 3 x 3.
Zigolo engine in the Aiace covered
single-cylinder engine could no longer
truck of 1961-63 and the three-
provide the level of performance
wheeled agricultural Motozappa 110
expected even from basic commercial vehicles.
of 1965. Even smaller versions
appeared later in the 1960s. With the
With Moto Guzzi at the peak of its
success in the mid-1950s, the 192cc
engine of the Galletto was used to create a smaller goods vehicle, the
1968-70 with a covered cab. None of these underpowered vehicles was very successful.
Ercolino. With a four-speed gearbox, plus reverse, and a payload of 350kg. this would also be a successful model
A more interesting machine was
for the company, production lasting until 1971. In 1958 it received 10-
the 3 x 3 Autoveicolo da Montagna
(Mechanical Mule) of 1961, Powered inch wheels in place of the earlier 14- by Carcano's new 745cc (80 x 75mm) and 15-inch, and an increase in carry- 90° V-twin engine, this three-wheeling capacity to 560kg. It was also drive vehicle was originally intended available with an electric starter. for the Italian Ministry of Defence. It Following the use of the Galletto was an ambitious engineering exerengine came the 110cc two-stroke cise, but at 20bhp it did not perform
Ti come any models of Moto Guzzi have to symbolise the marque, it
has been the post-war Airone, and its larger brothers, the Astore (Goshawk)
and Falcone (Hawk). Although not produced in anything like the numsers of the Cardellino, Galletto or Zigolo, or even the Stornello, it was because they had such long and distinguished production runs that they have become representative of Moto
Guzzi in the post-war period.
The 250cc Airone had made a brief
appearance during 1939 and 1940, with 122 even being manufactured during the war, but it was not until
the end of 1945 that regular production resumed. It was much the same
with the500cc G.T.S., G.T.W. and
G.T.V. Although production had con-
tinued on a very limited scale until
the seven 500s of 1940 to be resurrected, and these, with the V engine,
were to form the basis of the new
Astore, and Falcone, a few years later. The Falcone would also benefit from
the development that the venerable
overhead valve engine received from
racing as a Dondolino and as the
Gambalunga.
The Airone
With 875 manufactured in 1945, the
246cc Airone made up half of that year's total production. It looked a utilitarian type of vehicle with its pressed-steelframe, swingarm and
parallelogram forks, and provided very
modest performance. Still with the pre-war 9.5bhp engine,the 135kg
(2981b) Airone could barely achieve a
speed of 95km/h (59mph). After one year, however, it was updated with upside-down-type telescopic front
1942, these did not become available again until 1946. Even then they were in short supply because the Mandello forks and hydraulic rear shock plant was largely being used for the absorbers, still with the springs hugely successful, and profitable, mounted underneath the engine, the
Guzzino.
new version appearing in 1947.
With demand increasing (1,100
When the Airone made its appearance again after the war it was largely unchanged from the final version of
were produced in 1947), the Airone received continual development. In
1940, which was strongly derived from the sprung-frame 250 P.E. but with the
1948 the cylinder head and barrel
were cast in aluminium, and the
previously exposed rocker
pressed-steel frame of the 1940 version instead of the tubular type that
gear enclosed. At the same time a Sport
version was introduced. This used the pressed-steel frame with a tubular rear section and saw a return to the friction dampers. The engine of the Sport fea-
had appeared on the first Airone.
Although one 500cc G.T.S. with the opposed-valve 13.2bhp engine
was produced in 1946, this engine was
finallydiscontinued after thewar.
tured a different camshaft,thicker valve springs (4.5mm instead of
Starting life in the Normale of 1921, it had had a long and fruitful production
4.2mm), a 25mm Dell'Orto carburet-
tor, and an increase in compression to
run, but was now underpowered and
obsolete. The sprung-frameG.T.V. and G.T.W. were the only versions of
7:1. The power increased to 13.5bhp at 6,000rpm. Completing the sporting
profile were 19-inch Borrani alloy
wheel rims, 200mm alloy drum brakes, lower and narrower handlebars, alloy
friction dampers(ratherthan the
Turismo's steel ones), and a rear pad on the mudguard to allow the rider to adopt a crouched riding position. The
top speed of the 137kg (3021b) Airone Sport was around 118km/h (73mph).
Both the Airone Turismo and Sport
came in for a complete restyle in
1952, together with the introduction
MZO. The Motozappa was produced
from 1961 until 1965 and used the 49ccDingo engine, while the
Motocoltivatore used a short-stroke
*F 100' four-stroke single (80mm stroke
yielding 486cc) with the cylinder inclined 25°.These were manufac-
tured from 1964 to 1966. It is beyond the scope of this book to detail these vehicles exhaustively, but they need to be included as they were produced with a Moto Guzzi trademark.
of a specific Airone Militaire. With styling along the lines of the larger
Falcone, they looked more modern,
but there were also several changes to
the engine and final drive. The manual advance magneto became automatic and a Sin x ½in chain
replaced the earlier /zin x 3/i6in type.
The Turismo now shared its frame with the Sport, but the Turismo still
retained the 9.5bhp engine through to
its demise in 1958. The weight had
increased, however, to 140kg (3091b),
fortunately only marginally denting the Turismo's already sedate perfor-
mance: top speed was around 94km/h (58.4mph).
With the restyle of 1952 came a
lower state of tune for the Sport.
Although now with 12bhp produced
at a lower 5,200rpm it was not enough of a drop to hurt the performance dramatically. After all, even by the stan-
dards of the early 1950s the Airone
was a sedate motorcycle. Other Sport
features such as the thicker valve
springs and Borrani alloy wheel rims
remained. The Airone Militaire dif-
fered in a number of small details from
the Turismo, notably the fitting of
standard legshields, pillion seat and 3.25 x 19-inch tyres. By 1956, how-
54
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
SYMBOLIC SINGLES: AIRONE, ASTORE AND FALCONE
55
HOYO GUZZI
In 1952 the Airone was restyled along the lines of the Falcone. The Sport initially had black-painted tank panels and in 1954
received a new round silencer and automatic advance magneto as pictured here. (Streetbike)
ever, the Sport was deleted, the
poor performance was beginning to
the cylinder head. The parallelogram girder forks were retained but became
Turismo and military versions contin-
affect sales and only 75 were produced
telescopic whenboth models were
in 1957, most of these military ver-
uing until 1958. The Airone briefly resumed production for the police in
sions. That was also the year when the Lodola was established. Offering similar performance to the Airone but in a
updated in 1947 following develop-
ment of the Airone. Production during 1946 and 1947was. 1.620
1961, with 201 being built.
Those first few years of the early 1950s were the peak period for production of the Airone, which at this
more modern, smaller and lighter
G.T.V.s and 133 G.T.W.s.
package at a price considerably lower,
With the telescopic forks came hydraulic reardampers, a deeply valanced frontmudguardand an
it virtually made the Airone redundant. It was an inauspicious end to a model that had been so successful only a few years earlier, but the spirit
stage outnumbered the larger Falcone and Astore by a factor of four to one. By 1952 3,375 were being produced annually and there was only a small
increase in weight to 190kg (419I6). The G.T.W. was slightly more sporty with lower handlebars, alloy wheel
of the Airone lived on in its larger
drop to 3,450 in 1953. With sales at such buoyant levels, there were only minor changes to the Sport for 1954.
rims and larger brakes, but both
brother, the Falcone.
The G.T.V., G.T.W., Astore
models shared the cast-iron barrel and cylinder head with exposed valve gear. Performance was, however, still very
The Sport and Turismo were now
and Superalce
visually distinguished by the Sport's chromed kneepads in the fuel tank in place of the earlier rubber pads and the Turismo's black kneepads. Chrome was very much in demand and expensive, so this gave the Sport an air of quality. The distinctive but loud fishtail silencer was replaced by one with a rounded end that was also
Production of the Airone having
much at pre-war levels, the G.T.V.
recommenced in 1945, it was joined
managing 120km/h (75mph) and the in 1946 by the sprung-frame 500cc G.T.W. 130km/h (81mph).
G.T.V. and G.T.W.As before, the G.T.W. had a higher-performance
Further Airone features filtered through to the larger model late in 1949 when the G.T.V. evolved into the Astore (Goshawk). Production began in 1950, and it replaced both the G.T.V. and G.T.W. Although
engine (20.5bhp at 4.300rpm) and the G.T.V. received the 18.9bhp version. These were essentially the same as the
pre-war versions but for red rather
quieter.
than amaranth paint and a single
Unfortunately, 1956 saw the popu-
essentially unchanged from the final larity of the Airone plummet. The exhaust, with a single exhaust also in version of the G.T.V., the Astore now
The G.T.V. and G.T.W. continued in production until 1947 virtually unchanged from the pre-war versions. This 1946 G,T.V. is
missing only the standard legshields.
had an aluminium barrel and cylinder head, with enclosed valve gear. There was also a new Dell'Orto MC 27F car-
burettor, but the power output was unchanged at 18.9bhp. Although it
was quite successful, with 1,250 being
produced in 1950, the Astore still
looked very old-fashioned and was slightly restyled for 1951 with a red
fuel tank with black panels. It was also
offered with an optional sidecar, but
production was halved, to 662, in 1951. This was probably due to the
introduction of the more sporty Falcone,but economic factorsdic.
tated that sales of large-displacement motorcycles during this period were considerably less than those of smaller bikes. The final year for the Astore
was 1952. when 800 were con-
Evolving from the G. T.V., the Astore of 195l was painted red with black tank panels.
structed. By now it had a fuel tank
styled along the lines of the Falcone,
but it continued with hydraulic rear
dampers and legshields.
During this period the wartime military Alce evolved into the Superalce.
Released in 1946,this was almost
identical to its predecessor except for the use of the engine. The
V
Superalce remained available to the
Carabinieri and military until 1958, but was only ever produced in relatively small numbers. To the end it
retained the girder forks but gained a magneto with an automatic advance in 1952. Until 1955 it always featured
a distinctive double silencer exiting
on the left.
The Falcone
By 1950 the Astore had replaced the G.T.V., but Guzzi now needed a more
sporty motorcycle to fill the space occupied by the unremarkable and
ageing G.T.W. With very few modifications, the Astore was transformed into the Falcone. It was an extraordi-
nary transformationbecause the
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
SYMBOLIC SINGLES: AIRONE, ASTORE AND FALCONE
57
56
Falcone was to have one of the
longest production runs of any motor-
cycle, not just a Moto Guzzi. It has
also become a symbol of the production Guzzi throughout the 1950s and early '60s. This is despite only a few
hundred generally being produced
each year, mostly for police use. In terms of production nearly three times as many Cardellinos were produced in
1950 (22,115) as Falcones between 1950 and 1968. Thus the Falcone is
one of the rarer production Guzzis.
detuned version of a Condor or
Dondolino. The crankcases were cast
in aluminium rather than electron and the cylinder head had enclosed
valve gear like the Astore, but other-
wise the Falcone engine was that of
the Condor. The gearbox was the Condor four-speed constant-mesh
type, and the crankshaft and con-rod were lighter than those of the Astore.
The 43mm inlet and 40mm exhaust
valves were inclined at 60° and a
volt electrical system included a more powerful (Marelli DN 19G 30-watt) dynamo and a battery, but the ignition was still by magneto with a manual advance and retard. The weight was reduced considerably from that of the G.T.W., to 176kg (3881b), and conse-
quently the top speed increased to
around 135km/h (84mph). Although
only 300 were manufactured in 1950, with a further 512 the following year, the Falcone was immediately successful as a spearhead for the entire line-
rettor was used. For all that, the up. In1952 two versions of the
Dell'Orto SS 29A racing type carbu-
Falcone appeared, both with minor styling and its relationship with the sion ratio, but produced marginally changes. At the January Milan Show catalogue racers,the Condor and more horsepower than the G.T.W., the Falcone appeared with less Dondolino. Smallermudguards, 23bhp at 4,500грm. Where the chrome, an oil tank with black knobs, rounded 17.5-litre fuel tank, and fric- Falcone differed was that with a little and many other black-painted compotion instead of hydraulic dampers gave modification it could be made to nents. Another version was displayed it a much more sporting profile. It also provide similar performance to that at the Milan Show in November, this shared the G.T.W's alloy wheel rims of a Dondolino, and a Dondolino featuring a Marelli MCR 4E magneto and lower handlebars, and, in line camshaft was easily installed. Consider- with an automatic advance, and new with the Airone Sport, a rear seat pad ing that the Falcone in 1950 sold handlebars and switches.
Falcone still only had a 6.5:1 compres-
The success of the Falcone was undoubtedly due to its purposeful
was shown to replace the Astore, and following the example of the Airone
there were now two varieties of the Falcone. The earlier Falcone became
the Sport, and the new bike the Turismo. Although the Turismo
shared its major engine components
(like the constant-mesh gearbox) with the Sport, it basically had the engine
of the Astore. This had a 5.5:1 com-
pression ratio, a 42mm inlet valve and a Dell'Orto MD 27F carburettor. Maximum power was the same as for the Astore, 18.9bhp at 4,300rpm, and the performance of the Turismo pre-
dictably sedate.
a
With the frame and suspension of
the Sport, the Falcone Turismo gained
the Astore's handlebars, legshields and more forward mounted footrests.
The chromed knee sections in the
tank became black and the front tyre
a 3.50 x 19-inch, also from the
Astore. The Turismo also featured steel wheel rims and the rear mudguard carrier of the Astore. There
were a few further changes over the
next few years, but basically the
Falcone in both its forms weathered the problems that Moto Guzzi faced
In 1954 the Falcone Turismo replaced the Astore. This Turismo, beautifully restored by Serafino Valsecchi at Moto Guzzi, has the correct Airone-style oil tank, and steel
wheel rims.
that allowed the rider to assume a for half the price of a Dondolino, it There were more changes for 1953. racing crouch. made it an attractive proposition for In April, at Milan, a Falcone was The biggest changes to the Falcone those seeking a performance motor- introduced with an Airone-style oil came in the engine. Finally racing cycle. tank without knobs and new pillion developments found their way The first Falcone was a range-lead- seat. The biggest development, howthrough to the production line and ingsporting motorcycle with ever, was shown at the Milan Show in
the Falcone engine was virtually a chromed fuel tank. An improved 6- November. Here a detuned version
Prior to 1953 the Falcone had chromed tank sections and oil tank knobs. There would also have been a rear seat pad rather than a rack.
Turismo there was now a speedometer,
and a new, more rounded fuel tank. The seat mounting was also changed
and the Nuovo Turismo had wide
handlebars, but it still came with the
Turismo-style legshields. As it was towards the end of the 1950s. Also, at intended for official use, the Nuovo point during that decade did Turismo came with the higher head-
no
Falcone production exceed the high
light mount with a siren fitted under-
neath. Weightwas up to 192kg
point of 700 manufactured in 1957.
In 1956 both the Turismo and
(4231b), together with a corresponding decrease in performance.The
about 125km/h (78mph). It was not
that successful and only 405 were pro-
duced in 1967, with a further 390 in 1968. These were the final Moto
Guzzi horizontal 500cc singles with the external flywheel. Throughout its life the Falcone was produced in sev. eral special versions for the police, notably the Guardia di Finanza and the Corpo dei Corrazieri (Presidential Guard) of 1952, and the now sought-after Corpo dei Corrazieri of 1957.
Sport gained quieter (and uglier) silencers, similar to that ofthe Airone, dropping the noise level to
84dBA as well as hurting, perform-
ance. A specific police model with a
higher headlight mounting to allow the fitting of a siren on the forks appeared in 1958. In response to a
police request the 30-watt dynamo became a 60-watt Marelli DN 36C in 1961. Production of the Falcone
increased slightly in the 1960s, with a peak of 1,150 produced in 1960. The end of the Sport, and regular Turismo
production, occurred at the end of
1963, although 10 were built in 1965.
If it had not been for the police and
military, the Falcone would have
ended there, but it was relaunched in 1967. Now only in one version, the Nuovo Turismo, it featured a Falcone Sport engine (6.5:1 compression) but with the Turismo's Dell'Orto MD 27F carburettor, and the resulting power
was 19.4bhp at 4,450rpm. Unlike the
Amongst many specific features these The Falcone Sport of 1954-55 had black-painted tank sections and possibly
Nuovo Turismo could only manage
represented the epitome of the Falcone concept. Here is another beautiful restoration.
58
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
SYMBOLIC SINGLES: AIRONE, ASTORE AND FALCONE
59
had 12-volt electrics, dynastart and
extra batteries.
The most extraordinary thing about the Falcone was that, even when pro-
duction ended in 1968, it was still
basically a pre-war motorcycle. The
engine and running gear were still very much those of the G.T.W., and
riding a Falcone was really an experience of a different era. The heavy fly-
wheel meant that acceleration was
leisurely, and even the constant-mesh
sliding gearchange was very slow com-
pared with more modern designs.
Friction dampers combined with the unique Guzzi springing under the engine were very much an anachronism, and was still very similar to the
typeof rear suspension that had appeared the ill-fatedThree
on
Cylinder of 1932, certainly vindicat-
ing the expertise of Giuseppe Guzzi.
Fortunately Guzzi was not relying
on the Falcone for survival and the
company was able to produce and sell
such a motorcycle with its proud ancestry essentially unchanged for many years. Becauseof its long
production run, it has earned itself a
classic status, and become a represent-
ative model for the marque. This is
not that surprising: while the Falcone
may have always been obsolete, it retained clear bloodlines to some of
the most significant racing Guzzis, the Condor, Dondolino, Gambalunga and, of course, the G.P. of 1920.
The Nuovo Falcone
Continued demand for the Falcone by
the police and military saw Moto
Guzzi release the Nuovo Falcone in 1969. Although only eight were built
that year, it soon proved extremely
popular, with many more being pro-
duced than the earlier Falcone. In
1970 2,946 were built, with produc-
tion peaking at 3.775 in 1971. At that
stage more Nuovo Falcones were
being constructed at Mandello than
any other single model, including the
V7.
By combining many of the tradi-
tional features of the earlier Falcone
in a more modern chassis, Guzzi man-
aged to create an uninspiring work-
horse that was eminently suitable for the police and military. Much of the
engine was similar to before: it still
had the 88 x 82mm bore and stroke of the very first Moto Guzzi, the horizon-
tal cylinder with radial finning, and the external flywheel (although this was now hidden underneath an alloy side cover).
Where the Nuovo Falcone really departed from its predecessor was in the change to wet-sump lubrication
and a redesigned four-speed gearbox.
No longer with magneto ignition and
a separate dynamo, the Falcone finally
came of age with a 12-volt electrical
system and coil ignition. There was even an optional dynastart. A more modern square-slide Dell'Orto VHB 29A carburettor was used, but with a 6.8:1 compression ratio the Nuovo
Falcone was barely morepowerful
than a Falcone Sport, 26.2bhp being developed at 4,800rpm. Civilian versions had a lighter flywheel than the
military models.
The chassis, too, was completely
updated, with an orthodox tubular
A 1956 Falcone Sport outside the factory at Mandello. Another Serafino Valsecchi restoration, the tank had now reverted to
chromed sections and the quieter cylindrical silencer hurt performance.
The Nuovo Falcone was still a motorcycle of dreams in 1971. The enclosed flywheel and electric starter can be seen in the example at the top left. (Two Wheels)
with enclosed telescopic forks and twin
steel double-cradle frame
rear shock absorbers. The wheels were reduced in size to 18 inches (3.50 x 18
tyres front and rear) and a 200mm twin leading shoe drum brake fitted
on the front. Unfortunately this mod-
ernisation saw the weight soar to
214kg (4721b). This meant that the Nuovo Falcone was barely able to match the performance of a Falcone Turismo and had a top speed of only 127km/h (79mph). The Nuovo Falcone was not a motorcycle suited
to the Autostrada and gave a new
meaning to the word plodder.
However, as a military motorcycle
it was extremely successful, particu-
larly in Italy, In 1970 and 1971 so many were sold that the following year it was also made available to civilians. It was intended to be the
motorcycle for those enthusiasts eager
for an update, while still offering the nostalgic look ofthe previous
Falcone. But as it was neither ancient
nor modern this new model was a dis-
appointment. The more modern
instrument layout was shared with the V7 Special, as were many of the ancillaries. The styling of the civilian white Nuovo Falcone was unusual, particularly the twin silencer emerging from
a single exhaust. In a world where
performance levels were increasing, the Nuovo Falcone began to struggle in the marketplace. However, production was still up considerably on that
of the earlier Falcone, and 2,293 were
built in 1973.
In 1974 the Nuovo Falcone was
given a new colour scheme (dark red
and matt black) and stainless-steel
mudguards, and there was an additional version, the Sahara. Painted
beige, the Sahara was essentially a
military bike sold for civilian use. It featured a sprung single seat, panniers, and a noticeable absence of chrome. The compression ratio was
increased slightly to 7:1, and power was up marginally to 27bhp, but as
this was still a very heavy motorcycle
it could still only manage about
130km/h (81mph).
By 1976 demand for the Nuovo
Falcone had dwindled and the model finished that year. Except as a military motorcycle it had never lived up to its expectations and it was also a victim
of increasing worldwide legislation. All motoreycles were beginning to share uniform left side gearshifting
and converting such a basically
ancient design was not economically
feasible. Although nearly twice as
many Nuovo Falcones were manufactured as Falcones, the newer model
has never achieved the classic status
of the original. The marriage of an
older-style engine with a modern
chassis and styling was never going to be a recipe for success. It was an
inauspicious end to a great engine
line.
THE SECOND GOLDEN AGE
61
6.
The
second golden age
inaugural World Championship 1949. While the 68 x 68mm engine
shared much with the
Albatros.
including the bevel-gear-driven single
overhead camshaft and four-speed gearbox, power was increased to
25bhp at 8,000rpm. This was primarily through the use of a Dell'Orto SS 35mm carburettor. For theofficial Gambalunghino, the twin downtube
frame and rear suspension came from the Albatros, the Gambalunga supplying the leading-link front suspension, brake, fuel tank and a more stream-
lined tail section. Painted silver and
the V8, was again totally unique.
Aided by a sympathetic management, and with considerable financial backing, some of the greatest racing motor-
cycles of all time emanated from
Mandello during this period.
1949
For the new World Championship
Moto Guzzi was better prepared than most manufacturers. By developing
their two excellent pre-war designs in the years immediately following the
end of the Second World War, they
had competitive offerings in both the 250 and 500cc categories for the 1949
season. The 350cc class was one historically associated with British manu-
facturers, but it would not be long
Brmo Ruffo gave Moto Guzzi their first World Championship, the 1949 250cc. Here
Whilederfulthe 1930speriod hadfor Motobeen aGuzzi,woneven this decade was eclipsed by the
magnificence of the 1950s. From 1949
until their dramatic withdrawal at the end of 1957, the Moto Guzzi racing department, headed by Giulio Cesare
series of created and GrandPrix
Carcano,
developed a
unequalled
machines. These were not only highly individual, but also portrayed Carcano's ideology. Unlike the com-
petition, Carcano placedgreater
importance on aerodynamics, minimal
weight, and weight distribution. He
wascommitted to the leading-link
front forks and the development of
the existing flat single. When forced to seck more horsepower, his answer,
he lines up at Monza for the Nations Grand Prix with a 250cc Gambalunghino.
I PIRE
before Guzzi would also successfully contest this category.
With the 250 Parallel Twin shelved, the successful but ageing Albatros was transformed into the Gambalunghino (Little long-leg). The combination of the Albatros engine with Gambalunga, leading-link front sus-
a
pension and front brake, gave the venerable single overheadcamshaft
250, which had first appeared in 1926,
a new lease of life.The success of the Gambalunghino over the next few
years really showed how good the concept of the compact horizontal single, with its geared primary drive and
external flywheel, had been in the first
place. What was really more surpris-
ing, especially given its incredible success over the next few years, was that
no one copied it. For the 500cc class the venerable Bicilindrica was further developed, but was not to be as successful against stronger, four-cylinder
competition.
The first Gambalunghino had come
about at the beginning of 1949.
Enrico Lorenzetti was racing in the 250cc class for Moto Guzzi on an Albatros. After collecting the bike from the racing department at
Mandello, it was badly damaged when the trailer broke away from as
the car to
it was being towed. Returning
Mandello, the mechanics found that the frame was too badly damaged to
repair, so in order to get the bike ready
to race in time they simply installed the Albatros engine in a Gambalunga chassis. Lorenzetti won the race, and the resulting hybrid also took him to victory in the Italian 250cc champi-
onship.
The factory also adopted it for the
later red, the early Gambalunghino looked very much like the
Gambalunga.
Although the weight was similar to
that of the final Albatros at 122kg (2691b),the Gambalunghino was a more effective racing machine
because of its better brakes and front suspension; where it really succeeded over the competition was not so much in its superior speed, but in its reliability. The first race on the calendar was
the Isle of Man TT. Here Manliff Barrington on a Gambalunghino won the Lightweight TT at 77.93mph
(125km/h). ahead of Tommy Wood. also on a Gambalunghino.
At the Swiss Grand Prix at Berne,
factory rider Bruno Ruffo took his
only Grand Prix victory of the season,
and at Ulster Maurice Cann rode an
Albatros to first place ahead of Ruffo's
factory Gambalunghino. With only
four events counting towards the 250 World Championship, Ruffo became
World Champion, and Guzzi won
their first manufacturers' title.
For the 500cc class Moto Guzzi
continued to develop the Bicilindrica. While the telescopic-forked Micucci version of 1948 had performed well,
particularly at the Isle of Man, for 1949 the machine was considerably revamped. Carcano's influence
became more apparent and the result was one of the best-looking racing machines of the era. Development of the engine saw the use of Dell'Orto
carburettors withdetachable float
chambers, and megaphone exhausts. Power on the low octane fuel was up to 45bhp at 8,000rpm.
While the frame, with the oil reservoir and rear suspension with a single spring, came from the 1948 version,
The 500 Bicilindrica of 1949 featured the leading-link forks of the Gambalunga and an unusually shaped fuel tank. Although not successful in the World Championship, Lorenzetti took the Italian title:
the leading-link forks were similar to
that of the Gambalunga. The front brake was a full-width drum. One of
the more unusual features of the 1949 Bicilindrica was the fuel tank, which
extended forwards in front of the
steering head to improve
With thismodel thestreamlining.
weightwas
reduced to 145kg (3201b) and, unlike the Gambalunghino, the Bicilindrica
was painted red.
the Bicilindrica
between the engine and carburettor, a feature that would last on the racing singles until 1957. Other develop-
ments included a new, more streamlined seat, and friction rear dampers
mounted backwards to improvethe handling under hard braking. In order to lower the machine, 20-inch wheels were fitted.
Despite this development the
Unfortunately
could not match the success of the
in the
World
Gambalunghino
Championship.At the Isle of Man Bob Foster was leading the Senior TT
before the clutch failed, and there were no results of any significance during 1949. In the Italian championship, however, Lorenzetti (now a factory rider) rode a Bicilindrica to
victory in the 500cc class.
1950
Although victorious in the 250cc class
in 1949. Moto Guzzi faced increased competition during 1950, this year
being their least successful of the
period. It did, however,
further development of both the 235
and 500, as well as a 350. To counter
the Benelli of Dario Ambrosini, the Gambalunghino was further improved. More power was required, SO the valves were increased to
38.5mm inlet and 33mm exhaust. A special inverted 37mm Dell'Orto carburettor was fitted to a down-draught manifold and the power was increased to 28bhp at 8,000rpm. There was now
a largerubber connecting tube
Gambalunghino was outclassed by Ambrosini's Benelli, and Guzzi withdrew official works entries before the conclusion of the season. This saved
some of the embarrassment of a com-
prehensive defeat, and also allowed development of a double overhead camshaft four-valve Gambalunghino that would make a brief appearance in 1951.
The only Grand Prix win for the Gambalunghino in 1950 was Maurice Cann's victory at Ulster, and Cann eventually finished second in the 250cc World Championship. However, Guzzi did manage to fill the minor placings, Fergus Anderson
coming third and Ruffo fourth.
Following the disappointment of
the 1949 season, the Bicilindrica was not officially entered by the factory in Grands Prix during 1950. Despite this,
there was still some development,
mainly alongthe lines ofthe Gambalunghino, the front Dell'Orto
carburettor being mounted in a simi-
lar downdraught style. Styling was again altered, with an unusual fuel tank shaped to accommodate the rider's arms when crouched. Foster
again rode the Bicilindrica in the
62
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
THE SECOND GOLDEN AGE
63
absorbers for some circuits, but gener-
ally the four-speed gearbox was still used. A four-valve twin cam 250 had
been produced in the latter part of 1950, featuring twin Dell'Orto remote float bowl carburettors and enclosed coil valve springs. This engine had a slightly longer stroke
(68 x 68.5mm) and a longer con-rod,
140mm (5½ inches) eye-to-eye. A
99
short-stroke version (70 x 64mm) was:
also constructed, but the four-valve engine showed no superiority over
the single camshaft model and, while it made further brief appearances in 1952 and 1953, was eventually dis-
carded.
More successful wasMaurice Cann's home-built double overhead
Maurice Cann and the Gambalunghino at Bray Hill during the Lightweight TT of 1950. Cann finished second to Ambrosini. (Ivar
de Gier collection) Senior TT at the Isle of Man but was unable to match his pace of the previ-
before being forced to retire with the
rubber carburettor connecting tubes.
engine misfiring at the end of the sixth lap after he holed one of the
More significant was the creation of a 350 single during 1950. Following the poor showing of 350cc Bicilindrica by Bruno Bertacchini in 1949, Guzzi decided to build a double
ous year. He was in sixth position
a
Bob Foster braking heavily on the Bicilindrica during the Senior TT of 1950 before retiring. (Ivar de Gier collection)
overhead camshaft 350 single. This 78
x 73mm engine displacing 349cc soon
produced31bhp at 7,000rpm and,
weighing only 116kg (256lb), showed considerable potential. It also featured an unusual arrangement of quadruple hairpin valve springs. Several innova-
tions were tested, notably a water-
cooled exhaust valve. Lorenzetti first rode the new five-speed 350 at Mettet in Belgium and later Cann tested it at the Isle of Man. Guzzi also supplied
Cann with a 310cc single overhead camshaft Gambalunghino-inspired version for the 1950 Junior TT, which he preferred and eventually rode in
the race. During the race the 310
expired but even prior to that it was unable to challenge the leaders. Both
camshaft two-valve 250. During prac-
tice for the Lightweight TT Cann's bike was as fast as the factory
Gambalunghinos, and the Guzzi engi-
neers had a very close look at it. It
would be this engine that would influ-
ence the eventual double overhead
camshaft 250 Bialbero.
This was the final year for the
Bicilindrica and it featured a few more improvements. Power was increased to 47bhp at 8,000rpm, and the remote
While he tested this prototype DOHC 350 during practice, Maurice Cann elected to race the SOHC 310. Here he is at Ballaugh Bridge on the prototype 350. (Ivar de
Gier collection)
float bowl Dell'Orto SS carburettors
were mounted on long manifolds, the rear carburettor situated close to the rear wheel. Even in its final form the
May, Gino Alquati used Gambalunghino engine to power a
racing boat to a new flying start kilometre record of 80.181 km/h (50mph).
1951
After a disappointing season in 1950, Moto Guzzi were again strongly represented in both the 250 and 500cc cat-
egories for 1951. The official works team now included Anderson alongside Ruffo, Lorenzetti, Gianni Leoni
and Sante Geminiani, Happily 1951 was a highly successful year for the
Gambalunghino, and after the French
Grand Prix, where Ambrosini was
killed, Moto Guzzi was untroubled in the 250 category, winning four of the five 250cc races; Ruffo again took the
championship, with Tommy Wood second and Lorenzetti fourth. Wood
won the Lightweight TT and also
raced in the 350 class in Spain (there
being no 250 event), giving Guzzi
their first 350 Grand Prix victory.
Further development saw the 500 Bicilindrica was not as highly Gambalunghino gain a five-speed developed as theGambalunghino. gearbox and hydraulic rear shock Valve sizes were 35mm for the inlet
Tommy Wood being congratulated after his win in the 1951 Lightweight TT on the
Gambalunghino. (Ivar de Gier collection)
prototypes were then retired.
The construction of the famed wind tunnel at Mandello was also
undertaken in 1950; it is still operational and located behind the original
buildings of 1921. Further world speed
records were set at Montlhéry in September on the Gambalunghino. Anderson, together with Ruffo and
Gianni and Guido Leoni, set ten 250cc world up to 8 hours, including hours at 160km/h (99mph). A few months earlier, on 9
2records
64
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
THE SECOND GOLDEN AGE
65
(129km/h), Lorenzetti took another
Bicilindrica to third place.
While the 250cc results were excel-
lent, 1951 was a particularly tragic
year. Besides Ambrosini, Guzzi riders Gianni and Guido Leoni, Geminiani, and Raffaele Alberti died in accidents.
in attempts several at the long-distance record Montlhéry autodrome
The Gambalunghino was also used
in
France. On 17 September Anderson, Lorenzetti and Ruffo con-
tinued where they had left off in 1950,
setting 1,000-mile and 9, 10, 11 and
12-hour 250 records.
1952
In 1952 the development of the
racing Guzzis took an important turn
that would continue to see them
dominate. With the commissioning of
the wind tunnel, aerodynamics started
role as
to play as important
engine development. This immediately
of the
the
influenced
shape
Gambalunghino, resulting in a considerable redesign. The fuel tank was derived from the anatomical design of the final Bicilindrica, and as it incorporated the number plate, it indicated the way of the future and the eventual
integralfairing. There was a new
frame and rear suspension was now by
twin hydraulic shock absorbers with external springs. To improve the frontal area the wheels were now 18
inches instead of 21 inches. There was
not much more development to the single overhead camshaft engine
except for a new Dell'Orto carburettor, which featured a special float to stabilise mixture strength while cornering, braking and accelerating. At 7,500rpm 27bhp was developed and the compression ratio was now 8.7:1. The bike weighed 116kg (256lb) and still used a single leading shoe front
brake.
With the Bicilindrica pensioned off,
Guzzi contested only the 250cc class in 1952, with three riders, Anderson,
Lorenzetti and Ruffo. The Guzzis won five Grands Prix, only being beaten in
Germany by the DKW after all the
factory Gambalunghinos retired. With two victories, Lorenzetti took the title ahead of Anderson (alsowith tWO wins). Ruffo distinguished himself at the Isle of Man where he comfortably led the Lightweight TT, but slowed on
the last lap to obey team orders that allowed Anderson and Lorenzetti to
overtake him. In the process, Ruffo set a fastest lap of 84.82mph (136km/h).
The Ulster Grand Prix was won by Cann on a 250 Gambalunghino with
his own designed and built twin overhead camshaft cylinder head.
During the season Lorenzetti tested various experimental four-valve Gambalunghinos, but they were never as effective as the two-valve version. Even Cann's home-built effort was superior. That August also saw further
At the age of 43 Fergus Anderson
became the oldest TT winner with his victory in the Lightweight TT of 1952. (Ivar de Gier collection)
Bruno Ruffo was the moral victor of the
1952 Lightweight TT, leading until the
final lap and forced to slow to obey team
orders. Aerodynamic development was
evident in the shape of the fuel tank
incorporating the number plate. (Ivar de Gier collection)
Maurice Cann's home-built DOHC 250 would later influence factory designs. Here
he is at Ballaugh Bridge during practice for the Lightweight TT. (Ivar de Gier
collection) and 33mm for the exhaust. There was victory was in store for the a return to the rear friction dampers Bicilindrica when Fergus Anderson (in place of the hydraulic unit under dominated the rain-soakedSwiss the engine) and a redesigned seat and 500cc Grand Prix of 1951.
rear mudguard. One more significant an average speed
of80.16mph Winning at
The wind tunnel at Mandello del Lario. Still operational, this gave Moto Guzzi a
significant advantage in the early 1950s.
66
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
THE SECOND GOLDEN AGE
67
successful world record attempts, with
the pre-war sidecar
onsupercharged
250 and a Monaco-Ingolstadt
the
autobahn in Germany. With new
streamlined bodywork designed in the
Guzzi wind tunnel, Luigi Cavanna
took the supercharged 250 to a record speed of 221.226km/h (137mph) over
a
flyingkilometre. Seven further
records were also set.
1953
With the company buoyant from the
sales of Guzzinos, Moto Guzzi decided
to expand the racingprogramme
beyond the 250cc category. There
were no changes to the team for 1953, but Guzzi now provided works entries
in both the 350 and 500cc classes. It was the new 500 that caused the most
interest. At the final event of the
1952 season, the Italian Grand Prix at Monza, the racing world was stunned by the unveiling of the replacement for the 500cc Bicilindrica, a new inline four, for the 1953 season. By this
stage the four-cylinder MVsand
Gileras were beginning to dominate
500cc racing and the Guzzi design was
refreshingly different. Unfortunately, unlike the earlier Bicilindrica, which
was also an original and unique
design, the four was unsuited to a
racing motorcycle application. It was
also uniformly disliked by the riders.
At the instigation of Giorgio Parodi,
the great Carcano was bypassed when
it came to the design of the four-cylin-
der. Although Parodi had approached
him as carly as 1948, in 1951 the fourcylinder was given to the Rome-based engineer, Carlo Gianini, who worked for the company Giannini. Parodi felt that it was time for some fresh ideas in the racing department and underestimated Carcano's brilliance. This may
have seemed a slight on the racing team at the time, but the failure of the four would eventually give Carcano the sanction for the V8.
Gianini had impressive credentials.
Together with Piero Remor he had
been responsible for the four-cylinder
OPRA 20 years earlier, which had
become the Rondine and eventually
the supercharged Gilera four. This was
the engine that had inspired the ill-
fated Guzzi four of 1931, and Gianini's new four would also prove to be a disappointment.
In an effort to be different from the other fours, and also reduce frontal
area, the new engine was a longitudinal four-cylinder that closely followed automotive practice. In the era before streamlined fairings it made sense to keep the engine narrow. However, by 1954 this was not really so important, as wider engines could be more easily
accommodated under the dustbin
fairings, and ultimately the disadvan-
tages of an in-line four outweighed the advantages. It was not only the torque reaction from the crankshaft that caused problems, but also the engine-speed clutch made gear changing difficult. The clutch was
also too small and not strong enough, but to fit a larger clutch would have
required an expensive redesign of the
rear of the engine.
Technically, however, the four was a
beautiful racing engine in the best Italian engineering tradition.
Designed without too much regard for
thecost, it was oversquare (56 x
50mm) with a displacement of 492cc,
and
featured
double
overhead
camshafts driven by straight-cut gears
from the crankshaft. One-piece conrods with single-row roller big-end
bearings were used with a built-up
180° crankshaft. The big-end journals
were locked in place with serrated Hirth couplings and the crank itself
ran on five ball and roller bearings.
With the two valves set at a wide
included angle of 96°, the three-ring pistons required a very high dome to achieve the 11:1 compression. Although designed to allow for larger valves, this 1930s practice of a wide included valve angle ultimately lim-
ited potential horsepower and was one
area where Gianini's design was obso-
lete. Valve sizes were 32mm for the
inlet and 30mm for the exhaust, each valve having three coil springs, the camshafts operating directly on caps over the valve springs. An unusual
feature was the seating of the valves
directly in the cylinder head without inserts. The clutch was a multi-plate type splined to the crankshaft without
any reduction. A compact four-speed gearboxwas incorporated
inthe engine casting and drive to the rear
wheel was by a shaft in the left side of the swingarm. The bevel drive for the magneto sat within the gearbox shell
and the oil pump in the sump situated in the lower crankcase.
Undoubtedly the most unusual fea-
ture of the four was its induction system. So as to minimise engine
width by not mounting four carburettors to one side of the engine, a pressurisedsystemusing aRoots-type blower housed in the gearbox shell supplied air to four atomisers in the
inlet tracts. These air valves were opened by additional cams on the
inlet camshaft and fuel was continually fed by a pump. Excess fuel was returned to the tank by another pump and later by gravity. This mechanical fuel injection system was a variation
on experiments carried out on the supercharged 250cc 'Gerolamo' Milano-Tarantomachine of 1939.
Even with water-cooling it was a very clean-looking engine, with the water
pump mounted on the front of the
engine near the radiator.
The power developed by this com-
pact 500cc motor was 55bhp at
9,000грm, and it was housed in an original trellis frame with Bicilindrica leading-link forks and a twin leading
shoe front brake. Wheels were 19. inch at the front and 18-inch at the rear, and the 500 weighed in at a
respectable 145kg (3201b). Thus it
the
noted
maintained
Guzzi
favourable power-to-weight ratio and was capable of 230km/h (143mph). It
was also surprisingly compact and the
wheelbase was a moderate 1,400mm
(55 inches). When it appeared early in 1953 it featured the 'bird-beak'-
style fairing that typified 1953 racing Guzzis. Development was very slow,
mainly because the engine was built in
Rome and modifications made in Mandello.The frame, too, was
a
Giannini design, but by the time the bike was ready for the 1953 season
there was much Guzzi influence in the design.
After its showing at Monza, Lorenzetti tested the four at
Ospidaletti in San Remo in February
1953, and it made its debut at
Siracusa together with the new 250
Bialbero. Things looked promising
when Lorenzetti won an international
event at Hockenheim on 10 May at
an average speed of more than
173km/h (107mph), with Anderson
setting a fastest lap at 182.4km/h
(113mph). Yet while it occasionally showed bursts of speed, the four was extremely unreliable and difficult to ride. Guzzi did win a 500cc Grand Prix in 1953, the Spanish, but it was not with the 500 four. Here Anderson
amazingly defeated a field of Gilera and MV fours with the new 350.
It was in the 350cc class that Guzzi
found their greatest success that year,
and one that they would dominate
until 1957. After several years of test-
ing various prototypes,
Carcano
finally discovered the right formula.
Earlier 350s were simply a bored and stroked Gambalunghino, and this was
initially what Fergus Anderson per-
suaded Carcano to do late in 1952. As a Scot, Anderson wanted to compete against the Nortons and AJSs, the tra-
ditional leaders of the class. By enlarging the 68 x 68mm Gambalunghino as
far as the crankcases would permit and moving the crankpin as close to the edge of the crank webs as seemed
safe, a 317cc (72 x 78mm) version was created.A longer, 155mm (6-
inch), con-rod was used in the longerstroke engines.
The cylinder head design followed that of the60°iGambalunghinowitha ncluded valve angle, still very narrow for the day. Valve sizes were 38.5mm
for the inlet and 33mm for the
exhaust, and with a 10:1 compression ratio power was 31bhp at 7,700гpm. This was the same horsepower as the
short stroke 350cc double overhead camshaft prototype of 1950. A 35mm Dell'Orto carburettor was used, on the usual long induction tract with a steep 33° down-draught angle, and the crankshaft also followed Gambalunghino practice by being
pressed up in three pieces with a
caged roller big-end bearing.
This engine was then placed in a 1953 250 Bialbero chassis with the
'bird-beak' streamlining of that year. Wheels were both 19-inch, a 2.75 x 19-inch tyre on the front and a 3.00 x 19-inch on the rear, and unlike the
250 Bialbero the front brake was a
twin leading shoe. This 317 was
entered in an international meeting at
Hockenheim in May and Anderson
easily won the 350cc race. It was also an extremely successful day for Guzzi, as it was the same event at which the 500 four was also victorious.
The 1953 500 four with distinctive bird-beak fairing is still on display in the Moto
Guzzi museum.
So encouraging had been the 317's
performance
at
third at 89.41mph (144km/h), conHockenheimthat vincing Carcano that Guzzi should
Anderson organised a last-minute entry for the Junior TT at the Isle of Man three weeks later. He came home
contest the other rounds in the 350cc World Championship. For the next
event at Assen, Carcano redesigned Fergus Anderson at the bottom of Bray Hill in the 1953 Junior TT on the SOHC
317. The suspension is totally compressed, with the 'bird-beak' nearly touching the front wheel. He finished third. (Ivar de Gier collection)
68
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
THE SECOND GOLDEN AGE
69
the engine cases to accept a 75mm
Guzzis took the opposition completely piston, and Lorenzetti went on to win. by surprise. With victories in France, Throughout therest of the 1953 Belgium and Switzerland, Anderson season both the 317cc (72 x 78mm) won the 350cc World Championship and larger 345cc (75 x 78mm) engines from Lorenzetti, who hadwins were used. Holland and Italy. However, with sev-
in
Both these engines had a one-piece eral retirements, the success of the crankshaft with uncaged needle-roller 350 was tempered by constant reliabig-end bearings and two-piece con- bility problems during 1953. The
engine suffered excessive oil con-
rods. For the larger bore (75mm), the
sumption as the cast-iron liner was so
valve sizes were increased by 2mm to
thin that both it and the piston dis-
37mm inlet and 32mm exhaust, and
the compression ratio reduced slightly to 9.5:1. Though a 37mm carburettor
torted. Also the uncaged rollers were
unsuitable for high-speed big-end
was tested, the 35mm proved more satisfactory and the engine produced 33bhp at 7,500rpm. Weighing 122kg
bearings and contributed to prema-
ture big-end failure. Both of these problems would be rectified for the
(2691b), and with a top speed of around 210km/h (130mph),the
1954 season.
Despite their move into the 350cc
At 44 years of age, Fergus Anderson took his first World Championship, the 350 title, in 1953. He was the first Scot to do so, and won 12 of Moto Guzz's 46 Grands Prix.
category, Guzzi continued to contest
the 250cc class. Double overhead
camshaft two-valve and four-valve
versions were tested by Lorenzetti and
Anderson at Ospidaletti early in the
year, and box section swingarms were
tried. However, as had happened
earlier, the two-valve cylinder head
gave better results, and this was used during 1953. It was based on Maurice
Cann's DOHC design of 1951, but
Guzzi made it lighter and more compact with a different valve angle. Like the larger bikes the 250 had the 'birdbeak' fairing that year and a low fuel
tank that required a fuel pump. Both single and double overhead camshaft versions were raced during 1953, and both shared a slight increase in stroke (to 68.4mm). This had been tried on the 1950 double overhead camshaft bikes and saw the capacity increase to 248.2cc. The double overhead
camshaft 250 Bialberoproduced
28bhp at 8,000rpm with a 9.5:1 com-
pression ratio and a huge 40mm
Dell'Orto carburettor. As with the
350, 19-inch wheels front and rear
were used on the Bialbero.
Although now outclassed by Werner Haas on his NSU Rennmax twin, the 250 Bialbero managed to win three events in 1953. Fergus
Anderson again took the Lightweight
TT, this time at 84.73mph (136km/h) after Ruffo had crashed badly in practice, ending his career. Lorenzetti won two 250 Grands Prix, the Nations at Monza and the Spanish at Barcelona in October. These were also the first
Anderson had approached Norton's Anderson believed Kavanagh had
assisted him in his victory in the World Championship over Lorenzetti.
With the championship decided,
really was. After a poor start and black-flagged in Monza,
were disappointing for a team that had dominated for the previous few
Left: Enrico Lorenzetti had a long and glorious career with Moto Guzzi, culminating in the 1952 250 World Championship. He rode the new 250 Bialbero to victory at its 1953 debut at Siracusa.
Right: Fergus Anderson rode the 250 Bialbero at the Isle of Man in 1953 to take Moto Guzzi's final victory in the Lightweight TT, winning at the record speed of 84.67mph. This is on the mountam, after the railway tracks, near today's Murrays. (Ivar de Gier collection)
years. Anderson ended up third in the 250cc Championship, with Lorenzetti
fourth. Although the results in the 250cc World Championship were
in the
European
disappointing,
Championships the 250cc Guzzis continuedto dominate. National
championships were won in Italy, Austria, France, Great Britain and Switzerland. However,while they
would still have an interest in the 250
class, Guzzi would concentrate more seriously on the larger categories in
the future.
1954
Enrico Parodi offered Kavanagh a full works ride for 1954 alongside Anderson, Lorenzetti, Montanari and Ruffo. An indication of the financial buoyancy of the company at that time
was his incredible salary of £3,000
tostrictly followteam
plus expenses and prize money, with a
condition
orders. As Kavanagh says, 'Compared
with Norton, Moto Guzzi had an enormousracing department and
seemed to have an unlimited budget. Reserve riders included Duilio Agostini, who had won the 1953
Milano-Taranto race on a Dondolino,
and Alano Montanari. The dustbin
fairings developed with the aid of the
wind tunnel were also first seen in
1954. Initial testing for the 1954 season was again undertaken at
Ospidaletti at the end of February. All
works riders tested the 250, 350 and 500s, including Ruffo in what was his last ride on a racing machine.
Although it had not had a very
spectacular debut year, the 500 four continued to be developed, mainly by
Kavanagh, despite almost universal
dislike by the riders.
For 1954 it
received a metal dustbin fairing that
incorporated side 28-litre fuel tanks,
the upper tank being replaced by a rather ugly metal bulkhead. The four was also fitted with a linked braking system and Kavanagh's single front
brake lever, but was unable even to
The 500 four had a new full fairing for 1954, with pannier fuel tanks. It was still
uniformly disliked by the riders. Notice the finned final drive unit.
70
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
THE SECOND GOLDEN AGE
71
continued to be developed by Gianini for car racing. Uprated to 750cc, the Giannini G2 powered many highly
successful Italian racing cars.
Sharing the same engine dimensions as all the classic Moto Guzzi
500cc singles (88 x 82mm), the 500cc Grand Prix single initially had a single overhead camshaft and was developed
2 6
from the Gambalunghino.This was the bike that Kavanagh rode to victory at Hockenheimat an average speed of 182km/h (113mph), with a fastest lap at 188.8km/h (117mph). With a 45mm Dell'Orto carburettor, 42bhp was developed at 7,000грm. This engine proved very unreliable,
largely as a result of Carcano's obses-
sion with weight-saving, and many parts broke through being too light.
The final race for the 500 four was at Hockenheim in May 1954 where Anderson (2) was defeated by the new SOHC 500 single of Kavanagh (26).
repeat the moderate success of the previous year. Apart from a minor victory by Anderson at Mettet in
four was at an international race at Hockenheim on 9 May 1954 where
Anderson was defeated by Kavanagh
on the new 500 single. In a staged
Belgium, where the injection system was replaced by four carburettors, the
race the four towed the fragile single,
then threw its rear tyre tread at
four was spectacularly unsuccessful.
After all the expense of design and
250km/h. Not only did this frighten Anderson, but the four's defeat convinced Parodi that Carcano should persevere with the 500 single.
development there were no Grand Prix victories and Carcano's racing programme was vindicated. All the
riders preferred theless powerful
However, while it was no longer raced
500cc single and the last race for the by Guzzi, the four-cylinder design
Kavanagh gives the 'thumbs up' to Carcano on his way to victory at Hockenheim.
Note the 'twin seat' and length of pedals. The bikes were crudely modified to accept the longer Anderson and shorter Kavanagh.
At the Imola Gold Cup the clutch
lever simply snapped off its pivor lugs because they were designed for 250 clutch springs. These problems were largely overcome when the 500 was
redesigned as a larger engine. It
received a double overhead camshaft cylinder head like the 250 and 350 of 1954, with an increase in power to 45bhp at 7,000rpm. Valve sizes were 47mm inlet and 42mm exhaust, and
the 500 used a 165mm (6k/2-inch)
con-rod. Twin spark plugs and battery and coil ignition were employed.
While the 500 single may have
been an expression of Carcano's ideol-
ogy and a tribute to excellent aerodynamics, it was never a match for the
significantly more powerful Gilera and
a
MV fours.Kavanagh managed
second place in Belgium and Spain,
eventually finishing third in the 500cc
World Championship. These results would see him as the principal development rider for Guzzi's next 500cc contender, the V8.
After many years riding Nortons, Kavanagh initially found the Guzzi
singles strange to ride. 'The front
brake plate was anchored to a flange
on the front axle so that when the
brake was applied the front of the bike would lift. This was especially discon-
certing going into a curve a little too quickly because by backing off nothing happened. It was the first thing I
had changed on my Moto Guzzis. I
also had the two front brakes balanced by the front hand lever, then fitted to all the racing bikes. The
Ken Kavanagh on the 500 in the 1954 Senior TT. The pannier fuel tanks were replaced by a cylindrical tank over the engine. When
Kavanagh passed Anderson, who had crashed, he stopped during the race to ensure that Fergus was unhurt. (Ivar de Gier collection)
Guzzis had a much wider powerband than the Nortons, more like a touring bike. What made the Guzzis so good
was the weight and the streamlining.'
As it was the 350cc Championship that Guzzi was defending, most devel-
opment went into this engine. In an
effort to overcome the reliability problems of 1953, the 350 was redesigned
over the winter of 1953 for the 1954 season. As before, both 72 x 78mm and 75 x 78mm engines were raced,
and later there was also a 79mm-
stroke version displacing 349cc.
However, information from Umberto
Toderoindicates that the 78mm
stroke was generally used. Many of the developments were carried over
from the 1953 250 Bialbero and even-
tually sharedwith the 500. These
included a double overhead camshaft
cylinder head with enclosed valve
gear and single coil valve springs, the twin camshafts still being driven by a shaft and bevel-gear and five straight-cut gears. The cams operated directly on bucket-type tappets without skirts,
and the fuel and oil pumps were
driven from the ends of both
camshafts. A five-speed gearbox was
also standard for 1954.
This is a confusing year in the doc-
umentation of the 350, but Umberto
Todero states that three versions were
used (317, 345 and 349cc), and that
both single and double overhead camshaft cylinder heads were fitted, depending on circuit. The
the
Monalbero engines were lighter than
the Bialbero and preferred on slow
tracks. The 317cc engine was only
used at the beginning of the season, and by the end of 1954 a completely new short-stroke 350 was also developed, which was used in a few races
towards the end of the season.
The reason for the continued use of the 317cc (72 x 78mm) engine early in the season was the problem of exces-
sive oil consumption with the larger bore. During 1954 the 345cc engine
(75 x 78mm) received a thicker cylinder liner and a stronger piston to alleviate this problem. The compression
ratio was reduced to 9.4:1 and valve
sizes were increased yet again, to
39mm inlet and 33mm exhaust. With
a 37mm carburettor, 35bhp was devel-
oped at 7,800rpm. Another important change was a return to a three-piece built-up crankshaft with caged roller big-end bearings. Ignition was
no
longer by the magneto, which had
occasionally caused problems, but now consisted of two individual circuits of
twin coils and twin 10mm spark plugs
operated by twin distributors. One
ignition circuit provided less advance and was used for starting only. For the TT two batteries were used with two independent circuits, one as a back-up
with two switches on the handlebar. Over long bumpy races the batteries would fail and the 6-volt ignition
26
system required a high current. These features were also incorporated on the
similar 79mm-stroke version, but generally the 78mm stroke predominated during 1954.
Other significant developments
occurred in the design of the frame
and fairing, and these too were shared
with the 250 and 500. The dustbin fairing, constructed of hand-beaten
72
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
THE SECOND GOLDEN AGE
73
cycle for the first time. It was a revolu-
tionary idea, and one that would ensure the 350's superiority. With
only 35bhp, the 123kg (2711b) 350 of
1954 was capable of anamazing
220km/h (137mph), purely because of
the compactness of the motorcycle
and the aerodynamic efficiency of the dustbin fairing. The fairing also con-
tributed to extraordinary fuel con-
sumption.
During the course of the season the fairing design was continually devel-
oped,Anderson sometimes racing
with rear streamlining, although this
- was unsuccessful. One of the duties expected of the riders was the development of the frame and the improve-
ment of the overall handling, which in those days was done by trial and error.
Various combinations of fuel tank
were tested, as with the pannier tanks the rear wheel would sometimes lift under braking. The pannier tanks also used to split due to vibration, and for the Isle of Man TT they were replaced by a cylindrical tank over the engine, together with an interconnected fuel
tank on top. After the TT, for other Grands Prix, only the cylindrical tank was used, held by steel straps against wooden supports so that it could be
moved forward and backwards to alter weight distribution. From November
1953 until September 1954 most of this development was undertaken by Kavanagh. Both Anderson and Lorenzetti felt that at their ages (45
and 43 respectively) they had better things to do. In Anderson's case this
was golf, and Lorenzetti had many
business interests in Milan.
Not content with the 75 x 78mm,
or even the 75 x 79mm, engines, Carcano wanted to improve breathing
at high rpm and also reduce piston speed. Already the 75mm bore had
stretched the 250-based design to its
limit, so Carcano created the short-
stroke 350 by reducing an 88 x 82mm
500. The stroke was shortened to
69.5mm, and a bore of 80mm took the capacity to 349.345cc. This new 350 could fit larger valves, a 41mm inlet and 36mm exhaust, and with a 40mm Dell'Orto carburettor the power was increased to 38bhp at 7,400гpm. The cast-iron cylinder liner was replaced by a hard-chrome aluminium cylinder,
also reducing weight.
The 1954 350cc Grand Prix season
started very poorly for Moto Guzzi and there were no results in the first
three rounds at France, the Isle of
Man and Ulster. At the Belgian Grand
Prix, however, the
345cc Guzzis
showed that they were in a class of their own, Kavanagh leading home
Anderson.
With
victories in
Switzerland, Holland, Italy and Spain,
Anderson comfortably retained his
350cc World Championship. The 350
Grand Prix at Monza was a triumph for Moto Guzzi in front of their home
crowd, works bikes filling the first four places.
23
The 250 Bialbero continued to be
raced during 1954, but although a short-stroke version (70 x 64.8mm)
As chief designer, Carcano was ably assisted by Enrico Cantoni and Umberto Todero. Here they are at the drawing-board at the end of 1954. (Ken Kavanagh)
was produced, the NSUs continued to dominate. The new short-stroke
engine had a 38.5mm inlet valve and 33mm exhaust valve, and still used
the 140mm con-rod. This was the
final 250 Bialbero engine and would
also be used during 1955. First raced
by Lorenzetti and Montanari at a
national meeting at Monza, even with
the new engine results were not forth-
coming in the 250cc category. The
first Grand Prix was the Isle of Man
and FergusAndersoncould only
manage fifth in the Lightweight TT, his streamlining having broken with the vibration and acting as an air brake. Assen would be the next Grand
Prix, and also the last official race for
a works 250. Here Kavanagh finished
fourth,
For the Italian Grand Prix at
Monza much effort was spent on get-
ting more speed out of the bike, but
when NSU's Rupert Hollaus was
killed in practice NSU withdrew from the event. In a spirit of sportsmanship
Moto Guzzi also withdrew, Arthur
Wheeler taking the 250cc victory on his private machine. After Monza the official 250 was retired. Nonetheless,
1954 was an extremely successful year
for the 250cc Moto Guzzi in various 250 national championships,with wins in Italy, Austria, Great Britain,
Holland and Switzerland.
By the end of 1954 the 350 was still
dominant in its class, and with the
new short-stroke engine the prospects for the next season looked promising. However, both the 250 and 500 sin-
gles were struggling, and after the dis-
appointment of the 500 four, Carcano
wanted a new challenger for the
500cc crown. This would be the V8
that would appear during 1955.
1955
Enrico Parodi was now worried about the age of two of his leading riders and offered Fergus Anderson the position
of racing team co-ordinator over Mondo Michelli. Anderson thus retired from active racing, and
Lorenzetti, only slightly younger than
Anderson, having disobeyed the fin-
ishing order in the previous year's
350cc race at Monza, was replaced by Duilio Agostini. Completing the team alongside Kavanagh was Dickie Dale
and the reserve rider, 1954 Italian
Champion in the 2ndCategory,
Kavanagh rode in three classes at the Isle of Man in 1954, retiring in all of them. Here he
is on the 250 in the Lightweight TT. The 250, 350 and 500 were visually similar, and
also used new frames constructed of small-diameter tubes. (Ivar de Gier collection)
to minimise a back flip. There was nier tanks on either side. This was also a completely new trellis frame done because only frontal resistance, built from small-diameter tubes. This and not lift, could be tested in the extended over the front wheel to supwind tunnel, and Carcano wanted as port the fairing, making the fairing much weight on the front as possible integral in the design of the motor-
electron, carried the fuel in two pan-
Ken Kavanagh was also a enthusiastic photographer. This is Gudio Carcano at San
Remo golf club at Christmas 1954. (Ken Kavanagh)
Giovanni Rocchi. With no official factory representation in the 250 class,
Lorenzetti, Roberto Colombo and Cecil Sandford were provided with
1954 works bikes, Lorenzetti winning
the Italian Championship in 1955.
Duilio Agostini became a works rider for 1955, being responsible for wind tumel testing. Here he is on the 350 in the Imola Gold Cup that year prior to having a disastrous accident in the 500 race.The streamlining was more rounded and the
screen was held in place by a metal strip.
5
74
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
THE SECOND GOLDEN AGE
75
Easter. It was an eventful meeting. Kavanagh won the 350 race at an average speed of 83.98mph (135km/h), an event marred by the
death of Ray Amm on the MV. In the 500cc race Agostini's 500 single
caught fire, the electron parts causing a spectacular fireball. At Hockenheim shortly afterwards Kavanagh and Lorenzetti completely dominated the DKWs, Kavanagh winning at
154.5km/h (96mph). Kavanagh also
finished second in the 500 race.
In the 350cc World Championship
1955 was a vintage year for Moto
Guzzi, the green streamlined singles winning every face, Agostini in
France, Dale in Italy and Kavanagh in Holland. However, it was new recruit
Bill Lomas who took the title with victories in the Junior TT, Germany, Belgium and Ulster. To prove that
there was still life left in the 500 single, Lomas also won the 500cc
Ulster Grand Prix, his efforts earning him a two-year works contract.
A single overhead camshaft 1953
350 was also used to set several world
records during 1955. On 23 March Anderson, Agostini, Dale and
Kavanagh took the 350 to Monthéry in France where they set 8, 9, and 10-
hour records, plus the 1,000-mile in
350, 500, 750 and 1000cc categories. Further solo and sidecar records were
set in October and November by
Anderson, Lomas and Dale. Shortly
after that Lomas and Dale went to
Australia with a 350 and 500 to com-
pete in selected events, winning races as far afield as Perth and Mildura Giorgio Parodi, one of Moto Guzzi's
founding fathers, died on 28 August,
leaving Enrico firmly in control.
1956
Now at the peak of their success, the venerable singles were coming under
increased competition from the fourcylinder opposition. Again Carcano's brilliance was demonstrated with fur-
ther domination in the 350cc class, although Guzzi still struggled in the
500s.
For 1956 the official racing team consisted of Lomas, Kavanagh, Dale
andAgostini. Rocchiwas again retained as the reserve. With
Anderson gone, Mondo Michelli once
again became team manager.
Enrico Parodi immediately insti-
gated a new set of guidelines regarding prize money and starting money. This gave the company even more control
over the outcome of the races, and the company, rather than the riders,
would negotiate starting money. Also
it was agreed that all prize money would be shared between the three
riders.
In the 500 class the single was still campaigned but was now totally outclassed. The ignition was changed to a
magneto and single spark plug, the
only placing achieved by the 500
being Lomas's fifth in the Senior TT
at the Isle of Man. Carcano was
hoping that the V8 would provide
success in the 500 category, but devel-
opment was slow and hampered by
problems with the handling and relia-
bility. It was with the 350 that most
hopes were placed, but now the ven-
erable single was coming under
increased competition from the fourcylinder Gileras and MVs.
While the engine remained much
as for 1955, it received new camshafts
to improve the torque, and different gearbox ratios. The camshaft timing was now inlet opening 77.04° before top dead centre, closing 63.39° after
bottom dead centre, and exhaust
opening 63.87° before bottom dead centre, closing 44.37° after top dead centre. For a racing engine the over-
lap of 121° was very moderate, as was the inlet duration of 243° and exhaust duration of 288°. With a compression
ratio of 11.7:1 the 1956 engine still produced 38bhp at 7,400rpm on 90/100 octane fuel, but with a wider spread of power.Even though the
power peaked at 7,400rpm, the engine
would run safely to 8,200rpm. The
contact breaker for the dual ignition
was now mounted on the right side of the crankcase, above the geared oil
pump.
More development work was con-
centrated on the chassis and stream-
lining, with particular emphasis on
reducing the weight even further.
Carcano knew that only through a combination of superior aerodynamics
Bill Lomas started a winning streak with Moto Guzzi by taking victory in the 1955 Junior TT at 92.27mph (148.46km/h). He went on to win the 350cc World Championship with the short-stroke DOHC single. (Ivar de Gier collection)
the rest of the racing department,
However, Agostini was the standard with 1955 streamlining. rider for the wind tunnel tests. When
Lorenzetti also had a 1953 350 fitted
much of it centring on his continued
From September 1954 all the test- Bill Lomas joined the team after the ing was done by Kavanagh, and he Isle of Man TT he was only a freewould spend two or three days a week lance rider and still rode an MV in the at Monza. Dale still lived in England 250 class.
role as a journalist for The Motor Cycle
and his first test of the V8. This is
recounted in the section covering the V8, and ultimately led to Anderson's
and Agostini was involved in riding Soon, however, there was considerinstruction for the police at Mandello. able tension between Anderson and
position as team manager not being
renewed. By 1955 Enrico Parodi was
also becoming concerned about the
cost of running the racing programme, which by now also included the V8.
Lomas also rode the DOHC 500 single to its final Grand Prix victory at Ulster in 1955 at a winning speed of 92.22mph (148.38km/h), slightly faster than his winning speed in the 350 race. (Ivar de Gier collection)
The 350 for 1955 was the shortstroke (80 x 69.5mm) version that
was raced a few times at the end of 1954. frame was virtually unchanged from 1954 but there was
The
more development in the wind
tunnel. The result was a new fairing
that had a better drag factor, leading
to higher speeds. In order to save
weight Carcano would not allow the electron fairings to be painted a final
colour, instead leaving them in the
anti-corrosive green protective paint. This would become as distinctive for racing Guzzis as the earlier red. The
55
barrel fuel tank was supplemented by
a normal one above the top frame
tube, giving a fuel capacity of 30 litres.
By now the 500 single was barely competitive, and development of the V8 continued throughout the year.
The first official meetingwith
Anderson as team manager was the annual Shell Gold Cup at Imola at
and an improved power-to-weight ratio could the 350 single beat the
fours. The fairing for 1956 also featured a small air intake to cure what Carcano suspected was a breathing
problem. Although the fairing was noticeably sleeker. the frame t00
reverted back to the 1953 type, with a single large-diameter main frame tube
that also acted as an oil tank. The
engine hung from a trellis and there
Dickie Dale and Duilio Agostini in the 350 Grand Prix at Assen in 1956. Only the
350 was raced there, the fairing shape being altered again with an air intake below the screen. Lomas won the race and went on to his second World Championship.
76
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
THE SECOND GOLDEN AGE
77
was a completely new rear subframe consisting of short triangulated tubes. The leading-link forks were now from
the V8, and featured Girling sprung
dampers. The reduced drag, combined with lower weight and higher overall gearing (17/43 final drive sprockets), saw the top speed increase to around 230km/h (143mph).
Lomas and Dale returned from Australia in time for the Imola Gold Cup at Easter. Here Kavanagh led the 500cc race on the V8 before it over-
heated, but won the 350 event.
Shortly afterwards, at the non-championship event at Floreffe in Belgium, Fergus Anderson, after such a distinguished career with Moto Guzzi, was tragically killed on a BMW. The first World Championship event was the Isle of Man Tourist Trophy. Kavanagh won the Junior IT, but that was to be his only Grand Prix victory that year.
Lomas went on to take victories in
Holland, Germany, and Ulster, which
was enough to give him his second
350cc World Championship.
Throughout the season the bikes of
the other riders were plagued with detonation and ignition failures, but
the cause was not located until the
end of the season. Each frame had its own coil ignition, as did the Heenan
and Froude test bench. Tracing the problem to faulty ignition systems attached to the frame led to the coil ignition being discarded for the fol-
lowing year. Another problem was the
bucket tappets with the cam riding directly on the valve collar. After Lomas dropped valve at
Hockenheim these were replaced with those from the 500 four, in either steel or duraluminium, along with a larger valve guide.
In October 1956 a single overhead camshaft 350 was used for more stand-
ing start record attempts. On the
at
Enrico
Montichiari,
airstrip
Lorenzetti set both standing kilometre
and standing mile world records. He
also continued to campaign a 250
Bialbero special with more up-to-date streamlining. Created with the assistance of Luigi Lunardon and Eugenio
Lorenzetti's
Canova,
five-speed
Bialbero featured the barrel-type fuel
tank and a tubular backbone frame. Although he did not win any classic
World Championship, an amazing
result given that he was 45 years of age
and that the Bialbero, its roots in the
TT 250 of 1926, was struggling against the MVs. After his final race, the 1957 Nations Grand Prix, where he finished third, Lorenzetti retired to his business in Milan; he died in July 1989.
It was at Senigallia on 30 July that
rider, Keith
another
Australian
Campbell, was offered his first ride on a factory 350cc Moto Guzzi. Campbell
was being tested with Eddie Grant
(who was killed the following weekend) and the politics of racing took
- over. Campbell, with a faster machine
and under team orders, won the race
ahead of the official works riders
Kavanagh and Dale. Mandolini, on an
indecently fast 1953 bike, finished second, creating further tension within the team. This resulted in the eventual signing of Campbell for the
1957 season and led to Kavanagh leaving Moto Guzzi for MV. In the
meantime Campbell took a pair of racing singles to Australia and com-
peted in several events over the
winning the
southern
summer, events, he finished third in250cc Australian Senior TT.
After Lomas dropped a valve at Hockenheim, Kavanagh went on to win the 1956 Junior TT at an average speed of 89.29mph (143.67km/h), with a fastest lap of 93.15mph (149.88km/h). (Ivar de Gier collection)
During the period from March 1956 until 1958 Count Giovanni Lurani used a singleoverhead
fourwheeled Nibbio Il to set several dis-
camshaft
350cc-powered
tance records at Monza. In 1960 it
was fitted with a 1954 DOHC 250cc
engine, the final version being the
1963 Colibri of Piero Campagnella
and Angelo Poggio.
1957
This final Grand Prix season for Moto Guzzi was one of the more difficult. but ultimately rewarding years. In a
season marred by serious injuries, this
year saw the 350 Bialbero reach the
pinnacle of its development and the V8 finally achieve somesuccess.
Alongside Lomas, Dale and Campbell was newcomer Giuseppe Colnago for
the Italian championship of 1957. Development of the V8 continued
slowly, but the machine still had some
way to go before it was a champi
onship contender. A 350 V8 was also
considered, but it was with the 350 single that Carcano still saw Guzzi's
racing future in that class.
With ever-increasing competition, especially from the Gilera, Carcano set out to lighten the 350 even further, and alter the power characteris-
tics. In so doing hecreated the
ultimate racing single, and one that could defeat the far more powerful competition because it could corner
and brake more effectively. There was
no better example of Carcano's genius
than the magnificent 350 of 1957,
which existed in two versions, one with a 78mm stroke and one with a 79mm stroke, although they were
essentially similar.
After testing a 1954 version and its
1956 counterpart at Modena, Carcano found that the earlier bike lapped faster because of its better
acceleration out of slow corners. The priority on reducing weight as much as possible and also increasing lowspeed torque saw a return to the 1954
engine dimensions of 75 x 78mm
(345cc), with a corresponding reduc-
tion in valve sizes to 39mm inlet and
power was unchanged at 38bhp, although this was now produced
higher up the rev range at 8,000гpm. Even with single coil valve springs (to
reduce weight further), theengine
was safe to 8,400rpm. The rest of the engine followed the tried and tested
formula that had worked so well since 1954. The one-piece connecting-rod
ran on a caged big-end consisting of 16 5mm roller bearings on a 36mm
crankpin.
With the reliability problems of
1956 traced to the coil ignition, there
was a return to a magneto with a
single 10mm spark plug.Similar to
that of the 500 single of 1956, this
also saved the weight of two batteries,
coils andcontact breakers. Everywhere there was evidence of con-
siderable attention to weight saving, aluminium or magnesium being used throughout. Even the front brake was now a single leading shoe instead of the earlierdouble. Such careful
attention to lightness resulted in a
33mm exhaust.The carburettor size race weight of just 98kg (216lb), while was increased to a 45mm Dell'Orto, for the TT, which required a larger and while the torque was increased, fuel tank and fatter tyres (2.75 and
Following the injuries to Lomas and Dale, Keith Campbell assumed the role of number one rider. Here he is on his way to finishing second in the 1957 Junior TT, and he went on to take the World Championship. The larger fairing for 1957 is clearly evident. (Ivar
de Gier collection)
72
78
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
THE SECOND GOLDEN AGE
79
3.00 inches) the weight was 102kg
(225lb). Half-way through the 1957 season the stroke was lengthened to 79mm, giving 349cc, but all the other
engine specifications were unchanged,
as was the power of 38bhp at
The 1957 350 season got off to a poor start for the Guzzi team when
Lomas was injured, first at the baster
Imola Gold Cup, then more seriously
on the V8 in practice for the Assen TT, effectively ending his career; he
ment was difficult to justify. By the
end of 1957 all three works riders had been severely injured, and 1958 would
see the end of the dustbin fairings, one of the advantages that Guzzi had over other companies. Although they
did not race in any Grands Prix that had planned to approach John Surtees The weight-saving measures of the year. Dale also crashed at Assen on to ride in 1958, this did not happen. 350 were also passed on to the 500 the 350 Bialbero, finishing his season. With 14 World Championships, 47
8,000грm.
single. Although power stayed at The first classic event was the Isle of Italian Championships and 3,329 vic46bhp, the carburettor grew to 50mm Man TT where the Guzzis were tories since 1921, a long tradition had and the weight of the 500 was defeated by Bob Melntyre's Gilera, come to an end.
reduced to 100kg (221%lb). These although Campbell did come second Keith Campbell reverted to racing were astonishing figures considering in the Junior TT. After that Campbell private Nortons in 1958, suffering a that this was before the era of plastic completely dominated the rest of the fatal crash at Cadours in France in components. With streamlining, the season, winning the 350 Grands Prix - July on a 500 after winning the 350 500 was capable of nearly 250km/h of Holland, Belgium and Ulster. He race.However, the single-cylinder (155mph). On the track it meant that ended up winning the championship. Guzzis were raced by privateers some
the 38bhp 350 was more than a match Guzzi's last. Another Australian, years afterwards. Giuseppe Mandolini for the 45bhp Gileras, even on fast Keith Bryen, had joined the Guzzi raced thelong-stroke500 in the circuits likeSpa Francorchamps. team in Belgium, where he finished Italian championship and some However, with only 4bhp more than third, following that with a second at Grands Prix from 1965 until 1970, his the 350, the 500 was more disadvan- Ulster. best result being third in the Spanish taged against the fours. It was at the end of September, Grand Prix in September 1970. Prior
shortly after the final race of the season at Monza, that Dott Rag
to that, however, he had finished
However, Carcano had already designed a replacement 500 single that he fully expected to run during
second to Giacomo Agostini in the 1965 Italian championship. Arthur Wheeler also continued to campaign 250s and 350s, his best result being a victory in the 250cc Argentina Grand
Bonelli, Moto Guzzi's general man-
ager, announced that the company would bewithdrawing from Grand
1958. This new engine was eventually
produced in 1965 and had an even longer stroke (84 x 90mm). With an
Prix racing. Moto Guzzi's withdrawal,
together with that of Gilera and Mondial, signalled the end of the
Prix of 1962; he was third in that
11:1 compression ratio, four valves set
at a narrow included angle, and a 45mm carburettor,the power was
year's 250cc championship.
Gileras and MVs on the 500 single.
On the drive back to Mandello
Carcano suggested to Kavanagh that
the best solution to defeat the fours
was either a straight air-cooled six or a
water-cooled V8. With the dustbin fairings, engine width was a crucial factor; Carcano calculated the maxi-
mum width of the engine to be
500mm, and set about designing the most powerful engine he could within those parameters.
A meeting was held to put the idea to the directors of Moto Guzzi. Carlo Guzzi was not very enthusiastic about
theproject, preferring that Carcano
build and test a single-cylinder first,
but Dott Enrico Parodi supported Carcano and overruled Guzzi. Enrico Cantoni was given the project to draft, as Umberto Todero was involved with the short-stroke 1955 350 Bialbero. The design was to proceed in secrecy, with the bike appearing by surprise at the French Grand
Prix in May 1955. However, in the meantime Fergus Anderson became racing manager, and in a letter of 1
February 1955 he sent the news of the V8, together with a preliminary draw-
ing, to the press. When the picture
was published in The Motor Cycle on
10 February 1955, so began the
tension between Anderson and the
rest of the Guzzi racing department. It also hurt Guzzi's relationship with the
Italian press, and the V8 was no
longer a secret.
The water-cooled 90° V8 was an amazing design, with many unusual features. The crankcase consisted of one-piece magnesium casting
mounted transversely across the frame and incorporating a six-speed gearbox. When it was found that the flexibility
of theengine did not necessarily
Two of the proponents of the V8: Giulio Carcano, who designed it (left). and Ken Kavanagh, the principal tester (right). Here they are at Mandello in 1985. (Ken Kavanagh)
bronze valve guides needed to be split
to allow for assembly. This valve collet
retaining system would also cause
problems and was later modified. The valves were operated by double overhead camshafts driven by six straight-
cut gears, and like the earlier 500 four
they seated directly in the cylinder
head with no inserts. As expected the primary drive was by straight-cut
gears, the reduction being 2.7647:1 (34/94), with a dry multi-plate clutch
mounted outside the primary drive cover. This large reduction was in response to the problems that had
occurred with the engine speed clutch
of the 500 four.
Water-cooling was essential to cool
the rear cylinders, and the radiator
was situated in front of the crankcase.
The water pump was driven by one of
the timing gears, but the cooling
not
system
pressurised. Lubrication was dry-sump, the 5 litres of oil being retained in the frame top
was
shaft had perfect primary balance and was chosen for simplicity of construc-
tion, there was some secondary imbal-
ance. The crankshaft itself was
supported by five roller bearings, the
middle three having split outer races and split cages. The one-piece crankshaft also required the big-end bearings to be split. This was an unusual
golden era. While the racing success
had been a wonderful advertising
exercise, the motorcycle market was success by Giuseppe Mandolini nearly undergoing a severe downturn and ten years later. the cost of running the racing departDickie Dale, in a trench coat, awaits the start of the 1957 Junior TT. He retired during the race. (Ivar de Gier collection)
47bhp at 7,000rpm. This five-speed
500 was eventually raced with some
The V8
Nothing represents the resources and technical expertise available to Moto
Guzzi during the mid-1950s more
than the 500cc V8. Even 45 years on it stands alone as an example of engi-
neering luxuriance. In designing the V8 Carcano was given a free hand, helped by the regulations then governing 500cc motorcycle racing. The resultwas an engine clearly too
advanced for the frame and tyre tech-
nology of the day, and one that also
showed huge potential for further
development. While it did not achieve any memorable racing success
over its three-year life span, it was
truly representative of the Moto Guzzi
racing department at that time brilliant concept let down by a reluctance to face up to the problems it
created.
The V8 story began after the
Nations Grand Prix at Monza in 1954. Although Guzzi had triumphed mag-
nificently in the 350 race, Kavanagh could only manage sixth behind the
move, especially considering the unre-
liability of split cages in the350
Bialbero during 1953, and would be
one of the major causes of engine failure during the next two years, Eye-toeye con-rod length was 90mm (31/zin),
giving a long rod-to-stroke ratio of nearly 2.2:1.
Carburation was by eight 20mm Dell'Ortos controlled by a single cable and two cross-shafts, initially with a
single float chamber for each bank. In
this form, with a 10:1 compression ratio, 68bhp at 12,000rpm was pro-
require the six speeds, a five-speed,
52
duced at the rear wheel. When placed and finally a four-speed, gearbox was in a duplex cradle frame with leadingused. Cast-iron cylinder liners were tube. On the left of each inlet link forks and a swingarm pivoting at screwed into the engine cases, these camshaft was mounted a C.E.V. dis- the rear of the engine cases, the total being grooved to provide a larger sur- tributor for the coil ignition to that weight was 150kg (3311b), of which face area for cooling. With a bore and bank of cylinders. For the first engine the engine and transmission comstroke of 44 x 41mm, the engine was the firing order (right to left starting prised 56kg (1231lb). The front forks slightly oversquare and each cylinder at the front) for the 10mm spark plugs used two externalGirling shock had a 23mm inlet and 21mm exhaust was 1, 8, 3, 6, 4, 5, 2, 7. absorbers similar to those at the rear. valve set at an included angle of 58°. The initial design of 15 November and brakes were a 240mm four lead-
The valve stems were a very narrow 1954 featured a one-piece 180° crank- ing shoe at the front and a 220mm 5mm and thus not grooved for collets. shaft. This was essentially an in-line single leading shoe at the rear. Tyre The tops of the stems were enlarged, four with dual con-rods side by side on sizes were 2.75 x 19-inch on the front which meant that the aluminium- the crankpins. While the 180° crank- and 3.00 x 20-inch on the rear.
80
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
THE SECOND GOLDEN AGE
81
Although he had shown little inter-
est in theV8 project, Anderson
arrived unexpectedly at Modena and
demanded to be the first to test the
new machine. Despite being set up for the much smaller Kavanagh, Anderson tested it against the wishes
of the technical departmentand
immediately crashed it. The bike was
destroyed, even the engine, as the broken swingarm had broken the
crankcases. As every part was unique
the entire project was postponed. From that moment Anderson had a
difficult relationship with the racing department and barely communicated with Carcano.
The first race for the V8 was thus
at Spa for the Belgian Grand Prix,
where Kavanagh retired when all the crankcase studs snapped. Immediately
after Belgium larger bearing studs were installed, and Kavanagh then raced the V8 again twice in 1955, at Senigallia and Monza, but in both races the valve collars unscrewed. At this stage the crankshaft was still a
one-piece component, and in an
effort to overcome balance problems a one-piece 90°c rankshaft was designed and installed September 1955. This was followed on 5 October by90°canevolutionary rankshaft. With the 90° crank came
a revised firing order of 1, 5, 4, 8, 6, 3,
7, 2. The new crankshaft also used
lighter flywheel discs because the pis-
tons now contributed to crankshaft
inertia.
A winter redesign saw the V8 ready for the 1956 Easter Imola Gold Cup,
where Kavanagh retired with water pump failure while leading. At Hockenheimshortly afterwards he retired after five laps when the big-end cages broke, again while leading the race. He did, however, demon-
strate the speed of the V8 when he set a lap record of 199km/h (124mph). At Assen he retired after a collision with
Umberto Masetti's MV on the third lap. Until Assen Kavanagh was the
only rider to race and test the V8. but
for the Belgian Grand Prix at Spa Lomas also rode one. Here a longer swingarm was tried and Lomas worked his way up to third before retiring, once again demonstrating the V8's impressive speed. Kavanagh
found the bike frightening on the long
fast curves at Spa and after a confrontation with Carcano over the
handling no longer raced it.
Lomas then rode the V8 at Solitude where it overheated when in second place behind Geoff Duke. Ar Senigallia, the same event that saw Keith Campbell's first Guzzi works
ride, Lomas crashed the V8 dicing with George Monneret's Gilera. At
Monza Lomas crashed the 350 single,
breaking hiswrist, and Campbell
raced the V8 but retired after three-
quarters of a lap with a big-end bear-
ing failure. On 25 October, at the
Montichiari aerodrome near Brescia, Dickie Dale set world records on the V8 for a standing start kilometre at 144.8km/h (90mph) and a standing
start mile at 185.99km/h (115.5mph).
The one-piece crankshaft was used
until Monza in 1956.and despite
The 1957 version of the V8 was the most reliable, but there were still significant handling
problems. It was an amazingly compact engine given its complexity. (Two Wheels)
at Modena on 18 April. It was still the
although occasionally a 19-inch rear
intention to present the bike unex-
wheel was used.
pectedly at Rheims in May and hopefully have Kavanagh lead the Gileras
Development
proceeded very quickly and by 14 April 1955 the first prototype was ready. On the road outside the factory Kavanagh briefly ran the bike in front of a crowd of onlookers that included everyone of impor-
(Rheims was chosen because it had three very long straights and would not place too many demands on the
handling). This would have been
purely as a publicity exercise and the
tance at Moto Guzzi. They were to
V8 may not have been raced again, existing only to represent the engi-
take it to Monza the next day, but on that occasion it would not run on all cylinders because of an ignition problem, so the first test session took place
neering and technological superiority
Dale's world records the V8 had still
not finished a race. The persistent
crankshaft problems finally led Carcano to Hirth-Welle in Germany,
90°p ressed-up crankshaft with one-piece con-rods and caged big-end bearings. The crankpin was increased to 30mm, and the big-end used 15 5mm rollers. Con-rod length increased significantly
to 110mm (41/in). The new crank-
shaft consisted of nine separate parts
united by radially serrated Hirth
whom he asked to design a
At Hockenheim in 1956 Kavanagh agam led the race before the engine expired. Нете he is about to take to the track.
mately 7bhp more, and torque was Hefinished fourth at 94.89mph
couplings.
4.85 kgm at 9,300rpm. An indication On 4 December 1956 the new of the success with the development engine was drafted and most of the of the engine was when Lomas set engine reliability problems solved. new speed records on 26 February Other small changes were the reloca- 1957 at Terracina near Rome: his
tion of the oil pump to the rear
standing start 10-kilometre speed of 234.572km/h (151mph) stood for more than 30 years.
exhaust camshaft, and the carburettors, which now had individual float chambers. Carburettor size also
Not long afterwards the V8 had its
first victory. On 19 March 1957
increased to 21mm, and with the new
crankshaft came revised camshafts. Valve timing76°bwasinletopening efore top dead centre, closing 67º
Colnago won the 500cc Italian cham-
pionship race at Siracusa in Sicily.
That was followed by the V8's great-
est moment, the Imola Gold Cup at
after bottom dead centre, and exhaust
opening 62° before bottom dead centre, closing 40° after top dead
Easter. Three V8s were entered (Dale, Lomas and Colnago), Dale taking the victory. With Lomas out after a crash
centre. With valve overlap of
116°t hese were still very moderate figures for a racing engine. The compression
on the 350 at Imola, Dale and
Campbell rode the V8 in the German Grand Prix at Hockenheim. where Dale finished fourth and Campbell retired after four laps with engine trouble. In the Isle of Man Senior IT Dale again rode the V8, now with a
ratio remained at 10:1 (it was the
same from 1955 until 1957) and the now produced 73bhp at 12,500гpm (at the rear wheel), with strong power from 7,000грm.
dolphin rather than dustbin fairing.
Crankshaft horsepower was approxi-
(153km/h), the engine only running on seven cylinders. Lomas was back
of Moto Guzzi.
for Assen but crashed in practice, seri-
ous head injuries ending his career:
Kavanagh led the 1956 Imola Gold Cup before the V8 retired with water pump
failure. The V8 failed to finish a race that year.
Dale also crashed in the 350cc race at
Assen, breaking both ankles, so he
was out for the rest of the season.
With the loss of two star riders the
final Grand Prix for the V8 was the Belgian event at Spa. It was almost
the V8's final hour as Campbell set a
new lap record at 190.130km/h
(118mph) and was timed atan incredible 286km/h (178mph) on the
Masta straight. While leading the race
convincingly the V8 came to a halt with a broken battery lead. For the final event of the season at Monza,
Campbell crashed the V8 at the notorious Ascari curve in practice, breaking his pelvis; he would not race again
until 1958.Bryen also practised on the V8 at Monza but refused to race it. Two machines sat in the pits, but
there was no one left to race them. all
82
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
tion; he sometimes tested and raced
the V8 with lead weights on the
swingarm.
There was also probably an aerodynamic problem. The wind tunnel only
measured frontal resistance and pro-
vided no data on the effect of lift.
According to Kavanagh, on slow and banked curves the V8 was magnificent, but on the 240km/h (149mph) left-hand Ascari test curve at Monza the V8 had a terrible weave. So bad was the handling on fast curves that Carcano even invited the 53-year-old Stanley Woods to test the V8 during 1956. After testing at somewhat less than Woods described
themotorcycle racing speeds as perfect and
Carcano feltvindicated. What is indisputable is that the V8 nearly
killed several top-line riders, including world champions Lomas and
Campbell.
A 350cc V8 was also built, but not raced. This 36 x 41mm engine produced 48-52bhp. By using stretched
front cylinders from the V8, a significantly lighter 350 four was also built, producing 48bhp. If developed further
this could have been the most suc-
cessful of all Carcano's multis.
While Carcano's V8 was an incred-
ible engineering exercise, over its three-year period it still achieved no
victories in classic events. If the handling difficulties had been overcome
in the same way as the crankshaft
problem, it would probably have been invincible. Nearly 50 years on, the V8 remains a unique example of the abilities of an extraordinary engineer, and a small dedicated racing department,
in a time of unparalleled economic
prosperity.
The V7
s soon as Moto Guzzi withdrew from racing at the end of 1957.
Ing Giulio Cesare Carcano started to design a new V-twin engine. The first sketches appeared late that year and work continued during 1958, initially as an academic exercise, but many of the design features would eventually find their way to both the 3 x 3 and a sporting engine for the Fiat 500 motor
car.
Built initially as a 500 in 1959, then
650cc, this Fiat engine can really be
considered the predecessor of the V7. With forced-air cooling and twin car-
burettors, it soon produced 34bhp.
enough to propel the tiny car to
140km/h (87mph). The Fiat project
was then abandoned, but many of its characteristics continued on the
unsuccessful 3 x 3 Autoveicolo da
Montagna that had been developed in
parallel. The 3 x 3 engine was, however, designed by Micucci and, apart from being a 90° V-twin, shared little with the eventual V7; the crankcases, displacement, cylinder head and lubrication system were all different. It was
the tender for a new police motor-
cycle to replace the Falcone which
would see a more satisfactory outcome for Carcano's V-twin.
Since the 1920s Moto Guzzi had been the primary supplier in Italy of police and military vehicles, so it was with some surprise that a tender was
announced. Moreover, it was vital
that Moto Guzzi secured this tender for the continued prosperity of the
company during the depressed 1960s.
In May 1963 Carcano and Todero,
assisted by Micucci and Soldavini, began serious work on the project. The requirements were for a faster
and more powerful machine than the
Falcone, with a powerful electrical
system and a service life of 100,000 kilometres,
Taking the Fiat engine as a basis, it
was decided to double the power
output of the Falcone and place the engine in a tube and pressed-steel
frame; however, this was soon consid-
ered too expensive to produce and was replaced by the cradle frame of the V7. The prototype was produced during 1964 and testing began over the winter of 1964 and 1965. In the meantime a civilian version was also developed, the first model being dis-
engine wear the V7 won the contract ahead of offerings from Benelli, Gilera and Laverda.
The designation 'V7' came from
the V layout and the capacity of
700cc. Both the civilian and police
varieties were very similar (the police
version in a lower state of tune) and the basic layout adopted would prove so successful that it continues today.
As a large-capacity reliable motorcycle the V7 was a wonderful design, but it was far removed from Carcano's
Dickie Dale finished fourth in the 1957 Senior TT on a dolphin-faired V8. Even with the smaller fairing the V8 was commendably narrow. This was the best result the V8 achieved in a Grand Prix. (Two Wheels)
a
215
good-handling motorcycle. Kavanagh, with much experience on
of Guzzi's works riders being injured.
Shortly after came the announcement
Nortons, wanted to try telescopic
that Guzzi were withdrawing from
forks and was worried about the narrowness of the swingarm bearing at the rear of the crankcase. The leading-link forks worked well on the 350, but the V8 was considerably heavier and more powerful. Dale thought that the bike had a front-end problem, but Lomas thought it was weight distribu-
competition.
After three years the development
of the V8 was starting to pay off, but
while the engine was finally producing reliable horsepower, it was not quite the same with the handling. Although
always stable enough in a straight line,
the V8 never earned the reputation
fabulous racing engines only a decade earlier. The huge V7 was the antithe-
sis of the final 350 Bialbero that had played at the Milan Show in taken the balance between minimal November 1965 where it was the star weightandpower to new levels. of the show. Testing by the Italian However, while it was no lightweight
police and military began in 1966, the
V7 initially only completing 31,000
kilometres before Guzzi's own testers
rode a further 55.000. With minimal
performance machine, the V7 was a
very clever design, with careful attention paid to accessibility for servicing and long-term reliability. These quali-
The prototype V7 was built in 1964, with first testing over the winter of 1964 and 1965. The single seat indicates its intended function as a military and police
motorcycle. (Ivar de Gier collection)
84
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
THE V7
85
ties would distinguish this next gener-
ation of Moto Guzzi, and the V7
would build a loyal following. Eventually, too, it would evolve into
some of the most impressive sporting
motoreycles of the 1970s, '80s and
*90s.
A 90° V-twin all-alloy design, like the earlier Fiat and 3 x 3, the V7 had pushrod-operated overhead valves with the camshaft situated between the cylinders. The camshaft timing
was inlet opening 24° before top dead centre, closing 58° after bottom dead centre, with the exhaust opening 58* before bottom dead centre and closing 22° after top dead centre. Lift for both inlet and exhaust valves was a moderate 6.6mm. This camshaft would also
be
used on the later V7 Special,
Ambassador and 844cc Eldorado, and was driven by helical gears from the crankshaft.
Unlike most motorcycle engines of
the time the one-piece steel crank-
shaft used plain big-end and two plain
main bearings. Many of the design features would remain unchanged
throughout the entire production life
of the engine. These included the
con-rod length of 140mm (51/zin), the
22mm gudgeon and 44mm crankpin.
The plain bearingsnecessitated
high-pressure lubrication system, the
3 litres of oil being contained in a detachable sump underneath the engine. Unlike the 3 x 3, which had
an oil filter, the V7's only oil filter was
a wire gauze located at the bottom of the crankcase directly connected to
the oil pump. Replacement of the
lower-end bearings could be done
without removing the engine from the frame.
Bore and stroke of the first version
was 80 x 70mm, giving an unusual
displacement of 703.717ce, again quite different from the 3 x 3. In line
withother Moto Guzzis, chrome
cylinder bores were used. Two over-
head valves, a 38.5mm inlet and
34.5mm exhaust, were set at an
included angle of 70° and used single coil springs. An unusual feature was the four-ring piston, which carried a
second oil scraper ring underneath
the 22mm gudgeon. The compression
ratio was 9:1 (7.5:1 on the police ver-
sion), and carburation was by two Dell'Orto SSI 29mm carburettors. Ignition was by battery and coil, an
automotive-type Marelli S 123A dis-
tributor being driven off the of the camshaft. Power was 50bhprear at
6,300гpm, with 32bhp at 4,500rpm for the police model.
The clutch and final drive followed
automotive rather than traditional
motorcycle practice, Bolted to the
rear of the crankshaft was a flywheel
housing a twin-plate dry clutch, and
the final drive was by shaft inside the right side of the swingarm. A universal joint was connected to the gearbox layshaft and the rear of the drive shaft to a pair of bevel gears. It was a robust
design well suited to the police use
that was the motorcycle's prime intention. More motorcycle in design was the four-speed gearbox
that bolted constant-mesh of the
to the rear
crankcase.
A civilian pre-production V7 was displayed at the 1965 Milan Show, eventually going into limited production the following year. (Ivar de Gier collection)
Other areas where the V7 departed from usual motorcycle practice was in the electrical and starting system. A
12-volt electrical system incorporating
a 300-watt Marelli DN 32 M dynamo
and a 32 Ah battery was used, and
starting was electric only. A massive Marelli MT 40 H 0.7hp starter motor made the fitting of a kickstart unnecessary. The only instrument fitted to the V7 was a speedometer.
The chassis was more conventional
in its layout. Although constructed more for strength than lightness, the
frame was a tubular steel double-
cradle type with a single 48mm back-
bone tube. Telescopic forks and
swingarm rear suspension completed the specification. Because the forks were enclosed by top covers these, too, looked massive,but the fork
tubes were only a marginal 35mm in diameter and were very heavy as the
fork legs were steel. Wheels were alloy
Borrani 18 inch front and rear, fitted with large 4.00 x 18 Pirelli tyres. This
was also an unusual feature for the
time as most motorcycles were fitted with narrow tyres on 19 inch rims. The brakes were also marginal, even
though the front was a full-width 220mm twin leading shoe, with a
220mm single leading shoe at the rear. The weight of 243kg (536lb) was just
a little too much for the brakes, and
even though the factory claimed a top speed of 170km/h (105mph) with the
rider fully prone, the early V7 was
hardly a performance machine.
As the V7 was a totally unique
motorcycle it was greeted favourably by the press. Not only was it a refreshing design, but it also offered a level of quietness and sophistication that was rare for motorcycles in 1966.
Handling was surprisingly sure-footed
for such a large machine, and as a touring motorcycle the V7 was
unequalled. Performance, however,
was lethargic, Cycle magazine in June 1967 putting its test machine through
a standing start quarter-mile in 16.1 seconds at 84.9mph (136km/h).
While various prototypeshad
appeared throughout 1965 and 1966. only 30 production V7s were built in
1966, together with 52 V7 USAs.
Regular production began in 1967,
these differing in several details from
the prototypes. There was now a
round taillight, new passenger grab rails, new silencers, and rear shock absorbers with exposed springs. Colours were no longer silver but burgundy with chrome tank panels,
The delay in putting the V7 into production was undoubtedly due to the instability facing thecompany during 1965. Ar the time of the V7's conception Carlo Guzzi had retired from company;he died at
JUS
the
Mandello on 3 November1964.
before he could see the V7 come to
fruition, Enrico Parodi was totally in
control during this period, but had
completely underestimated the signifi-
cance of the Fiat 500 in the Italian market for mass transportation. Whereasduring the 1950s people were clamouring for Cardellinos,
Zigolos and Gallettos, they were not enthusiasts and when prosperity arrivedin the mid-1960s they
deserted these basic motorcycles for
cars. Parodi put his faith in the Dingo but this was misguided.
There were also other problems
facing the company. Much of the plant and machinery was out of date, as was
themanagement and
marketing.
Enrico Parodi had dramatically sacked Dott Rag Bonelli in the early 1960s, signifying the beginning of the company's decline. On top of these probems the Parodis were running out of
By 1968 the V7 was painted white and firmly entrenched as a police vehicle. This
photo from 1970 shows a V7 as used by the Italian municipal police.
Esercizio Industrie Moto Meccaniche), was formed. Although
still owned by IMI, SEIMM initially
rented the Moto Guzzi plant and
equipment for three years, with an option to buy; it eventually bought the plant after two years. New directors were installed, Luciano Francolini as chairman and Romolo De Stefani as manager. In 1968 Donato Cattaneo
replaced Francolini as chairman, and money and on 25 February 1966 the remained for the next five years. De company went into receivership. Stefani came from Bianchi, bringing Under the control of the IMI Lino Tonti with him as chief engineer, (Istituto Mobiliare Italiano), a group and Luciano Gazzola as tester.
Tonti had a long and illustrious
of creditors, a
provisional board
career in the Italian motorcycle indus-
chaired by Arnaldo Marcantonio was installed. The day before receivership the entire workforce was sacked, with
try. Hailing from the country's engi-
neering heart, Emilia-Romagna, since
the war he had been associated with
instructions to report for re-hiring the following day. This was too much for the proud Carcano, who expected to be asked back to the factory, but in a move that appreciation
Benelli, Aermacchi, Mondial and
Gilera, as well as Bianchi. Like
Carcano, he also had strong racing
showed little and racing
connections, being involved with the Paton and Linto racing machines that
forhis technological
bore his name. Gazzola had been a
achievements, he was not invited to return. This left the V7 design unfinished, and much sadness within the company. Later many of the workers were laid off, Cantoni being another casualty. Carcano was to leave motor-
leading racer in smaller-capacity Italianchampionships during the
1960s and would prove invaluable as a
development rider for the V7 and
together with the rectangular taillight of the prototypes. The Dell'Orto SS 1
carburettors were replaced with a VHB 29square-slide type. Colours were white with red pinstriping and production totalled 1,844 for the year. Although it was eventually replaced by its larger siblings, the V7 with its 703cc engine remained in production in limited numbers until 1976. These were mainly police bikes, the later V7 Special provingconsiderably more
popular for civilian use.
The V7 Special/Ambassador
As soon as he joined the company, Tonti continued work on the V7. At that time the United States was the
largest market for the bike,but Berliner, the US importer, wanted a
larger-capacity
motorcycle.
To
achieve this capacity quickly, the first
Ambassadors of 1968 were created
simply by increasing the bore of the
V7 to 83mm (still with the 70mm
stroke) to give 757.486cc. Thus 1968 Ambassadors had smaller V7 valves,
as well as all other V7 features.
later V7 Sport.
Soon, however, the 757cc bike was further developed into the V7 Special
cycles and become a world class yacht designer; now in retirement, he still lives in Mandello.
One year later, on 1 February 1967,
a new company, SEIMM (Società
During 1967 the V7 was produced
in modest numbers (1,031), and it
continued into 1968 with a few
changes to the specification: there was a new starter motor and seat,
for Europe, and the Ambassador in the United States. Now there were many other changes apart from the
larger bore. Valve sizes went up to 41mm inlet and 36mm exhaust with
86 dual valve springs and new valve
guides, now retained by a circlip.
Although they still had four rings, the pistons no longer featured the second
oil scraper ring under the gudgeon pin. There were also new camshaft timing gears with a coarser pitch and
an uprated oil pump, together with
new crankcases and crankshaft. A
four-speed gearbox was retained, but the V7 Special now had a higher-ratio final drive (8/35). While shifting was
still on the right for the V7 Special, US Ambassadors featured left-side
gearshifting.
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
In response to demands from the US, the frame was lengthened and strengthened around the steering
head, resulting in a longer wheelbase of 1,470mm (58 inches). A larger fuel tank with unique left (main) and right (reserve) fuel taps was also fitted, and
police versions had footboards. The
757cc models also opened the door to the lucrative American police marker; in March 1969 ten Ambassadors were
supplied to the Los Angeles Police
Department for testing, 85 eventually beingordered. Other US police departments also eventually added
The larger V750 Ambassador was developed with the US market in mind. This is a brochure from 1969. (Ivar de Gier collection)
GU77 ambassador
THE V7
87
the Ambassador to their motorcycle
fleets.
With the 757cc engine, power went
up to 60bhp at 6,500rpm, and the
reduction in claimed weight to 228kg (503lb) saw the top speed increase to
185km/h (115mph). The improved
performance was reflected in Cycle's
test of an Ambassador in October
1969; their test bike went through the standing quarter-mile as fast as many lighter British 650s in 14.36 seconds at 93.16mph (150km/h).
Production of the first 757cc
Ambassador began towards the end of
1968, 286 being built. Taking over
from the V7, 1,361 second series V7 Specials and Ambassadors were manufactured during 1969. That year also
saw Moto Guzzi return to world
record speed attempts. The V7 may
have seemed an unlikely basis for such
attempts, but Lino Tonti managed to create two remarkably light and powerful machines for speed attempts at
Monza on 26 June 1969. A 757cc
engine was used for the 1000cc class, and a slightly smaller, 739.35cc (83 x
70mm) engine for 750cc records. Compression was increased to 9.6:1
and with two 38mm Dell'Orto SS carburettors the power for both engines
was similar - 68bhp at 6,500гpm.
More significant was the reduction in weight to 158kg (3481b). These bikes
still used standard V7 Special frames, swingarm, wheels and forks, but featured a 29-litre alloy fuel tank and an alloy dolphin racing-style fairing. Top speed was around 230km/h (143mph).
With chief test rider Gazzola out with a broken leg, four other riders were chosen for the June attempt, Remo Venturi.Vittoria Brambilla, Guido Mandracci and Angelo
Tenconi. This first attempt was very
successful in the 750cccategory,
where three records were broken, the 100-kilometre, 1,000-kilometre,and the hour. Although they suffered tyre
problems, this success prompted Moto months later, in October.
Guzzi to attempt further records a few
On 30 and 31 October 1969 a larger team of riders went to Monza,
this time to attempt both solo and sidecar classes. The sidecar was the same unit used by Cavanna on the Supercharged 250 in 1948. Gazzola
Right: One of the 1969 world record
bikes. The photo is autographed by chief
tester Luciano Gazzola, although he was absent from the sessions through injury.
(Ivar de Gier collection)
Below right: With two specially prepared
V7s, a team of four riders attempted a
series of world speed records at Monza in June 1969.
was still injured and the 750 class riders were Silvano Bertarelli,
Brambilla and Alberto Pagani. Pagani
was joined by Mandracci, Franco Trabalzini and racing journalist
Roberto Patrignani in the 1000cc category. The sidecar recordswere
attempted by Brambilla, Giuseppe Dal Toe and George Auerbacher.
Nineteen new records were set,
including the 1000cc 100 and 1,000kilometre and hour solo records. The 100 kilometres was completed at 218.426km/h (136mph), andthe
1,000 kilometres at 205.932km/h (128mph), while the hour record was set at 217.040km/h (135mph). The 739cc special Guzzi also completed 12 hours at 179.553km/h (111mph).
which the V7 was adapted.
entered in
kilometre race at Monza, but Luciano
Rossi crashed.
Another significant racing Guzzi
was the ZDS racer of 1970. Sponsored by ZDS, the US West Coast distributor, this bike was essentially an insur-
was prepared specifically take on Harley-Davidson,
impressed.
•1
Ollamiar luat con
Amicisia Gamele Luisa
ASTROL CAS
750cc ambassador
SPECIFICATION
ENGINE: 750 cc OHV. twin,
2
Tal get on i been
LUBRICATION: wetsump. gear type oil pressure pump CLUTCH: tein piate dry clutch with SUSPENSION: telescopic tront fork
DRIVE: shaft drive with dual bevel dear to the rear wheel FRAME: duplex tubular structure Center and side stande
WHEELS: 18" alloy tims TIRES: 400 x 16 front and rear
BORE: 83 mmm
STROKE: 70 mm
BRAKE HORSEPOWER: 55 HP SAE COMPRESSION RATIO: 9 10.1
FUEL TANK CAPACITY: 4%, US gations
Speedo Instrument
pause no trat indicator and charge
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM: 12 V 300 W
88
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
Left:The V750 Ambassador gained
valuable publicity when it was used in
the James Bond film Diamonds are
Forever in 1971. Here Sean Connery
sits astride a police Ambassador during
filming in Las Vegas.
Below left: The European-specification 750 was the V7 Special. This is the 1972
version.
bike was considerably developed with Norris camshafts, 10:1 Mondial pistons, and cylinder head porting by C.
R. Axtell. Carburation was still by
square-slide Dell'Orto VHB 29 carburettors, although it was also planned to fit fuel injection. The starter motor,
battery and dynamo were removed
and the frame altered considerably to get the weight down to 150kg (3311b). Rickman forks with a single Lockheed front disc brake were fitted, but unfor-
tunately the bike did not get the
opportunity to prove itself except in non-AMA races, mostly in California and later Texas. The ZDS did. how.
ever, prove that the big V7 could be
an effective racing motorcycle.
In 1970 production of the V7
Special and Ambassador increased
dramatically to 4,806 units. There was
a new instrument layout (for civilian
models) that included a speedometer
and tachometer, and a return to the heel/toe gearshift, but generally the specification was unchanged. When
the French Moto Guzzi importer. Charles Krajka, entered one of the
1969 world record bikes in the 1970 Bol d'Or at Monthéry it gave Guzzi
the incentive to develop their own
sporting version of the V7. This would be one of Moto Guzzi's finest sporting models, the V7 Sport.
8.
V7 Sport:
the first and the best?
SHERIFF
WhilewiththeitsV7 hadperformancesurprisedin settingmanya large number of world speed records
at Monza in 1969, Lino Tonti had other ideas for Carcano's V-twin
engine. He envisaged a lithe high-per-
formance sporting motorcycle that could also be raced in endurance
events. The V7 Sport that appeared in 1971 was not only a magnificent
sporting motorcycle, but one that
would herald a long and distinguished
range of performance Moto Guzzis.
The transformation of the V7 into
the V7 Sport showed Tonti's genius at
its best. The V7 and the V7 Special may have been magnificent touring
motorcycles but they were not performance machines. The engine was not
designed with that intention, and considerably than weight removal was required to enable the
large V-twin to be used in a more
sporting chassis.
During the world record sessions of
October 1969 Tonti, with managing
director Romolo De Stefani and FIM president Dore Letto, discussed building a street bike suitable both for production and production-based racing.
De Stefani's outline forsuch
machine was that it needed to be
capable of 200km/h (124mph), weigh
less than 200kg (441|b), and have a five-speedgearbox. Thus the V7 Sport was born. Unfortunately 1970 was a year beset by strikes, and the development of the V7 Sport was delayed. Tonti, with the help of two former Aermacchi colleagues Francesco Botta and Alcide Biotti,
built the prototype frames in his own
workshop.
When Tonti unveiled his creation
metre race1971 for 750cc production machines, the Italian motorcycle
world was stunned. Not only did the
new Sport look purposeful, but unlike
any other sporting motorcycle it had
shaft drive.To ensure that the bike was competitive,prior to therace
Mike Hailwood had tested it at
Monza,afterwards proclaiming that
the V7 Sport was the best-handling
street bike he had ridden. Two bikes
were entered in the event,Vittorio
Brambilla and Guido Mandracci shar-
ing one and Raimondo Riva and
Piazzalunga the other. The latter pair
finished third after being second for much of the race. It had been a bril. liant debut and the design of the V7 Sport was immediately vindicated.
in June
at the Monza 500 kilo-
A few months later, at the end of September, a prototype 844cc V7 Sport was entered in the Bol d'Or at
Le Mans, raced by Mandracei and
Brambilla, and Riva and Sciaresa.
Again it was an impressive showing.
Guzzis eventually finishing third and
sixth. The V7 Sport was entered in
the other rounds of the 500-kilometre
series at Modena and Vallelunga. However, victory eluded
Italian
them, although Brambilla and Cavalli finished second at Vallelunga.
The FIM required at least 100 bikes
to be manufactured to homologate the V7 Sport for production racing
and 104 were built in 1971. However, there was initially some doubt as to whether production would even take
place. Production manager Alberici
Sharing the V7 Sport with Raimondo Riva in its debut, Piazzalunga took the V7 Sport to third place in the 500-kilometre race at Monza in June 1971.
58
90
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
V7 SPORT: THE FIRST AND THE BEST?
91
was completed. Even then they would occasionally manufacture specific
racing or test bikes that were also technically "Telaio Rossi, The chrome-molybdenum frame
was lighter than that on later V7
Sports, and the early models were hand-assembled with different internal parts, notably the primary drive
and five-speed gearbox. The cylinder heads and rocker covers on the "Telaio Rosso also carried different numbers. The first version was distinguished by
a non-reinforced
gearbox (smooth exterior), similar to that of
case
the V7 and V7 Special.
To enable the engine to fit a lower
frame,Tonti started by reducing the height. The belt-driven Marelli 300watt generator was replaced with a
much smaller 180-watt Bosch alterna-
tor mounted on the front of the crankshaft. Other changes to the
engine included new crankcase and
sump castings (evident by more external ribbing), and a slight reduction in capacity to 748cc. Pistons were now 82.5mm, still using four rings, and the compression ratio increased to 9.8:1.
As with other Guzzis, chrome bores were used, but as there was no air filtration the cylinders and pistons were prone to premature wear. Valve sizes were the same as the V7 Special at 41mm inlet and 36mm exhaust, but
the V7 Sport received a new camshaft
with both more valve lift and
increased duration. The inlet valve
nowopened 40° before top dead
centre, closing 70° after bottom dead centre, and the exhaust valve opened 63° before top dead centre and closed 29° after bottom dead centre. Valve lift for both valves was 6.9mm, and
this camshaft was used on all 750
Sports until 1974. Camshaft drive was by helical gear.
The forged one-piece crankshaft
and two-piece con-rods were polished
on the early V7 Sport, and Dell'Orto VHB 30 carburettors with accelerator pumps were fitted. A five-speed gearbox was also used. The V7 Sport was
fitted with a new ignition system, which featured a Marelli distributor
with twin points and coils. There was
also a significantly lighter flywheel with different ignition timing marks, increasing ignition advance to a total of 39°. The first V7 Sport featured a
gearbox with a unique set of ratios. The primary drive was that of the V7 and V7 Special, 16/22 (1.375:1), and
other ratios were: first, 15/27; second, 19/24; third, 22/21; fourth, 24/19; and fifth, 25/24. The higher-ratio
Ambassador final drive (8/35) was always used on the V7 Sport,
although two other ratios were avail-
able as a factory option, an even
higher 9/37 or a Sport 8/37.
In order to save even more weight
the starter motor was changed to a much smallerBosch centrifugally
engaged type. Only 0.4hp, this lacked
a solenoid and would be one of the least reliable features of the new
Sport. With 70bhp at 7,000гpm pro-
at
duced at the crankshaft (52bhp
6,300гpm at the rear wheel), the V7 Sport was one of the most powerful
motorcycles available in 1971.
While these engine modifications were significant, it was the design of
the red frame that really set the V7
Sport apart. With more space between the cylinders, Tonti designed a long
low frame with the backbone between
them. Together with the unique feature of fully detachable lower frame
rails to facilitate access to the engine,
the double-cradle frame consisted of
nearly straight tubes and would even-
tually feature on the entire range of large twins. The result was an
extremely compact motorcycle with a
seat height of only 750mm (291/
inches). To accentuate this lowness, 18-inch wheels were fitted front and
reat, which was the same as the V7
but was a pioneering feature for sport-
ing bikes when 19 inches was the norm, especially on the front. The
WM2 and WM3 alloy Borrani rims were shod with the latest-generation Michelin tyres, a ribbed 3.25 on the
front and an 3.50 S41 on the rear.
Brakes were a 220mm double-sided twin leading shoe on the front with a
220mm twin leading shoe on the rear.
The35mm front forks with pol-
ished alloy fork legs were manufactured by Moto Guzzi and included sealed internal dampers.Although
they were a highly innovative design,
cartridge-type forks becoming the standard from the mid-1980s, they were not particularly sophisticated and effective,They were much narrower than those of the V7 Special
and Eldorado at 180mm (7 inches), and were probably the weakest component in the Sport's chassis specifica-
tion.
The V7 Sport abounded with quality components, such as 320mm Koni
rear suspension units, a hydraulic
steering damper, and clip-on handlebars that could be adjusted both fore and aft and up and down. The petrol taps were solenoid operated and the rearstainless-steel guard hinged to allow the rear wheel to be removed.
Neat touches abounded - there was
even a courtesy light that operated when the seat was opened. These
The prototype V7 Sport was the centre of attention after the race.
parts book. There is some confusion as to the actual number as the "Telaio Rosso continued to be built to special order during 1972. An Italian owners' register puts the number at 153 (finishing at frame number VK 11263), but Lino Tonti has said that 204 were manufactured. The confusion appears because the racing department con-
was not convinced, and this almost
led to Tonti's resignation. Fortunately
Alberici agreed to their production, but as there was no room on the production line they had to be built in
the racing department. This first production series continued briefly into 1972; these were the 'Telaio Rosso' (red-frame) models, 150 being con-
tinued to build the "Telaio Rosso' until
structed (from frame numbers VK
the regular V7 Sport production line
11111 to VK 11261) according to the
Specially prepared V7 Sports were also raced in other 1971 Italian production events. This is Vitorio Brambilla on his way to second place at Vallelunga.
carly models were, however, real production racers and came without turn signal indicators. Finishing off the V7
Sport wasa wonderfully sculptured
lime-green fuel tank and surprisingly
The classic V7 Sport was the 'Telaio Rosso', hand-built by the racing department before a production line could be installed. When displayed at the Milan Show at the end of 1971 it caused a sensation. The small screen was always a factory option. (Two Wheels)
VIL SILEX
MOTO GUZZI
92
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
V7 SPORT: THE FIRST AND THE BEST?
93
quiet chromed Silentium mufflers.
Although the V7 Sport represented a remarkable transformation from the V7, it still was not exceptionally light despite its compact dimensions. Only through excellent design was the
weight of 206kg (454lb) well dis-
guised. However, when it came to performance the V7 Sport lived up to its expectations with a claimed top speed
of 206km/h (128mph). In 1971 and
1972 the V7 Sport was the fastest pro-
duction motorcycle available. In a
V7 Sport was so strong that it soon went into regular production,there being several changes made during
1972. The next European series had a
black-painted framewith the same
green tank and black decals, but were still without turn signal indicators. In all other respects the V7 Sport was as before, but they no longer featured as many hand-finished internal engine components. For this reason the early
"Telaio Rosso' models are the most
sought after, fetching premium prices superbike comparison test in over later examples. Producing special September 1972, Motociclismo man- first editions was not unique to Moto
duction levels increased significantly, and 2,152 were produced in 1972.
The racing programme continued during 1972. April saw the inaugural Imola 200 race and special V7 Sports
were prepared and tested at Monza prior to the race. One of the testers was Mike Hailwood, who was soon
lapping as fast as Gazzola. (Hailwood
was offered a ride in the Imola 200, but Guzzi could not meet his salary demand.) When the racing bikes lined up at Imola the drum brakes of the
prototype had been replaced by triple
Lockheed discs and they featured aged a top speed of 201.117km/h Guzzi: both Ducati and Laverda also- shorter exhaust pipes. Three bikes (125mph) from their "Telaio Rosso', indulged in this practice in the early were riddenby Brambilla, Jack faster than any of the other 750s 1970s with their 750 Super Sport and Findlay and Mandracci, finishing including the Honda CB750 and SFC. eighth, 10th and 11th respectively, Kawasaki H2 750. Ar Monza the V7 Regular production of the V7 Sport the Guzzis being overshadowed by Sport lapped significantly faster than coincided with that of the 850 GT Ducati on this occasion. There were any of the other bikes in the test, and Eldorado, so specific US versions also further entries in endurance which also included the Ducati GT were also produced. The gearbox events that year, but as before these 750 and Laverda SF 750. Weighing casing now featured external streng- were 844cc prototypes and are cov-
212.5kg (4681/1b), the standing-start theningribs and revised internal ered in Chapter 10. Two V7 Sports 400 metres time was 13.44 seconds at ratios. The primary drive was raised were entered in the 1972 Monza 500-
148.76km/h (92mph). slightly to 17/21 (1.235:1) and all the kilometre race, Ernesto and Vittorio
The first production version of the other ratios lowered to compensate. Brambilla finishing third, with
First gear became 14/28; second,
V7 Sport was announced to the press
Luciano Gazzola and Carena fifth.
in September and displayed at the Milan Show in November 1971. At
The Brambillas' bike was one of the
18/25; third, 21/22; fourth, 23/20; and
Imola racers,while the Gazzola/
fifth, 24/18. US Sports had a silver
the show it was a sensation, the dis-
Carena machine was a stock 'Telaio Rosso'.
frame with red paint, and a larger tail-
light, turn signal indicators,and reflectors.However, as theengine
play bike differing in small details
from the eventual "Telaio Rosso' ver-
The following year, 1973, was the
sion,notably in its more rounded
specifications were unchanged, so was
beginning of the De Tomaso era at
Lafranconi mufflers. Demand for the
the performance. Nonetheless pro-
Moto Guzzi. By 1972 SEIMM was looking for a buyer for the company and in December of that year, after negotiations also with Berliner, they formed an agreement with Alejandro
An early production series V7 Sport being put through a road test in 1972. It was
undoubtedly one of the best sporting motorcycles available in its day. (Two Wheels)
De Tomaso. Born in July 1928 in
Argentina, De Tomaso initially raced
Maseratis,then, after he moved to Italy in1955, OSCAs, made by a
small racing car manufacturer set up by the Maserati brothers after they
sold the company that bears their name. During 1957 and 1958 De Tomaso achieved some notable
results, but it was his marriage to a
wealthy American, Elizabeth Haskell, that gave him the finance to develop and construct his own sports cars in Turin. Elizabeth changed her name to
Isabelle, but continued to maintain
ties with her family. The Rowan Controllet Group,with Isabelle's brother Amory as chairman, was
involved in the purchase of the Ghia
coachworks and would continue to
Right: When first tested at Monza in
April 1972 for the impending Imola 200 race, the front brakes were still Fontana four leading shoe driens. Standing behind is factory mechanic Roberto DeBenardi
Middle right: Guido Mandracci finished 11th in the Imola 200, three laps behind the winning Ducatis.
Bottom right: Luciano Gazzola teamed with Carena to finish fifth on a standard "Telaio Rosso' in the 1972 Monza 500kilometre race. The vintage Pirelli
Falcone-type front tyre, produced specially in a more modem compound, can be clearly seen, as can the passenger footpegs. (Ivar de Gier collection)
figure prominently in the history of the DeTomaso business for many
years to come. De Tomaso and Rowan
eventually sold their interests in De
Tomaso Automobili and Ghia to Ford in 1970 and 1972. This provided the capital to invest in motoreyele manufacture, DTI (De Tomaso Industries, based in New York) purchasing 85 per cent of the ailing Benelli company at
Pesaro in 1971, and leading De
Tomaso to Mandello del Lario a year
later.
There was much apprehension
about the De Tomaso take-over, much of it justified. Yet De Tomaso did possess a strong belief in Italian motorcy-
and a
cles,
dislike of Japanese motorcycle industry practice,even though he obviouslyliked their
designs. His influence on existing
Moto Guzzi models was initially very
limited, and the V7 (both Sport and touring) remained unscathed for a
short time. However, it soon became
apparent that De Tomaso did not
really see any future for the big twin
and was committed to multi-cylin-
ders. Soon after taking control of the
company he was reported to have
strolled through the V7 assembly lines brandishing an engraved Arab sword,
exclaiming no more stupid twins. The immediate result was to restrict
research and development, and 1973 was the beginning of a long period of limited model evolution. Many of the
new motorcycles were simply rebadged Benellis and the larger Moto
Guzzi twins continued with irritating
design faults for many years.
Fortunately there were few changes
46
94
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
V7 SPORT: THE FIRST AND THE BEST?
95
to the V7 Sport for 1973. All bikes
now came fitted with turn signal indicators and had black-painted frames.
Colours were generally green, with
the same decals as the US models had
for 1972. In late 1972 the V7 Sport's
replacement was displayed, the 844cc
Le Mans, but as 1973 was a year of transition towards total De Tomaso influence it would be several years before production of the Le Mans
came to fruition. Although a modified V7 Sport, this prototype represented the beginning of a new series and is
also covered in Chapter 10.
The regular V7 Sport continued in
production, but bylate 1973 De
Tomaso's influence began to affect it.
Although the sporting ethos of the motorcycle continued and performance was unchanged, economic rationalisation began to have an
affect. From engine number 33448 the
helical gear camshaft and oil pump
drive were replaced by a timing chain
and sprockets, detracting from the
purity of the original design. The rear brake and gearshift arrangements were also revised, the new system of rods being less satisfactory than the
earlier type. The two-ball-joint con-
nection for the earlier right-side
gearshift, and cable rear brake, were
replaced by a system of rods. A
splined rod underneath the swingarm could now be adapted for either right or left side gearshift and rear brake.
The ball joints disappeared for a
was also inferior to the earlier cable
type, being far less progressive. It was obviously a quick solution because the
rear brake plate still had the casting
for the cable attachment. On these
later V7 Sports there was also a new, bent clutch arm that now cleared the back of the gearbox case. Earlier ones
with the straight clutch arm were
known to foul the case if not adjusted
correctly,
There were also small cosmetic changes for late 1973. Plastic tank
badges replaced the decals and there
was a wider range of colours, now pin and right-angle connection; - including black, bronze and blue. compared with the earlier arrange- Production was reduced considerably, ment it was cheap and crude. Most to 1,435 during 1973; 1974 model
sloppier and simpler system of a clevis
export versions now had the gearshift
year V7 Sports were all manufactured
during 1973, the 750 S taking over in 1974.
on the left, but as it was the right side
reversed, the shifting pattern with a one-up and four-down arrangement
Also for 1974 was the option of a V7 Sport with a dual disc front brake.
was opposite to that of other left-side patterns. The rod-operated rear brake
Similar to that of the prototype Le
By late 1973 the V7 Sport gained a rod-operated rear brake and a left-side gearshift. The camshaft timing gears also made way for a chain. It was still a desirable motorcycle, but a little less so than the origial.
MOTO GUZZA
Mansdisplayed at the
*Premio
Varrone in 1972, this included twin
300mm dises and Brembo 08 callipers
witha handlebar-mounted master cylinder, but retained the
for its day, especially with twin opposed pistonBrembo callipers.
Most other large-capacity motorcycles generally used smaller-diameter single
disc brakeswith floatingcallipers, placing the V7 Sport in an elite class. The twin disc kit was also offered by the factory for the V7 Sport and was
very
comprehensive, including replacement fork legs and front mudguard stays. Only 152 V7 Sports with
front disc brakes were manufactured in 1973, as 1974 models, all going to the US.
The 750 S
De Tomaso's intention was to double production at Mandello between 1975 and 1978, and the expensive V7 Sport
did not fit into this scenario. The
double-sided twin leading shoe front brake was not only obsolete by 1974, but was also more expensive than disc brakes, and the overall specification of the V7 Sport was considered too high to be profitable. As an interim model
Moto Guzzi released the750 S for
- 1974, being homologated on13
February. This was very similar to the
disc-braked V7 Sport but for some cosmetic modifications. All 750 Ss
Produced for one year only, the 750 S of 1974 was essentially a dual front disc V7
Sport with a striking colour scheme.
undoubtedly detracting from the orig-
inal. There was no doubt that the
750 S was considered an interim
model as only 948 were built.
The 750 S3
Although a final 100 drum-brake V7 Sports were manufactured in 1975,
probably to use up spare parts, the 750
evolved into a final archetype that
year. There was no disguising the existence of the 850 Le Mans, which had
had a left-side gearshift, still with the unusual one-up, four-down pattern. been threatening to supersede the Most of the changes were in the 750 since 1972. However, that
model's delay gave the 750 a one-year reprieve, the 750 S becoming the 750 S3. It may have looked superficially similar to the 750 S, but in nearly
paintwork, black with diagonal stripes
in either red, green or orange, new
side covers, seat and a rather dubious combination of chrome exhaust pipes
and matt black Silentium silencers. The seat was neither a single nor a
every respect the S3 was an inferior motorcvele. It was also a victim of De Tomaso's rationalised production, which meant that many components of different models were shared. This programme would eventually also see the end of the Eldorado and 850 GT. Now the 750 S3 was very similar to the 850 T and T3, the S3 and T3 featuring triple disc brakes with a linked braking system. This had first featured on the Le Mans prototype of late 1972 (see Chapter 10).
dual, being a 14/2-seater, again a rather
unusual concept.The side covers
came from the contemporary 850 T.
In all other respects the 750 S was a
V7 Sport. It had the same multisolenoid-operatedadjustable handlebars,fuel tap,instruments handlebar switches, and neat touches like the ignition key incorporated in the hydraulic steering damper. engine and electrical specifications
All
was its lack of performance; in an era where performance levels were increasing, it was ludicrous to offer a slower version of the 750 S. As it was really a sleeved-down 850 T3, the S3 used the 850 T3 camshaft, which not
only offered less valve lift, but also less
duration. This camshaft worked well
in the 844cc engines (like the Le Mans), but gave the S3 decidedly asthmatic performance, especially with the small Dell'Orto VHB 30C
carburettors. The inlet valve opened
20°52°a
before top dead centre, closing
10-33
fter bottom dead centre, and the
exhaust valve opened 52° before bottom dead centre, closing 20° after top dead centre. Inlet and exhaust valve lift was 6.58mm. All other internal enginespecifications were as
before except for a heavier crankshaft, although some of the final S3s had the
lighter flywheel of the Le Mans. Later S3s also featured the T3 distributor with a revised advance curve, also contributing to a loss in performance.
As the engine castings were shared with the T3, the exhaust manifolds
now bolted into the heads rather than being screwed as before.
Despite the milder cam, claimed
were also shared, the styling changes
The biggest problem with the S3 power increased to 72bhp at
96
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
97
uprated at the same time. Now 0.6hp,
it was joined by a 280-watt Bosch alternator.
With an increase in dry weight to 208kg (4591b) and wet to 230 (5071b),
the S3 suffered in comparison with other sporting motorcycles of the period. Contemporary tests were rather unflattering about the bike's performance, and the very optimistic Veglia speedometer. One of the most memorable was Motor Cycle Mechanics in April 1976, which described the speedometerneedle hovering at 140mph (220km/h), with a BMW R90S and Kawasaki Z900 disappearing into the distance. Actual timed top speeds reflected this disappointing performance. Motor Cycle of
17 July 1976 tested a 750 S3 and only
managed a meantop speed of
114.2mph (184km/h). The very high final drive gearing also hurt the acceleration, with a standing start quarter-
Looking very similar to the 750 S, the 750 S3 of 1975 was a disappointing motoreycle. The S3 shared more with the touring 850 T3 and suffered from poor performance.
7.000грm. One advantage that the S3
front disc was controlled by the
inherited from the T3wasthe
handlebar-mounted 12.7mm master cylinder, and the left front and rear
replaceable oil filter cartridge, this
discs were operated bythe rear
being housed in the sump and requit-
ing oilpan removalforaccess.
15.875mm master cylinder. This brak-
ing set-up would become another
Although undoubtedly the oil filter
Guzzi trademark, and one that few other manufacturers have adopted.
was beneficial for engine life, the loca-
tion inside the sump made replacement unnecessarily awkward and time-consuming. It was also was a designproblem that MotoGuzzi refused to rectify under De Tomaso
All S3s had a left-side gearshift and
mile time of around 14.2 seconds at 169km/h (105mph). Only comparatively few 750 S3s were manufactured before it was replaced by the 850 Le
Mans, total production being 950.
Obviously by 1975 the performance
of the 750 S3 was no longer compara-
ble to other sports bikes that were gradually growing in capacity. The
Ducati 750 Super Sport had become a 900 SS and the BMW and Kawasaki 900s were about to become 1000cc.
Moto Guzzi's answer was to draw even
more on the 850 T3 to create the Le Mans for 1976. Certainly there were
performance gains to be had from the 844cc engine, as well as braking, lubri-
cation and electrical improvements.
Yet as a pure uncompromised sportster
the larger machine offered little over the original "Telaio Rosso' V7 Sport.
The V7 Sport was built as the embodi-
ment of an engineer's ideal, and not
compromised by economics, fashion or marketing. As such it is the greatest
sporting Moto Guzzi of the modern era.
Undoubtedly one of the most spectacular settings for a motorcycle factory anywhere: with Mount Grigna looming above, Mandello del Lario on the shores of Lake Como, near Lecco, has been the home of Moto Guzzi since 1921.
right-side brake.
The first production Moto Guzzi was the 500cc Normale, which was in production from 1921 until 1924.
Changes from the 750 S abounded.
The multi-adjustable clip-on handle-
ownership.
Gearbox and primary drive were as for the 850 T3, the same as the 750 S
except for a new fifth gear (28/21) giving the same ratio. The S3 also
received the 850 T3 final drive (7/33)
and a wider, WM3 21.5-inch Borrani alloy front wheel. It was really the
braking system that set the S3 apart from the earlier versions. In addition to the twin 300mm front discs there
was a 242mm rear disc. The right
bars were discarded for non-adjustable
forward
offset
clip-ons.
These,
together with footpegs mounted fur-
ther forward, made the riding position very uncomfortable. There were new switches and an overall loss in detail quality. Side covers became those of the 850 T3, but colours mirrored that
of the 750 S; while it was definitely
built to a price, not all was inferior on the 750 S3. Finally the Bosch starter
motorgained a solenoidand was
98
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
99
Left: Pietro Ghersi's 1T 250 would
have finished second in the Lightweight
TT at the Isle of Man in 1926 but for
disqualification
Below: The first of many Moto Guzzis to carry an omithological name was the
spectacular Condor of 1939. (Roy Kidney)
Right: After the Second World War the Condor became the Dondolino. It was to become one of Guzzi's most successful catalogue racers because of its strength and reliability.
Below right: With the banning of
supercharging after the war, the pre-war
Bicilindrica restemed racing duties almost unchanged until 1948. This is the 1947
3
100
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
101
MOTO GUZZI
Above: For nearly 20 years the 500cc 120° V-twin was competitive. When it was replaced by the four-cylinder in
1953 the Norton team was surprised and
relieved.
Left: The Gambalunga was initially a
longer-stroked Dondolino, bur gradually developed into a full works racer with a
completely different chassis.
Right: Because it was designed with racing specifically in mind, the 250cc Albatros continued to be a highly
successful racer after the Second World
War
102
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
103
The Albatros continued to be raced well into the 1950s, many being modified with Gambalunghino equipment to keep them
competitive. This Albatros has a Gambalunghino doundraught carburettor and fuel tank but retains the Albatros girder forks. (Roy
Kidney)
The Airone Sport was styled along the limes of the larger Falcone in 1952, so both bikes looked very similar. The Airone Sport still used the pressed-steel frame with a tubular rear section. This example has the incorrect Falcone oil tank with knobs. (Roy Kidney)
A restored 1956 Falcone Sport outside the factory at Mandello. This year saw a retum to chromed tank sections. The magnificent V8 in its final form of 1957. After three years of development it still had many problems.
2
104
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
105
There was little space around the engine but the V8 was amazingly compact. This is the gear camshaft drive side.
Gaming successive 350cc World Championships from 1953 until 1957,
the 350 Bialbero was the most suecessful racing Moto Guzzi. Carcano's obsession
with saving weight saw them finished
only in green protective paint. This is the
1956 350, with the Isle of Man TT number. The 1956 air intake in the
fairing has been covered but is clearly
visible.
In 1972 the V7 Sport went into regular production. These were no longer raceshop assembled but were still a highly
desirable motorcycle. (Phil Aynsley/
Streetbike)
More suzz
72
72
From every angle the V7 Sport was a
purposefulmachine.(Phil Aynsley/
Streetbike)
106
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
107
Left: The gradual evolution of the V7 saw the 850 GT of 1972.
Right: The De Tomaso influence became
evident by 1974 with the slightly softened
750 S: still a handsome motorcyele and
tate than the V7 Sport.
MOTO GUZZI
Below: Another modern sporting classic was the Le Mans. This example has non-
standard Marzocchi forks. (Streetbike)
850
GiT
108
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
109
Left: Although never attammg
the
following of the larger twins, some, like
this V50 Monza,werebeautifully balanced motorcycles. Unfortunately
they were also somewhat underpowered.
Below left: The most popular Moto
Guzzi of the late 1980s through to the
early '90s was the California III. Offered in a total of eight different varieties, this is the normal carburettor version. (Two Wheels)
Above right: A significant improvement
on the Le Mans IV, by 1993 the Le
Mans V was obsolete and struggling in the marketplace. This is a final version
with fairing air scoopsand framemounted instruments.Missing is the
lower belly pan.
Right: For some reason the Daytona
failed to meetexpectations. At the
request of dealers, and against Dr John's wishes, a dual-seat option was produced.
The rectangular headlight was required in the US, UK and Australia.
110
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
111
HOTO GUZZI
Above: While the sporting Guzzis failed to find favour, the cruisers thrived. The EV 1100 was universally hailed as one
of the world's best cruisers.
DAYTONARS
Left above: In 1996 the 1100 Sport
gained many improvements, including
electronic fuel injection.
Left: One of the finest Moto Guzzis in recent years was the Daytona RS. Unfortunately it came too late and was
discontinued after only two years.
Right: The Centauro Sport of 1998 was
painted to emulate the colours of the
racing Austin Mini Cooper S. This
example is outside the factory gate at Mandello.
112
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
The final 1100 Sport was the Sport 1100 Corsa, a limited edition of 200 produced in 1998. Here a Corsa rests
alongside Lake Como.
Big tourers
and cruisers
Even though the V7 Sport stole th show at Milan in November 1971 almost as significant was a replace-
ment for the V7 Special and
Ambassador. This saw many of the
engine and gearbox improvements of the V7 Sport, plus, largely as a result
of influence from the United States
importer Berlinet, another increase in engine capacity, to 844cc. Throughout this period the demands of the United States market, including police departments, had a consider-
able influence on the design of the big twins, as the US accounted for about half the production. As an evolutionary redesign, the 850 GT, and its US variant the Eldorado, would last through until 1974. The 850 was also offered as the California, primarily a police bike but also available to civil-
ians. This was the first of a long line of California cruisers that would eventually become the backbone of produc-
tion at Mandello. Initially all these
850s used the larger loop-type frame,
but after 1974 the 850 engine would be used in the Tonti-designed Sport
chassis.
The 850
GT/Eldorado/California
Although it looked superficially simi-
lar to the final 1971 V7 Special, the
850 GT, or Eldorado, featured a
Styled like the first 'Telaio Rossa' V7 Sport, the six-speed VI1 Sport of 1999 representedthe new generation of
number of significant developments. The new engine gained its capacity
through a stroke increase to 78mm for
a capacity of 844.06cc.Although
Created specifically for the US market, the Eldorado differed only in detail from the 850 GT. Most noticeable was the retention of the weak twin leading shoe front brake. This is a nicely restored example.
114 83mm pistons were retained, these
now had three, rather than four,
piston rings and gave a 9.2:1 compres-
sion ratio. Despite the longer stroke,
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
BIG TOURERS AND CRUISERS
115
leading shoe brake, 850 GTs now had a four leading shoe brake similar to sanesame yearcertainalso insawthenewpaten onl that of the V7 Sport. With the new silencers, shaped more like those of engine came an increase in weight to the 750 S, these appearing on both
235kg (518lb), so the performance of the California and 850 GT As with largely unchanged, the con-rod length the 850 GT was similar to that of the the V7 Sport, the helical timing gears remaining at 140mm. This gave the V7 Special. Cycle magazine, testing an were also replaced by a cheaper timing 844cc engine a stroke-to-bore ratio of 850 Eldorado in July 1972, managed a chain at this time (fromengine 1.79:1, and crankshaft horsepower top speed of 116mph (187km/h), and number 58532). While only 835 went up to 64.5 at 6,500rpm. The a standing-start quarter-mile in 14.04 Californias were built in 1972, proengine crankcase castings now fea- seconds at 94.65mph (152km/h). The duction increased to 1,335 in 1973. tured the internal and external web- 850 immediately superseded the V7 There were a few more alterations bing of the V7 Sport, as did the Special, 815 being produced towards to the specification of the 850 GT and housing that accommodated the five- the end of 1971. The next year saw Eldorado for 1974. Because of strikes speed gearbox. This reinforced hous- the 850 become Moto Guzzi's premier at Dell'Orto, some of the final variing was also shared with the regular model, with 2,412 Eldorados and - ants were fitted with Spanish Amal production V7 Sport of 1972, as were 2,626 850 GTs produced. 930 carburettors. As with the V7
the lowerend of the engine was
the primary and gearbox ratios. Although the California had also Sport, the front four leading shoe
Another significant development was been displayed at the Milan Show of drum brake was replaced on the 850 a larger and stronger rear drive cast- 1971, it was not until 1972 that this GT. Eldorado and California for 1974. ing, with a return to the lower (8/37) went into production. The first Whereas the Sport received a dual ratio of the first V7. The rear hub fea- California models were built for the disc set-up, the touring models now. tured a finned sludge trap, an American market as a civil version of featured a single 300mm Brembo disc. increased oil capacity, and a six-bolt the police bikes, initially as 750 then Even though 300mm was quite large
sump in place of the earlier single
850cc; they were called the 'Police Special' before becoming the
for a dise brake in 1974, it was not
much stronger than the drum it
10mm plug.
An improvement over the V7
replaced. It was fitted with a 15mm handlebar master cylinder that was
California. Deviations from the specification of the 850 GT included even
Special was a Bosch starter motor instead of the Marelli, but the 850 GT
higher handlebars,footboards, a thickly padded white and black solo seat, crash bars and a windscreen.
intended for dual dises. With the front disc came new fork legs, now in alu-
still shared the V7 Special's belt-
minium. Only 350 850 Eldorados
driven Marelli dynamo rather than
the alternator of the Sport. Also
Like the 850 GT, the California also
were built with the front disc brake, and 164 850 GIs for Italy, before this model was superseded by the 850 T.
shared with the Special (and Ambassador) was the rod-operated
featured a four leading shoe front
brake, this eventually also being fitted
to the Eldorado during 1973. The
More Californias featured the disc (1,590), with which came cartridge-
rear brake, enabling the gearshift and
rear brake to be fitted either on the
increase in power and weight had
right or left side. While the US
type forks that had been pioneered on the V7 Sport. By 1974 De Tomaso's production rationalisation for Moto Guzzi would see the end of the large
increasingly taxed the double leading
shoe front brake and it had come
Eldorado still used the earlier double
For 1974 the 850 GT received a Brembo front disc brake. This California has a
second dise fitted. (Streetbike)
loop-frame models, all big Guzzis shar-
ing Tonti's lighter and more compact
low maintenance of a BMW. In many ways it was a landmark motorcycle for
Moto Guzzi: it showed that a Guzzi
was more than a huge interstate
tourer or uncompromisedsportster,
and could appeal to a wider market. In the process of transformation, the 844cc engine also received a number of upgrades to improve horsepower and reliability.The biggest problem
with the 850 T was that the concept
was so successful that it was used as a basis for all large touring Moto Guzzis
formany years to come,limiting
development and model evolution.
Although the 850 T engine shared
its displacement with the GT and
Eldorado, the 83mm pistons had thinner piston rings and the compression ratio was increased slightly to 9.5:1. Four piston rings were still used, three
compression and one oil scraper. As
usual at that time, the cylinder bores were chrome plated. The camshaft was new, being less sporting than that of the 750 S and the same as that used
on the 53 of 1975 (see timing figures
in Chapter 8), and the firstwas
homologated in Italy on 3 November 1973.
For the 850 T the rocker arms were
modified so that the rockers were located further from the cylinder bores. Already it was apparent that
there were plans to enlarge the engine further with bigger cylinders. The only change to the bottom end was a small
increase in crankpin diameter (to 44.008-44.020mm). There was yet another flywheel, with different timing marks. The V7 Sport dualpoint distributor was still used, but maximum ignition advance was
reduced to 34°. The five-speed gearbox and 18/37 final drive were as for the 850 GT. The carburettor size also increased to that of the V7 Sport, the twin Dell'Orto VHB. 30Cs unfortunately without any air filtration, and claimed power was 68.5bhp
at
6,300гpm (53bhp at the rear wheel).
In many respects the 850 T engine was an improvement on both the V7
Sport and 850 GT. The Tonti frame
required a lower engine so that neces-
sitatedan alternator, initially 180
watts (13-amp) but later increased to
280 watts (20-amp) during 1975. The starter motor was a Bosch 0.7hp, now
with a solenoid located above the
Combining the best elements of the Sport and 850 GT, the 850 T of 1974 successfully broadened Moto Guzzi's line-up. This picture is taken from a period road test. (Two Wheels)
starter motor. This was a much more reliable system and would serve the
big twins well until 1988. The few final 850 Ts produced during 1975
also featured the replaceable oil filter
cartridge in the sump that would be
standardised that year.
The cycle parts were new for the 850 T, and were of excellent quality.
Mudguards were stainless steel, and a 220mm twin leading shoe drum brake
was fitted on the rear. Inside the rear wheel was now a rubber cush-drive thatalmost eliminated driveshaft
spline wear. Rims were alloy Borrani
WM3 front and rear (although the
1973 prototype was fitted with steel rims), with 3.50 x 18 and 4.10 x 18-
inch tyres. The single front 300mm
Brembo disc was identical to that used
on the 1974 850 GT and California, and lacked feel and stopping power
due to the 15mm master cylinder. The instruments came from the V7 Sport, but there was new switchgear.
Because the 850 T owed more to
the V7 Sport, it was much lighter and
handled better than the 850 GT. With only 35mm fork tubes, the cartridgetype front forks were still less rigid than other types, this being accentu-
ated by the wide spacing of the fork
legs at 195mm (25½ inches).
However, the balance of the motor-
Sport frame.
cycle was superb, and if anything detracted from the 850 Ts quality it was the insipid colour scheme of
The 850 T (Interceptor)
While it may have made economic
sense to create a touring bike from the
Sport, it also turned out to be an
inspired idea. The resulting 850 T,
also known as the Interceptor for the
UnitedStates, was a sport-touring
motorcycle that was a match for anything else sonthe market. So
impressed was I by the 850 T when I
tested it in 1974 that I immediately
traded in for one an early Ducati 750
GT.
The 850 T was a bike that com-
bined the best sporting elements of
the Ducati with the shaft-drive and
green, red or the pure 1970s brown, accentuated by gold tape. Underneath
this blandness, however, there lurked
a true Grand Tourer that was the
equal of any on the market. Sales reinforced this, and production was
5,086 in 1974, with a further 214 in
1975. These production figures were at least double those of some of the
competition, in particular Ducati's
750GT. Performance,
too, was
stronger than the comparable Ducati.
Cycle World, in August 1974, managed
a standingquarter-mile in 13.78
seconds at 98.03mph (158km/h) and a top speed of 123mph (198km/h). Weight was 506lb (230kg). Although
116
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
BIG TOURERS AND CRUISERS
117
considerably lighter than the 850 GT, the 850 T was still no featherweight.
The 850 T3/T3 California
The next year saw one of the 850 T's
main shortcomings addressed, the
poor braking, especially at the front. The single Brembo had always been
lacking in outright power, so 1975 saw
theimplementation of the linked
braking system that had featured on the Le Mans prototype back in 1972 at the 'Premio Varrone' Italian design
award. The resulting 850 T3 would
form the basis of most Guzzis through to the mid-1980s.
With the 850 T3 there were also a few improvements to the engine and drive train. All engines now had the
oil filter in the sump, the 280-watt
alternator, and the larger U-joint and carrier bearing. The exhaust headers
were bolted to the cylinder heads
rather than screwed as before. Finally
the carburettors received a paper air
although surprisingly the square-slide Dell'Ortos remained
filter,
when they had beeneffectively
replaced by the newer PHF type on other motorcycles. To reduce emis-
sions the T3 also received a new
Marelli distributor with a modified advance curve, providing more
advance at lower revs and a maximum of 33%. Together with a new flywheel,
this distributor would be used on
lower-performance engines in the
future. The T3 also featured a new
fifth gear (28/21), still with the same ratio, and a lower final drive (7/33).
It was primarily the braking system that set the T3 (and S3) apart from all other motorcycles. Designed by Tonti
to enhance safety byboth limiting
front wheel lock-up in an emergency
and the rider's reliance on the rear
The police market always accounted for a significant number of 850 T3s. This 1976 example was for the West Australian police. (Two Wheels)
brake, this linked the rear 242mm disc and left-side front 300mm disc through a master cylinder under the
right-side cover and operated by foot pedal. On the early versions of the integrated braking system the hydraulic lines were joined at a simple four-way manifold without a proportioning valve. Weight transfer generally resulted in a proportion of around 70 per cent to the front and 30 per
cent to the rear brake. The right-side front disc was worked by a handlebar
master cylinder as before, but of a smaller (12.7mm) diameter. Wheel
lock-up was virtually eliminated and
again this system showed Moto Guzzi's
capacity for innovation. Interestingly enough, although Moto Guzzi has persevered successfully with the
braking. it has not been
integrated
widely adopted by other manufacturers.
There were other small changes to the specification of the T3. Handlebars were taller and the clutch cable incorporated a cut-out switch. With the T3 also came the return of the California, an amalgam of the
1974 California and T3. Like the earlier California there were footboards, a plexiglass screen, a thick seat and
panniers. As tested by Bike magazine
in August 1975, the T3 California managed a top speed of 97.4mph
(157km/h) and weighed in at 576lb (261kg). Underneath, the California
was T3, and it wouldprove to be
exceptionally successful, both in civil-
ian and police guise, over its eightyear life span. In the US the T3 was also offered as the 850 T3 FB (footboard), combination of the
California and T3 with footboards and high handlebars.
The 850 T3 continued virtually
unchanged until 1979 when the
Borrani alloy wheels were replaced by the cast-alloy FPS that were used on several other models (notably the Le
Mans and SP 1000). There were also
other detail touches in line with these
other models; these included the taillight, switches, seat, headlight, lock-
ing fuel cap, and a plastic cover for the alternator. Up until this time the
alternator covers had been polished
aluminium, and while it may have
seemed another cost-cutting measure, the plastic cover was also designed to cool the alternator by directing air in
and out. Production of the 850 T3 and T3 California continued on a limited scale until 1982.
The V 1000 l-Convert
The direction of Moto Guzzi under De Tomaso took a significant turn during 1975. De Tomaso saw Guzz's future with their big twin away from
sporting bikes, and he wanted a more
luxurious touring bike. He also wanted more automotive influence in
motorcycles, and nothing represented
this more than the V1000 I-Convert with automatic transmission. The
Convert was conceived for the Italian
Servizio Scorta, for escorting con-
voys, which demanded a motorcycle that could be ridden at walking pace.
Later it became available as a civil
version, but was unpopular. Again De Tomaso completely misread the
motorcycle market, yet theConvert
was an interesting technological exer-
cise.
The Convert's heart was a bored version of the 844cc engine, 88mm
pistons taking the capacity to 949cc.
These pistons gavea compression
ratio of 9.2:1 and no longer used the chrome bores, featuring instead cast-
iron cylinder liners. A more usual
arrangement of three piston rings was also used. The top end of the Convert
engine was as with the other 850s,
including the Dell'Orto VHB 30C
carburettors. As the 949cc engine still
used the 78mm stroke, 140mm con-
rods were maintained. Although the
claimed crankshaft power was up to
71bhp at 6,500rpm, the larger engine
was required to offset drive-train
power loss through the torque converter.
In a move that not only astonished
the motorcycling world, but also
seemed totally unnecessary, the regular clutch and five-speed gearbox was
replaced by a torque converter, dry multi-plate clutch, and manual two-
speed gearbox. It was really a semiautomatic transmission, neither
manual nor fully automatic. Called the I-Convert after the torque converter (Idro-Convert), this unit was
supplied by Fichtel & Sachs.
The torque converter sat behind the engine where an impeller was driven by the crankshaft, pumping fluid through a turbine fixed to the
One of the more unusual Moto Guzzis of the 1970s was the V 1000 I-Convert with a two-speed transmission and torque converter. Full touring equipment was featured and, although built in reasonable numbers for several years, it was not popular.
gearbox input shaft. To help cool the
fluid there was a trocoidal pump mounted at the front of the engine,
above the alternator, pumping auto-
matic transmission fluid to a tank
under the left side cover, and a cool-
ing radiator mounted on the front
downtubes. This pump was known to fail on early Converts but was later improved. Unfortunately pump failure was catastrophic, leading to overheating. ultimately torque converter fail-
ure,andan expensive repair bill.
Unlike automotive torque converters, however, the Convert also required an
additional overdrive ratio.
Although the drive range of 1.6:1
to 1:1 was sufficiently wide for a
motorcycle, a two-speed gearbox was
also fitted, with a clutch to enable the
selection of either gear. This clutch was different from the usual twin-
plate automotive-style Guzzi clutch,
being a dry multi-plate type (seven
friction and five driven plates) located
between the torque converter and gearbox. Primary drive wasby
straight-cut gears (19/22) and the two gearbox ratios were 18/24 and 22/22,
In concert with the torque converter
there was considerable overlap
between the maximum range in
normal and the minimum in overdrive, effectively meaning that the
Convert could be treated as an automatic. In the low gear it could run to nearly 130km/h (80mph), and while the owners' manual warned against it, it was possible to shift into overdrive before around 65km/h (40mph). The
Convert had a 9/34 final drive, and the driveshaft U-joint and transmis. sion U-joint had 20 splines instead of
the manual versions' 10 splines.
In keeping with its luxury status, the Convert featured a number of
amenities, most of which were also of doubtful usefulness. The large instru-
ment
panel
included only
a
speedometer (but notachometer)
together with an array of ten warning lights.There was an electronic fuel
tap and fuel gauge, and rear disc park-
ing brake and ignition cut-out oper-
ated by the side stand. Other features
specific to the Convert were the air
spoilers mounted on the crash bars
and adjustable steering damper. Apart from the standard screen and panniers, the rest of the Convert was 850 T3, the chassis being identical
except that most Converts had foot-
118
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
BIG TOURERS AND CRUISERS
119
remained unchanged from the 850 T3.A 9.2:1 compression ratio, Dell'Orto VHB 30C carburettors and
a distributor were also as for the
Convert, but the SP 1000 lacked the power-sappingtorque converter SO that more of the power was useable. Still, the 949cc engine with the small square-slide Dell'Ortos was working
hard on the SP 1000. The exhaust
system, with its upswept pipes, was
similar to the Le Mans.
The five-speed gearbox and 7/33 final drive were from the T3, but the
FPS cast-aluminium wheels were from the Le Mans. These had identical rim
sizes of 2.15 inches and were fitted
with 100/90H18 and 110/90H18 Pirelli MT18 Gordon tyres. The
35mm forks were fitted with new car-
Despite its weight and complexity the Convert was a comfortable and remarkably
reliable touring motorcycle.
high standard for such a large motor-
boards. It was also produced in a
butunfortunately itwas cycle, victim of poor timing and a general The I-Convert won the 1975 misreading of the market. Always an 'Premio Varrone',but this did not expensivemachine, concerns about translate into sales success. Cycle drive-train reliability, and the complimagazine tested one in March 1976 cated electrical system, really sealed
police version, but this was never as
popular as the 850 T3 California.
and found the performance and com-
its fate.
plexity difficult to justify. The curb
The SP 1000 (Spada) and NT
weight was 272.6kg (6011b), and a standing quarter-mile was covered in
only 16.432 seconds at 80.71mph
Together with the Convert, one of De Tomaso's plans for the Guzzi V-twin engine was a sport-touring motorcycle
magazine, in September 1978, achieved a top speed of 108.7mph (175km/h) after removing the screen.
(130km/h).
Bike
to compete with BMW. This called for
a revised riding position, effective fair-
Early Converts had a lighter flywheel that was prone to failure. These were later recalled and changed to a heavier type, and generally the Convert was a reliable, if somewhat slow, motorcycle. In 1979 it received the same updates as the 850 T3, FPS
ing, and full instrumentation. For
Moto Guzzi it was also surprisingly
simple to create, as most of the com-
ponents were from existing models.
The frame and footpegs were from the
Le Mans, and the engine from the Convert. The result, especially with cast wheels and new taillight and the unique fairing, was a superb allswitchgear. Other alterations were a round sport-touring motorcycle, and locking fuel cap, fork-mounted igni- one that fitted nicely between the tion switch and, for the US, PHF 30 sporting Le Mans and the touring Dell'Orto carburettors with accelera- Convert and T3. First displayed at the tor pumps. Milan Show in November 1977, the
The Convert soldiered on in pro- SP 1000 went into production during
duction until 1984, after which the torque converter survived briefly in the California Il Auto. The Convert
1978. For the UK it was named the
Spada (Sword).
The top end of the engine was
identical to that of the Convert, and
has come in for a lot of criticism, but for what it was endeavouring to do it
even though 88mm pistons (still with
was a groundbreaking concept. The handling and braking were of a very
cast-iron liners) were used, the valve
sizes (41 and 36mm) and camshaft
tridge dampers and provided another 25mm of fork travel. On the SP 1000
the integrated braking system was fur-
ther refined through the useof a larger 09 rear brake calliper and four-
way proportioning valve with regulator instead of a simple manifold. The larger calliper (with 48mm pistons)
resulted in a stronger rear brake, and the proportioning valve transferred
pressure to the front calliper as more
brake was applied. No parking brake was fitted to the SP 1000, but the
Convert's rear brake bracket with
park brake attachment was still used
(as it was also on the T3 and Le
Mans).
The SP 1000's most original feature was the fairing. By re-commissioning
the wind tunnel that had stood idle
since 1957 except for scientific purposes, a unique fairing was designed for the SP 1000. All the testing had to be done at night because the wind tunnel consumed so much power that the production lines were unable to operate. Unlike most other designs, the fairing comprised three fibreglass parts, the top section turning with the
handlebars and the two side panels
mounted on the frame. These incor-
poratedangled airfoils to increase downthrust at speed. With this new
fairing came a redesigned instrument
panel (in 1970s-style pseudo alligator-
skin), new C.E.V. switches and throt-
tle, and a metal cover over the fuel
cap. The steering damper was now an
adjustable friction type rather than the earlier hydraulic. Colours were
The most significant feature of the SP 1000 was the wind tunnel-designed three-piece fairing. Designed to compete with the BMW RIOORS, the SP 1000 lacked performance although it still handled and braked well.
silver, gold or silver/blue, with an red and white (or white and red) abundance of matt black paint. paintwork and a number of subtle
Unfortunately the SP 1000 was let down by the engine performance. In
changes. The fairing lowers were now splayed further outwards to suit taller riders, and the footpegs lower, more forward and non-folding; these were
April 1979 Cycle magazine achieved a
standing quarter-mile in 14.29 seconds at 91mph (146km/h). The wet weight of 251.2kg (5541b) undoubt-
from the T3. US versions now had
Dell'Orto PHF carburettors, while for everywhere else the stiff square-slide
edly blunted the performance, and the
wind tunnel-designed fairing also
VHBs continued. While it may not
have fulfilled its role as a BMW-beater in performance or in the marketplace, the SP 1000 was a formidable opponent. Offering more character and a substantially lower price tag, for the first time an Italian motorcycle could be considered a viable alternative in the world of long-distance interstate
restricted top speed. Bike magazine, in
September 1978,managed a maxi-
mum speed of 113.72mph (183km/h),
well down on the 850 Le Mans.
Gradual development saw the SP 1000 evolve into the NT 80 of 1980. Changes included Nigusil cylinder bores (from engine number 215000),
new and more restrictive silencers
and intercontinental sport-touring.
(from the T4), which were no longer upswept, a thicker G5 seat, different colours, and new turn signal indicaThe frame now had a more
The V1000 G5
Continuing the concept of expanding
the line-up through amalgamation of models was the V1000 G5 (G5 indicating five-speed gearbox). Essentially a V1000 with a five-speed gearbox, it was offered alongside the
durable gloss finish, reflecting a general improvement in finish.
a
The final year for the SP 1000 was 1983, by which stage it had received
SP 1000 during 1978. The G5 was underrated, as it offered the performance advantages of the 1000cc
engine, without the power-sapping
torque converter. Thus it was not only
lighter than the Convert. with a
claimed weight of 220kg (4851b), but
it also had a top speed around
190km/h (118mph).
Most of the features were from the Convert. The same instrument panel now included a tachometer, also fea-
turing the widearray of warning
lights. While the Convert side stand
was maintained, the G5 also received the revised braking system of the SP 1000 with the larger 09 rear Brembo brake calliper and four-way propor-
tioning valve. Other chassisparts
were more Convert than SPThe wheels were still alloy Borrani and the front Brembo brake callipers forwardmounted. While most Converts came
with footboards, the G5 had normal
footpegs, lower and moreforward than the SP 1000 and T3. In 1979 the
G5 received the updates of the similar
120
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
BIG TOURERS AND CRUISERS
121
Not available in the US, the 850 T4
was primarily sold as a police model.
The California II/
automatic/850 G
While the 850 T3 California continued in production until 1982, and the
SP 1000 into 1983, the days of the round-finned engine were clearly
numbered. The Le Mans III had made its debut in late 1980, and a replacement California with a new square-fin
engine appeared in 1981. This new California, the California II, harked back to the big loop-frame 850 GT and Eldorado, last seen in 1974. It may have used the Tonti frame as a
basis, but with the California II came
a model delineation similar to that which existed in the early 1970s, a specific big tourer in addition to the
more sporting models.
Therewas much more to the
California Il than simply a restyled engine and 850 California styling. Apart from the finning, the engine
wasalmost identical to thefinal
SP 1000 NT, so was now 949cc, and
featured the Nigusil cylinders, new silencers, and a proper air filtration system. It also had the small-valve cylinder head (41 and 36mm valves), 9.2:1 compression ration, and
Dell'Orto VHB 30C carburettors;
later versions were fitted with roundslide Dell'Orto PHF 30s. The empha-
sis with the larger engine was on
torque rather than peak power, with a claimed 77Nm at 5,200rpm. As with
all square-fin engines, there was also a
sump spacer, and the entire unit was quieter. In 1987 (from engine number
18786) the Bosch alternator was replaced by a Spanish Saprisa, and
from engine number 21100 the engine oil breathing was improved with vent tubes from the cylinder heads.
There were even more changes to the frame for the California II. Not only was the swingarm even longer than that of the Le Mans III, but it
was also of a much heavier construc-
tion. The steering head was also
longer at 212mm (8½ inches) with an
extra gusset to the frame backbone
tube. The result was a motorcycle
considerably larger than its predeces-
sor, and quite similar in size to the
earlier 850 GT. Bodywork, too, mirrored
the 1974 California: deeply valanced
guards, black and white seat, crash
bars, screen and panniers were standard equipment.
Together with longer and wider
(195mm/7/sin) forks with 35mm fork
tubes and air-assisted dampers, there
were new cast alloy wheels for the California I!,still only 2.15× 18
inches. On these were mounted Pirelli Gordon MT 18 120/90 x 18-inch tyres,
really too large for the rims. At the slightly longer invertedairassisted Paioli shock absorbers
(330mm) also contributed to a larger-
feeling motorcycle.The integrated
braking system with three Brembo 08 brake callipers (the front mounted in
front of the fork legs) were carried
over from the 850 T4 rather than the
One of the many models of Moto Guzzi that has been forgotten is the 1000 G5. This offered the advantages of the V 1000 Convert with a five-speed gearbox.
SP 1000. From the SP 1000 came the upper fairingand forks with
Convert, in particular cast wheels and a new taillight, switches and, for US
versions, Dell'Orto PHF carburettors.
mounted brake callipers like the later
850 T3, although the T4 used a
All engines by 1980 had Nigusil-
longer fork damper and dual spring.
plated cylinders, and the final G5 fea-
The braking system with proportioning valveand regulator also came
tured a more normal instrument panel
withside-by-side speedometerand
tachometer.
from the SP 1000, and the T4 had the
new, lower mufflers. The 850cc engine
The 850 T4
was unchanged from the T3 except for Nigusil-plated cylinders. Claimed power was 68.5bhp at giving the 215kg (4741b) T4 a top speedaround 190km/h (118mph).
With the NT 80 of 1980 came an
addition to the 850cc range, the T4; the 850 T3 continued as before, the T4 filling the gap berween it and the
The expanding range of the early 1980s saw the 850 T4, essentially an 850 T3 with the top part of the SP 1000 fairing.
SP 1000. From frame number VT 17500 (1985) the California II
received a longer seat, seat lock and different footboards. The crash bars, too, were wider on later models. The
overall result was a large touring motorcycle that weighed a claimed
250kg (551lb) dry.
In 1985 some California Ils were manufactured with the Convert auto-
matic gearbox and these were the final Moto Guzzis with the torque
converter. Released specifically for the large German market in 1986 was the 85CG. Essentially a California II with an 850 T engine, this was only avail. able for the one year.
Although really designed for the American market, the California II
was a consistently good seller between
The day of the big Moto Guzzi tourer returned with the 1000cc California Il of 1981. This was the first 1000cc square-fin engine.
cycles, and he had his Modena styling
studio rework the T4. The resulting
850 T5 of 1983 was a much more
integrated design, but not an entirely successful one. The concept was also a little too radical for the conservative Moto Guzzi clientele and, combined with very negative press reports, the
850 T5 was a sales disaster. As with Giugiaro's Ducati 860 GT of 1974, it
again proved that motorcycles cannot be treated as two-wheeled cars when it comes to styling.
The engine of the T5 was similar to
that of the T4, but for the square finning. Thus it continued with the
small valves, carburettors and lowerrivalling the Le Mans. The peak years performance distributor. Power was were 1982 (2,338 units) and1983 67bhp at 7,000rpm. Just about every(2,341). While it was not intended as thing else was new on the TS. The a performance motorcycle, it offered first (1983) series featured a frame equivalent performance to other vehi- with steering head cles of its type. Motorrad, in June (165mm/61/zin), but from 1985 the 1982, managed a respectable top frame was the longer steering head speed of 159km/h (99mph). So suc- type of the California II with the extra cessful has the California idea been gusset between the steering head and for Moto Guzzi that it later became backbone tube.All TSs had a the California III, and today the EV swingarm that was the same length as dominates production. the Le Mans III (410mm/l6in), but reinforced as with the California II
theshorter
1981 and 1987, with numbers
The 850 T5
and wider to allow for the larger rear гуте.
Even before fashion dictated the form of the Le Mans, it begin to infiltrate
The biggest changes concerned the use of 16-inch wheels front and rear and new front suspension. For the first time a Moto Guzzi featured forks with fork rubes larger than 35mm, the
into the850 T line. Together with fashionable trends,another of De
Tomaso's beliefs was that automobile design should influence that of motor-
T5's being 38mm. With linked airadjustable dampers, initially these
forks had dual springs, but this was
later changed to a single spring, and finally to a longer and shorter twospring combination. The fork width was the narrow 180mm (7 inches) of
the first Le Mans rather than the
wider 195mm (77 inches) of all the
other T series, and the forks featured an integral fork brace. Rear shock absorbers were air-assisted 320mm Paioli. The combination of these normal-length shockabsorbers and
the 16-inch wheels meant that the TS suffered from a severe lack of
ground clearance. Although the 16inch wheels were chosen more for fashion than function, there was one
benefit over all other Moto Guzzi
wheels: the rim width was increased to 2.50 inches on the front and 3.00
inches on the rear. This enabled larger MT29and MTZ8Pirelli
Phantom tyres to be fitted, a
110/90H16 and a 130/90H16.
While the patented Guzzi inte
grated braking system with four-way
manifold was retained, there were sev-
eral changes to the TS brakes.
Because of the smaller-diameter
wheel, the front disc brake rotors were
reduced to 270mm (one-piece and drilled), and there was now a matching 270mm disc on the rear. With the strengthened frame in 1985 the integrated braking system was also
122
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
BIG TOURERS AND CRUISERS
123
(122mph) from their 225kg (496lb)
machine.
In 1984 there were a few styling
changes to the T5, but in response to
criticism, particularly regarding stabil-
ity and handling, there were more
developments for 1985. In addition to
the frame and fork alterations, the
HOTO GUZZI
biggest change on the 850 T5 NT was
the substitution of the 16-inch rear
wheel for a 3.00 x 18-inch. Tyres were now Michelin A/M48, the rear being
a 120/90V18. Koni shock absorbers also replaced the Paiolis, and the fair-
ing had a taller screen. This final
series also featured dark grey anodised Dell'Orto PHF 30C carburettors and, from engine number 13400, the revised engine oil breather system of
other models. The claimed power was the same but there was a slight reduction in performance. In February 1986 Motociclismo achieved a top speed of 191.3km/h (119mph) from their
lighter (221kg/4871b) 850 T5 NT.
Produced until 1989, by this stage the T5 had been transformed into the
more acceptable MilleGT, which proved that the T5 could have been
far more successtul if it had not origi-
nally been such a victim of fashion. Underneath those 16-inch wheels and integrated bodywork was an excellent motorcycle waiting to be unleashed.
While the 850 T5 was subsequently
replaced in the civilian line-up by
1000cc variants, it continued as the basis for police models through until 1998. These had 18-inch wheels front and rear, and all the engine improvements of the later models.
The SP II
Complementing the T5 in late 1984
was the similar 1000 SP 1Ithat
replaced the SP 1000 NT. This was very much an amalgam of the 1985
850 T5 and the California II. The
949cc square-finned engine
was
shared with the California II, the run-
ning gear with the TS, and it was really more a 1000cc T5 with an SP
fairing. Continual development of the
small-valve 949cc engine now saw
67bhp at
andwhile European-specification models still used the Dell'Orto VHB 30 C carbu-
rettors, US versions had Dell'Orto
PHF 30s. Later examples featured a
Saprisa rather than Bosch alternator,
A real parts-bin special, the 1000 SP Il combined a California Il engine, a 1985 850 T5 chassis, and the SP 1000 NT fairing. The result was not one of Moto Guzzi's most brilliant efforts and epitomised the disappointing period of the mid- 1980s.
which was generally more reliable,
and also the revised engine breather
system. The frame came from the
California II, with the longer steering
head and extra gusset, but with the
850 T5 swingarm. Also from the T5
were the 38mm forks, 16 and 18-inch
wheels, and 270mm one-piece disc
brakes. The 337mm Koni shock absorbers were also shared with the
California II. Unlike the early SP
1000, however, only a four-way manifold was used for the integrated brak-
ing system.
While the fuel tank, seat and side covers were from the T5, the fairing was the familiar SP 1000 NT item with two rigidly mounted side panels
incorporating a spoiler, and a handle-
bar-mountedcentre section. In the
same way that the T5 failed, the SP II
still did not fulfil expectations. The performance was particularly disap-
pointing; in November 1984 Motorrad
could only manage a top speed of
177km/h (110mph) from the SP 1I.
The Mille GT
The ultimate development of the T
series was undoubtedly the Mille GT.
While in some respects it was regres.
sive, market forces in Germany
required the return of a standard
motorcycle, and with the Mille GT
the days of the 850 T were recalled, with 18-inch spoked wheels and no fairing. In many ways the Mille GT was almost a reaction to the smooth
integrated look of the T5, and Moto
Above: One of the least satisfactory
Moto Guzzis of the 1980s was the 850
T5 of 1983 with 16-inch wheels. A
product of the De Tomaso Modena design studio, it represented a significant styling departure from the earlier 850 T series,
Left: The instrument panel of the 850
T5 shows the automotive influence that De Tomaso encouraged.
upgraded to incorporate a four-way
proportioning valve.
The styling, too, was a significant
departure from the earlier T3 and T4. A small fairing incorporated the rec-
tangular headlight and instrument panel, and there were new switches
Integrating the side covers with the
fuel tank, seat and mudguards was not only unlike other Moto Guzzis but was also a styling trend shared with some Ducatis of that era.
With the moderate power of the
small-valve engine, the T5 was not a particularly strong performer. Motociclismo, in March 1984, man-
aged a top speed of 196.5km/h
Guzzi's first effort at a 'retro' look The engine of the Mille GT was the small-valve 1000cc unit (41 and
36mm valves) with Dell'Orto PHF 30mm carburettors providing 67bhp
at 6,700rpm. The first batch were
individually numbered, differing in slight details from later versions. In 1989 (from VT 024596) the clutch
was modified to minimise spline wear on the input transmission hub, which involved a new clutch plate and input
hub. After number VT 024724 a
spring-loaded self-adjusting camchain tensioner was fitted, and from engine number VT 024876 the Mille GT was
fitted with Motoplat electronic ignition. From 1991 some Mille GTs were fitted with larger-valve engines (44 and 37mm) and 36mm carburettors, producing 71bhp at 6,800rpm with a corresponding increase in perfor-
mance. These (from VT 25277) also
featured a new oil pump. As with
most large Moto Guzzis except the Le Mans, a 50bhp version was produced for Germany,
While much of the running gear
was shared with the SP II, in particu-
124
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
BIG TOURERS AND CRUISERS
125
when compared to the performance of the 850 T back in 1974. Fifteen years
of development and a capacity
increase had certainly not translated into a faster, or even better-handling. machine.
The California III/C.I./Classic
A more significant machine for Moto
Guzzi wastheCalifornia Ill, also
released in 1987. This offered considerable improvements in many areas
over the California II, and such was its
success that it would be the most pop-
ular big twin through until 1993.
- Initially the engine was the smallvalve (41 and 36mm) 67bhp unit with
the 30mm carburettors of the Mille
GT, but over time this was developed. In 1989 there was a clutch modifica-
tion that included a new plate and input hub (from engine number VT
032542), and from number VT
032698 a spring-loaded self-adjusting camchain tensioner was fitted. Initiallyignition was by the usual Marelli dual point distributor, but from 1990 (engine number VT 032931) Motoplat ignition with an
electronic ignition advance was used. Saprisa alternators were fitted to the California III, and most also had an improved French-made Valeo starter motor. In 1991 (from VT 34474 and
I.E. VY 11307) there was a new
higher-capacity oil pump with 16mm
instead if 14mm gears.
Many variants of the California III
were produced.In 1989 a fuel-
injected version was introduced, using a Weber Marelli system very similar to
that of the Daytona that also incorpo-
rated the ignition. This early variant
of the Marelli EFI used a P7 processor. The following year also saw the intro-
duction of the Classic, a more basic
California, without bags orwind-
shield, and with slightly lower handle-
bars and now with an optional
catalytic converter. While the latter was an option on all models, it was
standard on the California I.E. catalizzatore, also with fuel injection. Both the California Ill and Classic were
available in carburettor and fuel-injected forms, and an Edizione
Limitate' was produced at the end of
1991 with the 71bhp SP Ill engine
with 44 and 37mm valves and 36mm
carburettors. This engine was then
fitted to all European California IIIs during 1992, but US Californias con-
tinued with the small-valve engine until 1993. In that year all 1000cc
twins were fitted with the SP III
engine, now with a Digiplex ignition
that adjusted ignition timing for
engine speed and load. These engines also used a Ducati Energia alternator,
an improvement on the low-output Saprisa. Injected versions now fea-
tured an upgraded P8 CPU.
Inconsistencies abounded with the
California III over its seven-year life
span, and many versions were offered.
To use supplies of engines that had difficulty meeting emission requirements, some California Ills in 1991
and 1992 were fitted with big-valve Le Mans V engines; these also had the Le Mans V performance camshaft, Bosch alternator and Marelli dual point performance distributor. The first batch of California Ills also featured a lower final drive ratio (6/32), with a fine 20-
tooth spline, but this wasquickly
changed to 7/53
While the engines fitted to the
California III were familiar, if inconsistent, the bodywork came in for serious
restyling over the California II. The seat was much lower than before at
800mm (31½ inches), and the overall style more cruiser-oriented. The frame and long swingarm were carried over from the California II, but the instrument panel was shared with the Mille GT. With the exception of US models, a windshield and pannier bags were
fitted as standard. Initially the panmers were colour-matched to the
bike, but were later replaced by regu-
lar Givi bags.
A big advance over the California Il was the change to 40mm forks, still with the wide fork spacing of 195mm
(74 inches). Later versions shared their forks with the California 1100; these looked similar externally but were quite new, offering improved action due to anti-friction bushes. The shock absorbers were Koni (337mm). The front brake disc size
remained at 300mm (but with floating
rotors), as did the integral braking, but the 270mm rear disc of the 850
T5 was fitted. Until 1993 the four-way manifold was used (except on German
Californias), this being replaced by the four-way proportioning valve in
Offered in a bewildering number of varieties, standard equipment on the California III generally included a windshield and panniers. (Two Wheels)
The Carenatura Integrale, or C.L., offered full touring equipment. This is the fuel
injected version.
Another confused model was the Mille GT, Moto Guzzi's first attempt at a 'retro'
look. Wire-spoked wheels were standard, and cast wheels an option.
lar the frame and medium-length
swingarm, a retrogressive step was a
return to the spindly 35mm forks with air-assisted damping of the California Il. As the front disc brakes increased
in size to 300mm and alloy wheel rims
were fitted, the skinny forks incongruous on such
aseemed
heavy
machine, which could otherwise have been a competent handler. Cast alloy wheels were an option, these having
wider tims (2.50 x 18 and 3.00 x 18 inches). Like the TS, the integrated
braking system used a four-way pro-
portioning valve. The Mille GT fea-
tured many new components, in particular improved switchgear from the
Le Mans V, and a new instrument panel from the smaller Custom
models.
Performance of the small-valve ver-
sions was similar to the SP II. Cycle magazine, in September 1989, managed a standing quarter-mile in 13.51 seconds at 96.46mph (155km/h) from their 252.5kg (5571b) (wet) Mille GT.
Moto Sprint, testing a Mille GT in
1987, achieved atop speed of
189.7km/h (118mph). These figures are really only put into perspective
126
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
BIG TOURERS AND CRUISERS
127
1992. As with the Mille GT, the wheels on the California Ill were
either cast or spoked, generally the
latter, with the spoked rims narrower
than the cast.
In 1992 a special anniversary edition, the California Anniversary, was
created to celebrate 70 years of Moto
Guzzi. Typically this came one year
late, but made up for it with a leather saddle, engraved plate and certificate signed by De Tomaso. Later, to add to the confusion surrounding the various models of the California III, was the LAPD, also in carburettor and fuel-
injected forms.Theseappeared in
1993 with panniers and windshield
and featured the SP III engine.
Another version of the California Ill was the Carenatura Integrale, or
C.I., introduced in 1988, The C.l.
offered even more touring equipment than the California III, and only came with the small-valve engine with, initially, 30mm carburettors, and in 1989 an option of fuel injection. In the style
of the larger BMWs, there was now a
full fairing (with rectangular head-
light), and a rear top box that incor-
porated a passenger backrest. As with the California III both spoked (CIRR) and cast (CIR) wheels were available,
and all C.Ls featured the integrated
braking system with four-way propor-
tioning valve. This model did not
prove especially popular, particularly the injected version, only a few being produced each year.
The SP III
The final expression of the SP idea was the SP Ill of 1988. Taking the touting Moto Guzzi concept beyond that of the California C.I. and into
sport-touring BMW territory, it was a
clever amalgam of bodywork on a California III, but with a higher-per-
formance engine. The engine was the
most significant feature of the SP III in that it combined improved performance with reduced emissions. The
cylinder head and valves sizes (44 and
37mm) now came from the 850 Le
Mans, as did the Dell'Orto PHF 36C carburettors. The pistons featured a higher dome than the earlier smallvalve 1000cc engine but lower than the Le Mans IV and V. The camshaft used on these medium-valve engines
was the same as that of the earlier
small-valve engine. Contributing to the improved emissionswas the
SP II, as was the medium-length
swingarm. A completely new fairing
and integrated tank, seat and side Digiplex, andpower was 71bhp at covers graced the SP III. The huge 6,800грm. fairingwas totally frame-mounted, The chassis was a combination of contributing to the feeling of a mas-
Motoplat ignition, soon changed for a
the California III and SP II. From the Californiacame the 40mmforks,
sive motorcycle.
Even though the SP III had a more
powerful engine than earlier exam-
300mm floating front and 270mm rear
dises, and the 18-inch cast wheels. These were fitted with large-section 110/90V18 and 120/90V18 MT28
ples, the weight conspired against performance. Moto Sprint, in 1989, could only achieve a top speed of 188.1km/h (117mph) from their 268.8kg (5931b)
Pirelli Phantom tyres. The frame was
Offering improved suspension and engine performance over the SP Il, the SP Ill was underrated as a sport-tourer. (Two Wheels)
(wet) machine. It was undoubtedly
the finest example of the SP line, but suffered from uncertain styling, poor market perception, and limited performance. After the confused SP II, the
SP Ill was a definite improvement,
but neededmorerefinement and
power to be a true BMW-beater and was discontinued in 1992.
The Quota
Another unusual Moto Guzzi of this period was the Quota 1000. It was almost as if Moto Guzzi wanted to
cover every aspect of the marketplace
with the venerable big-twin, so produced this dual-purpose street-trail bike in 1989. While the result was hardly a state-of-the-art off-road
machine, creating it forced Guzzi to
incorporate many up-to-date features
in the design. In fact, so many new
characteristics were incorporated that manufacture of the Quota was delayed, finally making it into pro-
duction during 1992.
When first displayed, the engine of the Quota was the same as the SP III, but when it did make the production
line the 36mm carburettors were
replaced by Weber Marelli electronic
fuel injection. Unlike the California
III I.E., the Quota used a single injec-
tor body with the P8 CPU. All other engine and drive train parts were
shared with the California III, including the long driveshaft and 10-spline
pinion.
With the frame of the Quota, Moto
Guzzi came up with a completely new solution to housing the V-twin engine. Two box-section steel spars connected
the swingarm with Marzocchi mono-
shock suspension to the steering head,
the engine supported by a detachable duplex cradle, which did not feature
the parallelogram set-up of the Daytona or the rival BMW GS.
Wheels, tyres, brakes and forks, how-
ever, were as expected for a large-
capacity trail bike. Spoked 1.85 x
21-inch front and 2.75 x 17 inch rear wheels were shod with Pirelli MT 50
90/90 x 21 and 130/80 x 17 tyres. The
brakes were all new for the Quota, twin 280mm discs on the front with Brembo four-piston callipers (28mm pistons), and a 260mm disc on the rear with a twin-piston calliper. There was no integration between the front
A rider needed very long legs to straddle the Quota. With a new monoshock frame it was an exceptionally large motorcycle.
and rearbrakes, and Marzocchi
41.7mm leading axle forks completed the chassis layout.
The downside of the Quota as an
off-road motorcycle was its overall size.
The wheelbase was 1,620mm (632/3
inches) and seat height a massive 880mm (34⅔ inches). This was no
bike for short-legged riders, and when
tested by Moto Sprint in 1992 wet
weight was a considerable 258.1kg (6461b). Although not intended as a
performance motorcycle,
aged a top
speed of191.1km/h it still man-
(119mph). With production peaking
at 349 in 1992, the 1000cc Quota was only built in limited numbers, primarily for the Italian market, remaining in production until 1997. In 1998 it was
replaced by the Quota 1100 ES,
detailed in Chapter 13.
The Strada 1000
Representing the ultimate develop-
The Strada 1000 was the final 1000cc standard Moto Guzzi. Offering many
improvements over the Mille GT, it was really obsolete by 1993.
128
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
ment of the standard big-twin Moto Guzzi was the Strada 1000 of 1993. Taking the underrated SP III, remov-
ing the fairing but keeping the fuel
tank, seat and side cover bodywork, Moto Guzzi created one of their most
successful attempts at the standard
motorcycle.Mille GT instruments
and headlight were used, and in every
respect the Strada was an improvement over that model. The engine,
initially with Motoplat ignition, was
the higher-performance SP III unit. Always with carburettors, the Strada was the final version of this engine and featured Digiplex ignition and the
Ducati alternator.
The chassis, too, was from the SP
III. This included the 40mm forks,
frame and medium-length swingarm, and fully floating 300mm brake discs.
Shared with the Mille GT was the
option of cast orspoked 18-inch
wheels. As tested by In Moto in May
1993, the 241.1kg (5321b) Strada
achieved a top speed of 201.7km/h
(125mph). Unfortunately, while an undoubted improvement over the Mille GT, the Strada 1000 came too late to save the no-frills standard Moto Guzzi. Situated in the middle of the marketplace, neither cruiser nor -
sportster, the Strada lacked direction in a world demanding motorcycles
with a more specific focus and sophis-
tication. While twin shock absorber
rear suspension and 71bhp may have been acceptable for a cruiser, a standard type of motorcycle needed to be more powerful and offer an alternative style. The future would rely on
more specialised machines,with
sporting varieties offering improved
engine and chassis performance. Guzzi
now looked at widening thegap between the cruiser and sporting
lines.
10.
Le Mans
sixth. These promising results on a debut performance saw the Le Mans
designation used when the first 850 Rosso riddenby Mandracci and sporting prototype was displayed at Brambilla led for more than 10 hours the 'Premio Varrone, the Italian before being delayed by a broken design award, towards the end of
Thewasdebuttheof1971the 844ccBol d'Orracing24-hourbikes race at Le Mans. A modified "Telaio
theweight of 206kg (454lb) was
unchanged from the V7 Sport, the Le Mans featured triple disc brakes and Borrani alloy wheels fitted with larger
Michelin tyres, a 3.50 x 18 on the
rocker. This was followed by a crash by Mandracci, and finally a rear wheel
puncture half an hour from the end of
the race. Theyeventually finished
third, behind Ray Pickrell and Percy Tait on a BSA and the Laverda SFC of Augusto Brettoni and Bruno Cretti. Raimondo Riva andAbbondio
Sciaresa, on another 844, finished
front and a 4.25 x 18 on the rear. The 1972. brakes were twin 300mm discs on the Although still based on the V7 front and a 240mm on the rear, with Sport, this first Le Mans had a half new Brembo callipers, the first time fairing and solo seat. With Dell'Orto the later ubiquitous Brembo 08 calPHM 40mm carburettors, power from liper was seen. Perhaps the most sigthe 83 x 78mm engine was 82bhp at nificant feature of the braking system 7,500rpm. The claimed top speed was was the linked hydraulic system, the 225km/h (140mph), with a standing left foot pedal operating both the rear 400 metres in 12.25 seconds. While brake and right front disc, while the
Prototype 844cc V7 Sports were raced as early as September 1971 in the Bol d'Or at Le Mans. This is the sixth place bike of Raimondo Riva and Abbondio Sciaresa.
130
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
LE MANS
131
Fortunately Lino Tonti and his engi-
neering department persuaded him
that there was life in the V-twin as a sporting motorcycle and they were allowed to proceed with the develop-
ment of the production 844ccLe
Mans during 1975. With a production span of 19 years, the Le Mans would eventually become as symbolic of the marque as the earlier Falcone.
The Le Mans
Now considered not only one of the classic modern Moto Guzzis, but also representative of the archetypal street sportster, the Le Mans came at a time when the Italian motorcycle industry was setting the sporting standard for others to follow. In the late 1970s the
Italians undoubtedly produced the best handling and braking motorcycles available. As the Japanese
street competition at that time shared
little with their racing cousins, and with the British industry virtually
extinct, it was really only the Italians who built motorcycles with true racebred chassis. However, while the 750 S and S3 provided excellent handling. by 1975 their engine performance (particularly the S3) was not competitive.
Ducati's 750 SS had grown into an
860, and Laverda's 1000cc triple had supplanted their 750. The 844cc Le Mans gave Guzzi a true complement to these, completing a magnificent
Italian sporting triumvirate.
Early production Le Mans had a 1½ seat, similar in design to the 750 S3. However, in nearly every respect the Le Mans was superior to its immediate predecessor. (Two
First displayed at the Milan Show
of November 1975, the Le Mans not only offered more performance than any of the earlier 750 Sports, but was also one of the styling miracles of the 1970s. As Ducati also managed with
their first 900 Super Sport of 1975,
SPORT
the elegant purity of the 750 was
transformed into a remarkably aggres-
sive and attractive motorcycle. The interesting thing about both the Le
Mans and 900 SS was that under-
neath they were surprisingly similar to
their smaller brethren. The parallels
did not end there: both larger versions, while offering higher performance, were also less exotic in their components, and were produced in
larger numbers.
While the engine had fewer special
The first Le Mans of late 1972 was a modified V7 Sport with 40mm Dell'Orto
carburettors and triple disc brakes.
often with factory assistance, and
left front disc was operated by a han-
even the production Le Mans looked for the Mans prototype, its doomed. De Tomaso saw Guzzi either announcement coincided with the De without twins altogether or as a tourTomaso take-over of the company and ing or sport-touring motoreycle like it was a bike that De Tomaso was not the 850 T and later SP 1000; he was particularly interested in producing. more committed to producing the Eventually the engineers and market- Benelli 750 Sei, which he hoped ing department got their way, but it would become Italy's premier sporting would be three more years before the motoreyele. As he wanted this also to Le Mans made it into production. By be sold as a Moto Guzzi, just as the that stage there were a number of smaller 350 and 400 GTS were, De
debar master
Lecylinder.
Unfortunately
Tomaso could see no sense in pursuing
changes to the specification.
During 1972the 844 was again
the path begun with the V7 Sport.
raced in Endurance races. At the Bol
d'Or24-hour race on 16 and 17
September, Riva and Mandracci fin-
ished fourth at an average speed of
Wheels)
115.59km/h (71.78mph) after leading
for 18 hours. Riva and Carena also
rode in the 24 Hours of Liège at
Zolder in August.
In 1973 De Tomaso gained control
of the company and the scale of the official racing programme was imme-
diately reduced. There were only a
few entries in major events during the
year, in particular the Barcelona 24.
hour race in July. Here an 844cc
endurance racer ridden by Riva and Luciano Gazzola finished fifth, completing 683 laps. Again the Guzzi was overshadowed by Ducati, the latter's 864cc prototype winning the event at
record speed.
After 1973 the only Guzzis raced
were by privateers or distributors,
internal parts than imagined - even the camshaft was the same as the T3 - the changes translated into signifi-
cant performance gains. In the cylin-
der head the combustion chamber was reshaped to incorporate larger valves,
44mm inlet and 37mm exhaust. To
obtain a compression ratio of 10.2:1,
the 83mm pistons had a much higher dome, and unlike the 850 T, with its chrome-plated cylinders, the Le Mans
featured cast-iron liners. Although the thinner piston rings of the 850 T
were used on the Le Mans, there were now only three rings, two compression
and one oil scraper. Lighter pushrods were also used. Unlike the T3 (and
later S3), the distributor was that of
the earlier 750 Sport, providing 34° of full advance. The Le Mans also had a thinner and lighter flywheel (reduced
from 12 to 8mm), and new clutch plates. These would now feature on all big twins until 1993, but smaller-
valve twins received the lighter fly-
wheel with different timing marks for their 'touring' distributor.
Complementing the higher compression andbiggervalves were
Dell'Orto PHF 36B carburettors, with
The Le Mans was an amazingly narrow and compact motorcycle for an 850cc
sportster. (Two Wheels)
bell-mouths and no air filtration, the17/21 primary and 7/33 final
mounted on rubber manifolds as the 1950s Grand Prix racer's had been. The 36mm carburettors also featured accelerator pumps and, together with the single-walled 40mm exhaust
drive, although some Le Mans came
fitted from the factory with a straight-cut racing gearbox.
Aswith the engine, there were
remarkably few changes to the chassis
from the 750 Sport. The frame was
system, undoubtedly contributed to the claimed 80bhp at 7,300rpm (at
painted satin black, and similar 35mm
cartridge forks used,still with a 180mm (7-inch) fork width. As a
the crankshaft). The standard Le
Mans gearing was as for the S3, with
weight-saving measure the forks featured thinner-walled fork tubes. These were unique to the Le Mans, and also included a different threaded fork nut, which was round with an Allen bolt rather than hexagonal nut. LISPA shock absorbers replaced the
earlier Konis (still 320mm).
The biggest change was to the
wheels. Following fashion trends, the
132
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
could also be ordered in metallic blue,
and later white.
For 1977 the Le Mans remained virtually unchanged but for a proper dual seat and the angular taillight of tion of a Rille 10 3.50H18 on the the SP 1000, although US versions
featured a more protruding headlight. Production was initially modest, with 219 being built in 1975, but by 1978 the Le Mans was the most important
front and a C7 Block Racing 4.10V18 on the rear. These tyres were known for transmitting a greasy and insecure feeling and some Le Mans were fitted with Michelin or Pirelli tyres.
model in Moto Guzzi's line-up. As The Le Mans also featured the demand for the T3 and California
integrated braking system of the 750 S3 with the same four-way manifold. Three Brembo 08 brake callipers were used, with two 300mm front discs and
dwindled, the Le Mans became more popular: 2,532 were manufactured in
1976, 2,548 in 1977, and a further
1,737 in 1978.
one 242mm rear disc.To save on
An optional racing uprating kit was
available for the Le Mans, which included two sets of straight-cut
unsprung weight, the front cast-iron discs featured aluminium carriers. All discs were drilled. Styling considerations saw a new seat, partly covering
close-ratio gears (one with a higher first and second gear) and a choice of two primary ratios (16 and 17 teeth).
the fuel tank, a small fairing with orange'dayglo' front section, and
Also available were four different final
drive ratios (6/32, 7/33, 8/33 and
lighter mudguards and side covers. Weight-saving measures extended to
9/34), creating an amazing selection
ofalternative overall gear
the use of a smaller 20Ah battery. Most Le Mans were red, but they
ratios.
Other items in the racing kit included
Dell'Orto PHM 40 carburettors, a
higher-lift camshaft, megaphone exhaust system, and a 24-litre aluminium fuel tank. The camshaft gave
7.2mm of intake valve lift, up from
6.8mm.
Contemporary road tests confirmed
that the Le Mans was a significantly faster machine than any of the earlier 750 Sports, particularly the S3. Bike magazine achieved a maximum speed
of 132.15mph (213km/h) in August 1976. The extra capacity and tuning
also translated into far better acceler-
ation despite a dry weight of 210kg
(4631b). In May 1976 Motociclismo
saw a standard-start 400 metres in 12.314 seconds at 173.04km/h (108mph).
As well as offering performance
similar to other large-capacity sportsters, the Le Mans provided a more civilised and compact package. Even though the handlebar switches were not too reliable, an electric start and shaft drive placed the Le Mans in a
different category altogether from
Always popular for production racing, the Le Mans was also moderately successful. Standard performance alterations included Lafranconi Competizione exhausts. This is Tarbotton in the Perth (Australia) 4-hour production race in April 1978. (Australian
functional and light alloy Borrani rims made way for heavier cast alloy FPS wheels, still with the same WM3 rim sizes (2.15 x 18 inch). Tyres were originally Metzeler, an unusual combina-
Motorcycle News)
LE MANS
133 formula, and that is exactly what
many other Italian motorcycles. My own experience confirms that the Le
Mans had considerably more midrange power than the 750 S, being
overall a more muscular machine.
Tonti's magnificent frame was more
than up to the task of handling the
extra power, and the Le Mans was still one of the best-handling motorcycles
available. All the improvements made to the electrical system over the previ-
ous few years meant it was also an
easy machine to live with for a sports bike. Functionally it was only really
compromised by the heavy cast-alloy
wheels, 35mm forks and slippery seat. Combined with its aggressive styling
and compact dimensions,
was
it
undoubtedly one of the great sporting
the
motorcycles of
1970s and, together with the V7 Sport, a classic modern Guzzi. In the world of motor-
cycles the Le Mans was a masterpiece.
While not officially raced by the factory, in the hands of distributors and privateers the Le Mans had a
moderately successful racing career. contribution of Luciano Gazzola and
the support of Tonti
team led to many modifications being
carried through to the production line and the official factory racing kit.
Perez Rubio and Morante
Giovanni Pretto finishing eighth at
Misano on a 1000cc Le Mans.
Berliner, and tuned by Reno Leoni, Baldwin has some considerable success in the AMA Superbike
Championship. He won at Loudon in
1976, and also at Charlotte in 1977, proving that the 850 Le Mans was a very competitiveracing machine.
Only moderately modified, the Leonituned Le Mans had 40mm Dell'Orto
carburettors, a 10.8:1 compression
ratio and a swingarm altered to
accommodate a WM5 rim. Estimated
power was 90bhp and the bike was
at 143mph (230km/h) at
timed
Daytona.
The Le Mans Il
The success of the Le Mans proved to
De Tomaso that there was definitely
life left in the V-twin and undoubtedly
ensured its survival. However, it has often been a failing of Italian companies to unnecessarily alter a winning
Moto Guzzi did to the Le Mans in
1978. By incorporating many features
of the SP 1000 they created the Le Mans Il, unfortunately destroying some of the appeal of the original.
Functionally the Le Mans II was simi-
lar to the earlier bike,but the SP
1000-inspired fairing and instruments detracted from the original's sporting purity.
Initially there were no changes to
the engine specifications on theLe Mans Il. Already the 844cc engine had earned a reputation for exceptional robustness, as well as strong performance. This was particularly
evidentin a 25,000-kilometre test
undertaken by the German magazine Motorrad in 1981. No serious prob-
lems were encountered and compres-
sion and overall performance actually increased over time. In 1980 Nigusil-
The Le Mans Il incorporated several features from the SP 1000, in particular the
hinged fuel filler cap, instrument panel, and fairing with side panels. Very few Le Mans
Ils seem to have survived, most being converted to the more desirable Le Mans.
COTO GUZA
9
While
tion racing the Le Mans was surprisingly competitive. Roy Armstrong won the British 1977
Sponsored by the US importer
134
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
LE MANS
135
plated cylinders replaced the cast-iron type (from engine number 80390).
With the Le Mans II came a return
to the normal, thicker, 35mm fork tubes, With the normal hexagonal spring retaining nut, these forks had 25mm longerdampers, providing
additional fork travel. The fork width
was increased to that of the 850 T series and SP 1000, 195mm (7%
inches). Springs were now dual rate, and in 1980 air-adjustable dampers
were incorporatedwith individual
valves for each fork leg (from frame number VE 22636). The 08 Brembo front brake callipers were now
mounted behind the fork legs. Rear suspension units on the Le Mans Il were either FUTA, LIMS or LISPA.
Other features continued as before,
notably the integrated braking system
and FPS wheels, although the tyres fitted were now generallya much
more satisfactory Pirelli Gordon MT
18.
It was the fairing and instrument panel that set the Le Mans Il apart
from the earlier bike. The fairing was
similar to that of the SP 1000 with
two rigidly mounted side panels and a
front section that turned with the handlebars. Also similar to the SP
1000 was the instrument panel, which
incorporated a volt meter and clock
and a friction steering damper under the fuel tank. The fuel tank cap was now covered by a locking panel. As with the Le Mans, a full racing up-
rating kit was available.
Unfortunately the extra equipment saw the dry weight of the Le Mans Il
(as tested by Motociclismo) rise to
228kg (5031b), considerablymore
than the factory's optimistic claim of
196kg (4321b). Performance, however, did not seem to suffer. Motociclismo, in
February 1979, achieved a top speed
of 203.6km/h (126.5mph).with a standing 400 metres in 12.198 secondsat 173.127km/h (107.6mph). The lower top speed than the Le Mans was undoubtedly due to the
larger fairing.
However, even while the Le Mans Il may not have had the raw appeal of its predecessor, it was still a magnificent sporting motorcycle. My experience of a Le Mans II in 1979 was that it gave away nothing functionally to
the earlier model but suffered from
the styling compromises. The plastic
instrument panel and square head-
light only detracted from the sporting ideal, and the lack of air filtration lim-
ited the bike's usefulness as a long-
distance machine. Because it has been perceived as being less sporting than the Le Mans, many Le Mans II have been converted to the earlier specification, and these days an original Le
Mans Il is surprisingly rare.
Despite this, the Le Mans II was produced in similar numbers to the classic Le Mans. Although only 560
were manufactured in 1978 as it
usurped the Le Mans, production.
increased to 2,980 in 1979 and 2.786
in 1980. Even though it was effec-
tively replaced by the new-generation Le Mans III in 1981, 1,009 Le Mans
Ils were constructed that year. In 1980
many Le Mans Il were painted black
and gold by the British importer Coburn & Hughes to move unsold
stock.
The CX 100
With the high-compression 850cc engine no longer meeting emission requirements in the United States,
281 hybrid CX 100s were manufactured for that market in 1979. A fur-
ther 72 were also built in 1981 as the
Le Mans Il was being replaced.
A surprisingly successful concept
thatsomehow failed to become accepted, the CX 100 was an amal-
gam of the Le Mans II chassis and the SP 1000 engine. Thus the engine had the air filters and Dell'Orto VHB 30C carburettors, together with the
smaller valves and lower-performance
distributor advance of the SP. This
should have theoretically indicated a
9bhp deficit, but the actual perfor-
mance of the CX 100 did not bear this
out. Cycle magazine, in July 1980, found that their test bike performed
only slightly slower than the Le Mans, with a standing quarter-mile covered
in 13.50 seconds at 98.46mph
(158km/h). Where the CX 100 really suffered was in the increase in weight, with a wet weight of 240.4kg (530lb) compared with the 232.7kg (5131b) of the Le Mans. The few 1981 CX 100s featured Nigusil-plated cylinders, and
the round-slide Dell'Orto PHF 30
carburettors.
The Le Mans Ill
While it seemed that the Le Mans II had been marking time, its replace-
ment in 1981 restored the faith of the Guzzi enthusiast. In what looked
initially to be simply a re-style of the
earlier bikes, the Le Mans Ill included
significant modifications and
44
The brochure for the CX 100. Built only in very limited numbers for the US market,
the CX 100 was a Le Mans Il with an SP 1000 engine. (Ivar de Gier collection)
A Masterpuce Of Elegance And Craftimanship
MOTO GUZZZ]
I panel
Comprehensive instr ontaining speedome
Polycarbonate shatter proat smoke-Colored screen
1000 Le Mans
improvements, Even theangular
styling was a success and the Le Mans
Ill again showed that the engineers and designers at Moto Guzzi could
still achieve aesthetic miracles.
The engine, too, was restyled, with angular cylinder heads and cylinders, but internally there were few changes.
Capacity remained at 844cc, and the
valve sizes at 44 and 37mm, the cylinders being Nigusil-plated as they were
on the later Le Mans II. There was a
new cylinder head gasket, and even by lowering with compression ratio only slightly, to 9.8:1, Guzzi engineers managed to redesign the cylinder head sufficiently to enable the Le Mans Ill to pass the more stringent US emission standards.This was so
successful that the Le Mans III was no slower than a Le Mans or Le Mans II,
and claimed power was 76bhp at
7,700грm.
Other changes included a spacer between the oil pan and engine; this spacer was also incorporated in later versions of the Le Mans Il racing kit
as a result of racing practice that found that there were considerable
benefits from having the oil sump further away from the spinning crankshaft. Carburation was still by
Dell'Orto PHF 36B carburettors, but
these were re-jetted as there was now
an effective air filter. The Le Mans III
also featured a completely new, chromed exhaust system with larger-
diameter exhaust headers. much
larger capacity mufflers and no front exhaust balance pipe; this was now
under the gearbox.
While it looked similar to before,
the Le Mans Ill also had a new frame,
incorporating an engine crankcase
breather in the top frame tube.
However, one changes was
of a
the most significant 20mm longer
swingarm, increasing the wheelbase to
1.505mm (59 inches). The 35mm front forks were longer (141mm/ 51/in)and provided 20mm more
travel. These were also narrower than
the Le Mans II, reverting to the
180mm (7 inches) of the Le Mans,
and featured linked air adjustable dampers and fork legs painted the
colour of the bodywork. A linked air pressure system was also fitted to the
softer Paioli rear shock absorbers. The wheels and integrated brakes were as
Although the styling was angular to complement the square-finned engine,the Le
Mans III was a styling success. It also handled in the best Guzzi tradition.
before, and tyres were excellent Pirelli Phantoms (100/90V18 and
110/90V18). Surprisingly, however. there were no changes to the ignition
electricalsystem apart from a
larger, 24Ah, battery.
There were many alterations to the cycle parts on the Le Mans III. A new frame-mounted fairing combined the
best aspects of those of both the Le
Mans and Le Mans II, and there was a new, larger fuel tank (25 litres), foot-
peg mounts and instrument panel dominated by a 100mm (4-inch)
white-faced Veglia tachometer. If anything summed up the styling success of the Le Mans Ill it was the purpose-
ful instrument panel. Colours were either red/black white/black, or
metallic grey/black.
One of the most impressive aspects of the Le Mans Ill was the new instrument panel, dominated by the white-faced Veglia tachometer. The air-assisted forks were linked.
oil pressure light, high beam and parking lights indicator and hazard warning
liptts and trake sil warning light
Fluorescent strip ingraved recognition
High output alternator
5 Speed gearbar
Gauge and cartridge
ail titter to parity ngine eil
Light alicy cast wheels
Tirin front and single rear dises made from cast iron and dellled to improve thermal efficiency and water dispersal
136
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
eighth. These teams followed this
with a fifth and ninth respectively at the Liège 24-hour. This was the final racing Le Mans prepared by Luciano Gazzola, and today Micheli works as a test rider at Moto Guzzi.
The Le Mans IV
De Tomaso was always a strong follower of fashion and nothing epitomised this more than the Le Mans IV of 1984. In nearly every respect this
was an lesser motorcycle than the earlier 850cc Le Mans, but it should
have been superior. After the excellent Le Mans III, the sporting Moto Guzzi -
concept was brutally attacked with
this extremely disappointing succes-
sor. The mid-1980s obsession with
'bigger is better' was not only confined to Moto Guzzi, but the first 1000cc Le Mans was one of the worst examples of this dubious philosophy.
Unfortunately production of the Le
Mans IV coincided with a period
where quality and assembly standards were also very mediocre, contributing to the bike's poor reputation.
There were many changes from all the earlier models, so it was effectively a completely new version. The valve sizes were increased from the 850 Le
Mans to 47mm for the inlet and
40mm for the exhaust. However, with little room left for an effective squish
being the high-performance type of Francesco Giumbini, Alfio Micheli the other Le Mans. Another problem and Francesco Tamburini finished band, very high piston crowns were that Moto Guzzi refused to solve on fourth,with the German entry of needed to get the 10:1 compression the larger twins was the clutch. With Mattias Meyer and Klaus Hoffman ratio. Thus many of the emission the Le Mans IV came a new clutch plate but still no solution to the probOne of the least satisfactory Le Mans was the first 1000 of 1984. The overall lem of spline wear on the transmission dimensions were increased and there was a l6-inch front wheel. input hub. Other engine modifica-
The smaller fairing saw a slight
problems encountered with the early
and
Le Mans Le Mans Il were repeated with the Le Mans IV, and the engine would have a limited life in those countries with strict emission
reduction in claimed weight from the Le Mans II, to 206kg (454|b), but wet weight was 240.9kg (531lb) as tested by Cycle magazine in September 1983.
requirements.
Performance was increased over all the earlier Le Mans, Motociclismo in
To further boost performance there was a new camshaft for the Le Mans IV, the one previously available in the earlier Le Mans racing kit. Providing more valve lift (7.2mm) for both inlet and exhaust valves, the valve timing
November 1981 managing a top speed
of 210.120km/h (130mph), with a standing 400-metre time of 11.950 seconds at 175.600km/h (109mph):
With production beginning at the end of 1980 (180 manufactured), the Le Mans Ill would become the most successful of all the Le Mans, as well as enjoying the longest production run. Even when superseded by the
was also much more sporting. The inlet opened 29º before top dead
centre, closing 60° after bottom dead centre, and the58°bexhaustopened efore bottom dead centre, closing
31° after top dead centre. Completing the performance package was a set of
larger 1000cc version, the Le Mans III
continued for a short time. In all, 2,296 were built in 1981, 3,288 in 1982, 2,609 in 1983, 1,625 in 1984 and a further 58 in 1985. In many
Dell'Orto PHM 40N carburettors. Unfortunately these had extremely
strong slide return springs, detracting from aggressive sporting riding. Nonetheless, the result was a healthy power increase to 81bhp at 7,000rpm. The exhaust system was black chrome and featured a large crossover under
ways it represents the epitome of the
Le Mans concept by offering a balance between performance and practicality.
It also retained the compact dimensions of the earlier bikes and the clear bloodline of the V7 Sport.
but the Michelin A/M48s fitted to most examples were not the most
confidence-inspiring.
One area that was an improvement over earlier bikes was the 40mm forks,
still with the traditional cartridge damper and linked air assistance.
Initially the dampers were Paíoli, but these were soon changed to Sebac. As
with the Le Mans and Le Mans III, the forks were the narrow (180mm/
7in) type. The brakes were shared with the 850 T5, but the 270mm rotors were now a superior two-piece floating type.
All the bodywork was new for the
1000 Le Mans, and styled similarly to
the V65 Lario. Although the instrument panel was that of the Le Mans the switches were revised.
III,
Completing the styling-over-function idea was a belly pan under the sump; a feature of other Italian motorcycles of this period, it served no useful purpose
except for collecting road debris.
Colours were red or white, with a red
and white version with different
decals also available during 1986.
Contributing to a much larger-feeling motorcycle than any of its prede-
cessors was the use of longer, twin
337mm Koni P7610 shock absorbers.
No longer was the Le Mans a low and
lean motorcycle in the style of the V7
Sport. Surprisingly, considering the
larger forks and stronger frame, the weight of the Le Mans 1000 was only slightly increased on that of the Le Mans II and III, to a claimed 215kg
(4741b). Wet weight as tested by Cycle magazine in March 1986 was 245.2kg (5411b). However, they found the performance of the larger engine remark-
ably similar to the850, with a
standing quarter-mile covered in 12.48 seconds at 109.46mph (176km/h). Motociclismo, in October 1985, also found that the 1000 Le
Mans offered few performance advantages over the 850, managing a top
speed of 217km/h (135mph).
Almost immediately there were
complaints about the stability of the
Le Mans IV, and in 1986 revised steel
triple clamps with less offset were
offered to increase trail from 90 to
108mm (3½2 to 41/4 inches). These also lowered the steering head, and
during 1987, from frame number VV
100165, an aluminium type was fitted as standard. The factory also offered
LE MANS other modifications to cure instability. One was the replacement of the plas-
tic handlebar end plugs with steel ones, while another was the rubber mounting of the fork brace.
Undoubtedly the best solution was simply to replace the offending 16inch wheel with a normal 18-inch
type. This, too, became a replacement kit and eventually the factory itself realised that the Le Mans worked
better with an 18-inch front wheel.
Modifications continued for 1987. Pirelli MP7R radial tyres replaced the Michelins and there was a lengthened front and wider rear mudguard. The fork dampers were changed to Bitubo, a significant improvement, and these
were no longer air-assisted. Never as
popular as the 850cc models, produc-
tion of the Le Mans IV tapered off after a high of 1,766 in 1985.
Although 1,179 were produced in 1986, only 754 were built in 1987
with a final 71 in 1988.
While it may have suffered a confused identity on the street, the 1000 Le Mans formed the basis of one of Dr John Wittner's successful racing
Moto Guzzis. Wittner had cam-
paigned an 850 Le Mans Ill in 1984, winning the middleweight class of the
AMA/CCS US Endurance Road
Race Series championship with a 100
per cent finishing record. In 1985 the
Dr John's Team Moto Guzzi took the
endurance title outright with a 1000
137
a
Le Mans. With a very low budget and traditional American hot-rod approach to engine tuning (hot cams, high compression, andcombustion chamber shape), Team Moto Guzzi
won four events and proved that the Le Mans could provide surprising performance and reliability. By 1986 the
teamcarly was1987 sawstrugglingtheDrfinancially,JohnLeMansand with a steel box-section spine frame and cantilever suspension (see Chapter 12).
The Le Mans IV SE
As a commemorative model to cele-
brate 20 years of the V7, a Special
Edition Le Mans IV was released for
1987. They were all red/white and
were differentiated by a black engine
and gearbox. The SE also differed
from the regular Le Mans IV by
having a straight-cut close-ratio gearbox, which had a completely new set
of ratios, different even from the
earlier Le Mans race kit. The primary
ratio was 18/23, with first gear, 17/28;
Unfortunately, that was about to
change with its replacement.
In 1982 came a change of fortune
for Moto Guzzi in the highly competitive Endurance World Championship.
In the openinground at Imola,
the gearbox.
While the 1000 Le Mans exhibited many signs of following fashionable trends, in many respects it continued
with Moto Guzzi tradition.Ignition
was still by dual points, the distributor
tions were shared with the California Il and SP II, including the modified
engine breather with valve cover
vents.
When it came to the chassis and styling the Le Mans IV moved away
from the excellence of the earlier bikes. As a tribute to a particularly
dubious fashion trend, the front wheel
was now a 16-inch, and this just did not suit the motorcycle. The frame and swingarm were shared with the
later TS, with the longer steering head and extra frame gusset. Even though it retained the 410mm swingarm, the wheelbase increased over that of the Le Mans Ill to 1,514mm (60 inches). The wheels, 2.50 x 16 and 3.00 x 18, now accommodated tubeless tyres,
second, 21/24; third, 32/21; fourth, 25/19; and fifth, 27/19. With fourth almost identical to the previous fifth gear, this gearbox. (with the standard
7/33 final drive) offered considerably
higher and closer gearing than the
regular Le Mans IV. As expected, such high gearing hurt drag strip acceleration, Motorcyclist magazine achieving a standing quarter-mile in 13.59 sec-
A Special Edition Le Mans was offered in 1987 to commemorate 20 years of the V7.
The colour was red/white, with a close ratio gearbox and Pirelli radial tyres.
Unfortunately there was still the 16-inch front wheel.
138
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
LE MANS
139
onds at 102.2mph (164km/h) in May 1988.
The Le Mans V
Fortunately Moto Guzzi took heed of complaints about the Le Mans IV and designed a much improved version during 1987, this being homologated in January 1988. With the Le Mans V the Le Mans concept progressed but
still failed to offer any significant
advances over the earlier 850s. The
engine specifications were unchanged from the Le Mans IV, and this was the final version of the big-valve engine. Thus ignition remained with the dual point higher-performance distributor rather than the electronic ignitions of
other big twins, although the Le Mans
V now featured a Spanish Saprisa
alternator.
adjusting camchain tensioner was
fitted, and some of the final examples were fitted with the straight-cut close-ratio gearbox of the Le Mans IV SE.
The final LeMans V (from VV
017817) had the higher-capacity oil
pump, also shared with other 1000cc models.
Although the 40mm forks still fea-
tured the later Le Mans IV Bitubo dampers, these now had externally adjustable damping and spring preload. The biggest improvement over the Le Mans IV, however, was the
replacement of the 16-inch front
wheel with an 18-inch. The rim sizes
remained at 2.50 and 3.00 inches, but smaller section tyres were fitted, gen-
erally the Pirelli Phantom MT29/28 tube-type, a 100/90V18 on the front and 120/90V18 on the rear. Unfortunately the small 270mm discs remained, limiting braking power, but
Improvements to the engine continued to filter through. In April 1989 there was yet another new clutch the Le Mans V finally received the plate and input hub, which had four-way brake proportioningvalve deeper splines to prevent premature that had first appeared on the SP
wear; however, this still failed to rec-
1000. There was also an improved
tify the problem of rivets loosening on the plate. These new clutch compo-
front brake master cylinder.
Contributing to the better stability
nents were fitted from engine number VV 016375, again demonstrating Moto Guzzi's reluctance to rectify a
at higher speed was a frame-mounted,
rather than handlebar-mounted, fair-
ing, although the ugly belly pan remained. Early versions had the
persistent problem. This was strange considering that the smaller twins suffered none of the clutch problems of
triple clamp,butlateron thiswas
instrument panel mounted
the top
changed to a fairing mount. The Le
their bigger brothers. From number
VV 016418 a spring-loaded self- Mans V had muchimproved
While the Le Mans V addressed many of the deficiencies of the earlier 1000, it came too late, and by 1993 it was obsolete. (Two Wheels)
switchgear and later versions did not feature the integrated turn signal indi-
cators in the fairing. Handling and
stability were definitely improved over the Le Mans IV, the smaller-section
tyres contributing to this together
with the frame-mounted fairing and
18-inch frontwheel. As expected,
performance was very similar to the
Le Mans IV. Moto Sprint, in 1988, achieved 213.4km/h (133mph) from their 228.1kg (5031b) machine.
The Le Mans V soldiered on until
1993 with only changes to colour
schemes, black and red for 1988 and all black with white wheels for 1989. Production over its six-year life span was considerably less than earlier ver-
sions: in 1988 724 wereproduced, with 720 in 1989 and 325 in 1990. After that the days of a twin rear
shock absorber sporting motorcycle were clearly numbered, and only 147 were produced in 1991, 143 in 1992,
with a final 54 in 1993. The final 100 were listed as 'Ultima Edizione' models with a numbered plaque and
signed certificate.
While there was nothing especially inferior about the Le Mans V, it really should have been produced ten years earlier. By 1993 it was an anachronism
and offered little improvement over its 850cc predecessors. Also, by this stage Dr John's four-valve Daytona had rendered the Le Mans obsolete.
The 1000 S/SE
Although not strictly a Le Mans, the ethos of the 'retro' 1000 S was such
that it deserves to be categorised with
the sporting Guzzis rather than the tourers and cruisers. Introduced in
1989, the 1000 S replicated the style
and black and red paintwork of the 1974 and 1975 750 S and S3. but little was really shared with those
earlier bikes. When it started life late in 1989 the 1000 S was an unfaired Le
Mans V, with retro features such as spoked alloy-rimmed wheels and a simpler instrument panel and side covers; later versions had a revised
instrument panel.
Most 1000 Ss used the large-valve
engine (81bhp) of the 1000cc Le Mans (also with the higher-perfor-
mance camshaft, Dell'Orto PHM 40 carburettors and the twin point distributor). However, with the end of
the Le Mans, and the difficulties faced
getting the larger-valve engine through tightening emission requirements, the final 1000 Ss of 1992 and
1993 used the engine of the 1000
Strada and SP III. With 44 and 37mm valves, this also featured the Digiplex electronic ignition with a lighter fly-
wheel; this ignition alsoadjusted
timing for both engine speed and load.
Dell'Orto PHF36 carburettors were used, as was a new Ducati Energia
alternator mounted on the crankshaft.
Power was less than with the largevalve engine (71bhp at 6,800грm), but the engine was compatible with unleaded fuel. From VV 50625 these engines also featured the highercapacity oil pump.
Although much was shared with the Mille GT, the 1000 S was a considerably higher-specification motorcycle.The forks featured the 40mm
fork tubes and Bitubo dampers of the Le Mans V, also with external damp-
ing and preload adjustment. These were still the narrow type (180mm),
and surprisingly the 1000 S continued to use the 270mm floating discs of the
A final attempt at the 'retro' look was the 1000 S of 1989. This also came with the
option of wire-spoked wheels, but was a disappointing attempt at re-creating the earlier
750 S.
Despite the more powerful Le Mans V engine, the 1000 S only offered sim-
ilar performance to the older 750 S.
Moto Sprint, in 1990, achieved a top
Le Mans V rather than the 300mm speed of 206.3km/h (128mph), the type of the less powerful Mille GT. wet weight 229.1kg (5051b) Two versions of the 1000 S were pro- undoubtedly blunting performance. duced, one with cast wheels and one 1000 Ss with the smaller valve engine with spoked. These also required dif- provided even less performance, but it ferent forks, and the spoked wheels was not this alone that determined its had narrower rims, 2.15 x 18 inch and fate: the market just was not ready for 2.50 x 18 inch. a retro Moto Guzzi and thus very few
were produced. After a high of 524 in
1990, 401 were manufactured in
1991, only 196 in 1992, and a final 84 in 1993.
In addition to the S, styled along the lines of the 750 S3, during 1991 the British market was treated to the
1000 SE. These were red with a small
Le Mans I-style fairing, but inall
other respects were identical to the 1000 S,
SMALLER TWINS
141
11.
MOTONEUREL
Smaller twins
tion run, been subject to a myriad of modifications, and been produced in
an extraordinary number of varieties.
The V35 and V50/V50 lI
In many respects the new design
solved some of the problems that had never been tackled on the V7, in par-
ticular the clutch and accessibility.of
the oil filter. The crankcases were hor-
izontally split, and the oil filter could
be replaced without removingthe
sump. The one-piece steel crankshaft used split shell main bearings with a 32.9mm journal on the timing end of
the crankshaft and 40mm on the
drive end. There were two-piece connecting rods as before, these having a
length of 106.5mm (41/4 inches) with an 15mm gudgeon and 35mm big-
end. The dry clutch, too, was
improved through the use of one friction plate and a diaphragm spring in
place of multiple coil springs.This
clutch design gave far fewer problems
than that of the larger twins, with
minimal spline wear and a smoother
action.
Another variation from the larger
engines was the cylinder head design,
utilising Heron heads with two parallel valves, the combustion chamber
being incorporated in thepiston
crown. While this enabled high compression ratios (10.8:1), excellent fuel economy and simplified manufacturing, ultimate breathing was limited by
the small valve sizesand sharply
curved ports. The V35 (346cc) with
its 66 x 50.6mm dimensions had valve sizes of 30.6 and 27.6mm, while the V50 (490cc) with dimensions of 75 x 57mm, had a slightly larger inlet valve of 32.6mm. The valve timing was inlet
Duringmotorcyclethemid-manufacturers1970smanyItalianwere looking towards expanding their middleweight range. Moto Guzzi was no exception, but where they differed was
in the utilisation of their traditional layout, a 90° V-twin with shaft final drive.While they still marketed the
re-badged Benellis,thecontinued
success of the larger V-twins finally persuaded De Tomaso to sanction a
smaller version.He was not only
determined to increase production of
Moto Guzzis, but also committed to
reducing manufacturing costs.
After building a small-block prototype in 1972, Lino Tonti was autho-
rised by De Tomaso to design the V35
and V50. Apart from horizontally split crankcases, the eventual design was quite similar to that early prototype. Tonti went to some trouble to reduce production costs, but also managed to
create a brilliantly compact motor-
cycle. Although the 90° V-twin closely followed the layout of the larger bikes with its chain-driven central camshaft and pushrod-operated valves, in many other respects the design was highly innovative, incorporating several
technical advances over the larger twins. Unfortunately the quest for
cheaper manufacturing compromised the ultimate performance potential of the engine design, and consequently the smaller twins initially suffered in
comparison with competitive products
from other manufacturers. Combined with production and quality problems
that persisted for many years, this meant that the smaller twins never
achieved the development and accolades they deserved. That aside, they have had an extremely long produc-
opening 18° before top dead centre and closing 50% after bottom dead centre, and53°bexhaust opening efore bottom dead centre and closing
15° after top dead centre, Although there were several modifications to the camshafts on the small V-twins over the next few years, the timing
remained unaltered.
Further effort at reducing costs was
evident in the use of cast-iron valve
Tages finitetwins).of Boresbronze onasthewithfirstthe models were chrome-plated and car-
buration on both the V35 and V50 was by Dell'Orto VHBZ 24F carburettors. For the first time on a Guzzi, Bosch electronic ignition was fitted
and the claimed power of the V35 was 33.6bhp at 8,100rpm, that of the V50, 45bhp at 7,500rpm. Other electrical equipment followed that of the larger
twins, a Bosch 280-watt alternator and 0.7k W starter motor.
There were several other changes to the overall design of the smaller
engine and drive train. As it was
always designed to be produced in a variety of engine displacements, the
helical primary gears lived in an inter-
mediate housing between the engine
and gearbox. This enabled the easy
fitting of different primary gear ratios; on the 350 this was 13/24, and on the
500 14/23. Ultimately there would be
a vastly confusingarray of primary
drive gears fitted to the range of small V-twins. Instead of the engine output shaft running directly into the clutch
and on to the gearbox as with the larger twins, a smaller gear on the
output shaft engaged a larger gear on
the gearbox mainshaft. Thus the gearbox centreline was below that of the
The first V50 was an excellent design let down by insufficient development and poor quality engine.The five-speed gearbox also thing about the new design repre- wheelbase and rigid frame ensured
differed that the gearswere straight-cut and the overall design less sophisticated so as to reduce production costs.
The 410mm (16-inch) alloy
swingarm pivoted on the rear of the five-speed gearbox in a manner similar to that of the 500cc V8 racer. To facilitate rear wheel removal the rear
drive incorporated the 235mm rear
disc and there was also provision for an optional kick-starter, which was a standard fitting on military versions. All small twins used a 8/31 final drive
ratio.
In most respects the rest of the
motorcycle was a downsized version of
the larger Tonti-framed twins. The
frame followed a similar layout, with a
detachable lower section and extremely skinny air-assisted (springs only, not damping) 32mm forks and shorter (305mm/12-inch) shock
absorbers. The forks also featured a
narrow width of 160mm (61/3 inches).
The cast alloy wheels were also
smaller in section, a 1.85 x 18 on the
front and a 2.15 x 18 on the rear. Triple integrated disc brakes were fitted (twin cast-iron 260mm on the
front) with small Brembo 05 callipers. The brake proportioning was also by a
"V' three-way manifold. Not every-
sented an improvement, however: a couple of poor features were the
cable-operated front master cylinder,
and ball-bearings in the steering head that were especially prone to wear.
The angular styling and engine finning would eventually influence
the larger twins and the overall result was a remarkably light and compact motorcycle. Unfortunately it was not without problems, and consequently there were continual updates.
The first variation was the V50 lI of 1979. Essentially identical to the V50 but for stripes on the tank and side covers, the chrome cylinder bores
were replaced by Nicasil bores as used
on other European motoreycles of
that period. Also for the V50 ll came
a deeper sump, increasing the oil
capacity to 2 litres. While the early V35 and V50 were initially primarily
for the Italian market, the V50 lI was
exported and performance was disap-
pointing. Cycle World, in September
1980, achieved a standing quarter-
mile in 15.93 seconds at 85.1mph (137km/h), barely faster than
Falcone. Where the V50 1l succeeded,
however, was in its weight and compact dimensions. The test weight was only 178kg (3921/2lb), which together
with the short 1,395mm (55-inch)
excellent handling.
Apart from the sedate performance,
other problems faced the V35 and
V50. They were not as inexpensive to produce as had been expected and the
plant at Mandello was too small to
cope with a massive increase in production. By 1979 engine production of the smaller twins had moved to the old Innocenti factory in Milan, which De Tomaso had purchased. Not only were costs reduced, but also quality. The bikes were plagued with irritating problems such as gasket leaks, and the finish was often very poor. Thus the small twins have always struggled to
maintain the tradition of reliability
perpetuated by the V7 family.
The V35 Imola and V50 Monza
Not unexpectedly, sporting versions of both the V35 and V50 followed soon after their release. Styled along the
lines of the Le Mans, with small-fairing clip-on handlebars and rear-set footpegs, the first to appear was the V35 Imola in 1979, named after the
race track where Guzzi had triumphed
so often during the 1950s. Although
there were few changes to the engine, claimed power was 366hp at 8,200rpm. Valve sizes remained the
142
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
SMALLER TWINS
143
assisted Paioli shock absorbers and
forks with air-assisted dampers rather than springs, as with the larger twins. While the V50 Monza provided significantly improved performance over the V50 lI, it was still no match for the other sporting 500s appearing. at that time, in particular Ducati's new 500 Pantah. Motociclismo, in September 1981, achieved a top speed of 172.9km/h (107mph), with a standing 400 metres in 14.118 seconds at 148.76km/h(92mph). The Monza was the lightest in its class with a test
weight of 171.5kg (3781b), but already
it was outclassed and in need of more
horsepower.
The V35 ll and V50 III
Making its appearance with the V35 Imola at the end of 1979, the V35 II
was an amalgam of a V35 Imola
engine in a V50 Il chassis. Claimed power was slightly less than the V35 Imola, at 35bhp at 8,100грm. Production of the V35 Il commenced early in 1980 and, as had occurred with the Imola, the smaller versions incorporated developments sooner than their larger brothers. Moto Guzzi was well aware of the problems with the V50 Il, but it was not until 1981 that many of the features of the V35
Il filtered through to the new V50 III.
The V50 III shared its engine with the V50 Monza (larger valves and carburettors, dual point ignition, duplex timing chain, and gearbox), but still used the 14/23 primary drive. As with
the V35 II, the claimed power was also slightly less than the Monza at 47bhp at 7,500гpm. Other changes that had appeared on the V35 Imola
also made their way to the V35 Il and
V50 III. The front master cylinder was now handlebar-mounted, enabling the fuel tank cap to be neatly hidden by a steel cover. There were new silencers
and drilled steel brake discs rather
than the previous cast-iron. A number of cosmetic alterations differentiated the V50 Ill from its predecessors and
the V35 ll; for example the mud.
guards were altered, the taillight now
being incornorated with the rear
guard. From 1982, on both the V35 (after engine 29135) and V50 after
engine 31344), the single timing
chain of the V65 was used.
All these developments undoubt-
edly contributed to the V50 III being
more successful than the earlier V50s,
particularly outside Italy. With much assembly of the small V-rwins being
undertaken at the Benelli plant at
Pesaro, production could not only be increased but there were also significant price reductions in many export markets. However, the V50 Ill contin-
ued to struggle to find the balance between production quality and performance. Quality was continually elusive, but Moto Guzzi hoped that performancewould come from a
capacity increase.
The V65 and V65 SP
While the V50 III was more successful
than its predecessors, it still only
offered moderate performance for a 500cc twin. This led to the V65, first shown at Milan Show in November 1981. Productioncom-
the
menced in 1982, not at Mandello but
at the Benelli works at Pesaro. The
engines continued to be built by
Innocenti, with the framesby Maserati at Modena, and there was
considerably more to the V65 than
extra capacity.
The engine was not only bored and stroked (80 x 64mm) to give 643.4cc,
but the entire bottom end was strengthened, obviously with the
intention of enlarging the engine to
an eventual 750cc. The con-rods were
lengthened to 120mm (4¾ inches),
with a 40mm big-end and 20mm gud-
geon. On the crankshaft the journals
were increased to 40mmon the
timing side and 43mm on the drive
side, and the duplex timing chain that
had been introduced on the V35 |l
and V50 III reverted to a single chain.
Where the V65 was obviously at a
disadvantage compared with other 650s, however, was in the cylinder heads and small valves, still shared with the V50 Ill. Thus, even with
larger Dell'Orto PHBH 30B carburettors with a revised air filter box, and a
10:1 compression ratio, the power was
only 52bhp at 7,050гpm.The entire
clutch and gearbox was also new for the V65. Apart from third gear all the
internalgearboxratioswere also
altered, giving a slightly closer-ratio
spread. The 15/22 primary drive gears
came from the Monza, together with the 12-tooth U-joint spline.
Mars tuck
To address some of the criticism of the earlier V50, the V50 III had the more powerful Monza engine and many detail improvements.
A sporting variant of the V35, the Imola, appeared in 1979, followed shortly
afterwards by the similar V50 Monza. Looking like a miniature Le Mans, they were
attractive, but underpowered, motorcycles.
same as on the V35, but while the
Imola (to 10.4:1), there were larger
compression ratio was reduced slightly
valves and wider spacing of the ports.
to 10.5:1, carburettors were now two Dell'Orto VHB 26Fs. As with the V50 Il, cylinder bores were Nicasil.
Valve sizes were 34.6mm inlet and 30.6mm exhaust and, together with
the dual ignition points of the V35
The electronic ignition reverted to
Imola, the single-chain camshaft drive became a duplex. The plated cylinders
the twin points, claimed to provide an improved ignition advance but possibly to reduce costs. This new ignition was actually inferior, and contributed to off idle sluggishness by providing no advance until 2,000rpm.
were now Guzzi's own Nigusil and incorporated an additional stud next
to the pushrod tubes.While the
crankshaft was similar to before, it
featured a larger timing side journal at 35mm, and revised oil ways. The con-
The angular styling of the Imola
rods, still 106.5mm in length, now
predated the Le Mans IlI, and most of the running gear was shared with the V35, including the same 32mm Guzzi
used a 3mm larger gudgeon pin
(18mm), but the 35mm big-end was
forks and Sebac 305mm rear shock absorbers, but the twin 260mm front
retained. These modifications also found their way to the V35 and the V50 III. With Dell'Orto PHBH 28B
discs were drilled (as was the 235mm rear) and the front Brembo 05 brake calliners were situated behind the fork
carburettors the power was increased
to 48bhp at 7,600rpm, and the pri-
legs. The front master cylinder was now situated on the handlebar rather than on the top frame tube in front of
mary drive was raised to 15/22.
While the gearbox matios were unchanged, the sizes of the shafts,
a 12-tooth (instead of 10-tooth) transmission U-joint spline. Three
the fuel tank.
gears and bearings was increased, with
Soon after the release of the V35 Imola, 500cc version was announced. Called the Monza, after the race track near Milan, this was first shown at the Bologna Show at the end of 1980. Looking essentially identical to the Imola, the Monza had
versions of gearbox were fitted to the
Monza. Imola and later V50 III and
V35 II. These only affected shifting
forks and fourth gear on the layshaft, but reflected the continual refinement
a considerably uprated engine over the V50 II. Although the compression ratio was slightly reduced as with the
of the design.
The chassis was shared with the
V35 Imola, but with 310mm air-
The gearbox was strengthened for
the larger engine and the clutch
redesigned, but as with the V35 and V50 the gearbox was subject to sev.
eral revisions. Over the next few years there were three versions of layshaft,
new shifting fork locating dowels, and
In
improved internal lubrication.
1983 the V65 received almost a
totally revised gearbox in an endeavour to reduce noise. Further updates also included stronger replacement
ring-and-pinion rear gear sets and bearings. Despite all these develop-
ments ignition was still by dual points, but total advance was reduced to 33°.
Although the frame was similar to
the V50, to create more room for a passenger, the swingarm was lengthened to 435.5mm (17 inches). Other chassis parts, too, were upgraded for
the larger bike. Finally the flimsy
32mm forks were replaced with 35mm units, 180mm (7 inches) wide, similar
to those of the Le Mans, but fitted with extremely strong fork springs.
The inverted Paioli shock absorbers,
with linked air pressure valves, were slightly longer than on the V50 III at
320mm. Much of the rest of the chassis, however, was shared with the V50 Ill. The narrow-rimmed wheels and
As it was based on the smaller twins the V65 SP was still an extremely compact
motorcycle for its displacement.
144
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
SMALLER TWINS
145
integrated brakes were unchanged,
but tyre sizes increased to 100/90H18 and 110/90H18.
For a 650cc twin the V65 was still a remarkably light and compact motorcycle. As tested by Motorrad in March 1985, the wet weight was only 199kg
(439lb), while the top speed was a
respectable, but hardly earth-shattering, 176km/h (109mph).
In addition to the V65 there was
the V65 SP, a diminutive of the SP
1000. The V65 SP had identical spec-
ifications to the V65 but for the
three-piece fairing with handlebar-
mounted centre section. For some reason the V65 SP generally had a Lucas, rather than a Bosch, starter motor. Weight was marginally
increased, and while the handling was impeccable, both 650s suffered through offering only sedate performance. This was largely overcome with a new cylinder head design, but both the V65 and V65 SP were discontinued in 1987, replaced by the equally sedate Sessantacinque, and
the more sporting Lario.
The V35/V50/V65 Custom and V35/65 Florida
While many of the smaller V-twins were excellent motorcycles, it was
unfortunate that Moto Guzzi decided problems that afflicted the Custom, to expand the line-up with a series of particularly the V50 and V65. This
restyled in 1984, the seat incorporating a passenger backrest, and the 350 and 650 remained in production until 1988.
Responding to criticismof the
Custom, in 1986 Moto Guzzi released
themore radical V35 and V65
Florida, which by 1988 had replaced
the Custom. As well as offering a
more extreme chopper-like styling,
overall quality was improved, evident
in ancillary componentssuch as
instruments and footpegs. On the 350 the engine was also redesigned with a
different bore and stroke, so that
cylinders and heads were shared with
the V50. The bore was the V50's
74mm, with a shorter 40.6mm stroke
giving 349.2cc. Compression was 10.3:1 and carburation was by twin Dell'Orto PHBH 28 carburettors.
While the V35 Florida used identical gearing to the V35 Custom, the V65 Florida shared its 16/21 primary drive
with the Lario. The ignition on the
Florida was Motoplat electronic, and
from 1988 Saprisa alternators were fitted.
The chassis on the Florida was
quite different from that of the
Custom. Longer front forks, with
38mm fork tubes, elevated the front,
and 332mm Sebac shock absorbers
replaced the 330mm Paiolis. The V65
also included a standard windshield andinstabilitypanniers,at higheragainspeeds.contributingFinal ver-to sions featured spoked wheels, with the rear dise moved to the left as on the TT. While obviously never
intended as a performance machine,
Motorrad tested a V65 Florida in November1986 andachieved a
respectable 161km/h (100mph) from their 197kg (4341b) machine.
Although effectively replaced by the Nevada from 1991, the 650 Florida remained in limited production until 1994.
The V35 and V65 TT
In a further bid to expand the line-up, in 1984 a dual-purpose trail bike was created from the 350 and 650. Called
the TT. these were not really effective off-road motorcycles, but did offer the convenience of electric start and shaft drive, unusual for this type of motorcycle. Engines were shared with the V35/65 Custom (and V35 II/V65) but
Some of the most disappointing Moto Guzzis in recent years have been the smaller Customs. Not only did the V65 C offer only marginal performance, it also lacked the
handling finesse of other models.
was especially prevalent when fitted with the windshield or panniers that
chassis modifications were insufficient
to allay the handling and stability
were sometimes fitted as standard
equipment. The Custom was slightly
The Florida was an even more radically styled cruiser than the Custom.
With its low exhaust system, the V65 TT was really only a half-hearted attempt at an
enduro motorcycle. The frame had an additional brace to the steering head. (Australian Motorcycle News)
with different gearing: the V35 TT
had 12/24 primary gears and gearbox
with the earlier V35 ratios, later V35 TTs having an even lower 12/25 pri-
mary drive, while the V65 TT used
the V50 Ill primary gears (14/23) with the regular 650 gearbox.
While the frame was the stronger Lario design with tapered roller bear-
ings in the steering head, and the swingarm also the longer 458mm Custom type, all-new suspension graced the TT. It was fitted with non-
cartridge-style Marzocchi leading-axle
38mm forks, with 180mm (7-inch)
and 360mm Marzocchi spacing, remote-reservoir shock absorbers. Non-integrated brakingwas by a
single Brembo 05 calliper with 260mm
disc,with the rear 260mm disc locatedopposite the tear drive.
Spoked wheels with Akront alloy rims
were 1.60 x 21 inches and 2.15 x 18 inches, mounted with dual-purpose
tyres, but it was not really enough to create a truly functional off-road vehicle. With the V65 Baja, first shown at the Milan Show of 1985, Moto Guzzi created a much more serious off-road
motorcycle, but it failed to get into
production.
The V35 Imola II/V40 Capri, V50 Monza II and V65 Lario
poorly executed customs, epitomising the crisis period of the 1980s. Starting
with the V35 and V50 Custom in
1982, the V65 Custom joined them in 1983. The engines on all the Customs were identical to those on the respec-
tive touring models butfor the
exhaust systems. Thus they all featured different primary ratios, 13/24
for the V35, 14/23 for the V50, and
15/22 (together with the 650 gearbox)
for the V65. On all three Customs,
the 35mm forks, headlight and instruments were shared with the and
the handlebars came fromV65, the
California II.
The front wheel increased in size to
2.15 x 18 inches, with a 100/90H18
tyre, and the rear wheel became a 2.5
x 16-inch with a 130/90H16 tre. This required the swingarm to be
lengthened to 458mm (18 inches). To
compensate for the lower wheel, 330mm inverted Paioli shock
absorbers were fitted. However, these
A more significant development in
the small V-twin line-up occurred in 1984 with the introduction of a fourvalve cylinder head. It was indicative of Moto Guzzi during this period that
this improvement took so long to
come to fruition, but it was worth the
wait. The four-valve engine was
reserved for the more sporting models,
the V35 Imola II (and corresponding
Japanese market V40 Capri), V50
Monza II, and a new 650, the Lario.
Bore and stroke, crankshaft and
con-rods were unchanged from the
two-valve versions, as were the camshaft timing and compression
ratio, except for an increase in com-
pression for the Lario to 10.3:1. A single pushrod operated a forked rocker with the four valves now
organisedin a pent-roof Cosworth
style. Valve sizes were 24mm inlet and
21.5mm exhaust for the 350, with the
500 and 650 sharing 27 and 24mm
146
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
SMALLER TWINS
147
crankshaft came correspondingly longer con-rods (130mm/5in) with a
slightly larger gudgeon at 22mm. The
V75 had an even deeper oil sump
with a spaceras with the larger
square-finned engines. This did not increase sump capacity, but moved
the oil further from the spinning
crankshaft. There was also a larger
capacity oil filter. Carburation was the same as the Lario, with twin Dell'Orto PHBH 30B carburettors. An improve-
ment that featured on both the V35
Illand V75 wasanelectronic
Motoplat ignition that provided more advance (41° on the 350 and 38° on the 750).
Overall, however, the V75 was a
disappointing performer, the extra capacity translating into more torque
but little extra horsepower. Maximum power was only 65bhp at 7,200rpm. The V75 gearbox and primary drive were as with the V65, with the lower 15/22 primary gears. The V35 III, still
with the 66 x 50.6mm engine,
reverted to the earlier V35 Il gearbox
rather than the 650 type of the Imola
II, with 12/24 primary gears.
Both theV35 Ill and V75 were
Undoubtedly one of Moto Guzzi's lost opportunities was the V75. The only 750 with a four-valve cylinder head, it suffered from the use of a 16-inch front wheel and 850 T5 styling.
Although it may have looked over-styled and a product of mid-1980s fashion, the V65 Lario was an underrated motorcycle with many improvements over the earlier small twins. The 16-inch wheels suited the smaller bike much better than the Le Mans.
The Lario also proved to have a higher top speed than other small
were fitted front and rear. These had wider rims than the earlier V65, 2.15
The 350 used Dell'Orto
valves.
PHBH 28B carburettors, and the 500 and 650 larger Dell'Orto PHBH 30Bs. All three sporting variants now shared the closer-ratio V65 gearbox, but with the expected different primary gears.
on the front and 2.50 on the rear,
twins. In Moto achieved 191.1km/h (119mph) in 1987, faster than many of the 1000cc Guzzis. Although production lasted through until 1989, the
allowing for 100/90 and 120/90 tyres. To compensate for the smaller wheels
all had longer (330mm) air-assisted
To compensate for the 16-inch rear wheel the V35 Imola II had a 13/23 primary drive, and the V50 Monza II
Paioli shock absorbers, although later
Lario was only moderately successful. By 1989 16-inch wheels were unfash-
versions were fitted with Konis. Up frontwere theusual air-adjustable
ionable and 650cc inadequate.The
15/22 primary gears. The higher-per-
35mm Guzzi forks, and the size of the
demise of the Imola and Monza II followed in its wake.
formanceV65 Lario had an even
front disc brake rotors was increased to 270mm (shared with the TS).
higher primary ratio (16/21).
The V35 Ill and V75
Not all was evolutionary with the four-valve engine, however. Ignition was still by twin points, but now with a modified points plate allowing easier individual timing of the cylinders. As
The styling (fairing and seat) and many ancillary components such as instruments and the poorly designed switches followed the example of the contemporary Le Mans 1000, but the overall result was probably more successful. Exhausts were black chrome, and the somewhat dubious belly pan
The continual evolution of the small
V-twin continued in 1985 with the V75 and very similar V35 III. The
biggest difference between these two
models was the engine, the V35 I still utilising the 35bhp two-valve
expected from the better-breathing cylinder heads,power was signifi-
cantly increased over the two-valve versions, but still less than competiofferings from other manufactur-
346cc engine, while the V75 featured a development of the 650cc Lario
also featured. The 16-inch wheels
four-valve engine. In other respects these two models somehow managed
suited the smaller bike better than the
ers.tive The350 produced 40bhp at the 500 50bhp at 7,800грm, and the 650 60bhp at
16/18-inchcombination of the Le
Mans, the steering and handling being less idiosyncratic.
to combine many of the least satisfac-
tory features of Moto Guzzis of the
As expected, the performance, particularly of the Lario, was up on the two-valve versions. Cycle magazine, in April 1988, managed a standing-start
mid-1980s, notably the 16-inch front wheel and the ugly integrated fairing and instruments of the T5.
7,800грm.
With the four-valve engine finally
came a frame with tapered roller bearings in the steering head. The 458mm
Stroking the 650 engine to 74mm created 743.9cc, but the four-valve
swingarm of the Custom lengthened
quarter-mile in 13.40 seconds at
cylinder head of the V75 was the
the wheelbase, and following the fash-
98.2mph (158km/h) from their V65 Lario, weighing 196.4kg (433lb) wet.
ion of the mid 1980s 16-inch wheels
same as the V65 Lario. With the new
The reality was that these models
were a lost opportunity for Moto
Guzzi. If the V75 had been less compromised in its design, the four-valve
cylinder head may have survived
longer. Consequently, the V75 was the only 750 with a four-valve head.
The 350/650/750 NTX
While the V35 and V65 TT had pro-
standard-type motorcycles in the style
The V65 NTX was a better effort at the enduro concept than the TT, but was still of the 850 TS rather than sporting large and overweight. (Two Wheels) vehicles, so the styling, with a small handlebar fairing, followed the larger bike's example. Stronger Guzzi air-
assisted 38mm forks, 180mm wide,
were used, together with 320mm Koni shock absorbers. The frame was simi-
lar to that of the Lario with tapered roller steering head bearings and a
458mm swingarm. The integrated braking wascarried over from the
Lario, and there were twin front
270mm discs and a 235mm rear with Brembo 05 callipers. Contributing to
the odd looks were a 2.15 x 16-inch front and 2.50 x 18-inch rear wheel.
Another dubious feature was the
vacuum-operated fuel tap, which was leaky and unreliable and replaced in 1986 by two separate manual taps.
While the wet weights of 191.1kg (4211b) for the V75 and 181.3kg
(400lb) for the V35 Ill were extremely
moderate, the performance of both was disappointing. Moto Sprint, in
1987, achieved a top speedof
188.7km/h (117mph) from the V75, and 158.3km/h (98mph) from the V35 III.
148
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
SMALLER TWINS
149
compression ratio of 9.7:1 and produced 46bhp at 6,600rpm. All NTXs
had the Motoplat electronic ignition,
and from 1988 the Saprisa alternator.
The rest of the NTX was consider-
ably upgraded over the TT for offroad use. A more practical addition
was a centre-stand, and a less exposed
exhaust system, while the Marzocchi forks were strengthened with 40mm fork legs. Rear suspension now featured twin 370mm upside-down
Marzocchi shock absorbers, while the
260mm brakes and 21-inch and 18inch wheels were carried over from the TT. Completely new was the 32litre plastic fuel tank, integrated with a small fairing and painted in bright colours: white, yellow and black for the 350, and white, blue and red on
the 650.
With the 750 NTX came quite different bodywork. The fuel tank was
incorporated within a full fairing,
there was a low front mudguard, hand
guards, and the front disc had a plastic cover. The front brake calliper was
a four-piston Grimeca and colours were red and white; in 1989 came new colours of blue and light blue. However, in the highly competitive
world of enduro motorcycles the NTX did not offer sufficiently sophisticated suspension and it was also extremely
heavy. Moto Sprint tested all three
varieties, the 350 and 650 weighing
191.3 and 191.9kg (422 and 4231b) respectively, and the 750 NTX slightly heavier at 195.8kg (4321b). The performance, too, particularly of the 650 and 750, was very strong for this type of motorcycle. The 650 managed
164.7km/h (102mph) and the 750
164.8km/h. Despite this, the NTX
was not very successful and was discontinued in 1990.
The Trentacinque GT and Sessantacinque GT
A further development of the V35 III
and V65 appeared in 1987 as the Trentacinque (350) and Sessantacinque (650) GTs, primarily for the Italian market. The 350 GT was effectively the V35 Ill re-styled along the
lines of the Mille GT, the 650 GT looking virtually identical. These rather unremarkable motorcycles
offered little advance over the earlier
V35 Ill and V65, except for the
improvements that affected all smaller twins, including the Saprisa alternator
and a revised rear drive housing to overcome premature pinion bearing
wear. The Trentacinque GT, with the
long-stroke (66 x 50.6mm) V35 III engine, now had the Imola 1l (650type) gearbox and 13/23 primary
gears. The Sessantacinque shared the same gearbox, but with 15/22 primary gears.
Although the GT was based on the
V75/V35 III, the swingarm was the shorter 435.5mm (17-inch) item of the V65. In 1995, at the end of the production run, the longer 458mm (18-inch) swingarm of the V75 was fitted. EarlierGTs had air-assisted Paioli shock absorbers, but models
with the longer swingarm had 330mm
Koni rear shock absorbers. In other
respects the GT was as the V35
III/N75, with air-assisted 38mm Guzzi
forks (longer than the V65) and the
isual integrated braking set-up. Front
liscs were 270mm, and the wheels or
the 350GT were the same 16-inch front and 18-inch rear. Fortunately
with the 650 GT the 16-inch front
wheel was replaced by a normal 1.85 x
18-inch V65 type. However, the substitution of V65 wheels for V35 III wheels also saw a reduction in the rear rim width to 2.15 x 18 inches.
Details like this indicated Moto
in product
Guzzi's inconsistency
development during the 1980s.
As a basic no-frills standard motor-
cycle the 350/650 GT was adequate but really provided no improvement over the original V35/V65. With its elevated front end it even looked less satisfactory than the earlier model, with the styling of the instruments
and headlight overdone. When it came to performance the 650 GT,
with its larger frontal area, offered even less than the V65: Moto Sprint managed 168.7km/h (105mph) from their 178.9kg (3941b) Sessantacinque
The 750 Targa, SP and
Strada
The ultimate expression of the more sporting smaller V-twin was the 750
Targa of 1989. Although it seemed to be an extension of the 650 Lario idea, the use of a two-valve engine and a return to 18-inch wheels demon-
strated its origin back in the first V50 Monza. The styling followed that of the Lario, and the 750 Targa was very
much a smaller Le Mans V. It could
have been a brilliant recipe,but
unfortunately the Targa was fitted
with an underpowered 750cc engine.
This engine was essentially the
two-valve unit of the NTX, so it still
had the Heron cylinder heads with
small parallel valves. The gearbox and primary drive were from the Lario, but from 1990 there were revised first and fifth gears. As with other Moto Guzzis
of this period a French Valeo starter
motor replaced the Bosch. Even
though it displaced 744cc, the perfor-
More successful as an enduro was the 750 NTX with enclosed front disc brake and integrated fairing, fuel tank and side panels. This is the blue version of 1989.
350 and 650, the 350 used the new
vided a taste of how the small V-twin
could be adapted to an off-road
short-stroke (74 x 40.6mm) engine of the V35 Florida. Early 350 NTXs had
motorcycle, a considerably more effective version became available in 1986,
the V35 Ill gearbox and 12/24 primary drive, but later, after number 12137, used lower 12/25 primary
the NTX. Styling now followed that
initiated by Paris-Dakar racing bikes,
but the NTX was still a long way removedfrom those purpose-built
gears. From 1988 there was also a 750 NTX, with a two-valve engine. This 743.9cc engine had a slightly lower
machines. Initially only available as a
Following on from the Mille GT idea of a basic no-frills motorcycle was the
Sessantacinque GT and its smaller brother the Trentacinque. The 650 was still a very small motorcycle for its capacity.
mance of the Targa was noticeably
inferior to its smaller predecessor, with
claimed power of 46bhp at 6,600грm. The styling mirrored the
development of the Le Mans V over
the Le Mans IV. There was still the rather unfortunate belly pan, but the
Although it was a finely balanced machine with excellent handling, the two-valve 750 Targa was the slowest sporting 750 available in the early 1990s. (Two Wheels)
THES
150
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
SMALLER TWINS
151
50.6mm engine with the closer-ratio gearbox of the V35 Imola II, but with
a lower (13/24) primary gear. The
two-valve 750 Nevada shared its gearbox and primary drive with the Lario.
Over the succeeding years there were continual updates to the 350
and 750cc engines. Marelli Digiplex ignition replaced the Motoplat from 1993, and from 1994 all small V-twins
received new, strongercrankcases with longer outside cylinder head
studs. These also featured a higher. capacity oil pump. The compression ratio on the 750 was 9.6:1, and on the 350 10.6:1, and carburation was as before, twin Dell'Orto PHBH 30 car-
burettors on the 750 and PHBH 28s on the 350. Power for the 750 was 48bhp at 6,200rpm, with 30bhp at 8,200гpm produced by the 350.
Swingarm length on the Nevada was the now uniform 458mm, and
forks were 38mm. The first series used
375mm Biturbo shock absorbers, but later these became 387mm. As with the earlier Florida, and 16-
18-inch but all
inch wheels werefitted,
Nevadas had spoked wheels. The
floating 270mm front discs and leftside-mounted rear 235mm disc were
also unchanged from the final Florida, but the braking system was no longer
integrated. All the ancillary equipment, such as windshield, panniers
and crashbars, was no longer offered as standard equipment, but was still
available as an option. There was also considerable variation in specification
and styling from year to year, the
biggest changes being for the Nevada Club of 1998. This included a wider handlebar, adjustable rear shock absorbers, and electric fuel taps and
fuel gauge.The Nevada Club was
designed as an interim model before the production of the Ippogrifo that
had originally been intended for 1997. Originally there was to be no Nevada
offered for 1999, but the surprising end to the Ippogrifo project during
1998 saw it continue.
The Ippogrifo
Back in 1991 Umberto Todero had designed a replacement V75 engine, the V75 Hie. First used in the Israeli Air Force Hunter twin-engined aerial spy planes, in 1996 it was decided to
modify it for a motorcycle application.
Noted for exceptionally reliability, the engine passed strenuous tests at the US Naval Air Warfare Center in New
Jersey and received official homologa-
tion in Tel Aviv. This involved 200
hours at 7.000rpm and 196 hours with
the temperature varying from -32° to
+ 55°C.
The layout followed that of the earl-
ier V75, a 90° longitudinal V-twin
with a centrally located camshaft
operating two valves by pushrods and
rockers. Where the new engine differed was the cylinder head design that now featured a hemispherical
combustion chamber. Valve sizes were
40.5mm inlet and 35.5mm exhaust, these having a56°irelatively narrow ncluded angle. The aeronautical
engine displaced 744cc (80 x 74mm), but when proposed for the Ippogrifo it
In 1993 the 750 SP lost the fairing and panniers, and soon became known as the
Strada 750.
ity but needed more development. Unfortunately this did not happen, and the Targa was the final sporting small V-twin. For the UK a standard version was also available, called the
small fairing was now frame-mounted as with the larger bike. The attractive
instrument panel, with the large
white-faced Veglia tachometer, was carried over from the Lario.
750 T and styled like a V50.
There was little new in the chassis
In 1990 the 750 SP joined the
department. As with the Lario the
Targa in the style of the SP 1000, but with a one-piece fairing and optional Givi panniers. In 1993 the fairing and
frame used a 458mm swingarm, but there were now air-assisted38mm forks along with 330mm Koni shock
panniers were dropped and the 750
absorbers. The integrated braking system with twin 270mm front discs was also carried over from the Lario. One improvement was an increase in wheel rim width to 2.50 x 18 and 2.75 x 18 inches, but still fitted with obsolete Pirelli Phantom MT29/28 tyres in 100/90V18 and 120/90V18, Probably
SP continued with a few minor
changes such as fully floating front
brake discs before becoming known as the Strada 750. This now featured the Marelli Digiplex ignition that adjusted timing for engine speed and load and
was styled along the lines of the
Strada 1000. Tested by In Moto in
the most disappointing aspect of the
Targa was its performance; even compared to other Italian twins it strug.
May 1993, the 190.8kg (4211b) Strada
750 had a top speed of 179.1km/h
(111mph).
gled. In Moto, in October 1991, pitted
a Targaagainst Ducati 750 Supersport. The tall and skinny 195.6kg (4311b) Targa was not only
The V35/75 Nevada
As the sporting and touring models struggled to find their niche, it was
heavier but considerably slower; top speed was only 183.8km/h (114mph), The Targa was a confused effort.
the development of the unremarkable
American-style Custom that would
Not only was engine performance
see the final form of the small V-twin.
Introduced in 1989, the Nevada did not go into general production until 1991, and took the development of the Custom even further down the
poor, but chassis design was progressing by 1989, and 18-inch wheels were
becoming obsolete on a sporting
motorcycle. Yet it could have been so much more. The Targa offered a non-
'chopper' routethan the Florida. Unlike the V350 Florida, the 350
extreme sports bike with a unique
Nevada saw the return of the 66 x
combination of comfort and rideabil-
had new dimensions of 82 x 71mm,
giving 749.9cc.Weber-Marelli elec-
tronic fuel injection was used on both
the aeronautical and land versions,
the throttle diameter being 36mm.
With a 9.5: 1 compression ratio, power
ofthe Ippogrifowas 58bhp at
7,500грm. Other improvements over earlier small twins included a 32-amp alternator and a six-speed gearbox with twin secondary shafts reducing the distance between the bearings to only 106mm (41/ inches).
Following the example of the larger Centauro, the Ippogrifo took its name
from the Hippogryph, a mythical
winged beast, half horse, half eagle. The prototype was also quite an inno-
vative model, being neither cruiser
nor sportster. A completely new chas-
sis featured a single White Power
shock absorber under the seat, operated by a linkage from the swingarm,
to help shorten the wheelbase.To minimise shaft drive reaction a
Magni-inspired parallelogram rear fork was employed. A tubular steel
removable cradle frame was still used,
but the running gear was far superior
to thatof any earlier small twin.
Marzocchi 45mm forks similar to
those on the California EVwere
fitted, as were BBS spoked wheels that
allowed the use of 110/90 x 18 and
150/70 x 17 tubeless tyres. Non-integrated braking was by a single 320mm
front disc with four-piston Brembo
calliper, and a 276mm rear disc.
Superiorquality was evident
Nevada 154
Continuing the line of the Custom and Florida was the 750 Nevada. Still a cruiser-
style machine, it was also offered with a full range of touring accessories.
throughout. With Centauro instruments and hydraulicclutch, the
Ippogrifo promised a fresh interpretation of the traditional Moto Guzzi for-
mula. It may have looked like a
flat-tracker, but with a weight of only 180kg (3971b) and compact dimensions the Ippogrifo was eagerly
awaited. Announced at the Milan
Show at the end of 1996, it was originally intended to go into production
during 1998. That was eventually delayed until April 1999, but the
company restructure of late 1998 saw the project abandoned. It was another case of Guzzi disappointing enthusiasts by displaying the motorcycle and
failing to deliver. The Ippogrifo not only promised to replace the unremarkable Nevada, but was also to be
joined by a trail bike version, then a custom.
Police models
Police motorcycles have always played
an important role in Moto Guzzi production, and it was no different with
the smaller twins. Police versions of the
V35, V50, and 350 and 750 Nevada
were produced, together with specific 750s, the V75 PA NTX, based on the NTX, and the V75 PA, a modified 750
SP. While only a few hundred were
produced each year, these have always been significant, with the V75 models being the most successful. The various Italian forces accounted for 70 per cent of production, but the bikes future was in the balance when Moto Guzzi lost the contract to BMW early in 1998.
DR JOHN AND THE DAYTONA
153
12.
Dr John and the Daytona
bike did not arrive, followed by a
Instead of Foale's round spine, how-
uring the mid-1980s there was no official factory racing programme,
D
ever. Dr John used a strong 50 x
rained-out Daytona race, saw Wittner withdraw from endurance racing. He
75mm rectangular-section backbone running between the "V' of the cylin-
but in the United States former dentist Dr John Wittner entered a modified Le Mans in endurance races with astonishing success. In 1984 and 1985
had plans for a new frame and approached Moto Guzzi North
ders. Rigidity was ensured by connect-
the
head
steering
axis
America with the proposal to build a
ing
Dr John's Team Moto Guzzi won
sprint racer for the Battle of the Twins series. Shortly afterwards, in
perpendicular to the backbone tube. The backbone, which was also part of
AMA/CCS US Endurance Road Race
Series championships, proving that there was life left in the venetable
the engine breathing system, СОП-
December 1986, De Tomaso flew
Wittner to Italy; he was interested in
nected the steering head to a 63mm (212-inch) round steel tube mounted
Moto Guzzi V-twin. After these two successful seasons working out of his shop in Dowington, Pennsylvania,
a new chassis for the Moto Guzzi twin
andwas impressed with Wittner's chassis ideas. Thus Wittner returned
transversely across the
swingarm pivot. This tube bolted to 13mm (1/2inch) plates eut from aluminium sheet on each side, which also located the swingarm and gearbox. The swingarm
to America with enough funds to
Wittner looked forward to more victories in 1986, but was plagued with bad
allow him to build the new frame and
luck. Although he had limited spon-
swingarm with floating final drive.
sorship from Moto Guzzi North America and American-based
employed cantilever rear suspension with a single Koni F1 shock absorber. Torque reaction was virtually eliminated with a floating final drive unit pivoting on the axle. Thus the drive-
the
The new frame was heavily influ-
enced by a Tony Foale design for Dick Wood of Motomecca, itself inspired by
Moto Guzzi National Owners Club, a
debacle at the Isle of Man when the the later Aermacchi Ala d'Oro.
shaft was no longer incorporated in the swingarm and featured an extra, exposed, U-joint. To transfer torque reaction from the floating final drive
The first version of the Dr John spine frame as it appeared at Daytona in March 1987.
This is the basic layout that continued through to the production Daytona and
Centauro. (Two Wheels)
case to a fixed part of the frame was
an arm running parallel to the
swingarm. This system of a parallel arm working in compression was not unlike versions by Arturo Magni and
inches). It was also important for a shaft drive to place the engine as high as practical, at the same time keeping
the rider low, for maximum ground clearance. The spine frame achieved
this perfectly with the crankshaft 380mm (15 inches) above the ground and the seat height only 770mm (30% inches). Wheels and brakes were fairly
standard racing issue of the period, utilising twin 300mm fully floating fontdiscs with four-piston Brembo callipers and Marvic magnesium
wheels. While the front was a 17inch, an 18-inch rear was still
employed. Forks were 41.7mm Marzocchi MIR.
For the 1987 series a modified twovalve Le Mans engine was installed in
the new chassis.A 95.25 x 70mm
engine displacing 992cc was devel-
oped, the engine using Pro Series
power-jet flat-slide carburettors and producing around 95bhp. The power and handling was immediately suffi-
cient for Doug Brauneck to place
sixth in the shortened 1987 Daytona Pro-Twins race. Further development
and a set of Manfred Hecht ported
cylinder heads saw the engine eventu-
ally produce 118bhp at 10,000rpm at the gearbox, and Brauneck went on to
win the 1987 Pro-Twins champi-
onship. Dr John's Guzzi was now the
most successful racing Moto Guzzi
since the 1950s. At the beginning of 1988 Wittner took the 1987 bike to
Italy where it was analysed by factory
mechanics withthe possibility of
installing a four-valve engine in the new chassis.
The four-valve engine was the
brainchild of Umberto Todero. Todero, having joined the company on 6 March 1939, was a faithful pupil of Carcano and the final link with the
great racing period of the 1950s. During 1986 63-year-old Todero
designed a four-valve double overhead camshaft engine, but the engine
was considered too tall by De Tomaso.
This was followed by a four-valve
engine with the camshaft in the head,
but not over the valves, and by 1987 this being bench Originallywas intended for street machine, the 90 x 78mm 992 four-
atested.
valve engine with a 10:1 compression ratio, and mufflers, produced 92bhp at 7,500грm. However, Dr John's success
A formidable combination of power, handling and reliability, Dr John's highly
developed 992cc two-valve racer went on to win the 1987 Pro-Twins championship in the hands of Doug Brauneck. (Two Wheels)
Umberto Todero has been associated with Moto Guzzi for 60 years. Here he is at his drawing-board, overlooked by a picture of the great racer Omobono Tenni.
Fritz Egli.
The two-valve engine acted as a
stressed member and was bolted at the
front by two triangulated steel tube structures, which then bolted to the backbone tube. These triangulated structures used the upper engine
mounts on the timing chest, the lower crankcase mounts being connected by
a pairof aluminiumplates.The
engine was also offset 13mm to the right of the frame to allow for wider racing tyres.261/2°aThe fork rake was nd the wheelbase 1,440mm (562/3
154
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
DR JOHN AND THE DAYTONA
155
the exhaust. Considering the extra hardware, the new engine was only 7kg (151/1b) heavier then the earlier pushrod design, and merely 40mm
(1⅔ inches) wider.
Although Wittner had expressed interest in the new engine early in
1987, it was not until early 1988 that
the four-valve engine became available, the cylinder heads arriving from Italy three days before the Pro-Twins
final at Daytona. Using the 90 x
78mm engine dimensions, with a set
of Crane camshafts and minimal
preparation, Brauneck finished third, posting lap times similar to that of the
previous year and a trap speed of
259km/h (161mph).
More development followed during
1988. Searching for increased revs, after Daytona Wittner went back to
the earlier short-stroke engine dimen-
sions. A V7 Sport 70mm crankshaft crankshaft, camshaft and oilpump with Carrillo con-rods and 95.25mm were replaced by straight-cut gears. Ross 11.25:1 pistons were installed,
of the steering head between a set of Kosman triple clamps. Another
unusual feature was a further interpre-
tation of Guzzi's integrated braking
set-up, only this time all braking being
controlled by the handlebar and there being no foot brake. To prevent rear
wheel lock-up there was an adjustable brake proportioning valve. The weight
of Dr John's 1988 racer with oil was an impressively light 158kg (3481b). However, the new engine proved to
be less reliable than the 1987 twovalve and Dr John could not repeat
the previous year's victory.
With increasing interest in Battle of
the Twins racing in Europe, in 1988 the factory decided to produce some
two-valve Dr John Replicas. These
were very similar to the 1987 Dr John
bike, sharing the short-stroke 992cc engine but producing only 100bhp.
The spine frame, too, was similar but for a longer swingarm, increasing the wheelbase to 1,500mm (59 inches),
The fork rake was 2512° with only 95mm (3¾ inches) of trail. While tyres were still Metzeler, the rear remained at 18 inches. Suspension
was Marzocchi MIR forks with a Koni
rear shock absorber and brakes the
same Brembo 300mm twin front discs
with four-piston callipers, and a
230mm rear dise. Weight with oil was
167kg (3681b). Three of these
machines were produced, one going to Germany and another to France.
Further development of Dr John's racer continued for 1989. The engine was redesigned from the cylinder base upwards in an effort to improve power
and reliability. This included new
Crane camshafts, flat-topped Wiseco pistons, modified combustion cham-
bers, and reinforced and heat-treated
rockers. The biggest change was the
replacement of the carburettors by Weber-Marelli electronic fuel injec-
tion with 52mm throttles and a single injector. Because this required a fuel pump, a small-twin Saprisa brushless alternator was installed on the front of the crankshaft, with the magnetic rpm
pick-ups for the injection on an alu-
minium plate above the alternator.
The 1989 season started poorly when a cam belt broke two laps from
the end of the Daytona Pro-Twins race while Brauneck was lying fourth,
bur the bike was faster through the
speed trap than the previous year
(167mph/269km/h). By the end of the
Dr John Witmer checks the piston crown colour of the four-valve racer after practice at Daytona in 1988. The new bike finished third in its debut race. (Two Wheels)
in Pro-Twins saw a more immediate use for the design.
The valves were actuated by short together with 41.5mm flat-slide tappets and long cylindrical rocker Mikuni carburettors. Valve sizes were arms positioned perpendicular to the increased to 34 and 30mm, and later cams, allowing the looks of the trade- developments included testing even
Still using the traditional air-cooled
90° V-twin layout with its longitudinal crankshaft, Todero's design eliminated
the central camshaft and pushrods. Instead of the camshaft, there was a
mark Guzzi inlet and exhaust port
larger 45.5mm carburettors and new
driveshaft for twin 19mm toothed layout to be maintained. The cylinder belts, driving single overhead head design wasCosworth-inspired camshafts positioned in the sides of with a 44°(22°iincludedvalveangle the cylinder heads. The usual chain nlet and 22° exhaust), and valve sizes and sprocket drive between the 33.6mm for the inlet and 29.6mm for
camshaft profiles from Crane Cams in Florida. Ignition was electronic Dyna S/Raceco, running 31°-34°o f
advance, and total loss to save the weight of a charging system. Other
developments included Nicasil cylin-
ders and more head work by Hecht. Twin megaphone exhausts were also
Although it was more powerful than its two-valve predecessor, the four-valve racer was less reliable and was unable to emulate the 1987 result. This is the first version at Daytona in March 1988. This early chassis is virtually identical to that of 1987. (Two Wheels)
used for faster circuits, with a twointo-one and short megaphone on
shorter tracks. The single-plate clutch
was a Swiss Transkontinental with a diaphragm spring and 3.5kg (7%4lb) aluminium flywheel, with a factory close-ratio gearbox. Power was
115bhp at 9,300rpm at the gearbox.
Also during 1988 a new chassis was
produced by the factory. The frame
was 5mm longer, with 1° less steering
head angle. To allow for the use of a
new 17-inch radial Metzeler tyre and special Marvic wheel, the engine was also angled up 2º and the range of
Mobilal
swingarm operation angled down 2°. Wittner made further changes to the
chassis. The Marzocchifork was gutted, leaving only the springs inside
the fork tubes, the damping now controlled by another Koni F1 car shock absorber mounted externally in front
season Wittner had managed to increase power to 128bhp at 8,500грm at the gearbox, but still could not emulate the results of 1987. At that
By 1989 Brauneck had lost the No I plate but the bike was still competitive. The engine was fuel injected and often the bike raced without the new full fairing as it interfered with the single shock absorber front fork. This photo is signed by Dr John Wittner. (Ivar
de Gier collection)
4
156
stage Wittner retired from racing to work in Italy full time on the production Daytona.
The Daytona
With De Tomaso's involvement in the Dr John project, it was inevitable that
thisdevelopment would eventually
filter through to the production line. In 1988 Moto Guzzi production had
slumped to less than 6,000 and the
company needed something new. De Tomaso sold 70 per cent of Benelli,
and despite rumours that Guzzi would also be sold, the company was merged with Benelli to create a new company, GBM SpA.
The Daytona was finally displayed at the 1989 Milan Show, and by late
1989 the first prototype version
appeared, with a promised 500 in
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
typical of Moto Guzzi, production ver-
sions were some time in coming.
Despite a prototype being tested by
the press in late 1989, it was not until
1991 that another solitary Daytona was built, with regular production
beginning in 1992. It was an unfortunate delay. By the time the Daytona becamegenerally available it was
upstaged by the competition. In 1992 most potential buyers were tired of waiting. As such the Daytona never received the accolades it deserved,
and remains one of Moto Guzzi's most underrated models.
The early prototype of late 1989
featured a number of variations from both later production versions and the Dr John racer. The engine was similar to Todero's 1986 design with dimensions of 90 x 78mm, and a 10:1 com-
1990. However, in what was becoming pression ratio. Valvetiming was In late 1989 a prototype Daytona with carburettors was made available to the press.
Painted red and white, it lacked styling refinement. (Two Wheels)
moderate and symmetrical. The 33.6mm inlet valves (with 8.7mm of
lift) opened 22° before topdead
centre, closing 57º after bottom dead
centre. The 29.6mm exhaust valves (with 8.65mm57°boflift)opened efore bottom dead centre, closing 22° after top dead centre. The fly-
wheel and ring gear were much lighter
than that on the regular two-valve 1000cc twins (2kg/41/lb), and the
clutch also used ten, rather than
eight, springs.
The five-speed straight-cut gearbox
had three engagement dogs on each gear rather than six, and featured all
new ratios. Primary gears were 17/23, with an 8/33 final drive. Overall gearing was higher to allow for the lower-
profile rear
The unusual
stainless-steel exhaust system, with a
large central collector, may have
looked strange but was extremely
effective, both for muffling and horse-
power.
example of the racing bikes and were non-integrated, with twin300mm front discs with four-piston Brembo callipers, and a 280mm disc on the rear. Painted red and white to mimic the Dr John bike, the first Daytona
weighed in at 205kg (4521b). Styled at
Modena, it had a race-shop, hand-
crafted appearance.
The main reason for the delay in
production was the difficulty in adapting a pure racing design for the street. Lean air-fuel ratios and mufflers led to
extreme cylinder head temperatures
requiring special alloys. It must be remembered that the Daytona was one of the highest-output air-cooled engines available. This. ultimately delayed production by about a year, and when the production Daytona was displayed at Milan at the end of
1991 it differed in a number of details
from the earlier prototype. Still, it would be several monthsbefore the
bike became available during 1992.
The bodywork, designed by Dr
John in the wind tunnel, was all new, and painted red, although eventually black and silver versions were also
available. The engine still closely fol-
lowed Todero's original design with
crankcases now reinforced around the cylinder spigots.
engines were fuel-injected andProductionfea-
tured new camshafts with different valve timing. The inlet valve opened
231° before top dead centre, closing
57½° after bottom dead centre, with the exhaust491/2°bvalve opening efore bottom dead centre, closing
121° after top dead centre.
The Weber-Marelli electronic fuel injection with single injectorsper
cylinder used a P7 CPU until 1993; in
1994 a few examples of the Daytona used the later P8 CPU. To meet the demands of fuel injection a higher-
output350-watt (25-amp) Ducati
alternator was now used. This was
upgraded again for 1995, but was still rated the same.
Three performance kits were also available for the Daytona.The 'A' kit consisted of a new exhaust system,
computer chip, and foam air filters. 'B'
kits added Carrillo con-rods, lighter pistons, cylinders and crankshaft. The
kit included more radical 'C' camshafts, new tappets, a fuel regula-
tor, and an EPROM chip.
DR JOHN AND THE DAYTONA The chassis followed that of the Dr John racer, a particularly poor feature being the exposed driveline universal
joints with integral driveshaft. These were a constant source of problems, the exposed U-joints being subject to
more wear than enclosed joints on
other Guzzis, This was not only due to lack of lubrication but also because of
the more extreme rear suspension angles.To overcome this problem later bikes used shorter shock
absorber. The rear drive torque arm was 400mm (15% inches), this being lengthened after the introduction of the Sport 1100 to 406.3-407.8mm. In
1994 the Daytona received a com-
pletely new driveshaft assembly (also
shared with the 1100 Sport), which now incorporated a grease nipple at each U-joint plus another at the sliding spline connection. The swingarm was also modified to allow access to the grease nipple. These early prob-
lems with the driveline indicated a
lack of development that should have been rectified considering the delay in getting the Daytona into production.
Front brakes featured the newergeneration gold Brembo four-piston callipers with 34/30mm pistons, still with 300mm stainless-steel discs.
Even though they had stainless steel
brake lines, the small 16mm master cylinder produced less than optimum braking feel. At the rear, the produc-
tion Daytona featured a smaller,
260mm solid rear disc and 05 brake calliper located by a torque-arm. The
157 41.7mm Marzocchi forks, with 195mm (74 inches) fork leg spacing and red fork legs, featured cartridge dampers but were considerably improved over earlier designs. After
1994 the forks were White Power and
the fork legs painted to match the
bodywork. Initially there was still the
Koni rear shock absorber, but when the dual-seat version became avail-
able this was also changed to a White
Power unit. White-painted 17-inch front and 18-inch rear wheels were the same as before, but from 1993 these were also painted black. Probably due to cost there was no
rubber cush-drive, although the wheel casting provided for it, another area
where the Daytona was deficient.
With the production Daytona came
a new half-fairing and seat unit, differ-
ent from the prototype. The headlight was a unique shape, but was replaced by a more usual rectangular headlight for the US, UK, Australia and Japan.
When first displayed
When it came to performance and
intended to produce the Daytona in
two versions, carburettor and fuel
injection, but the prototype had twin Dell'Orto PHM 40 carburettors. There were also three airboxes, with a capacity of 10 litres; two sat behind
the intakes on each side, with the
third in the tail section inhaling
through a scoop in the seat cowl. The
carburettor version produced 91bhp at 7,800rpm, with the injected version (with 50mm throttle bodies) provid-
ing 94bhp.
The chassis closely followed the
lines of the racer. The spine frame and
400mm (15%-inch)swingarm were identical, but the aluminium engine mounting plates were now castings, 15mm thick, incorporating internal
webbing.Following developments during1989, the fork rake was
decreased to 25.9º with 103mm (4 inches) of trail, and the wheelbase lengthened to 1,470mm (58 inches). Front suspension was Marzocchi
MIR, with a Koni rear shock absorber,
and the white-painted wheels were 3.5 x 17-inch on the front and 4.5 x 18-inch on the rear; they were shod
with Michelin 120/70 ZR17 TX11 and
160/60 ZR18 TX23 radial tyres. Already there were signs that the
wheel and tyre sizes were inadequate
and obsolete. Brakes followed the
handling the Daytona set completely new standards for a Moto Guzzi. The
parallel arm locating the final drive
was exceptionally successful at reduc-
ing shaft drive reaction and the fourvalve engine, although only rated at 93bhp at 8,000rpm, produced perfor-
mance equivalent to Ducati's 851. Moto Sprint managed a top speed of 231.2km/h (144mph) in 1992 from their 226.6kg (500lb) Daytona. The
high gearing hurt performance on the dragstrip, but still saw the Daytona set
It took several years for the Daytona to make it into production, but it was worth the wait. A normal rectangular headlight was fitted for many export markets. (Australian
Motorcycle News)
GU 27
158
new standards for a Guzzi twin. Cycle World, in July 1993, managed a stand-
ing-start quarter-mile in 12.19 sec-
onds at 113.63mph (183km/h).
Yet despitethe excellent perfor
mance of the Daytona, somehow it failed to win acceptance in the heart of the Moto Guzzi enthusiast. Production peaked at 486 in 1992, thereafter declining to 283 in 1993,
155 in 1994 and 100 in 1995.
Unquestionably the introduction of the cheaper and simpler 1100 Sport
also hurt the Daytona, as did the earlier problems with premature
driveline wear.
As a racing machine the Daytona followed in the footsteps of the Dr John racer, particularly in the British BEARS Series. In 1993 and 1994 the Amedeo Castellani-tuned Raceco Daytona finished second in the series, and with Paul Lewis on board they
went on to win in 1995. Now displacing 1162cc (95 x 82mm), the Raceco bike, with 11.2:1 Omega pistons, 'C'
kit camshafts, and 36 and 31mm
valves, produced 125bhp at 8,200гpm
and weighed 175kg (386lb). The exhaust system was a big-bore
Termignoni and front suspension was White Power upside-down forks. To
accept a larger 185-section rear tyre
and 6.00-inch wheel rim, the final drive unit was re-engineered and offset by 18mm. The chassis was altered to reduce the wheelbase to
1,440mm (57 inches) and steepen the
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
steering head to 24°. For 1996 there
were further developments to the engine, with a new crankshaft and lighter alternator, and powerwas
increased to 130bhp. The front end was strengthened by 43mm White Power forks and total weight was
reduced to 170kg (375lb). lan Cobby rode the bike in 1996, winning two
races before a crash ended his season.
Cobby rode the bike again in 1997,
this time in the Sound of Thunder
series. Convincingly winning at Assen
in June and August, Cobby's Raceco Daytona now produced 139bhp and
weighed 169kg (373lb).
The Daytona Racing
To save the Daytona from extinction
in the wake of the 1100 Sport, the
Daytona Racing was released in 1996,
presumably to use up parts before the release of the new, and considerably improved, Daytona RS. Although initially the Daytona Racing was avail-
able without street equipment (no
lights or indicators) and a 'C' perfor-
mance kit, the production Daytona Racing was a limited edition of 100
units,also with the 'C' performance kit but a street exhaust system. Each
1996 Daytona Racing came with a numbered plaque on the top triple
clamp.
The Daytona Racing featured a new Weber-Marelli P8 CPU. Other
changes included a new flywheel (also
shared with the later Centauro and
Produced as a limited edition of 100 in 1996, the Daytona Racing offered more
performance than a standard Daytona but was overshadowed by the Daytona RS.
DR JOHN AND THE DAYTONA
MOTO GUZZI
The Daytona RS of 1996 was vastly improvedover carlier versions but it
came too late. Not only was there a chinmounted oil radiator, but for the first time on a Guzzi big-twin the oil filter could be changed without removing the sump.
and waterproofed electrical system. However, at a claimed dry weight of 221kg (4871b) the Daytona was large
and heavy in a world where 1000cc sporting motorcycles were becoming lighter and more compact. As such it
did not receive universal acclaim.
However, the Daytona RS was a sig-
nificant improvement on the earlier Daytona. Not only was performance
superior, but the quality and execution put the Daytona RS into another league altogether. This was a great
sporting motorcycle in the tradition of
the earlier V7 Sport, but unfortunately it came too late. The buying public also preferred the 1100 Sport and the Daytona RS was only pro-
duced in very limited numbers: 113 in
1996, and 195 in 1997. If Guzzi had produced the RS five years earlier it
could well have achieved the success
it deserved. Undoubtedly thiswill
become one of the more sought-after Moto Guzzis in the future.
The V10 Centauro
To bridge the enormous gap in the
range between the California and the
sporting models, the Centauro was
159 created in 1995, being displayed at
RS), but more importantly an updated driveshaft with an access hole in the swingarm for greasing. Finally the 18-
inch rear wheel, which made tyre
choice awkward, was replaced by a 17-inch Marchesini, now with a cushdrive. Tyres were Michelin Hi-Sport, a
120/70 ZR17 and a 160/60 ZR 17.
Although many of the improvements were welcome, especially the increased power, the Daytona Racing was very much an interim model, still
incorporating many of the earlier
Daytona's irritating design features.
The Daytona RS
Even while the Daytona Racing was
being produced, a much improved
Daytona was announced, the Daytona RS. While it may have looked superficially similar, there were many refine-
ments on the RS. As a result of some
restructuring within the company (see
Chapter 13), chief engineer Angelo Ferrari was able to implement many improvements.Introduced in April
1996, this was the Daytona that Guzzi
should have built in 1990.
There were significant changes to the engine. The 'C' kit of the Daytona Racing was retained but with highercompression 10.5:1 forged (rather than cast) pistons. Camshaft timing was inlet opening 221/2° before top
dead centre, closing 691/* after
bottom dead centre, with the exhaust
opening 631/° before bottom dead centre, closing 281° after top dead
centre. The crankshaft was lightened and polished with a larger, 45.5mm, crankpin. Con-rods were now Carrillo and the flywheel and ring gear were also lightened. There were improvements to the Weber/Marelli injection system; a smaller 16-megabyte CPU
was used with the50mm throttle
body, without the troublesome pick-
up above the flywheel. Air intakes
were also revised and the pressurised
airbox of the 1100 Sport fitted. The
power of the engine was now 102bhp at 8,400rpm. For some countries with strict emission requirements (notably
the US and Switzerland), Daytona RSs were fitted with lower-output
Centauro engines and an evaporative emission control system.
Together with all these changes
came some serious modifications to the lubrication system. Not only was
there a new oil pump incorporating a pressure regulation valve, but also an external thermostatically controlled
oil cooler mounted in front of the
sump. Arguably the biggest improvement, however, was the trap-door in
the bottom of the sump to allow
access to the oil filter. It had taken
over 20 years, but finally Moto Guzzi was addressing some of the practical problems with the design. Early versions had the same straight-cut gearbox of the Daytona and 1100 Sport, but from number CL 011200 the gearbox had helical gears, still with three dogs. For Switzerland the Daytona RS had the wider-ratio six-dog gearbox of the California 1100.
While the frame looked similar to
the earlier Daytona, there were a
number of differences. The 63mm cross-tube at the rear was narrower, and thus more rigid, with the ends now enclosed. As with the earlier
Daytona, but unlike the 1100 Sport,
the front downtubes were still bolted
on. The under-gearbox mounts were
now steel, like the Sport, and there was a new, more aesthetically pleasing
pressed-alloy support plate for the
swingarm. The lighter and stiffer
swingarm now featured oval-section tubing from the pivot to the rear wheel and was narrower at the pivot
to fit the narrower frame.
The rest of the running gear was also upgraded. At the front 40mm
White Power upside-down forks were
fitted, and at the rear a White Power shock absorber. This was shorter than
that on earlier Daytonas and all the suspension was fully adjustable for compression and rebound damping.
Brakes were now Brembo fully floating
cast-iron 320mm discs on the front, with a fixed stainless-steel 282mm
disc on the rear; there were two types,
the later type being shared with the 1100 Sport Corsa. The RS had new,
lighter wheels; in the same sizes as the
Daytona Racing, these were a 3.50 x 17-inch on the front and a 4.50 x 17inch on the rear, shod with Michelin
TX15
TX25
and
120/70ZRI7
160/60ZR17 tyres.
Completing the upgrade was new styling, along the lines of the 1100 Sport, new switches, and an adjustable clutch lever. Quality
touches extended to a sealed battery
the Milan Show at the end of that
year. Taking a Daytona engine and
updated RS chassis and giving it swoopybodywork, another unusual and individual Moto Guzzi was created. The name derived from the Centaur, a mythological half-man,
half-horse.
The Centauro engine was an amal-
gam of the regular Daytona and
Daytona RS. The bottom end, with
Carrillo con-rods and forged pistons,
was as the RS, but with regular
Daytona camshafts. The result was a reduction in horsepower to 95bhp at 8,200грm. Primary and final drive
were also shared with the Daytona, but the Centauro had a completely
new gearbox. The gears were helical,
the ratios reflecting the intended
nature of the machine, being similar
to the earlier Mille GT and not as
closely spaced as the Daytona.
The chassis was similar to the
Daytona RS, with 40mm White Power upside-down forks, 17-inch Marchesini wheels, and 320mm stain-
less-steel front discs. It was the
however, that set the Centauro apart from other Moto Guzzis. Rather than designed in-
styling.
house, it was styled by industrial
designer Luigi Marabese. It was unde-
niably different. but probably contributed to the lukewarm reaction to
the machine. Elsewhere there was evi-
dence of quality construction: attractive white-faced Veglia instruments, adjustablehandlebars, milled alu-
minium footpegs, Pirelli Dragon radial
tyres, and braided steel brake and oil lines,
As expected, the Centauro was a
very strong performer for this style of motorcycle. Although it weighed in at a considerable 244kg (5381b), in April
1997 La Moto managed 220.4km/h
in12.32 seconds at 179.2km/h
(137mph) with a standing 400 metres
(111mph). Yet despite its quality, style
and performance, Centauro sales
failed to meet expectations. Only 207
were built in 1996, with a further
1,265 in 1997. The first 25 Centauros were sold to Luxembourg as a limited edition series, and in 1998 the model
was replaced by two improved versions, the Centauro GT and Centauro
Sport.
160
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
Left: Moto Guzzi has always built
motorcycles that are different to those of
other manufacturers, none representing
this more than the Luigi Marabese-
designed Centauro.
Below left: Expanding the Centauro lineup in 1998 was the Centauro GT, with a
range of optional touring equipment.
The Centauro Sport/GT
Released in February 1998, the
Centauro Sport and GT refined the
concept, and instantly met with a
more positive reception. These versions were cleverly designed, as the only alterations the original
to
Centauro were cosmetic, although the wheels changed to Brembo. The Sport
came in two colours, red or British Racing Green, with white flashes to emulate the Mini Cooper S racing cars of the 1960s. Optional extras included a lower belly pan, a small
fairing along the lines of the original Le Mans, luggage rack, and Termignoni exhaust system. The Centauro GT came standard with adjustable handlebars, luggage rack
and larger seat, together with the
option of a Plexiglas windshield and luggage. Motociclismo tested
a
Centauro Sport in April 1998, managing a top speed of 221km/h (137mph)
from their 234kg (516lb) machine.
The standing 400 metres was covered
in 12.094 seconds at 185.6km/h
(115mph).
Although the Centauro was a brave attempt to mate the four-valve engine with a cruiser style, even as a Sport or GT it was only moderately successful.
However, particularly in its later incarnations it was an underrated machine.For a large motorcycle it
provided Daytona performance and handling, with a less extreme riding position. Ultimately it was the traditional enthusiast's preference for twovalve cylinder heads that hurt both
the Daytona and Centauro,even though these engines were more
sophisticated and smoother running.
13.
New directions
'he year 1993 was a crucial one for I Moto Guzzi. Alejandro De Tomaso was not in the best of health and the company was operating at a loss. Turnover was down to 35 billion
lira and the development of new
models was at a standstill. However, despite this there were plans afoot at Mandello. A press release at the end of 1993 announced that there would
be a limited production run of 200 replicas of the 1957 350Bialbero Grand Prix single. Each was to be
individually certified and identical to the original. Unfortunately there were only two prospective buyers, and this
was yet another plan that came to
nothing, although it did indicate that
not all was lost with the company. Tomaso Industries
When De
(originally set-up in Maryland in the United States in 1917 as the Rowan
Controller Group, later becoming
Rowan Industries Inc.) gave TIM
(Temporary Integrated Management),
then an independent management
company owned by Finprogetti SpA (a
small private Italian merchant bank)
the mandate to manage Moto Guzzi in 1994, it marked the beginning of a new
era. De Tomaso was still president, but
Arnolfo Sacchi came in as managing director for the nextthree years.
Sacchi's mandate was to re-launch the company, and immediately there were two welcome additions to the production line-up, the California and 1100 Sport. Production was increased to 5,000 units and turnover up to 45 billion lira, though the company was
still running at a loss,
The California 1100/1000
Spearheading the revival was a new,
and significantly improved, California.
Introduced in 1993, it was initially available only in 1100cc form,
although in 1994 and 1995 it was also
produced as a 1000 (949cc). There
was much more to the California 1100
than a 4mm larger bore and 2mm longer stroke. The 92mm 9.5:1 pis-
This was partly to compensate for the smaller 140/80 VB 17-inch rear tyre on a new 3.50 x 17-inch wheel, which required a wider swingarm. The front wheel, too, was increased to 2.50 x 18 inches, with a 110/90 VB18 tyre; the
tyres
were now either modern
Metzeler or Pirelli.
tons were forged rather than cast, and a lighter 80mm crankshaft was used. Valve sizes were the same as the final
There were also several significant
frame alterations for the 1100. The lower frame rails now included CaliforniaIll, at 44mm inlet and cross-brace, and there was an addi37mm exhaust, and the California tional brace across the top of the gear1100 also received a new camshaft, box. Both suspension and brakes were the lobes now designed by CAD. upgraded. The 40mm front forks were CAM to optimise separate inlet and redesigned with anti-friction bushings,
exhaust profiles as well as minimising
wear and noise. The inlet valve
opened 20° before top dead centre, closing 50° after bottom dead centre,
with the exhaust opening 44° before bottom dead centre, closing 10° after
top dead centre. As with the final
California III, the mixture was fed by
Dell'Orto PHF 36 carburettors or Weber-Marelli IAW electronic fuel injection. Further refined, with a P8 CPU, this also now had 40mm injector bodies. Carburettor versions used Marelli Digiplex MED 550 electronic
ignition. With both new induction systems came a larger airbox. The result of these improvements saw power increased by 15 per cent to
75bhp at 6,400rpm, and torque by 26 per cent to 9.7kgm at 6,400гpm.
Also with the 1100 came further
developments of the engine. A higher-
capacity oil filter was introduced to increase service intervals. Although
thegearbox was the same as the
California III but for a new shock
absorber, the 1100 was geared considerably higher with an 8/33 final drive.
and the longer (342mm) rear units
were now Bitubo, which were prone to failure. Brakes were improved with
an
11mm frontmaster cylinder,
although plated floating brake rotors remained at 300mm on the front and 270mm on the rear, with Brembo 08 callipers. Unlike the sporting models,
the brakes were still integrated via a four-way proportioning valve.
It was the general improvement in
the quality of finish and fittings that set the 1100 apart from its predeces-
sor. Improved switches, fuel taps, seat latch and anti-vibration footboards
were complemented by new paint for the engine and transmission and more durable plastic parts. Produced only as
a stripped version with either carburettors or fuel injection, the California 1100 was available with a wide variety
offactory options that included
leather or plastic luggage and two sizes of windshield.
Although never offered as a perfor-
mance motorcycle, the California 1100 offered superior handling and
performance over others of its type. In
162
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
NEW DIRECTIONS
163
To commemorate 75 years of Moto Guzzi, 750 'Serie Anniversario' 1100 Californias were produced in 1997.
centre, closing 54° after bottom dead centre, with the52°bexhaust opening
truly obsolete but still had a loyal fol-
Moto, testing a carburettor California
lowing that was for some reason
1100 in August 1994, saw 190km/h (118mph) from their 252.9kg (5581b) machine. The 1100 was immediately successful, superseding the California Ill in 1994. No carburettor 1100s were produced in 1995, 1,217 carburettor 1000s being manufactured instead. The carburettor 1100
eschewing the Daytona. To recapture that market Moto Guzzi released the
efore bottom dead centre, closing 24° after top dead centre. The valves
were reduced slightly from the Le
1100 Sport. This was a clever combi-
nation of the two-valve engine in a
Mans V to 46.5mm inlet and 39.5mm
exhaust to allow for the increased
Daytona chassis, the origins being in
the successful Dr John Pro-Twins
valve lift. The squish band was also
altered to improve combustion effi-
racer of 1987. As the styling was also
ciency. The flywheel was even lighter
more successful than the Daytona,
returned in 1996 and 1997, although only a few were produced in compari-
than the Daytona and the Dell'Orto PHM40 carburettors were force-fed
and the performance similar, the simpler and cheaper 1100 Sport was an
son to the injected versions. With in 1995 and a further 1,770
by a pressurised airbox. To overcome
instant success.
1.045 in 1996, the 1100 TAW
units
a
the problem of the excessively strong throttle springs of the earlier Le Mans
There was considerably more to the
accounted for almost one-third of 1100Sport than simply taking
V. the throttle action was slowed
total production. To celebrate the suc-
Daytona chassis and installing a tuned
cess of the California as Moto Guzzi's engine. With most important model, in 1997 750 Wittner's help the 92 x 80mm 1064cc 75th anniversary1100 Californias engine was uprated considerably with were produced. These were red and new 10.5:1 forged pistons, a lighter silver with a leather seat, aluminium crankshaft, and camshafts developed alternator cover, new shock absorbers, by Crane in Florida. These were quite and a limited edition serial number similar in timing to the mild cam of and silver medallion. the earlier 850 Le Mans, but featured
1100
down. This was successful but still not entirely satisfactory. Ignition was by
California
Marelli-Disiplex and power was a muscular 90bhp at 7,800rpm. The straight-cut gearbox and 10-spring
clutch were shared with the Daytona.
While the frame was similar to the
Daytona, there were some significant
a much higher valve lift of 7.57mm (inlet and exhaust). The valve timing By 1993 the 1000cc Le Mans V was was inlet opening 22º before top dead
alterations for the 1100 Sport. The
The 1100 Sport
front frame downtubes were welded. not bolted, and the mounts under the
A pair of 1995 1 100 Sports. Placing a hot-rod 1100 engine in a Daytona-style chassis was so successful that the Sport 1100 outsold
its more exotic brother. (Australian Motorcycle News)
gearbox were steel rather than aluminium. The driveshaft assembly was
redesigned to include grease nipples at
each U-joint, plus one at the sliding
spline connection. Also to help
reduce U-joint wear a shorter (White Power) shock absorber was used and a
longer rear drive torque-arm. Front
suspension was 41.7mm Marzocchi,
the fork legs initially painted to match
bodywork. then from1995
the
painted silver. Braking was uprated
over the Daytona with 320mm front
dises and a 260mm floating rear disc.
although this was no longer located
with a brake torque-arm. The rear wheels remained at 17-inch front and
18-inch rear. still without a cush-
drive.
With a restyled dual seat and fairing, the Sport 1100 was immediately
seen as better value than the
Daytona. Performance, too, was com-
parable, Cacle World in December 1995 standing-start
achieving a quarter-mile in 11.91 seconds at
114.71mph (184km/h). Motociclismo found the 220.4kg (486lb) 1100 Sport not quite as fast as the Daytona, with a top speed of 218km/h (135mph). As with the Daytona, there was a different fairing and larger rectangular headlight for the US, UK, Australia and Japan. Production immediately eclipsed the Dastona with 365 constructed from September 1994 and a further 1,191 during 1995. A final 215 carburettor 1100 Sports manu-
facrured. in 1996 beforewere it was
replaced by the 1100 Sport Injection.
In 1995 had been seen the first
positive result of Sacchi's management. Turnover was up to 63 billion
lira, production up to 5,314 units,
and for the first time since 1993 the
company posted a profit. In April
1995 Alejandro De Tomaso resigned
as company president and in July 1995 DTI acquired Finprogetti, including TIM.Paid-up capital was increased from 2 to 5 billion lira in
January 1996, and on 22 August
1996, DTI
became theTrident
Rowan Group Inc.(TRGI). From
July 1995 the director of Moto Guzzi was Mario Tozzi-Condivi, and 1996
saw production increase to 6,027.
with turnover to 76 billion lira. This year also marked the introduction of the previously Daytona
RS. and thementioned 1100Sport
new
Injection.
The 1100 Sport
Injection/Corsa
Alongside the announcement of the Daytona RS in April 1996 was a 1100
Sport replacement, the 1100 Sport Injection. This took the Sport 1100
engine (same camshaft but with 9.5:1
pistons) with many of the features of the Daytona RS, including the crankshaft with 45.5mm crankpin (without
the Carrillo con-rods). external oil
cooler, and revised oil filter arrangement. There was also yet another fly-
wheel,and
oil temperature
transducer. As with the Daytona RS,
164
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
NEW DIRECTIONS
165
finest of Moto Guzzi's sporting two-
valve machines, it also came too late,
Although more popular than the Daytona RS, it was discontinued
during 1997.
A final 200 1100 Sports were
released in March 1998 as the 1100 Sport Corsa- Limited Edition. Featuring Carrillo con-rods and black engine and wheels, these also
came with a Termignoni carbon-fibre
exhaust kit. Immediately this final
series was seized upon by collectors as the epitome of the 1100 Sport.
While quality and production levels
were increasing at Mandello, the
company experienced a further boost when shareholders increased the paid-up capital from 5 to 12 billion lira in
Featuring all the improvements of the Daytona RS, the 1100 Sport Injection also
offered comparable performance at less cost. Unfortunately it was not a sales success, being discontinued after only one year.
Dragon rear tyre. Thus the 1100 Sport IE was significantly improved in most
early examples used the straight-cut
Sport 1100 gearbox, but later versions
(from CF 011500) featured helical gears. TheWeber-Marelli injection
areas over the preceding Sport 1100. Although it was still a heavy motor-
cycle,manycomparison tests with
system was the same as the Daytona RS with a 16-megabyte CPU, but different (TW031) injectors and 45mm throttle bodies.
Ducati's 900 Supersport saw the 1100
Sport IE on top. Performance, too,
was up on the carburettor Sport 1100.
The frame and running gear were Motociclismo, in September 1996, shared with the Daytona RS, the only achieved a top speed of 223.3km/h differences being stainless-steel (139mph) from their 227.2kg (5011b) 320mm front brake discs and a higher- test bike. Unfortunately, while the profile 160/70ZR 17-inch Pirelli 1100 Sport IE was undoubtedly the
The final 1100 Sport was the Corsa, a limited edition of 200 in 1998. Each came with a numbered plaque on the top triple clamp.
February 1997. This was a result of TRGI announcing the private
placement of 20 per cent of total
shares in Moto Guzzi Corporation.
Since September 1994 stock had
traded on the New York NASDAQ SmallCap market under the symbol DTOM,and from August 1996, TRGI. Arnolfo Sacchi's three-year term ended and Oscar Cecchinato, formerly with Aprilia, took over as managing director in April 1997. In May 1997 sold 900,000 shares Tamarix CaymanIslandslimited duration company. This led to three new
toFinprogetti
Investors, a
Tamarix nominated board members,
Mark Hauser, William Spier, and Emmanuel Arbib. Later that vear. in December 1997, there was a further
increasein paid-up capital to 25
billion lira. Tamarix was now the
major shareholder in TRGI. with
2,885,000 shares (45 per cent), with
an unnamed investor,Tail Trust of
Jersey, controlling 15 per cent. Moto Guzzi Corporation, as a subsidiary of
TRGI, also owned Moto America,
Moto Guzzi France, and 25 per cent of MGI Germany.
The California EV 1100/
Special
As the sporting Moto Guzzis were
being phased out, the California was
entering a new, and highly successful,
phase. With 151 modifications over
the previous California, the EV, introduced in April 1997, was hailed as the
world's best cruiser. Changes to the 1064cc engine were few. limited to
Representing a significant development of the California idea, the EV 1100 was arguably the best cruiser available.
stronger con-rods and new 40mm fuel injection bodies. The exhaust system was now chromed stainless-steel, but
the rest of the EV was comprehen-
sively updated. The instruments came
from the Centauro and the fuel tank had a flush-mounted stainless-steel cap and electric fuel taps. Running gear consisted of a 45mm Marzocchi fork, White Power shock absorbers,
and BBS tubeless spoked wheels.
The biggest changes were, however,
to the brakes, which utilised twin
320mm stainless-steel front discs with
four-piston Brembo callipers, and a 282mm rear disc with an advanced load-compensating integrated brake
system that incorporated a Bosch pro-
portioning and delay valve. The gen-
eral finish was improved over the
already high standards set by the previous 1100 and there was no shortage
of chrome. Already on its way to
becoming one of Guzzi's most success-
brace, and even a steering damper. In
the best Moto Guzzi tradition the 257kg (5671b) EV reallyhandled. Performance was not too shabby
either, with a top speed of 115mph (185km/h).
Following on from the California EV was the California Special,
released in July 1998. Essentially iden-
tical to the EV, the Special was
designed to emulate the American
'Lowrider' style. Thus the Special had a lower seat (760mm/30in), larger rear
mudguard, wider handlebar, larger headlight and no footboards. Other changes included a smaller computer unit under the seat and Sachs-Boge
adiustable shock absorbers.
The V11 Sport/GT
With the four-valve line-up fading
away. the two-valve line was further developed with the V11 Sport. First
displayed at the Milan Show in
ful models. the EV took the world by September 1997, it would be almost surprise when it was hailed as Cycle two years before it went into producWorld's best Ameri-cruiser in March tion.Once again it showed Moto 1998. Of a class of 13, the EV was Guzzi's capacity to expand the tradi-
tional line-up and create a unique machine.The V11 Sport cleverly
notable in that unlike other cruisers it had fully adjustable suspension, a fork
combined sporting and nostalgic fea-
tures, creating an individual style. With itsgreen bodywork and red
frame it harked back to the magnificent 'Telaio Rosso' of 1971; a two-seater version was silver with a red frame.
In all other respects, however, the V11 Sport was a thoroughly modern
motorcycle.The engine was the trusted two-valve 1064cc fuel-
injected unit, now with a six-speed gearbox. Power was 90bhp at
7,800rpm and the chassis was similar
to that of the previous Sport 1100.
With a dry weight of 221kg (4871b),
the claimed top speed was in the
region of 230km/h (143mph).
Following the V11 Sport came a GT version, with full touring fairing and bags, introduced at the Munich Intermot Show in September 1998.
As with the Centauro, there was a
variety of dedicated accessories such
as a front fairing and carbon-fibre
exhausts.
The Quota 1100 ES
Somewhat surprisingly, considering its
rather poor sales figures, the Quota
166
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
Marelli fuel injection with 42mm
throttles; a new-generation, and more
compact, 1.5 CPU was employed.
Tuned for a broad spread of power,
70bhp was produced at 6,400гpm.
More importantly for an enduro bike,
90 per cent of the maximum 8.7kgm
of torque was available between 2,800
and 5,800rpm. Given the intended
nature of the ES, it was surprising that the entire gearbox and final drive was shared with the 1100 Sport.
Although the frame and swingarm were similar to the earlier Quota, the
ES featured a number of improve-
- ments, not the least being a dramatic
reduction in seat height to 820mm
(3214 inches). Other changes were an increase in front brake disc diameter
to 296mm and a fully adjustable
Sachs-Boge rear shock absorber. Most
of the dimensions were similar to its
predecessor, and with a claimed weight of 245kg (540lb) the Quota ES
still a huge motorcycle.
was
Production began in July 1998.
As the expansion of the company continued following the increase in paid-up capital, it was reflected not
only in improved quality, but also
increased turnover. By 1997 turnover was 85 billion lira and production at 6,432 motorcycles. The following year was seen as crucial for the company, with many decisions taken as to the direction Moto Guzzi should take in the future. By raising capital to 35 billion lira in June 1998 and borrowing 20 billion on the market to create 55
billion lira, it was anticipated that production could increase to 20,000 units
by the year 2001. The most exciting
news, however, was that 30 billion lira in product development would allow for a new engine, and one that would hopefully see Moto Guzzi back racing on the world stage.
The VA 10
Designed by a new team of engineers led by Danilo Mojoli, this first all-new Moto Guzzi engine since Lino Tonti's small twin followed the Guzzi tradi-
tion of being innovative and tradi-
tional. First discussed in September 1996, the idea came to fruition in
January 1997 with the assistance of
Ricardo in England
Retaining the usual transversely mounted V-twin, the all-alloy water-
Right: The design team responsible for the new VIO engine. Standing are Ivan
Ambrosini, Aleksandar Bacic and
Alessandro Massari, with project leader Danilo Mojoli seated in front.
Below right: The VI0 engine was very short, making it ideal for racing where
both a short wheelbase and weight on the front wheel are desirable.
cooled engine now featured the cylinders angled at 75°. 'This was done to reduce frontal area,' says Mojoli. "We
also wanted to keep the engine as
short as possible with as much weight
on the front wheel, so we initially
rotated it 10° forward but have now increased15°Wthat to hile the 75° engine did not offer
perfect primary balance, this was
The next evolution of the Moto Guzzi 1100 was the VII Sport, styled to emulate the
famous V7 Sport 'Telaio Rosso'.
enduro market. Whether it is more
was resurrected in November 1997 at
successful in the marketplace remains to be seen.
the Birmingham Show as the 1100 ES.
However, the ES was a significant improvement over the earlier 1000, and was aimed at the top end of the
A re-tuned 1100 engine was now
used, with new camshafts and Weber-
A surprising release of 1998 was the Quota ES. Now with an 1100cc engine, the
bike's most noticeable feature was the reduction in seat height.
obtained by spacing the crankpins
30°a part, the short spacing maintaining
crank stiffness. Secondary balance was
achieved by using longer con-rods, longer than the usual rwo-times-thestroke. Bore and stroke for the 1000cc engine were 100 x 63.3mm, but 850,
1100 and 1200cc versions were to follow. No longer were the valves operated by rockers, but twin over-
head camshafts to both cylinder heads
opened the two 39.6mm inlet and
33mm exhaust valves per cylinder.
Included valve angle was a narrow
261/2°, 14° for the inlet and 121/2° for
the exhaust. Drive to the camshafts was by chain from a shaft above the crank turning in the opposite direction to cancel torque reaction. This shaft also drove the waterpump.
Lubrication was by dry sump, with an
external oil tank. As expected,
Weber-Marelli electronic fuel injec tion was used, with twin injectors for
racing. Throttle bodies were 60mm for
racing, reducing to 54mm on street
bikes.
The biggest departure for Guzzi was the loss of shaft drive. A 90° gear from
the crankshaft took the drive to a
multi-plate clutch (dry for racing and
wet for production) and to a usual
separate six-speed gearbox but a chain final drive. With a total engine weight of only 30kg (66lb), it was 30 per cent
lighter than the current Moto Guzzi 1100. Incredibly compact, the eventual street motorcycle could have a 1,380mm (541/1-inch) wheelbase an
168
THE MOTO GUZZI STORY
Gilera design by Moto Guzzi.
Production was scheduled for May
1999, followed by the scooter in
November. The scooter endeavoured to emulate the earlier Gallerto by successfully combining both motorcycle and scooter features in a unique vehi-
cle.
With the planned expansion in production, Moto Guzzi signed an agree-
ment in May 1998 with Philips
Electronics for Moto Guzzi to acquire
their industrial site at Monza.
However, this agreement caused considerable unease at Mandello, where
many of the workforce had been at
Moto Guzzi for several generations. In
September 1998, with the support of
Despite being water-cooled, the VI0 engine was considerably more compact than the previous four-valve Daytona unit.
the 1950s. This called for a larger
weigh only 190kg (419lb).
Equally revolutionary for Moto
model range than was currently on offer, and a move from Mandello to premises closer to a major industrial centre. The prosperity of the 1950s had been created by the sales of a
Guzzi was the all-alloy beam frame and swingarm, encased by full body-
work. This is not an engine that
needs to be seen like the older one,'
large number of smaller motorcycles,
Mojoli says. With bench testing beginning in May 1998, production was ini-
and with this in mind Moto Guzzi
entered into an agreement with
tially slated for the year 2000, with a return to the race track in 2001.
Piaggio in April 1998 to acquire a
600cc four-stroke single for an
The future
enduro, followed by a scooter in 125 Oscar Cecchinato had plans to and 250cc. The enduro used the expand production levels to those engine originally from the Gilera that Moto Guzzi had not seen during Saturno and was to be built to the
influential board member Gianni Bulgari, former financial director Dino Falciola replaced Cecchinato and the move to Monza was can-
celled. This also put the future of new models in doubt, including the Piaggio
scooter and enduro, and further
delayed the V11 Sport. However, with
a commitment to the company
remaining at Mandello, there was fur-
ther investment in new machinery
and equipment. What these developments mean to the future of the V10
remains to be seen. Undoubtedly
Moto Guzzi, a company with such a
tradition of loyalty from both its work-
force and customers, will continue to prosper well into the next century.